Develop an essay on what an ideal ethical organization would be. What would be the characteristics of leadership? Training? Employees? How does one create such an organization as a change agent if the existing organization is rife with corruption?

You are expected to write professionally with correct spelling, punctuation, and grammar, developing your topic and providing solid examples from our readings, your own research, or your own experiences to back up your statements.

Essays should be double-spaced, in 12-point Times New Roman or Cambria font, with 1-inch margins all around. When citing resources, you must adhere strictly to APA style (all papers must include a title page and reference page, although you will not be required to provide an abstract). The paper must have a minimum of 2 full double-spaced pages of meaningful discussion (title page and reference page do not count as part of those pages). The paper must include a minimum of 3 references (outside of the course text), with at least one reference from a peer-reviewed academic journal (peer-reviewed references should be highlighted in bold type in the reference list). You must not to write in first person. All papers must be in a .doc, .pdf, or .rtf format.

All assignments must be your own original work and you are not allowed to turn in papers for this course that you have used previously for another course (even if it is from taking this very course during a previous session). All papers will be evaluated for originality by Turnitin.” Should the instructor deem the “Originality Index” score too high (50% or above), the paper may not be accepted.

Identify an organization that operates domestically as well as globally that could benefit from an improvement in its supply chain process. This organization will be the subject of your project for this course.

Discuss the following:
*Explain why you have chosen this company.
*What makes you think it needs improvement in its supply chain process?

Respond by Day 5 to two colleague’s post by suggesting an alternative sampling structure for their research question as well as an alternate way of selecting the sample. Please use the Learning Resources to support your answer.

Colleague 1 –
COLLAPSE
            In Week 4, the research question, How does the impact of kinship care on grandparents affect grandchildren in their care? may be structured using probability or nonprobability sampling structures. In a probability sampling structure, a proportionate stratified random sampling of 25 percent of 1000 children in a particular school district and 1000 seniors (250 children and 250 seniors) may suffice (Yegidis, Weinbach, & Myers, 2018). Strengths of a probability structure and a proportionate stratified random sampling are such that there is a likelihood any number of children and grandparents partaking in kinship care would be selected and the ratio of grandchildren to grandparents would be equal. Limitations may exist in terms of lack of diversity, especially if the sampling of participants was not taken in a culturally/ethnically/or racially diverse area. Gender may also present limitations as grandmothers and grandfathers may experience differing health issues, and differing genders in children may also respond to the impact of kinship care on their grandparents in a different manner. Additionally, random sampling would not guarantee grandparent and grandchild sampling.

            A nonprobability sampling structure would not use random selection, and may be more appropriate because, in contrast to the randomly selected participants in a probability sample, they may be excluded if they do not contribute to the understanding of the research problem (Yegidis, Weinbach, & Myers, 2018). Purposive sampling of grandchildren and grandparents could provide the unique perspectives needed to address the research problem, and it may help describe the wide variety of coping methods grandchildren use in kinship care (Yegidis, Weinbach, & Myers, 2018, p. 216). Samples could be selected from clinics and hospitals who treat grandparents with health conditions and from school counseling departments or teachers who encounter children in kinship care. This type of sampling structure appears to pose difficulty in privacy matters and overall sampling objectives. Though it may be more representative of whom the research problem is seeking to understand, it is not without serious issues in gathering participants and data.

References

Yegidis, B. L., Weinbach, R. W., & Myers, L. L. (2018). Research methods for social

            workers (8th ed.). New York, NY: Pearson.

REPLY QUOTE EMAIL AUTHOR
Colleague 2

In the case of random sampling, stratified random sampling and cluster random sampling are key techniques relevant and applicable in the pre-defined research question. For example, the random cluster sampling will adopt a process of selecting participants, especially in a vast and expansive geographical area. Precisely, it will be ideal in instances where the LGBT clients, as well as the counselors, consist of multiple elements such as cities, families, or learning institutions. On the other hand, simple random sampling will adopt a random number table or a lottery system in selecting LGBT clients and counselors. Conversely, convenience sampling, as well as purposive sampling, is techniques applicable in non-probability sampling (Etikan, Musa, & Alkassim, 2016). In specific, the convenience sampling will entail the collection of data from LGBT clients and counselors from a convenient location. On the other hand, purposive sampling will select participating LGBT clients and counselors based on their knowledge of the specific population.

Section Two

To obtain an ideal sample from the rest of the population, it is imperative to identify the ideal sample that will be representing the entire population. As a result, Both LGBT clients, as well as counselors, will be considered as participants as outlined in the pre-defined research study. In the selection of the LGBT clients and counselors, the proposed research study will adopt a stratified random sampling.

Section Three

            Probability sampling and non-probability sampling are some of the common techniques that are widely applicable in empirical quantitative research studies. On the one hand, a non-probability sampling technique refers to an approach in which the odds of any member of a member selected as a sample cannot be determined through calculation (Yegidis, Weinbach, & Myers, 2017). On the other hand, probability sampling entails the technique of selecting representatives from an expansive population through a theory-based approach of probability. For instance, for a participant to be part of the sample, one has to undergo random selection. However, there are many sub-categories in both the probability as well as non-probability sampling techniques (Bacher, 2019). Some of the key merits of non-probability sampling include the time and cost-effectiveness of the technique.

Furthermore, non-probability sampling is widely applicable, particularly in instances where probability sampling is impractical. Nonetheless, lack of depth, particularly in the representation of a population, is a major demerit of non-probability sampling. As opposed to non-probability sampling, some of the notable advantages of probability sampling include simplicity as well as the non-technical aspects of the approach (Sharma, 2017). However, the fair share of its disadvantages is evident in its ineffectiveness, especially in large populations.

References

Bacher, J. (2019). Probability and Nonprobability Sampling: Representative Surveys of hard-to-reach and hard-to-ask populations. Current surveys between the poles of theory and practice.

Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American journal of theoretical and applied statistics, 5(1), 1-4.

Sharma, G. (2017). Pros and cons of different sampling techniques. International Journal of Applied Research, 3(7), 749-752.

Yegidis, B. L., Weinbach, R. W., & Myers, L. L. (2017). Research methods for social workers. Pearson.

REPLY QUOTE EMAIL AUTHOR

Instructions:

Read the following scenario and complete the questions in a 3-5 page essay. At least two outside resources are required and proper APA format is mandatory for this project.

The State Department of Health has asked you to conduct a survey of registered dietitians regarding their perception of child and adolescent obesity in the state.

Step One:

  Answer/complete the following:

The objective of the survey
At least one research question
The overall design of the survey
A proposed method of data collection
How you would determine sample size
Describe any limitations or bias that may occur
Create a five question survey
Step Two: Once you have completed your research, compile your data and create a cohesive and professional 3-5 page paper. At least two outside resources are required. Be sure to include your survey at the end.

Instructions

Step 1: Research state laws, and any federal laws if applicable, regarding treatment against religious based medical decisions.
Step 2: Determine, through professional research, if you believe the physicians actions were medically justified, knowing the patient most likely would have died without treatment. OR, if you believe the legal outcome was justified for the patient and the doctors decision was a gross medical error.
Step 3: Discuss the outcome you believe would have occurred had the doctor not ordered the transfusion (outside of the patient dying).
Step 3: Compile your research and create a professional paper that adheres to APA guidelines.
Step 4:Ensure you are researching only scholarly works. It is recommended to use Concordes Online Library: http://galesites.com/menu/index.php?loc=miss22358 (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. (Links to an external site.)
Step 5:You must have at least five (5) outside resources. Wikipedia is not an acceptable reference.
Step 5: Save and submit your assignment.
Scenario:

Susi Givens, a thirty-seven-year-old woman with two children, was horseback riding one day when a snake startled her horse. She was thrown off and landed on a stump, resulting in massive internal injuries. She was rushed to the hospital, where the surgical team discovered that there was a large amount of blood in her abdomen and that she needed to have a kidney removed.

Mrs. Givens had a medical alert card identifying her as a Jehovahs Witness and stating that under no circumstances was she to receive blood. Her physician knew this but felt impelled by his oath to save lives to give her a blood transfusion. The hospital was unable to locate her husband, so the physician decided to transfuse her.

His actions saved her life; however, she was not grateful. She sued her doctor for assault and battery and won a $20,000 settlement.

You will be required to conduct research and search for peer reviewed articles. A peer reviewed article is an article where other experts/peers in a given field of study, review and critique the original authors article. This process helps to ensure that the research methodology and results are valid and meet research standards.

The following are resources that may assist you in completing this assignment:

Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. (2018, May 10). Healthy people 2020. Retrieved from https://www.healthypeople.gov.

U.S. Department of Agriculture. (n.d.) Food and nutrition. Retrieved from https://www.usda.gov/topics/food-and-nutrition.

Assignment Instructions:

Identify one different key nutrient for each of the following age groups:
Children (ages 2 to 8),
Adolescents (ages 9 to 18),
Adults (19-64), and
Older adults (over age 65).

Identify at least two age-appropriate foods that would provide a high amount of the key nutrient selected for each age group.
Suggest real foods and identify which nutrients the food contains that will improve the individuals diet.
Do not recommend supplements, such as multivitamins, or supplemental drinks as food recommendations.
Make sure not to use the same nutrients for each age group.

Describe the importance of each respective nutrient for each of the identified age groups.
Why does this age group require the nutrient?
How does this nutrient promote development and wellness in the age group?

Locate one peer reviewed article on nutritional needs for one of the age groups (either children, adolescents, adults or older adults)
Include author(s), date of publication, title of article, and source of article
Write a summary regarding the key concepts of the article in at least 250 words.
What did the article state about the research?
What were the limitations identified regarding the research?
How would you use this information when planning a diet for the selected age group? Your response should be at least 100-words.

Additional information:

You will need to organize the information into a logical sequence with an introduction to the topic as well as a conclusion/summary.

For this assignment, you will continue writing your educational autobiography. You will write one-two pages discussing how teachers, parents and other students informed your educational experiences, using the lens of sociology for your analysis. You must incorporate two of the readings and at least one of the concepts from the PowerPoints (separate from the readings) in your paper.
**NOTE: When you mention concepts from the course, be sure to explain what they mean and how they specifically apply to your education. My suggestion is to write the autobiography like the person who is reading it does not have a background in sociology and also does not know you, so you have to clearly explain the concepts and also show how they go along with the examples that you provide of your schooling.**

Several models and components of talent management are presented in Chapter 1 of the Silzer and Dowell textbook. Using these as a foundation, create your own talent management model, including its components and the evaluation methods that would demonstrate that this model is effective in your organization.
Describe three (3) effective ways to develop talent within your current or former organization and how they would support the organizations goals. List each organizational goal and whose responsibility it might be to develop the talent associated with that goal.

Case Study Opinion SeaWorld V. Perez

Analyze the case of SeaWorld of Florida v. Perez, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 6660 (D.C. Cir.) (Attached). Including the opinion of Judge Rodgers as well as the dissenting opinion of Judge (now-Supreme Court Justice) Brett Kavanaugh.

Write a case study review of Judge Kellys opinion that answers the questions below. Support your review with analysis and evidence from the unit reading and outside sources.

Follow the guidelines below:

1.    What are the legal issues enforced by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) and presented in this case?
2.    How did the plaintiff establish a valid violation under the General Duty Clause of the OSH Act?
3.    Explain how the elements of a valid claim were satisfied under the OSH Act.
4.    How does OSHA enforce workplace safety and health standards?
5.    Do you agree with the courts decision?
6.    Should or could SeaWorld have done more to abate the hazard? Support your position.

Guidelines to the Case Study:

a.    The essay should begin with an introduction to the topic.
b.    Organization should be logical, clear, and appropriate.
c.    You should provide strong evidence of critical thinking.
d.    Essay should end with a conclusion statement to support your essay.

** The format of the submission should be in essay format using subheadings.

** Need three (3) peer-reviewed, academic sources other than book source attached no more than 5 years old minimum**

** The Essay should be 3 Full pages minimum not including Title page and Reference page**

** Book Source: Walsh, D. J. (2019). Employment law for human resource practice [VitalSource Bookshelf version] (6th ed.). Retrieved from https://online.vitalsource.com/#/books/9781337670685

Case Study Opinion

Analyze the case and opinion in the case of Riser v. QEP Energy, 777 F.3d 1191 (10th Cir. 2015) (Attached)

Write a case study review of Judge Kellys opinion that answers the questions below. Support your review with analysis and evidence from the unit reading and outside sources.

Follow the guidelines below:

1.    What are the legal issues presented in this case?
2.    Did the plaintiff establish a valid prima facie case of pay discrimination?
3.    Was there a basis for equal work?
4.    On what factors did the appeals court base its decision?
5.    Why is the other-than-sex factor that is presented by the employer insufficient to avoid a trial?
6.    What should the employer have done differently?

Guidelines to the Case Study:

a.    The essay should begin with an introduction to the topic.
b.    Organization should be logical, clear, and appropriate.
c.    You should provide strong evidence of critical thinking.
d.    Essay should end with a conclusion statement to support your essay.

** The format of the submission should be in essay format using subheadings.

** Need three (3) peer-reviewed, academic sources other than book source attached no more than 5 years old minimum**

** The Essay should be (3) Full pages minimum not including Title page and Reference page**

** Book Source: Walsh, D. J. (2019). Employment law for human resource practice [VitalSource Bookshelf version] (6th ed.). Retrieved from https://online.vitalsource.com/#/books/9781337670685