Compare and contrast the similarities/differences between enzymes and receptors.

Hints: Focus on their structure/composition, their biological functions, where they are located (cellularly), etc…limit your response to 750 words and cite at least two references.

Blog: Chemical Engineering Info and Resources. Difference between Receptors and Enzymes. Retrieved from: https://elementtwentyseven.blogspot.com/2014/05/difference-between-receptors-and-enzymes.html

At the start of this paper I need a strong draft argument/thesis statement.

Can you come up with three more questions you could research and answer about this topic.
These questions I think can be used but i need three more six in total
1) Global impact of nuclear power plants?
2) Have people showed signs of radiation sickness in the areas around these three plants after the accidents?
3) How much information did they give the public about the accidents?

I need 15 sources about how these three power plants had accidents
write out the source then write a short paragraph on how you will use the source in the finale paper

Level 1:  Summarize!

Summarize the podcast(s) and sources from a single week of your choice.
    do not include external information or analysis   
    use prose, with paragraphs, as if in an essay (i.e. not in point-form)
    between 500 and 750 words (include a word count)
    the organization should be clear, with transitions between paragraphs
    information should be presented as a coherent whole
    include citations for the podcast(s) and sources

Requirements for all assignments
    completeness (all required items submitted)
    professionalism in writing quality and presentation: clear organization, no sentence fragments or run-ons, no more than two errors per 250 words (including citations in Chicago style)
    course relevance: must cite one or more podcasts and one or more of the assigned sources
    no plagiarism (see “Academic Policies,” below)
    All papers should be written according to the instructor’s How to Write (www.sfu.ca/~lclossey/howtowrite.doc) and the Chicago Manual of Style or Turabian’s A Manual for Writers of Term Papers.

It is July 5, 1776, the day after the Founding Fathers just committed an act of treason against the British by declaring their independence and establishing the United States of America. Were they in the right? Should the colonists fight for independence or should they be dutiful citizens with the rights of Englishmen? Make an argument, either in the form of a letter or a speech to rally your peers. (You are welcome to write in first person.) On which side should they be? What do you want them to do? What would you like to see as the outcome?
Introduction:
Create the setting. Provide historical background to give context for your speech. What
had happened in America in the previous decades? Also, identify who you are. (Are you an American? A Loyalist? A slave? You are welcome to choose a specific historical person, or you can just give a general position.) Where do you live? (In which colony? In an urban or rural area? Is it coastal?) What do you do? (Are you a merchant? Politician? Lawyer? Farmer?) Identify whom you are addressing. (Who are your peers?) Include your thesis sentence as your last sentence of your first paragraph. Your thesis sentence is the argument that you will be making throughout your paper.
Body:
In that speech, lay out the choices that they can take. What are the benefits? What are
the pitfalls? Then, rally them in the direction you want them to head. What actions do you want them to take to get there? Finally, explain the consequences and benefits that may befall them if they fail and if they succeed.
Use the rights of English citizens, the grievances of colonists, and the goals of the Americans as evidence to analyze. To make your argument use at least two primary sources (these can be from your documents book) from the Revolutionary Era. Quote from those two sources and use proper Chicago Manual of Style footnotes or endnotes to cite those quotations.
Conclusion:
Wrap it up with something convincing. What would you have considered your social and
political responsibilities, and even duties, in this era? Comment on ethical decision-making in terms of what occurred during the American Revolution.
Tips:
This must be a five paragraph essay, that is between 2.5 to 4 pages.
Be sure you follow the Rules for Writers and the Chicago Manual of Style for grammar and formatting.

Worlds Together, Worlds Apart (Concise Edition) Book
I would like you to reflect upon the possible connections that would tie the rise of Genghis (Chinggis) Khan to the era of intense spiritual and intellectual upheaval and questioning that preceded what came to be known as the Protestant Reformation over two centuries later in Europe. The Mongol expansion sparked a series of events that might provide us with at least one piece of the puzzle to explain what led society to question everything it had more or less quietly accepted before.  (I stress, this is a possible explanation of some of the many factors). Very specifically, I am asking you to consider disease as the particular engine of change here.
In essence I am asking you to follow the domino pieces.  Some of the domino pieces include the Mongol conquests, Mongol Empire, Trade, Plague, Depletion of Monastic Orders, Expanded Charity Requirements. Making the correct connections and linkages and expressing them well is crucialu. I am asking to follow one particular argument  focused mostly on disease, so although there are many other interesting factors (knowledge transfers and the like) please focus on disease.
In other words try to provide a fleshed out narrative that could explain the connections between these seemingly unconnected events (fleshed out refers to the need to provide some level of detail on each event and a clear explanation of the connections please be sure to establish a timeline and to provide dates.)
Notice that there is already an argument inherent to this prompt.  You do not need to create and original argument. Part of the exercise here is to see how well you can succinctly express this argument in your thesis statement.
Instructions:
To answer this question you will want to use the Power Points, the Three Days in October 1630 and the “Siege of Caffa” articles and the text. Please be sure to cite. DO NOT use arguments from outside sources. I expect this to be typed, proofed, edited and polished.  Double space, use 12 size font and employ regular margins (1 inch).  You should be able to answer this in no more than 4 pages.
Send me or your TAs any questions you might have and we will do our best to answer them. 
There are a few issues I would like to elaborate on in order to dispel any possible confusion.
Assignment II – Elaboration
1. This particular assignment is not about the Protestant Reformation itself that topic we will be covering later on in the semester but about some of the many possible precursors to the Reformation.
2. When you are asked to look at possible connections between the rise of Genghis Khan and the changes in Europe, I am not asking for a direct personal connection!! The Mongol unification gave rise to a certain set of events.  Those then set other events off, which in turn set off yet others until we finally have the events that I have referred to as possible precursors to the Reformation (Those things that caused people to question the Church and so on and so forth.) That is what I am asking you to discuss and explain. The events leading to the preconditions for a movement of intellectual and social revolt (so to speak.)
3. The article we read should be useful since if you draw the right information from it you can describe the effects of the plague and how it affected society, to support the argument that this was a time of chaos and fear and so on a so forthBe sure to review the lecture notes carefully and to use the textbook when appropriate.
4. Please use Chicago Manual of Style referencing style simple guides readily available online.

CONTENT REQUIREMENTS:
1. Describe the provisions (parts) of the Voting Rights Act that discuss the issue of preclearance.
2. Compare and contrast the views of those who think the federal government should have the
power of pre-clearance and those who do not. Include at least three points of comparison.
3. Using evidence from any election in 2014 or later, argue whether or not you believe
the federal government should have the power of pre-clearance relating to election laws.
Include at least three reasons and/or examples to make your point.
4. List at least two things you could do in order to engage in the political process in pursuit of
your position in (3) above.
5. Cite at least three (3) reliable, quality references within the body of the paper using the
Chicago Manual of Styles parenthetical citation style. One of the citations MUST come
from the class textbook (-10 points if this is not done). You must have at least three
parenthetical citations in the body of the paper that correctly match the sources properly
formatted in the Works Cited Page.
A paper with no parenthetical source citations in its body will receive a grade of 0.
A paper with no works cited section (a.k.a. list of reference list, a.k.a. bibliography) at
the end of the body will receive a grade of 0.
FORMAT REQUIREMENTS:
1. Typed, 2-3 pages (not counting Works Cited Page), 12-point font, double-spaced.
2. Your name, instructor name, POSC 1113, and the date.
3. A title is required, but a separate title page is not necessary.
4. An introduction with a thesis/statement of purpose in the first paragraph: This paper will
5. A logically organized and sequenced body followed by a clearly stated conclusion.
6. Use of the Chicago Manual of Styles parenthetical citation format. Students must be very
careful and pay attention to details when they examine and cite internet sources. A paper
with no parenthetical source citations and/or no Works Cited page at the end will receive a
grade of 0; no second chances will be allowed.
7. Use of footnotes or endnotes is prohibited.
8. Using encyclopedias, like Wikipedia, Ballotpedia, history.com, kids.law.com, etc. is
prohibited (-10 points).
9. Use of word mixers like Spinbot is prohibited and will result in a grade of 0; no second
chances will be allowed.

This is a Strategic Rewards Management Exam Paper.

It is a brief case study with 4 questions.

Word Limit: 1800 words. *(The entire exam paper should consist of 1800 words, not each question 1800 words.) There is a penalty if the word limit is exceeded by more than 10% or is short by more than 10%.

Referencing: Chicago 17th B

I will attach the following documents:

1) The PDF is the Take-home exam (Lee Citizen).

2) PowerPoint file Exam Guidance – This details what is needed for the exam paper

3) Exam Guidance 5 – Further instructions for the exam paper

4) Screenshot Practice Case Study 1-4 – This different case study with answers will help you to understand what is required when answering the Take-home exam(Lee Citizen) questions in the PDF

5) PowerPoint MGMT3014 lecture notes to help you answer the Take-home exam in the PDF

It is very important that you read Exam Guidance 5. This mostly details what is required for the exam and the style of answering should be in Essay Style. The Lee Citiezen case study is the Take-home exam so please answer this case study fully.

**Please provide definitions when you mention terms for the first time. Provide examples whenever possible.

There is no limit for References. However, since you have to provide definitions and examples, the more references from credible scholarly articles would be best.

**Please always relate your answer to the case study and do not trail off from the case study after providing examples and definitions etc. It is very important that you stick to the Take-home exam case study when answering its questions!

I only have less than 24hrs to complete and hand in this Take-home exam. So time is of the essence.

Please please do a very good job for this assignment. I need to pass this to complete my studies. This is very important. Thank you so much. Good luck!

Using primary texts supplied IN THE LINKS BELOW, choose two documents that support government intervention in the economy and two documents opposed to government intervention in the economy, and write a 820-word essay that demonstrates the arguments the proponents and opponents of government intervention used.  You should identify the authors main point and examine how they defended their position. NB: you are not expected to incorporate all of the sources listed, just those relevant to your approach to the paper prompt.

No secondary sources, other than the Cengage text, should be integrated into this paper’s analysis.

Your paper should briefly introduce your paper’s topic or question and provide a thesis statement. In a paper of this size, your introduction and thesis statement should appear on the first page, in the paper’s first paragraph.
Your paper should show that you reasoned through the evidence in a fair-minded way. In other words, you should state (paraphrase) what your evidence says and not what you wish it said or think it should say. You need to state the evidence fairly, even if you think it is wrong or offensive.
Your paper should use evidence to answer the historical question. You need to explain how the evidence answers the question.
Your paper should develop and organize your thoughts clearly and logically. Outlining is probably necessary, but not a required, step in writing a well-organized paper.
Your paper should draw a conclusion that addresses the paper’s chief topic or question and that states your answer to the question or your contribution to the topic.

LINKS:
1-
https://s3.amazonaws.com/blackboard.learn.xythos.prod/5a3298256260a/1090776?response-cache-control=private%2C%20max-age%3D21600&response-content-disposition=inline%3B%20filename%2A%3DUTF-8%27%27President%2520Franklin%2520D.%2520Roosevelt%2520Says%2520Government%2520Must%2520Act%252C%25201933%25281%2529.pdf&response-content-type=application%2Fpdf&X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Date=20201015T030000Z&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&X-Amz-Expires=21600&X-Amz-Credential=AKIAYDKQORRYTKBSBE4S%2F20201015%2Fus-east-1%2Fs3%2Faws4_request&X-Amz-Signature=1cafccffe5cedec20b1603593484aa5820220e94f7be7ce3f5db5d6cd8d4a216

2-
https://s3.amazonaws.com/blackboard.learn.xythos.prod/5a3298256260a/1090777?response-cache-control=private%2C%20max-age%3D21600&response-content-disposition=inline%3B%20filename%2A%3DUTF-8%27%27President%2520Herbert%2520Hoover%2520Applauds%2520Limited%2520Government%252C%25201931%25281%2529.pdf&response-content-type=application%2Fpdf&X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Date=20201015T030000Z&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&X-Amz-Expires=21600&X-Amz-Credential=AKIAYDKQORRYTKBSBE4S%2F20201015%2Fus-east-1%2Fs3%2Faws4_request&X-Amz-Signature=72ca4121d96cbd3b5be03de52c1db31667b18711ec303cfdccc7aa2c8d1403bd

3-
https://s3.amazonaws.com/blackboard.learn.xythos.prod/5a3298256260a/1090778?response-cache-control=private%2C%20max-age%3D21600&response-content-disposition=inline%3B%20filename%2A%3DUTF-8%27%27Supereme%2520Court%2520Accepts%2520LImits%2520on%2520Women%2527s%2520working%2520hours%252C%2520Muller%2520v%2520Oregon%25281%2529.pdf&response-content-type=application%2Fpdf&X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Date=20201015T030000Z&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&X-Amz-Expires=21600&X-Amz-Credential=AKIAYDKQORRYTKBSBE4S%2F20201015%2Fus-east-1%2Fs3%2Faws4_request&X-Amz-Signature=fab84db13f12eba501e820312d861d54e7c8e5c4f76664165cc0855d3ba7403e

4-
https://s3.amazonaws.com/blackboard.learn.xythos.prod/5a3298256260a/1090779?response-cache-control=private%2C%20max-age%3D21600&response-content-disposition=inline%3B%20filename%2A%3DUTF-8%27%27The%2520Clayton%2520Anti-Trust%2520Act%252C%25201914%25281%2529.pdf&response-content-type=application%2Fpdf&X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Date=20201015T030000Z&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&X-Amz-Expires=21600&X-Amz-Credential=AKIAYDKQORRYTKBSBE4S%2F20201015%2Fus-east-1%2Fs3%2Faws4_request&X-Amz-Signature=9444024287b39b0be1f9c55d0be2aeb4eb243e2d3f7b5a13f5967e130e794209

5-
https://s3.amazonaws.com/blackboard.learn.xythos.prod/5a3298256260a/1090780?response-cache-control=private%2C%20max-age%3D21600&response-content-disposition=inline%3B%20filename%2A%3DUTF-8%27%27Henry%2520Ford%2520on%2520Unemployment%2520and%2520Self-Help%25281%2529.pdf&response-content-type=application%2Fpdf&X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Date=20201015T030000Z&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&X-Amz-Expires=21600&X-Amz-Credential=AKIAYDKQORRYTKBSBE4S%2F20201015%2Fus-east-1%2Fs3%2Faws4_request&X-Amz-Signature=34735bc0cd4a27e41ed0fb6b60451bb58a00c03e52101f6b0da9215181f1bcdf

6_
https://s3.amazonaws.com/blackboard.learn.xythos.prod/5a3298256260a/1090781?response-cache-control=private%2C%20max-age%3D21600&response-content-disposition=inline%3B%20filename%2A%3DUTF-8%27%27Leading%2520Retailers%2520Propose%2520a%2520Solution%252C%25201934%25281%2529.pdf&response-content-type=application%2Fpdf&X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Date=20201015T030000Z&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&X-Amz-Expires=21600&X-Amz-Credential=AKIAYDKQORRYTKBSBE4S%2F20201015%2Fus-east-1%2Fs3%2Faws4_request&X-Amz-Signature=1753852713479a6757cac61040fbc5eef40edeb571e8505cddb76a9328b2a897

7-
https://s3.amazonaws.com/blackboard.learn.xythos.prod/5a3298256260a/1090782?response-cache-control=private%2C%20max-age%3D21600&response-content-disposition=inline%3B%20filename%2A%3DUTF-8%27%27Theodore%2520Roosevelt%2520Announces%2520the%2520New%2520Nationalism%252C%25201910%25281%2529.pdf&response-content-type=application%2Fpdf&X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Date=20201015T030000Z&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&X-Amz-Expires=21600&X-Amz-Credential=AKIAYDKQORRYTKBSBE4S%2F20201015%2Fus-east-1%2Fs3%2Faws4_request&X-Amz-Signature=8b9fc1edfa5d99914533eab9373d21d1e18f9507b2a867e7b88ec515741ff2b2