Overview

The purpose of this assignment is to continue your practice with the rhetorical, academic moves you are learning in your textbook, the “They Say, I Say” format, in order to compose a short response to a text. In They Say, I Say, you are learning how to define what others are saying, as well as craft your own response in order to produce academic writing and response. For this essay, you will work on synthesizing your skills in comprehension, analysis, summary/paraphrase/quotation, response, and anticipating objections.

Furthermore, today’s employers place a lot of value on thinking critically, ethical judgment and integrity, intercultural skills, innovation, and a life-long desire to learn. One way to continue to learn outside of school, get exposure to new ideas, and hone your own position is by regularly reading, viewing, and listening to high quality material, as well as discussing it with others. This assignment will allow you to organize your use of the templates in They Say, I Say, as well as show the progress you are making in the acquisition of academic skills and desirable professional qualities.

Academic Values: Critical Thinking, Critical Analysis, Discourse, Claims Based on Evidence, Close Reading, Basic Web Research

Process

For this assignment, you will locate, analyze, and respond to a review or critical viewpoint related to a television show, podcast, movie, album, video game, social media platform, or other cultural product that you enjoy. You should choose an article that reviews or makes a critical argument about the tv show, movie, podcast, album or cultural product. (Here is an example of the type of article you might analyze about Game of Thrones: “Game of Thrones and the Paradox of Female Beauty  (Links to an external site.).) After reading this assignment, you should start looking for an article on the internet that might interest you. Good examples of publications with thoughtful reviews and analysis include The New Yorker, The New York Times, and The Atlantic.

In order to respond to the text, you must first read it and comprehend the author(s) viewpoint, position, or argument. The first part of your assignment will therefore be an explanation of the author’s position using summary, paraphrase, and perhaps some quotation. The second part of the assignment will be your response, using the concepts you learned in Chapters 4, 5, and 6 of They Say, I Say. Your essay will start to bring together and synthesize your growing understanding of the templates in They Say, I Say, and the practice with them we have been doing in this course, as well as introduce basic internet research.

Therefore, on this assignment you will be assessed on comprehension, summary, analysis, understanding of the rhetorical situation, and the logic of your own response. You will also begin to use MLA format in order to design your document and cite your source(s) and practice generating an original title for your essay. Remember, you are not expected to know everything there is to know about academic reading, writing, and rhetoric, but to show that you are building the skills necessary for success in academic and professional contexts. The more practice you have, the better you will become!

The download is an example that was given to us.

Here is an example of what was provided:
Example Passage

From “Google, Democracy, and the Truth about Internet Search” by Carole Cadwalladr (Ch. 18):

This is all happening in complete darkness. We have no way of knowing how our personal data is being mined and used to influence us. We don’t realize that the Facebook page we are looking at, the Google page, the ads that we are seeing, the search results we are using, are all being personalized to us. We don’t see it because we have nothing to compare it to. And it is not being monitored or recorded. It is not being regulated. We are inside a machine and we simply have no way of seeing the controls. Most of the time, we don’t even realize that there are controls (491).

Example Response

The dangers of major technological conglomerates like Facebook and Twitter pose to democracy have been debated fiercely since the 2016 elections and Brexit referendum. In her essay, Carole Cadwalladr examines what is happening to our data and how it is being mined to influence us. She claims, “We are inside a machine and we simply have no way of seeing the controls. Most of the time, we don’t even realize that there are controls” (491).

Here are the 3 I need to answer:

1)From “The New Liberal Arts” by Sanford J. Ungar (Ch. 17):

Many states and localities have officials or task forces in charge of “work-force development,” implying that business and industry will communicate their needs and educational institutions will dutifully turn out students who can head straight to the factory floor or office cubicle to fulfill them. But history is filled with examples of failed social experiments that treated people as work units rather than individuals capable of inspiration and ingenuity. It is far wiser for students to prepare for change–and the multiple careers they are likely to have–than to search for a single job track that might one day become a dead end (337).

2)From “Hidden Intellectualism” by Gerald Graff (Ch. 17):

If I am right, then schools and colleges are missing an opportunity when they do not encourage students to take their nonacademic interests as objects of academic study. It is self-defeating to decline to introduce any text or subject that figures to engage students who will otherwise tune out academic work entirely. If a student cannot get interested in Mill’s On Liberty, but will read Sports Illustrated or Vogue or the hip-hop magazine Source with absorption, this is a strong argument for assigning the magazines over the classic (375).

3)From “Smarter Than You Think: How Technology is Changing Our Minds for the Better” (Ch. 18):

Every new tool shapes the way we think, as well as what we think about. The printed word helped make our cognition linear and abstract, along with vastly enlarging our stores of knowledge. Newspapers shrank the world; then the telegraph shrank it even more dramatically. With every innovation, cultural prophets bickered over whether we are facing a technological apocalypse or utopia (449).

1. Choose two topics of your choice to compare and contrast. You are not required to do any research for this essay, so this assignment encourages you to pick topics you know about so that you can use your own knowledge to build the content of the essay. Below, there will be some examples of compare and contrast topics, but you may pick your own. Ask your instructor if you have difficulty in finding topics.

2. When you choose your topics, spend some time brainstorming to find three items you can compare between the two topics. The example here is how in the Unit 5 lecture notes we found the items of Cost, Size and Teachers for our Community College and University essay. Again, the items you choose will be your decision about what you would like your essay to focus on. Use your judgment of what you feel is most important to discuss between the two topics.

3. Decide whether to use the Topic-by-Topic pattern or the Item-by-Item pattern. Either pattern is valid, so use the one you are most comfortable with. When you decide on your pattern, create an Outline as we did in the Unit 5 notes for Community Colleges and Universities.

4. Be sure that your essay has an Introduction that has the four points listed in the lecture notes, not necessarily in the order given in the notes: Topic, Thesis, Attention Grabber, Signposting. (Note, if you decide to write the essay inductively by not having the thesis in the introduction but in the conclusion, that is acceptable, so in place of the thesis in the introduction, you may ask a question and/or explain the purpose of the essay).

5. With your outline, you will write the essay filling in all the details for each point in the outline.

6. Be sure to have a conclusion where you evaluate and analyze the topics. This conclusion could be more than one paragraph, and you will likely develop it after writing all the other points of the essay. Part 3 of the Unit 5 notes show how the essay evaluated and analyzed the two types of schools to question the saying “you get what you pay for.”

7. Include a title for the essay.

8. Read over the essay several times to see if you need to make any revisions. Also, proofread the essay to make corrections. It is a good idea to let at least one other person read your essay for revision and proofreading. Your reader could be a friend or family member, or it could even be someone you connect with in class. It is fine to get together with a classmate to e-mail essays back in forth for proofreading and revision.

The essay needs to be at least two full pages following the MLA formatting guidelines of 1-inch margins, double spacing between lines, Times New Roman 12 type.

Each student is responsible for writing 4 short (2 double-spaced pages) response papers that summarize and integrate the readings for one week.
The position papers should be at a minimum, 500 words (double-spaced), 12 point font. Please include your name, student  ID, date, and course number on the top right of the first page. Please write the paper using a standard essay structure with in text citations and a bibliography. Please include a word count.
Response papers might consider the following:

-What is/are the central topic(s) of the papers?

-Why is this issue vital to investigate according to the author?

-What evidence is brought to bear among the papers about the topic/issue/question?

-What are the findings of the studies?

-What parts of the articles did you find persuasive or unpersuasive? Why?

-Did you find some of the individual articles/studies to be better than others? Why?

Please note, the questions above are suggestions. I do not expect you to answer all of these questions for each reading. This would result in a very long response paper

his written assignment should be 4 pages-long, 12-pt-font, 1-inch margin all around, double-spaced. You will be graded based on the articulation of your ideas and analysis!

THIS IS ABOUT YOU! I WANT TO HEAR YOUR VOICES! BE HONEST & TRUTHFUL!

This paper should NOT be a summary of your life but a critical explanation/ analysis/ assessment of meaning of your racial/ethnic identity in the context of your presence in the U.S.

This identity paper is about developing an introspective analysis of who you are and how you have become yourself. More precisely, I want you to think critically and reflect on the process by which you have developed your identity. There is NO RIGHT or WRONG! Knowing that race, ethnicity and other identification markers are socially defined, what are the meanings associated with who you are, about what you are trying to achieve and the struggles you face everyday?

1 You will identify a problem in Nursing or At Arizona College with the intentions of offering a solution to the problem! (your first page of content should identify the problem in very specific details, making sure you also identify the people who are affected by the problem)
2.  Your second page of contented every page after,  should begin to talk about your solution and how it will address your problem !( talk about your solution and  all of the particular components you will employ to solve your problem) Also, talk about how your solution will benefit the people!
3. The facts in your paper should be supported by scholarship (fact base evidence found in the database)  4 articles ( making sure you cite all of the information you use in the articles). EBSCO
4.Your paper should be 5 pages long, free of all grammatical errors and plagerism

For this exercise we will concentrate on the Ethics and the Courts section of Case Studies in Criminal Justice Ethics. Because I cannot cover every case in the book, I will choose 4 cases to focus on, one case from each section. Below is your second application exercise assignment. Read the case I attached and answer the question.

CASE #10:

My Job is to Defend the Constitution, p. 68.

My Job is to Defend the Constitution.pdf

QUESTION

For this exercise, I ask you to focus only on Chapter 9-10: Consequentialism. In  My Job is to Defend the Constitution a defense attorney has to decide if they should work zealously to defend their client (p. 46) or provide only adequate defense. If the defense attorney works zealously to defend the client, the client will likely be acquitted. If the defense attorney does just their job and no more, their client will likely be convicted. To learn more about the role of defense attorneys and zealous defense, visit https://www.americanbar.org/groups/criminal_justice/standards/DefenseFunctionFourthEdition/

Argue for or against each option by applying utilitarianism to the problem.

Consider the following as you write your response. Do not just answer these questions, use them to help you craft your responses:

What would revealing the information accomplish in the short term and long term?
It could take months for an investigation into the lab to occur and in the meantime the lab will continue to operate. How might this affect other defendants?
What effect might revealing the information accomplish if the client is acquitted?
Would making the decision based on the clients character lead the defense attorney down a slippery slope?
FORMAT

This assignment should be no more than 1-1.5 pages long, double spaced, 12 point font. You should not need more than 1 paragraph to explain each section. Do not copy material from the text. Everything should be in your own words – this helps me assess how well you understand the philosophy. Plagiarism will result in a 0.

Your submission should look like this:

Summary of Consequentialism (the category) & Utilitarianism (the specific philosophy):

Explain the focus of consequentialist philosophies. Explain utilitarianism and what makes an act right or good.

Zealous defense:

Explain zealous defense. Explain whether utilitarianism would support or reject providing zealous defense for the client. Consider this from both the act utilitarian (act in a way that maximizes good) and rule consequentialism (follow rules that benefit the majority) perspectives.

Adequate defense:

Explain the role of defense attorneys, and whether utilitarianism would support or reject providing only adequate defense for the client. Consider this from both the act utilitarian and rule consequentialism perspectives.

Review the following requirements before submitting your response

Your response must reflect the material .
Do not ask yourself, “What would I do?” ask instead, “What would a (hedonist,  egoist, utilitarian, deontologist, virtue ethicist, or social contract theorist) do?”
Content based on opinion does not count toward answering the question.
Be sure to cite the book as necessary according to the  APA style guide.

You are writing a letter to Nick Carraway, so you probably want to start out with Dear Nick. As you write, think about Nicks personality and interests. You will have to decide how to organize your description. What section of town will you begin with? What part of town will be left to the last? How will you decide to divide up the neighborhoods? By wealth and social class? By ethnicity and language? By some other criteria? Remember to thank Nick for taking an interest in your neighborhood.

Compose your draft. Before you turn it into your teacher, try to share it with a classmate who lives in a different neighborhood to see if it makes sense to an outsider.

THIS IS ABOUT THE GREAT GATSBY, be my perspective for answering the prompt above

You are writing a letter to Nick Carraway, so you probably want to start out with Dear Nick. As you write, think about Nicks personality and interests. You will have to decide how to organize your description. What section of town will you begin with? What part of town will be left to the last? How will you decide to divide up the neighborhoods? By wealth and social class? By ethnicity and language? By some other criteria? Remember to thank Nick for taking an interest in your neighborhood.
Compose your draft. Before you turn it into your teacher, try to share it with a classmate who lives in a different neighborhood to see if it makes sense to an outsider.
THIS IS REFERRING ABOUT THE GREAT GATSBY