Write an essay about the question above: are spin doctors always a negative presence in politics?
Critically assess the questions and provide empirical examples. Pull out key arguments and discuss within the context of the question. Answer the question with an argument, analysis, evidence and examples. The essay needs to be a maximum of 2,000 words and minimum 1,900.
Category: Harvard Referencing
Background:
The Construction 2025 Industrial Strategy has set a vision for the UK construction to be technologically advanced and efficient . A reduction of 50% in the time to complete projects and 33% in initial construction costs are targets set up by the government to ensure Britain has a competitive edge. These targets are to be achieved by the construction sector by taking advantage of new technology global trends. Machine learning (ML) is a technology already impacting the global economy and has the potential to transform the construction industry with the use of data-based solutions to improve the way projects are delivered by (1) better managing its workforce and (2) increasing construction productivity.
Question:
a) What can you draw from the academic and industry literature that offers ways of affecting change in construction with the use of ML on (2) of the above goals?
b) From this review, what would you recommend is done at the construction firm to improve (1) of the above goals? Consider the geographic focus and limits of your answer (your recommendations only apply to UK)
c) Provide reflective conclusions on the key learning you have obtained from answering this brief and identify no more than three recommendations for scholars to research and practitioners to consider implementing.
Requirement:
Reference: 30 reference required(I have uploaded 20). You should use Harvard referencing and base your reasoning on peer-reviewed literature in academic journals and books primarily based on such literature. Where you are required to use real world examples you may refer to trade literature and newspaper articles.
Analysis: Logical and appropriate analytical structure used to develop a coherent and to some degree original/independent argument. Argument grounded in observations of specific industry conditions. In addition, the paper shows ability to understand and solve problems, and work with and connect both theoretical and empirical content.
Conclusion: the last part of the essay will be for you to reflect on the major learning that has been achieved in the way.
Essay Tittle: Do international economic organisations (e.g. the IMF, the World Bank and/or the WTO) represent the interests of rich and poor countries equally? Provide examples to sustain your argument.
I want 0% plagiarism
I want 8 to 9 sources
Harvard Referencing
Writing an essay offers the opportunity to develop and apply your research skills and knowledge, using empirical and theoretical analysis related to IPE. You may select one of the essay titles below. The individual essay provides you with an opportunity to develop your research skills and apply your knowledge to important empirical and theoretical questions relating to current themes of IPE. You are expected to organise and analyse your research materials, present information and assess competing explanations from primary and secondary sources.
You must answer any 2 questions of the 4 questions provided by Marketing Management. Approximately 1000 – 1250 words per question. If needed, use in-text citation.
Question 1
Critically discuss the benefits that building brand equity brings to the customer and the company marketing the brand. Illustrate your answer with examples.
And/Or
Question 2
Explore the value of auditing of the variables in the marketing environment from the perspective of the Marketing Manager.
And/Or
Question 3
Marketers need to plan their marketing communications strategy effectively. Critically assess the different stages of communications planning that are essential to the delivery of an integrated marketing communications strategy.
And/Or
Question 4
Critically discuss how a firms marketing strategy is influenced by the process of segmenting, targeting and positioning.
You have the freedom of choice between two topics,
1.Is international politics founded on racial hierarchy?
2.How should the international economic order be reformed to deal with climate change?
You may choose whatever piques your interest more or whichever you think you’ll do a better job on. This is the rubric https://api.turnitinuk.com/rubric_view?lang=en_us&#assignment/12467542
The word count is 1000 words.
Please try to add 3-4% plagiarism
Tittle: What are the main foundations of the transatlantic relationship between the EU and the US?
I want 0% plagiarism on this essay
I want 8 Sources on this essay
This essay has to be Harvard refrencing
I have uploaded Lecture slides and some notes I took in class.
This analytical exercise is a short essay, limited in scope. It requires students to apply theoretical and conceptual approaches to specific issues or case studies of contemporary European governance. It is designed to promote a synoptic understanding of the different elements of the course, specifically the evaluation of theoretical positions in the context of the findings of empirical case studies.
It requires students to evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of specific theoretical and conceptual approaches to issues of European governance. Successful completion of this task requires a good theoretical and empirical grounding in the field of European governance and the ability to synthesise material from a wide range of sources in the development of an independent analytical argument.
Essays should be typed, paginated and double-spaced. They must include a bibliography of the sources used and be properly referenced. Essays that do not have a satisfactory bibliography or references will be penalised and essays with no bibliography or no attempt at referencing will be failed.
The following essay (attached separately as a pdf document) has been submitted by a colleague of mine last year, the essay is about Management Studies I assignment. Please read it carefully and discuss it in terms of strengths and weaknesses. Start by summarising the main points/arguments that the essay is making; decide if the essay answers the essay question mentioned at the top of the page; and critically discuss the main points in light of the proper literature. Please also refer to how the essay is written in general, its structure, its presentation (i.e. grammar), referencing, and academic conventions more broadly. Finally, provide suggestions for how the essay could be improved.
Please make sure you:
refer to the peer-reviewed literature (notably journal articles)
stick to the word count (2,000) excluding the referencing
check the marking criteria
reference your essay according to the Harvard referencing style
Your review should:
Discuss the main arguments of your selected article
Discuss the methodology that the author has used in her/his research and the advantages/disadvantages of this methodology
Demonstrate evidence of your own independent reading in order to examine the links between the discussion of your selected article and wider issues relating to social inequality, social inclusion/exclusion, poverty/deprivation
Assessment Criteria
Evaluation of the principal arguments in the article
Understanding of methodology and its appropriateness
Recognition of links between the arguments developed in the article and wider debates about poverty, deprivation, inequality, social inclusion, and exclusion
Development of well-structured and clearly expressed argument
Evidence of independent research and reading that draws on a range of appropriate sources
The article is provided and the essay questions to you need to answer all of the questions from the cw1 guidance document In the essay. The essay
JP Morgan Asset Management
You are a Hedge Fund Manager for JP Morgan Asset Management. You are in charge of a $3M fund pool. Your clients have instructed you to invest the fund in US assets predominantly in equities and foreign currencies with USD as the home currency. You decide to create a hedge fund portfolio of 8 assets consisting of 4 US equities and 4 foreign currencies with USD as the home currency. Use the Bloomberg terminal to select and gather data for these assets. The following conditions apply:
Your clients indicated that you are to invest the $3M in these assets. You do not have to use all 8 assets in the pool; however, your pool should consist of a combination of equity and f/x assets (and demonstrate your analysis in these 8 assets even if you do not use all of them at the end). You should aim to use most, if not, all of the $3M in the investment pool.
You should describe the risk attitude of your clients (loving, neutral or averse). In any case, your clients intend to maximise returns for any level of a given risk.
As a hedge fund manager, you are allowed to have a long and a short positions in these assets. For example, if you employ both a long and a short positions, then it is possible for your long position to go over $3M for as long as the total long and short positions is $3M.
Your clients also require you to provide rationale for the assets chosen in the investment. For instance, if you decide to invest in TSLA stock, the rationale behind this decision (e.g. transparency, liquidity, growth, returns, etc.). You can also add Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) such as income statement, balance sheet, financial ratios, segment data, credit rating, earnings estimate, relative performance, share price performance, etc.) to your analysis.
In terms of historical trade data, you should use and/or analyse minimum of 5 years worth of data at a monthly frequency. Please include COVID-19 periods in your data selection and analysis.
Required
JP Morgan Asset Management department has asked you to write a report outlining your recommendation as to which assets your clients should invest in. When compiling this report, your clients expect to see tables outlining the respective relevant information for each of these assets as well as appendices demonstrating all relevant calculations.
When preparing the report, you have been asked to address the following points:
Calculate the average return on the asset, the standard deviation of the assets returns as well as a risk-adjusted return measure for the asset.
When conducting your fundamentals analysis, that you use the top-down approach to justify your choice of markets and assets.
That you find and highlight the key findings of relevant research or literature (including newspapers articles, investor reports, etc.) on each of the asset classes and specific markets.
Structure of the Report
The report should be structured as follows:
1. COVER PAGE, which should contain:
a) A relevant title for the report.
b) The word count for the report (excluding the title page, executive summary, table of contents, tables and figures, appendices, and references).
2. TABLE OF CONTENTS, which should contain:
a) A full list of sections (including executive summary, references, bibliographic materials, and any appendices).
b) The page number of which each section begins.
3. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY, which should:
a) Highlight the key points and findings of the report.
b) Be in the third person and use the present tense, e.g. This report compares.
4. INTRODUCTION, which should:
a) Give a succinct explanation of the aims, scope and context of the report.
b) Include brief details and definitions for any information necessary for the reader to understand the report.
5. MAIN BODY, which should:
a) Provide the main critical analysis of the different markets and securities as well as any relevant research on the topic.
b) Provide relevant figures and compare this with the respective base lines.
6. CONCLUSION, which should
a) Briefly summarise the aims and key findings of the report.
b) Make a recommendation to JP Morgan Asset Management Team as to how the team should invest providing justifications for this recommendation.
7. REFERENCES & BIBLIOGRAPHY, which should:
a) The list of references lists the details of any material that have actually been cited in the report (full details of the source should be given using the Westminster Harvard referencing system).
b) The bibliography lists the details of any other sources that you may have referred to when preparing the report but not actually cited in the report itself (full details of the source should be given using the Westminster Harvard referencing system).
c) Details of the Westminster Harvard referencing system can be found at https://www.westminster.ac.uk/current-students/studies/study-skills-and-training/research-skills/referencing-your-work
8. APPENDIX, which should:
a) Provide calculations for the figures used in the report and highlight the respective formulae used.
b) Include any other material that you feel may be relevant but does not warrant being included in the report.
Question:
Critically discuss the role of predefined time boundaries in the organisation and management of projects
You are required to submit a fully referenced analytical paper of 3,000 words, with 20-30 appropriate references, such as New York Times, peer-reviewed journal articles, books and other scholarly works (no wiki or google)
The purpose of this term paper is to encourage you to read and assimilate theoretical and conceptual material that is most probably new to you. Your task is to present evidence of your findings (essentially a literature review – with references) through writing in an analytical style about that material.
In order to answer the question, you will need to identify a range of relevant published material. Your paper should present a discussion of the literature and identify what might be problematic (or beneficial) with pre-defined time boundaries in project organisations, analyse these issues by thinking critically about the different concepts involved and present conclusions on your findings. You are encouraged not to place excessive emphasis upon your own opinion. Your role involves the presentation of relevant information, its analysis and the formulation of a critique relevant to the question set.
