As our textbook alludes, in the middle to late years of the first Millennium after Christ, there were some major changes religious, cultural, social, economic that affected the status and role of women compared to earlier centuries.  As you read through Chapters 3 and 4, note the activities and accomplishments of women during the early stages of monasticism and then compare that to the end of the first millennium when scholasticism was becoming more popular and the Roman Church was initiating stricter requirements and control on its members  (see the last four pages of Chapter 4 under “Changes of the New Millennium”

Review Chapters 3 & 4 – “Feminine Threads”
Write a 3-4 page paper covering the following points related to this topic:

Beginning with the section Christian Women and the Ascetic Life in Chapter 3, choose two exemplary women who were involved in monasticism and summarize their accomplishments, doing some extra research on them.
Then compare that with the role of women during the 1100-1200s AD when scholasticism was becoming more popular (see the last four pages of Chapter 4).  How did the changes in the requirements of the Roman Catholic Church regarding the priests and the administration of the sacraments affect women?
Do some extra research on this subject and evaluate those requirements instituted by the Roman Catholic Church in the light of Scripture.

Support your work with scholarly academic resources using APA format.

Answer the questions

1. According to Martin, how does the process of essentializing work through the projection of an essence, labeling, attaching characteristics, and defining social roles? Discuss a religious and non-religious example.

2. What is group bias, according to Martin? How does it foster in-group behavior? Discuss at least one example.

3. How, according to Martin, how is socialization internalized? How does this internalization reinforce social positions and roles? Discuss at least one example.

4. According to Martin, what key elements do all social groups share? Make sure to discuss, not just list, these.

5. What is naturalization, according to Martin? How does naturalization function in terms of domination and social reproduction?

6. What is meritocracy, according to Martin? Why does Martin suggest that meritocracy is largely a myth?

7. What is habitus, according to Martin? How is habitus linked to class differences in society, and how does it reinforce what is considered “normal”? Discuss at least one example.

8. What is the relationship between habitus and religion, according to Martin? Discuss at least one example.

There will be two questions to address and write on. Each question should be answered within half a page.  There will be more instructions in the attachment.

In what ways does Confucianism and Daoism compliment each other, and in what ways do they oppose each other?  Write half a page on this.

Discuss the role of women in Shinto. Write half a page one this topic

In Joseph Campbell’s book The Hero with a Thousand Faces, he states that there is a common story of the hero across cultures and times found in religious stories, legends, and fairy tales and that this story is in fact everyone’s journey of self-actualization. In an essay, describe stages 1, 3, 8, and 9 of the hero’s journey (the call to adventure, crossing the first threshold, atonement, and apotheosis). In the introduction to the essay, identify and explain Campbell’s thesis of his book and define the following terms in the classic Greek sense: hero, myth, and inspiration (each with full descriptions). For each of the stages listed above provide the following: 1) a definition of the stage (several sentences), 2) the purpose of the stage, 3) provide one example for each stage, either from Campbell’s book or from lecture.Provide a full description of this example, several sentences.Outline of essay:

Paragraph 1 – introduction

Paragraph 2 – Stage 1

Paragraph 3 – Stage 3

Paragraph 4 – Stage 8

Paragraph 5 – Stage 9

Paragraph 6 – Conclusion.

Prompt: In 1,000 words, summarize the contents of Romans 18, paying particular attention to its major topics and themes. It is also appropriate to note puzzling features and/or challenges of interpretation.

Parameters: This is an informal paper, so no outside references are necessary, but if you would like to reference a resource, please cite parenthetically, i.e. (Wright, p.17). Your summary should be submitted as a Word document in 12-point Times New Roman font, double-spaced, and with indented paragraphs, page numbers, and headings when and where appropriate.

Purpose: This summary of Romans 18 introduces you to one of the Bible’s clearest statements of God and his purposes for the world.

The research essay (assignment) should be a maximum of 1000-1500 words. Please adhere to
the word count!
You need to include at least six academic sources. Including in-text references (year and page
numbers) and a complete bibliography!

The notion of religion as a precondition for morality is deeply entrenched, at the same time highly
contested. In Platos famous Euthyphro, Socrates famously asks whether the gods love good
action because it is good, or is good action good because it is loved by the gods? Socrates clearly
favoured the former proposal, yet some thinkers argue that morality is dictated and indeed
unthinkable without God.

The idea that, on Mount Sinai, Moses received the Written Torah and the Oral Torah constitutes one of the key beliefs in Judaism. Analyze a story about Moses and R. Akiba in the Babylonian Talmud Menahot 29b (the highlighted section on p. 190 in your reading). Address the following questions:

Summarize the story in your own words. Whats going on there?
Why is Moses unable to follow the arguments of R. Akibas disciples? Why, at the same time, the disciples refer to what they say as a law given unto Moses at Sinai?
How do rabbis portray themselves in this story? What claims do they make? Why is the figure of Moses important?
Why is this story relevant to the topic of the Written and Oral Torah in Judaism? What in the story is the written Torah and what is the oral one? What is the relationship between the two?
Use information learned from lecturettes and this weeks readings in your analysis. You will find Goldman, pp. 258-260, to be particularly useful.

A well-written paper will have a concise introduction to the general topic of the paper, a clear thesis statement, and a carefully developed argument with specific examples supporting the thesis statement.

Your paper should be written according to the following guidelines.

Your paper should be no longer than three pages (typed, double-spaced) and should concisely, clearly express the results of careful thought and prior drafts.  In the paper you turn in, dont waste space with filler material.

Avoid generalities not supported with specific analysis and evidence.  Anchor your paper in careful analysis of the talmudic story, not in broad generalities about Judaism. You should cite specific passages from the story to support your argument.

Do not, however, include long quotations of passages.  You are writing for an audience that has read these texts.  Instead, quote only what is absolutely necessary for your analysis.

Make every paragraph, sentence, and word count.  In three pages you dont have space to waste.

The first paragraph of your paper should include a succinct statement of what you are going to argue to answer the questions posed by this assignment. The following paragraphs should develop your argument to support the thesis that you have stated in your opening paragraph.  Your final paragraph should build on your argument to lead the reader into some implications of your thesis and argument for understanding the nature of the Written and Oral Torah.  Again, your argument must be supported by specific evidence from the story. You are trying to persuade the reader to agree with your thesis statement.

This assignment is not a research paper, but you should (as appropriate for your argument) interact with the readings and class discussions for the course.  You are also free (but not required) to pursue outside reading.  In any case, do not pass off the ideas of others as your own.  Footnote your use of the ideas of others.  For general citation guidelines, see Sources, Their Use and Acknowledgement (http://www.dartmouth.edu/~sources/).  Use the note method of citation. 

In general, material from the Internet has little value in lending support to your argument because most of the material has not been critically evaluated.  Anyone can say anything on a Web page.  Before you use information from the Internet, you must carefully evaluate its reliability.  You have to ask yourself, for example, from where the information is coming.  Dont believe something just because it is on a Web page.  You will lose points on your paper if you uncritically use material from the Internet.  If you choose to include material from the Internet, you must cite the source of the information.

Mordecai Kaplans Judaism as a Civilization and Gerson Cohens The Blessing of Assimilation in Jewish History reflect two different approaches to Jewish culture, which are still dominant today. Analyze both works. Answer the following questions:
1.    What is Kaplans understanding of Jewish civilization? What does he see as Jewish civilizations essential elements and most important characteristics?
2.    What does Cohen mean by the blessing of assimilation? How does his view of Jewish culture and history differ from that of Kaplan? Be specific.
3.    In light of information learned from lectures and the textbook, provide your own critique of both approaches and your own reflections on the nature of Jewish culture.
Use information learned from lecturettes and this weeks readings in your discussion.
A well-written paper will have a concise introduction to the general topic of the paper, a clear thesis statement, and a carefully developed argument with specific examples supporting the thesis statement.
Your paper should be written according to the following guidelines.
a.    Your paper should be no longer than three pages (typed, double-spaced) and should concisely, clearly express the results of careful thought and prior drafts.  In the paper you turn in, dont waste space with filler material.

Avoid generalities not supported with specific analysis and evidence.  Anchor your paper in careful analysis of Kaplan’s and Cohen’s articles, not in broad generalities about Jewish culture. You should cite specific passages from Kaplan and Cohen to support your argument.

Do not, however, include long quotations of passages.  You are writing for an audience that has read these texts.  Instead, quote only what is absolutely necessary for your analysis.

Make every paragraph, sentence, and word count.  In three pages you dont have space to waste.
b.    The first paragraph of your paper should include a succinct statement of what you are going to argue to answer the questions posed by this assignment. The following paragraphs should develop your argument to support the thesis that you have stated in your opening paragraph.  Your final paragraph should build on your argument to lead the reader into some implications of your thesis and argument for understanding Jewish culture.  Again, your argument must be supported by specific evidence from Kaplan and Cohen. You are trying to persuade the reader to agree with your thesis statement.
c.    This assignment is not a research paper, but you should (as appropriate for your argument) interact with the readings and class discussions for the course.  You are also free (but not required) to pursue outside reading.

Instructions
Paper 2

The Hebrew Bible contains a detailed description of the ritual performed in Jerusalems Temple during the Day of Atonement (Yom Kippur). Analyze this description and address the following questions:

Identify the components of the ritual described in Leviticus 16 and 23: 26-32.
What are the purposes of the ritual? What is the role of each component? Use information learned from Sperling, Day of Atonement, 492-93, and this weeks lecturettes in your analysis.
Your textbook summarizes todays understanding of the Day of Atonement. Compare this understanding to what we find in the Hebrew Bible. What has remained the same? What has changed?
Use information learned from lecturettes and this weeks readings in your discussion.

A well-written paper will have a concise introduction to the general topic of the paper, a clear thesis statement, and a carefully developed argument with specific examples supporting the thesis statement.

Your paper should be written according to the following guidelines.

Your paper should be no longer than three pages (typed, double-spaced) and should concisely, clearly express the results of careful thought and prior drafts.  In the paper you turn in, dont waste space with filler material.

Avoid generalities not supported with specific analysis and evidence.  Anchor your paper in careful analysis of Leviticus, not in broad generalities about Judaism. You should cite specific passages from Leviticus to support your argument.

Do not, however, include long quotations of passages.  You are writing for an audience that has read these texts.  Instead, quote only what is absolutely necessary for your analysis.

Make every paragraph, sentence, and word count.  In three pages you dont have space to waste.

The first paragraph of your paper should include a succinct statement of what you are going to argue to answer the questions posed by this assignment. The following paragraphs should develop your argument to support the thesis that you have stated in your opening paragraph.  Your final paragraph should build on your argument to lead the reader into some implications of your thesis and argument for understanding the nature of the Day of Atonement.  Again, your argument must be supported by specific evidence from Leviticus. You are trying to persuade the reader to agree with your thesis statement.

This assignment is not a research paper, but you should (as appropriate for your argument) interact with the readings and class discussions for the course.  You are also free (but not required) to pursue outside reading.  In any case, do not pass off the ideas of others as your own.  Footnote your use of the ideas of others.  For general citation guidelines, see Sources, Their Use and Acknowledgement (http://www.dartmouth.edu/~sources/).  Use the note method of citation. 

In general, material from the Internet has little value in lending support to your argument because most of the material has not been critically evaluated.  Anyone can say anything on a Web page.  Before you use information from the Internet, you must carefully evaluate its reliability.  You have to ask yourself, for example, from where the information is coming.  Dont believe something just because it is on a Web page.  You will lose points on your paper if you uncritically use material from the Internet.  If you choose to include material from the Internet, you must cite the source of the information.

Describe, compare, and analyze ways in which Judaism, Christianity, and Islam are each “monotheistic” faith traditions.
Thesis/topic/subtopics should relate to any number of the following: What names or designations does each of these faith traditions assign to God? How did the monotheism of each of these faith traditions develop in relation to its older Abrahamic sibling religion(s)? How did the influence of Hellenism help shape monotheistic theology and worship in Judaism, Christianity, and Islam? What does it mean that monotheism in Judaism (especially early Judaism) is more about uniqueness than about number? What are some the reasons given in the Hebrew scriptures for the Jews worshiping only YHWH among all the other possibilities? What are some of the metaphors and consequences mentioned in the Hebrew scriptures for worshiping other gods? Why and how did the Trinitarian monotheism develop in Christianity? How is monotheism defined in Islam? How does Islamic monotheism distinguish itself from Jewish and especially Christian monotheism?