Offer a close reading of Bettina Judds poem, THE RESEARCHER PRESENTS JOICE HETH. In your examination of the poem, analyze at least three formal elements (i.e. syntax, diction, layout, imagery, figure of speech, voice, symbolism, rhythm, etc.) and offer some commentary that connects to a theme/issue/concept from Harriet Washingtons introduction and/or the NPR podcast and/or Judds poetry reading.

thesis—-Basketball is overlooked as a healthy sport compared to football. -find people that think that basketball is not great or healthy or maybe people that like football better (need someone to argue with) -use interview or articles. issue—- is basketball healthier than football find our sources from stony brook library account- 5-8 sources(quality peer reviewd sources) intro opposing view point- respond to it 3 times (3 sections) supporting paragraphs using at least 2 sources to prove my point. conclusion ———————————————————————————– This is all the things that my professor told me I needed to write this 1st attachment- comparison and contrast info out of our textbook 2nd attachment- lecture audio explaining a student example of A+ argumentative essay. 3rd attachment- example for the previous attachment 4th attachment- lecture audio for another example of an argumentative essay 5th attachment- example for the previous attachment ———————————————————————————– Two typed, double-spaced papers are required. Although any one paper may be as short as four pages, the combined page count for all papers must be at least twelve pages. The typed papers will be developed from the journal assignments and should be revised, polished writing. Researched Argument Paper: This paper will take a position on an issue and use primary and secondary research. A successful paper will interact with multiple sources, analyze the arguments found in those sources, and build ones own ideas upon scholarly research. Topics for the paper will be suggested in class. The two research papers must be properly documented and formatted according to MLA, Chicago, or APA style. The style chosen should be appropriate to the topic and followed consistently. Your research may be primary (interviews, surveys) or secondary (books, articles). For your secondary research, print sources are preferred (books, periodicals, newspapers), but non-print sources (lecture, film, television, radio, the Internet) are also acceptable ———————————————————————————– For the sources you need to use the stony brook library data base to find sources for the paper. Here is the link to the database:https://library.stonybrook.edu/ once you search up something you will need to login at the top right here is the username and password: Username: vadvaney password: Essayshark54321! ————————————————————————————

. In Reassigning Meaning, Simi Linton critiques the popular phrase, overcoming a disability. Why is the overcoming narrative problematic, and what is its relationship to the representation of disability known as inspiration porn? After defining inspiration porn, reflect on what model(s) or framings of disability the overcoming narrative and inspiration porn linked to. You may use outside examples if you wish.

thesis—-Basketball is overlooked as a healthy sport compared to football.
    -find people that think that basketball is not great or healthy or maybe people that like football better (need someone to argue with)
    -use interview or articles.
issue—- is basketball healthier than football
find our sources from stony brook library account- 5-8 sources(quality peer reviewd sources)

intro
opposing view point- respond to it 3 times (3 sections)
supporting paragraphs using at least 2 sources to prove my point.
conclusion
———————————————————————————–
This is all the things that my professor told me I needed to write this

1st attachment- comparison and contrast info out of our textbook
2nd attachment- lecture audio explaining a student example of A+ argumentative essay.
3rd attachment- example for the previous attachment
4th attachment- lecture audio for another example of an argumentative essay
5th attachment-  example for the previous attachment
———————————————————————————–
Two typed, double-spaced papers are required. Although any one paper may be as short as four
pages, the combined page count for all papers must be at least twelve pages. The typed papers
will be developed from the journal assignments and should be revised, polished writing.
Researched Argument Paper: This paper will take a position on an issue and use primary and
secondary research. A successful paper will interact with multiple sources, analyze the arguments
found in those sources, and build ones own ideas upon scholarly research. Topics for the paper
will be suggested in class.
The two research papers must be properly documented and formatted according to MLA,
Chicago, or APA style. The style chosen should be appropriate to the topic and followed
consistently. Your research may be primary (interviews, surveys) or secondary (books, articles).
For your secondary research, print sources are preferred (books, periodicals, newspapers), but
non-print sources (lecture, film, television, radio, the Internet) are also acceptable
———————————————————————————–
For the sources you need to use the stony brook library data base to find sources for the paper. Here is the link to the database:https://library.stonybrook.edu/

once you search up something you will need to login at the top right here is the username and password:
Username: vadvaney
password: Essayshark54321!
————————————————————————————

There is SO much we could discuss. The field of anthropology of gender is huge. But we’ll limit ourselves to three questions, and I’ll give you the materials so that you can study them and think about and have some answers (and hopefully some more questions!!) about these. Remember to read or watch the materials in the order I present them.

1. What is feminism?

2. What is intersectionality?

3. What does it mean when we say something/someone is “gendered”?

Watch videos!

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=sWP92i7JLlQ

https://vimeo.com/263719865

If a writer of prose knows enough of what he is writing about he may omit things that he knows and the reader, if the writer is writing truly enough, will have a feeling of those things as strongly as though the writer had stated them. The dignity of movement of an ice-berg is due to only one- eighth of it being above water (Hemingway, Death in the Afternoon).

Write a thesis-driven essay about the above prompt.
KEEP IN MIND:
1. Support with evidence drawn from the text rom Ernest Hemingways Big Two-Hearted River
2. DO NOT EXPLAIN/DESCRIBE what’s going on, arguments supported by citations only.

REFER BELOW:

Address the prompt above in a thesis-driven essay of at least four full pages (double-spaced, in 12-point Times New Roman). Be sure to support your argument with specific evidence drawn from the text. Avoid simply rehearsing remarks already covered in class and strive instead for an original reading that showcases your own interpretation. Remember that what follows is a prompt rather than a simple series of questions, and you need not account for every suggestion it raises. Narrow your response to a single, well-defined thesis that can be defended with appropriate citations. Also, bear in mind that an argumentative paper (especially one this short) generally avoids summary and long quotation. Assume that your reader is already an expert (or is at least posing as one). Dont retell the story; argue for your particular reading.

Choose a series of details, images, or phrases from Ernest Hemingways Big Two-Hearted River and use them to develop a thesis about how the story employs his iceberg theory of writing. What do the moments youve selected reveal about the unwritten truth beneath the surface of the text? How do they suggest what remains unsaid? How does this contribute to the meaning of the piece? In your view, is Hemingways style effective? You may wish to consider the deleted ending of the story (which we encountered as On Writing). Was Hemingway right to cut this section? How might the inclusion of these pages change our reading of the story?

Read: Jardine, Cassandra “Should You Let Your Teenager Drink? Telegraph Media Group Limited. 29 Jan 2009. Web. 22 Oct 2009

Critical Analysis Essay Guidelines
Explanation of Critical Analysis Essays
You are to write four formal (either APA or MLA) critical analysis essays of an assigned article, approximately 650 words
each, applying principles of critical thinking to your analyses. In addition, you are to apply one Saint Leo University Core
Value to the assignment. Core Values are listed in the syllabus.
These essays must be submitted to the Dropbox, which is linked to Turnitin. Please see the syllabus for more information
about Turnitin.
Critical analysis involves going into the depths of the subject or material to be reviewed and discussing it objectively so
that the readers get to know the subject better and in details. A format for critical analysis should not only be a review and
contain a summary of what other critics say about the work. The major purpose of it is to voice your concerns, views and
opinions based on correct and logical evidences.
You should be reflective (think deeply and engage in multiple rewrites) not reflexive (inserting the first ideas that come to
mind.) When you find one assumption, always ask whether anything deeper has to be taken for granted for that
assumption to be true. You may find a more profound assumption.
Be thorough and precise and especially, be convincing. Feel free to use “if” clauses, “it is possible” clauses, “for his
reason X to be true” clauses, and “for the reason to support his conclusion” clauses, or any other creative device you
choose to show the impact of any ambiguity or assumption that you have identified.
Since the required word count is only 650 words, (please abide by that within 50 words in either direction) it is important
to be concise in all parts of your analysis. Writing and following an outline is crucial to remain focused on your argument
and avoid summary or irrelevant description.
Refer to the Grading Rubric for more information about requirements and criteria for grading.
Format of critical analysis:
A. Introduction Your introductory paragraph should set the stage for what is to follow. Use a catchy first line to grab
the readers attention. In this paragraph you should present the central theme, the thesis statement, and facts
surrounding the main theme. Any important definitions and terms that will have relevance in the body can be defined and
explained here if necessary.
B. Short summary – Provide a very brief summary of the work being reviewed. Then preview your argument, briefly
stating what you will attempt to prove your argument. Never present any more than the minimum that the reader needs
to know to understand your argument.
C. Body C. Body This should be the bulk of your paper. It is where the scope of the thesis should be explored and
where the facts and data presented in the article are analyzed and checked for their logic and accuracy. It is where you
will present details of the reviewed material and where you ask the critical thinking questions we have covered so far in
the course. You should identify and discuss any and all ambiguous terms and phrases, value and descriptive
assumptions, fallacies, sources of evidence or lack of sufficient evidence, credentials of authorities, and appropriate
citations, etc. It should clearly demonstrate how your analysis and evaluation influences how you reacted to the
reasoning. Most importantly, it should be your argument about the article and not a summary. Even though you are
potentially only referring to one source, you still need to cite your information using parenthetical citation or footnotes /
endnotes. In this section you will also apply the relevance of your chosen core value as it relates to the critical analysis.
D. Conclusion This final paragraph should sum up your overall conclusions. It should not contain any new or additional
information. It should very briefly restate the ideas or arguments that have already been presented in the paper and more
so point out the importance of your argument. Provide an interesting closing – a striking statement or a dramatic example
with reference back to the thesis statement, making an impact and signaling the end of your essay

1.    The effect of Covid-19 on peoples lives around the world has been to show how unequal society has become in almost every country. Rich people have found it relatively easy to cope whilst poor people have struggled. Once the pandemic is over the governments of all countries should change their tax systems so that rich people pay more of their money to support the poorest. Discuss.