The intent of social psychology research has been and still is to explain how circumstances are more a power determinant of individual behavior than our own intuitions lead us to believe. Research on obedience and compliance is focused less on explaining why obedience can be a good thingwhich it canand more on explaining why people obey/comply with demands when they would likely prefer not to or when the demands compel them to do bad things (e.g., the classic Milgram and Stanford Prison studies).

Many are familiar with the experience of being tasked by someone in authority (e.g., a teacher, work supervisor, athletic coach) to do something of questionable value and which may be counterproductive. The demand itself appears to be arbitrary and may serve only to establish the authority of the person making it.

For this Discussion, you will share social conformity situations that you have experienced and apply social psychology theory to explain your actions in those situations. 

 

Review the Learning Resources related to conformity and obedience in social psychology and consider how they would apply to this Discussion.

 

Consider a time when you have experienced when compliance with a task was required, even when you believed that time could have been better spent doing something more productive. The task may have come from a teacher, supervisor, coach, or other authority figure.

 

If you complied with the order, reflect on why. If you did not, reflect on why you did not comply. 

Post an example of a time when you complied with an authority persons demand, despite thinking it was not a good use of your time. Please explain why you did. Then, give an example of a time when you refused to comply; explain why. Your post must be informed by social psychology theory and research.

You were working on a team, how would you explain the importance of a solid design to one of your companys clients who is in a hurry to just get it done? Secondly, would you like to work on a team with a person who had great customer service skills and mediocre technical skills, or great technical skills with no people skills at all?  Why?  

3 discussion questions 

with references

Discussion 1.2

 Why is information security important and what types of information are we concerned with protecting?  

Discussion 2.1

 What is the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act?  Can you find any cases that have dealt with this Act?   

Discussion 2.2

 

What are the Payment Card Industry Standards?  Provide an example of why these standards were developed.

 

Operations Strategy” Please respond to the following:

  • Choose two service companies with which you are familiar, such as Facebook, Amazon, and UPS. Apply Hills Strategy Development Framework to them.
  • For each company you chose, compare and contrast each sector of the framework and determine which key area(s) provide(s) a competitive advantage. Provide at least two examples to support your position.

Analyze: Different Research Designs

Evaluation Title: Research Design

For this first assignment, you will analyze different types of research. To begin, please read and view the following materials:

  • Rice University. (2017). . in, Psychology. OpenStax. [Electronic version]
  • University of Minnesota Libraries Publishing. (2010). . In Introduction to Psychology. [Electronic version]

Select one research design from column A and column B.

Column A = Experimental Design or Correlational Design. Column B = Case Study, Naturlistic Observation, Survey, or Longitudinal/Cross-Sectional Design

  1. Describe the design.
  2. Discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the design.
  3. Give an example of a study completed using this design.

This information is all available in the Unit 1 Learning Content. There are also resources available online to further your understanding.

Your assignment should be typed into a Word or other word processing document, formatted in APA style. The assignment must include:

  • Running head
  • A title page with Assignment name
  • Your name
  • Professors name
  • Course

Estimated time to complete: 3 hours

Rubric

PS101 Unit 1 Assessment – Research DesignPS101 Unit 1 Assessment – Research DesignCriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContentPS101-CO118.0 ptsLevel 5Expresses content knowledge with the assignment purpose in a complete, organized, clear, professional, and culturally respectful manner.16.0 ptsLevel 4Expresses content knowledge with the assignment purpose in a complete, organized, clear, professional, and culturally respectful manner with minor weaknesses in one or more of the areas.14.0 ptsLevel 3Partially expresses content knowledge with the assignment purpose. Expresses ideas in a complete, organized, clear, professional, and culturally respectful manner with weaknesses in these area.13.0 ptsLevel 2Partially expresses content knowledge with the assignment purpose. Ideas are partially expressed in an organized, professional, and culturally respectful manner with major weaknesses in these areas.11.0 ptsLevel 1Expresses limited content knowledge with the assignment purpose. Ideas are not expressed in a complete, organized, clear, professional, and/or culturally respectful manner.0.0 ptsLevel 0The assignment was not completed or there are no constructed concepts that demonstrate analytically skills and no evidences to support the content does not align to the assignment instructions18.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysisPRICE-P18.0 ptsLevel 5Constructs concepts related to course content, demonstrating strong analytical skills with strong evidence to support professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.16.0 ptsLevel 4Constructs concepts related to course content, demonstrating strong analytical skills with evidence to support professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.14.0 ptsLevel 3Constructs concepts related to course content, demonstrating analytical skills with some evidence to support professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.13.0 ptsLevel 2Constructs concepts related to course content, demonstrating weak analytical skills with minimal evidence to support professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.11.0 ptsLevel 1Constructs concepts related to course content, demonstrating inadequate evidence of analytical skills. There is minimal or no evidence to support professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.0.0 ptsLevel 0The assignment was not completed or there was no evidence of constructed concepts that are supported by professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.18.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTechnology12.0 ptsLevel 5Manipulates multiple technological resources to effectively implement all assignment requirements.11.0 ptsLevel 4Manipulates multiple technological resources to effectively implement most assignment requirements.10.0 ptsLevel 3Manipulates multiple technological resources to effectively implement some assignment requirements.8.0 ptsLevel 2Manipulates multiple technological resources for some assignment requirements.7.0 ptsLevel 1Manipulates technological resources to minimally meet some assignment requirements.0.0 ptsLevel 0The assignment was not completed or difficulties with technological manipulation were evident. The assignment submitted does not meet requriements.12.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting9.0 ptsLevel 5The assignment exhibits a excellent command of written English language conventions. The assignment has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling.8.0 ptsLevel 4The assignment exhibits a good command of written English language conventions. The assignment has no errors in mechanics, or spelling  with minor grammatical errors that impair the flow of communication.7.0 ptsLevel 3The assignment exhibits a basic command of written English language conventions. The assignment has minor errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impact the flow of communication6.0 ptsLevel 2The assignment exhibits a  limited command of written English language conventions. The assignment has frequent errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impede the flow of communication.5.0 ptsLevel 1The assignment exhibits little command of written English language conventions. The assignment has errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader to stop and reread parts of the writing to discern meaning.0.0 ptsLevel 0The assignment does not demonstrate command of written English language conventions. The assignment has multiple errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader difficulty discerning the meaning.9.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPAPRICE-I3.0 ptsLevel 5In-text citations of sources and references in proper APA style are included with no errors.2.5 ptsLevel 4In-text citations of sources and references in proper APA style are included but have 1-2 minor APA errors.2.0 ptsLevel 3In-text citations of sources and references in proper APA style are included but have 3 – 4 minor APA errors.1.5 ptsLevel 2In-text citations of sources and references in proper APA style are included but have more than 4 errors.1.0 ptsLevel 1The errors demonstrate limited understanding of in-text citation and reference requirements0.0 ptsLevel 0There are no in-text citations AND/OR references.3.0 pts
Total Points: 60.0

Week 4 Assignment – Beck Manufacturing and Plant Capacity

PLEASE DO NOT SUBMIT A BID FOR THIS ASSIGNMENT IF YOU DO NOT HAVE EXPERIENCE WITH GRADUATE LEVEL WRITING TERMS AND CONCEPTS. ALL DIRECTIONS MUST BE FOLLOWED AND NO PLAGIARISM. MY SCHOOL USES SOFTWARE TO DETECT COPIED MATERIAL.

Read the Beck Manufacturing case study in Chapter 8 of your text. In a three-page paper, address the following:

Calculate the capacity of each machine center and the capacity of the system.

Analyze where the focus of the companys efforts should be if Beck wants to expand capacity. Determine how much extra capacity he can get without causing another operation to become the bottleneck.

Suggest ways Beck can expand capacity without purchasing new equipment.

Your paper should be in paragraph form (avoid the use of bullet points) and supported with the concepts outlined in your text and additional scholarly sources.

Submit your three-page paper (not including the title and reference pages). Your paper must be formatted according to APA style and must cite at least three scholarly sources in addition to the textbook.

Week 4 Discussions and Required Resources

Two-part assignment: All parts must be at least 200 words unless otherwise noted. Please read all attachments and follow ALL instructions.

Part 1: Process Selection: Product and Design Capacity

How is process selection related to product design and capacity determination? Your initial post should be 200 words.  

Part 2:  Monique Food Processing Company and Capacity

Read Problem 6: The Monique Food Processing Company in Chapter 8 of your text. Monique Food Processing Company produces light snacks that can be heated in a microwave. The following steps are included in the process:

  

Steps

Description

Capacity (Units/Hour)

 

1

Prepare food

200

 

2

Measure and place in   plastic pouch

175

 

3

Prepare cardboard box

200

 

4

Insert pouch into box

300

 

5

Shrink-wrap box

200

a. What is the system capacity, and which is the bottleneck department?

b. How much slack (unused capacity) is available in other departments?

c. How much system capacity can be gained by adding capacity to the bottleneck?

d. What are the key factors that determine when to add capacity?

e. Why would an organization want to reduce its capacity?

Make and include calculations. Answer questions a through e. Your response should be 200 words.

.   

NOTE:  Be sure to have a well-developed paragraph for all required work (posting & responses).  A well-developed paragraph contains 5-7 sentences for each paragraph created.  

1. Business is a social science.

2.  A well developed paragraph is 5-7 sentences.

3.  Use third person voice instead of first person voice.

4.  You must use a thesis statement when writing your assignments.

5.  Use a variety of transitions to help the flow of the paragraphs

6.  Check out the PIE structure of your paragraphs mentioned in the writing center.

7.  There are two types of in-text citations that you should be using:  a.  parenthetical and b.  signal phrase

Required Resources

Text

Vonderembse, M. A., & White, G. P. (2013). [Electronic version]. Retrieved from

  • Chapter 7: Facility Location and Process Selection
  • Chapter 8: Capacity Decisions

Recommended Resources

Multimedia

July, E. (Producer) & Rodrigo, J. M. (Director). (2003). [Video file]. Retrieved from the Films On Demand database.

Watch the following segments:

  • Anticipating Flower Market Demand:
  • Ecuador: King in the Flower World:
  • Ecuadors Flower Production:
  • Exporting Flowers from Ecuador:
  • Full Video: Business is Blooming: The International Floral Industry:

Websites

  • American Society for Quality. (n.d). Pareto      chart . Retrieved from
  • American Society for Quality. (n.d). Six      sigma . Retrieved from

please focuse on running a 5k please.

Using the outline in the Stack Coaches and Trainers article, in 500 words or less, perform a needs analysis on yourself.

When you perform your needs analysis, be realistic. What activities are you currently doing that you want to improve on? Or, if you aren’t currently active, what would you like to do (e.g., rec softball, run a 5k)? Use this as an opportunity to start building a plan. Consider the following:

What’s the activity?
Consider the muscles/movements: upper extremity push/pull, lower extremity push/pull; rotational stability, rotational power
Consider what energy systems you will need: will you use explosive power or do you need endurance for sustained postures or movements. How do you develop those?
Do you need muscle bulk (hypertrophy), strength, endurance, strength-endurance?
What injuries are common in this activity? What could you do to prevent/minimize the risk?

The client/athlete (i.e., You!)
Consider your training age. Have you been working out for decades or are you relatively new to working out, or have you switched from being a marathoner and now want to do Cross Fit?
What’s your relevant injury history (e.g., ACL reconstruction 10 years ago and now how chronic knee pain and swelling with impact); how will you work around this maximizing function while protecting yourself as best as possible?
Where are you in your training year? Are you just starting up or have you been going hard for six months and might need a recovery cycle?

Read:
Stack Coaches & Trainers. (2016, March 10). Why coaches should perform a needs analysis to create a perfect training program. Retrieved from http://www.stack.com/a/why-coaches-should-perform-a-needs-analysis-to-create-a-perfect- training-program (Links to an external site.) [4 pages]

National Council on Strength & Fitness. (n.d.). Creating a needs analysis for sports training programs. Retrieved from https://www.ncsf.org/enew/articles/articles-analysissportstrainingprograms.aspx (Links to an external site.) [6 pages]

Distinction Fitness and Education. (2013, August 12). The sports client – part 2: Personal trainer training – needs analysis [Blog post]. Retrieved from https://distinctionfitness.wordpress.com/2013/08/12/the-sports-client-part-2-personal-trainer-training-needs-analysis/ (Links to an external site.) [2 pages]

International Rugby Union – S&C Case Study. (2012). Retrieved from http://gregniclewiscasestudy.blogspot.com/ (Links to an external site.) [2 pages]

Cissik, J. (2014, April 24). The needs analysis [PowerPoint slides]. Retrieved from http://www.slideshare.net/jcissik/the-needs-analysis (Links to an external site.) [29 pages]

In 2-3 lines describe the following 

  • 9.1 Give examples of applications of IPsec.
  • 9.2 What services are provided by IPsec?
  • 9.3 What parameters identify an SA and what parameters characterize the nature of a particular SA?
  • 9.4 What is the difference between transport mode and tunnel mode?
  • 9.5 What is a replay attack?
  • 9.6 Why does ESP include a padding field?
  • 9.7 What are the basic approaches to bundling SAs?
  • 9.8 What are the roles of the Oakley key determination protocol and ISAKMP in IPsec?

 

Prior to beginning work on this discussion, read Chapter 1 of your course text and explore the web page.

Mental health professionals are a diverse group and range greatly in their scope and depth of practice. In terms of doctorly prepared practitioners you will often find yourself working with psychologists, psychiatrists, neurologists, and neuropsychologists. Using websites such as , explore these careers and what roles these professionals play. Then consider the three cases below and imagine you are the case worker for each instance. Your job is to refer the patient to one (and only one) of the professionals (i.e., psychologist, psychiatrist, neurologist, or neuropsychologist) who is the best choice to evaluate and manage the case.

  • Case 1 (Gary). Gary is a 23-year-old male who just last year enrolled in community college and who came to the attention of his professors when his grades started to drop. When asked what was going on he stated that there were people watching him all the time making it hard for him to sleep and therefore to study.
  • Case 2 (Connie). Connie is a 40-year-old mother of three and has been employed at a local warehouse for the last many years. She is well liked and gets great job performance reviews. Recently she has shown instances of being late, her work has declined, and she has been seen crying when off alone. She states she is upset over her children leaving for college and her husband not giving her much attention.
  • Case 3 (James). James is a 30-year-old semipro ball player. He was, until recently, moving up in his career and was getting a lot of attention from scouts. However, just in the last few weeks his pitching started to suffer, he became irritable over nearly everything, and was just found slumped over the steering wheel of his car that had rolled into another parking space. He was uninjured but seemed very confused.

In your initial post,

  • Determine which one (and only one) of the professionals (i.e., psychologist, psychiatrist, neurologist, or neuropsychologist) is the best choice to evaluate and manage each case.
    • Who do you pick?
    • Why?
    • Why not one of the other practitioners?