Instructions

This final project puts together the functions you used in preceding projects and has you present the data in a PowerPoint presentation. So you will be completing both an Excel spreadsheet and a separate PowerPoint presentation for submission. Please make sure to look at the attached files that contain all the information, and further instructions for this project

– Re-write 1.2 Problem definition (delete current text and write new one it should be about company)

-Change research objectives and make them mirror the research question (should be equal amount so 5 questions and 5 objectives) + first question and objective should be about academic literature + Create main research objective

– 3. Theoretical foundation create literature review table at the end

– create conceptual table of theories which will visualise the theories that will be used and give small explanation

– Re-write 1.2 Problem definition (delete current text and write new one it should be about company)

-Change research objectives and make them mirror the research question (should be equal amount so 5 questions and 5 objectives) + first question and objective should be about academic literature + Create main research objective

– 3. Theoretical foundation create literature review table at the end

– create conceptual table of theories which will visualise the theories that will be used and give small explanation

Keep a shopping diary for one week. Tabulate your results by type of retailer using the categories discussed in chapter 2 of your text. On a separate page write a reflective paragraph discuss the following: What trends do you notice in your shopping behavior? Are they similar to the trends discussed in the book? What did you learn about yourself during this exercise? Please submit your spending diary along with a typed reflective paragraph answering the questions above.

LITERATURE REVIEW OVERVIEW
The purpose of this research project and writing will conform to current APA 7 format.

You will research and write a literature review on a topic relevant to the course (  Retention Management).

What is a Literature Review?
A literature review discusses published information in a particular subject area, and sometimes information in a particular subject area within a certain time period. It has an organizational pattern and combines both summary and synthesis. The summary is a recap of the important information of the source; the synthesis is a re-organization, or a reshuffling, of that information. It might give a new interpretation of old material or combine new with old interpretations. Or it might trace the intellectual progression of the field, including major debates. And depending on the situation, the literature review may evaluate the sources and advise the reader on what is the most pertinent or relevant.

How is a literature review different from an academic research paper?
While the main focus of an academic research paper is to support your own argument, the focus of a literature review is to summarize and synthesize the arguments and ideas of others.  The academic research paper also covers a range of sources, but it is usually a select number of sources because the emphasis is on the argument. Likewise, a literature review can also have an argument, but it is not as important as covering a number of sources. In short, an academic research paper and a literature review contain some of the same elements. In fact, many academic research papers will contain a literature review section. but it is the aspect of the study (the argument or the sources) that is emphasized that determines what type of document it is.

Why write literature reviews?
Literature reviews provide you with a handy guide to a particular topic. If you have limited time to conduct research, literature reviews can give you an overview or act as a stepping stone. For professionals, they are useful reports that keep them up to date with what is current in the field. For scholars, the depth and breadth of the literature review emphasizes the credibility of the writer in his or her field. Literature reviews also provide a solid background for a research paper’s investigation. Comprehensive knowledge of the literature of the field is essential to most research papers.

Introduction: Gives a quick idea of the topic of the literature review, such as the central theme or organizational pattern.
    Body: Contains your discussion of sources and is organized thematically (see below for more information on each).
    Conclusions/Recommendations: Discuss what you have drawn from reviewing literature so far. Where might the discussion proceed?
    Annotated Bibliography

What is a thematic literature review?
A thematic review would have subtopics based upon factors that relate to the theme or issue.
Sometimes, though, you might need to add additional sections that are necessary for your study, but do not fit in the organizational strategy of the body. What other sections you include in the body is up to you. Put in only what is necessary. Here are a few other sections you might want to consider:
    Current Situation: Information necessary to understand the topic or focus of the literature review.
    History: The chronological progression of the field, the literature, or an idea that is necessary to understand the literature review, if the body of the literature review is not already a chronology.
    Methods and/or Standards: The criteria you used to select the sources in your literature review or the way in which you present your information. For instance, you might explain that your review includes only peer-reviewed articles and journals.
    Questions for Further Research: What questions about the field has the review sparked? How will you further your research as a result of the review?

Important Points to Consider
APA standards and contain at least 10 pages of content (excluding the title page, abstract, and references) that utilizes at least 12 scholarly articles from peer-reviewed journals, published within the past 5 years. References may not come from websites, blogs, newspapers, books, dictionaries, conference proceedings, or magazines.

Three levels of APA 7 headings must be used throughout the paper as this is a graduate-level research paper.

Do not use the same source more than a total of 3 times within the whole document for quoting or paraphrasing.

Formulate a personal program of managerial leadership development.
In your paper,

Designate general categories or groups of leadership theories.
These include: Traits Theories, Contingency Theories, Relational Theories, and others listed in the course text.
Select one specific category of theories from the course text.
Defend why the selected category of leadership theories is most relevant to organizational leadership.
Discuss the leadership style you will adhere to and the specific reasons for selecting this style.
Examine how your leadership skills will influence your ability to motivate followers in an organization.
Identify an area of weakness in your personal leadership.
Explain how you will develop this area of weakness into a strength.
Evaluate the factors that influence organizational culture, such as organizational structure, size, policies and procedures, staff, and office politics.
Evaluate your leadership style based on the factors you chose above.

Must include a separate title page with the following:
Title of paper
Students name
Course name and number
Instructors name
Date submitted
Must utilize academic voice

Must include an introduction and conclusion paragraph. Your introduction paragraph needs to end with a clear thesis statement that indicates the purpose of your paper.

Must use at least five scholarly sources in addition to the course text.
Must document any information used from sources in APA 7 styleMust include a separate references page that is formatted according to APA 7 style

I need a research paper that utilizes 6 SCHOLARLY sources to explore the 3 topics below. Each topic should have its own section. I was thinking 2 scholarly sources per topic since that seemed the easiest, but it’s up to you. Any further questions can be addressed with me.

1) The concept and importance of brand archetypes
2) The psychology behind typography choice
3) Significance of typography and color choice within brand development

At least 3 references, No repeats of education, system, or anything. Classification for medication included and why the patient is receiving the medication? Please review the blank concept map it has specifications. Be specific I would like to see your critical thinking, and your plan must make sense. This is an ICU patient.
Clarification: ethnicity is white (Caucasian) American male. Connect the ethnicity to point of view in illness and wellness. Per the rubric.