Recall from Meyers Chapter 1 that Agency is the simplest of the professional-client relationships. The client is sufficiently knowledgeable to achieve an established goal, and the professional serves as the agent by helping the client achieve that goal. In this discussion, you will enact this relationship amongst yourselves. Each of you has an essay due at the end of this module; your task is to act as an agent who will help your peers achieve that goal. You will do that by providing helpful insights to strengthen each others critical thinking.

Initial Post:
By Thursday of Module 3, post a brief description of the film or television show that youve chosen for your Module 3 Essay. Your post should include:

the name of the film or television show that you have chosen;
a profile of the character in question;
a plot summary;
an important clip from the movie that features something about your selected character.
Lastly, please apply specific terms from the textbook to identify and describe the ethical challenge that your character faces.

Reply Posts:
From Friday through Sunday of Module 3, return to this thread and reply to as many of your peers posts as you’d like, along with those who replied to you. Please use specific terms from the Meyers toolkit when you respond to the summaries posted by your peers.

Note:

After completing this discussion, you will be grading yourself on your performance in this specific discussion. Your instructor may or may not join in this discussion, so we ask that you practice ethics by taking responsibility for your performance.
Please review the self-evaluation form before you do the actual self-evaluation so that you can meet the requirements, honestly evaluate yourself, and get full credit.
After you complete the discussion, click Next to fill out the evaluation form, which is automatically graded.
The self-evaluation form will open on Saturday and the due date is the following Tuesday 11:59 PM ET.

Self-Evaluation Form
After each Student Discussion, you will evaluate yourself using a four-question short quiz in each module. The quiz questions relate directly to the required criteria of each Student Discussion.

Some of the questions ask you to practice strategies that lead to establishing stronger ethical relationships. We typically think we are practicing ethical behaviors in our relationships and professions, but you might be surprised to discover some new strategies in your textbook to promote better interactions.

Please review this form to preview the questions that will be asked so you can meet the requirements, honestly evaluate yourself, and get full credit.
Module 3

In my initial post, I answered all the questions and clearly mentioned the ethical challenge that the character faces. (True/False)
In my initial post, I specifically described the ethical challenge that the character faces by using specific terms from Meyers toolkit. (True/False)
I replied to at least one post, and I provided details by using specific terms from Meyers toolkit. (True/False)
Given the steps that Meyers has outlined, I am aware of how to deliberately analyze an ethical situation. (True/False)

1. According to the OSHA construction standards, what is a competent person? Discuss two examples of competent person requirements from the construction standards.

Your response should be at least 75 words in length.

2. What are the four classifications of employers under OSHA’s multi-employer worksite policy? How do they relate to each other?

Your response should be at least 75 words in length.

3. Using the requirements for General Duty violations in Chapter 4 of the OSHA Field Operations Manual (FOM), describe a situation that could be cited as a violation of the General Duty Clause. Remember that the General Duty Clause can only be applied if there is no OSHA standard for the hazard. Explain how your citation meets the four elements listed in the FOM as necessary to prove such a violation.

Your response should be at least 200 words in length

4. Imagine that you are the safety manager on a large construction site and are notified that an OSHA inspector has arrived at the site gate, inspection warrant in-hand, requesting access. Describe the procedures you would follow to accommodate the inspector’s request and how the inspection should proceed.

Your response should be at least 200 words in length.

Keep the questions separate.

identify an event from the past when research did not follow ethical guidelines.
share a link to the event you found and explain what happened.
Then discuss why ethical research is so important. Why do scientists need to be extra careful with research that uses human subjects? Do ethical guidelines restrict the boundaries of research? Feel free to explain by using the textbook or by doing additional research online. Remember to cite your sources.

all the instructions in the attached file
also, there is a video

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jRx0NRSGipg 

https://sketch.io/

also, respond to this

By looking at the data given for the Cuyahoga River flooding, it is safe to say that the concern of the citizens of Independence is justifiable. As you look at the data of the history of flooding from the Cuyahoga River, you can see that discharge has increased as well as the number of floods. The smallest discharge was 86,305 in November of 1985. The oldest flood was in February of 1981 with a discharge of 106,005. The highest discharge was 254,005 in June of 2006. The most recent flood was in October of 2012 with a discharge of 138,005. Analyzing these numbers, the change from the smallest discharge of 86,305 to the largest of 254,005 is a great concern. This indicates that more of the city will be affected and most likely damaged severely if not destroyed by these recent floods.

The number of floods in each decade has also started to increase as well. In the 80s, there was a total of six floods. Nine in the 90s. Eight in the 00s. Three in the 10s. The number of floods between the 90s and 00s is similar enough to assume that this increasing pattern will continue throughout the 10s. This is because the recurrence interval is decreasing as time goes on, meaning floods will be happening more frequently. Looking at the decade with the highest number of floods, the largest RI was 17.33 years, and the smallest was 2.08 years. This large range of years contains years in between these numbers, showing that more floods will be happening years out from this.

One thing that is not as concerning as these small RI numbers is the RIs from the recent floods. In 2012, the RI was 7.4 years and a flood in 2011 was 26 years. This means there will be more time in between each of these large floods to prepare the city and people for it. Though, the more time between each occurrence of a flood means the more catastrophic it will be and the larger discharge it will produce. These floods are very large floods and look to be getting larger with the higher RI, which is another concern for the city.

Looking at the graph, you can observe that the trend is increasing for the recurrence interval. The highest recurrence interval has the highest discharge which is one of the largest concerns out of all the concerns to be had about these floods. There is a high concentration of floods between two and ten years and the concentration is another one of the very important concerns for these floods. 

Create a 3 slide Microsoft PowerPoint presentation (NO NEED FOR INTRODUCTION OR CONCLUSION SLIDES) including speaker notes, in which you discuss various influences on the following:

-Summarize and critique the influential differences between the general public  and the National Rifle Association (NRA) on agency policies or practices.

Include a minimum of one peer reviewed reference.

Format your presentation consistent with APA guidelines.

a review paper, in the form of an IEEE conference paper on an alternative to silicon as a material for semiconductor-based electronics. (have at least 4 references that come from the peer-reviewed literature. Journal papers are the best choice, but also full-length (4+ pages) conference papers can constitute 2 of the 4 references.)

Write a critical appraisal that demonstrates comprehension of two qualitative research studies. Use the “Research Critique Guidelines Part 1” document to organize your essay. Successful completion of this assignment requires that you provide rationale, include examples, and reference content from the studies in your responses.
Use the practice problem and two qualitative, peer-reviewed research article you identified in the Topic 1 assignment to complete this assignment.
In a 1,0001,250 word essay, summarize two qualitative studies, explain the ways in which the findings might be used in nursing practice, and address ethical considerations associated with the conduct of the study.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance.