In 750 words explain how Bitcoin works and emphasise one element you find especially interesting. You can be positive or negative about Bitcoin.
(By short report I just mean an overview in a Word document. Don’t overthink the report part of it)
Minimum two academic references required
Times New Roman size
1.5 spacing
Must be Harvard Referencing
compare and contrast the RQ-4 Global Hawk and the MQ-9 Reaper.
In the paper, you should discuss the type of system, capabilities, structure,
limitations, payload, support equipment, and users. It is not enough to merely list what is
the same and what is different. But, why is it important to see what is the same and what is different?
Ensure you apply critical thinking, do not just list or discuss two separate UAS.
Compare and Contrast both UAS together, throughout the whole paper.
Darwins early writings on evolution come in the form
of travel writing from his voyage on HMS Beagle. How might his ideas on evolution relate to his
encounters with the Feugian people of South America, and why? Be sure to quote from the text
to back up your points.
Read Chapters I and II, of Kant’s major foundational work in ethics, Groundwork to a Metaphysics of Morals. (You can skip ch. 3 if pressed for time.)
We have devoted quite a bit to Kant now, so you should be able to analyze and evaluate this core theory:
In your short essay, assess Kant’s ethical theory. What works / does not work? What is attractive or useful (or not)? Support your analysis, discussion, and evaluation with quotes from Kant’s texts. (As usual, cite from the section in Kant, if you cannot refer to actual page numbers.) Be fair and accurate in your summary (avoid the “Straw Man” fallacy) before you proceed to evaluate it. Feel free to use examples (real or imagined). You can also bring in Sandel as a supplement if you wish.
As usual, also post a least one peer response.
Part 3 Project Approach (Methods): Students will identify the research process, how they will collect data, how they will analyze data, and the instrumentation used. This can include selecting what Qualitative research method to use, the research target (population and sample). Through a flexible design, using qualitative methods, a concept will be discussed. The methods sections will consist of five to eight pages using the Robson and Creswell textbooks, along with two other academic references on the methods chosen.
Textbook Readings
Merida et al.: Fast and Furious, Is There Hope for the Rebellious?, Ruin and Restoration
Robson: chapter 8 (p. 174-186), Part IV (p. 395-402), Part V (p. 403-408)
Drawing on the readings and articles you have analyzed, differentiate between basic and applied research providing advantages and disadvantages of both.
I will incorporate a few of the chapters of the book for you to use as a reference and pick one other source to corroborate your findings from the text.
compare and contrast the RQ-4 Global Hawk and the MQ-9 Reaper.
In the paper, you should discuss the type of system, capabilities, structure,
limitations, payload, support equipment, and users. It is not enough to merely list what is
the same and what is different. But, why is it important to see what is the same and what is different?
Ensure you apply critical thinking, do not just list or discuss two separate UAS.
Compare and Contrast both UAS together, throughout the whole paper.
compare and contrast the RQ-4 Global Hawk and the MQ-9 Reaper.
In the paper, you should discuss the type of system, capabilities, structure,
limitations, payload, support equipment, and users. It is not enough to merely list what is
the same and what is different. But, why is it important to see what is the same and what is different?
Ensure you apply critical thinking, do not just list or discuss two separate UAS.
Compare and Contrast both UAS together, throughout the whole paper.
Overview
Polygraph results fail to conform to the Frye doctrine and are therefore inadmissible as evidence in court. This doctrine, enunciated in Frye v. United States (1923) states that, before the results of scientific tests will be admissible as evidence in a trial, the procedures used must be sufficiently established to have gained general acceptance in the particular field to which they belong. Most courts refuse to admit the results of polygraph (lie detector) tests in civil or criminal proceedings unless admissibility is agreed to by both parties.
Instructions
Polygraph results are frequently used in situations such as pre-employment screening or background tests. Why should these results be excluded from courtrooms?
For this assignment, prepare a three-page memorandum to your supervisor, an attorney, addressing the admissibility of polygraph results.
In your memorandum:
Analyze the current position of the U.S. Supreme Court with respect to reliability and admissibility of polygraph evidence.
Determine the potential impact of Frye v. United States on criminal cases.
Be sure to review the Polygraph Results Scoring Guide to ensure you understand the criteria for this assignment.
Requirements
Your memorandum should meet the following requirements:
Written communication: Must be free of errors that detract from the overall message.
References: A minimum of two references.
APA format: Format resources and citations as per current APA style and formatting guidelines.
Length of memorandum: Three pages, not including the title page and the references page.
Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 point.
You are required to submit a draft of your paper to SafeAssign. Once you review your results and make any needed changes, submit your paper for grading.
Reference
Harvard Law School. (n.d.). Frye v. United States. http://www.law.harvard.edu/publications/evidenceiii/cases/frye.htm
Continued with last essay on Health Impact Assessment Critique of California’s Sweetened Beverages Tax.
Imagine that you are a part of the team that worked on the HIA that you read, reflecting on the discussion about equity, how would you strengthen the way equity was incorporated into the HIA?
1. Please describe 2 specific strategies.
2. Also please share one observation or response that relates to a point raised during the discussion of the HIA that you read.
(Approx. 275 words)
