Based on the week 2 learning journal where you discussed the project planning and front-end issues of your setting, in Week 3 submission you are required to discuss the value issues related to the project(s) in your setting. In so doing please relate to your own experience, case study discussions, theory and conceptual contributions from the readings allocated as well as the industry and research contributions.

Here are some questions you can use to guide your thinking.

Describe one or more of value creation, delivery and capture issues that you want to address in your contribution (150 words)

Discuss the identified value issue differentiating between different members of the delivery team as well as other stakeholders that participate in the project. Also discuss the role of users and operators in the creation, delivery and capture of value.

What would be impact and implications of you addressing this problem in your setting. Please think of impact not only for you personally but more widely – the organisation, industry, society, economy. Also briefly touch upon what the project practitioners and organisational leadership strive to do to alleviate the front-end and planning problem you identified in your setting – based on your current learning (150 words).

Please pay particular attention on the integration of literature in your writing. To accomplish this, please indicate references and use citations as you will have learned in the academic writing courses – this is very important. As a rule of thumb, I’d expect around 5-10 in-text citations to relevant academic references in your Week 3 submissions.

As already discussed, while writing the weekly submission, you should ask yourselves: What does literature say about the nature of the problem and its implications. What can I do with these insights to address the problem and advance practice? Additionally, identify any tensions, dilemmas and controversies that remain. Reflective questions such as this will help you in your learning journey. The main goal is to show a focus on the analysis of the problem synthesising literature.

To help flow and continuity of your argument, you can include one or two introductory sentences as a short summary of conclusions from the previous assignment and as a starting point for the new assignment.

Will upload my first two journals so you know what to do.
Answer the questions. Keep the structure clean and similar. Add a graph/chart from online.
(Author, Year) please use in text citations.

https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/infrastructure-and-projects-authority

1/ Name of the company is (Transcend) their website is (transcend.io)
2/I need section 3 only (Stage 3, is the opportunity viable). I uploaded a sample please follow its structure identically if possible. Data can be drawn from the link https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/transcend
3/I uploaded the book for reference for the project.

Please note that the questions you are required to answer are:
How might one characterizer the architectural paint coatings industry and Janmar Coatings’ trade area?
How might one segment Janmar Coatings’ market area?
Which segment(s) represent opportunities for Janmar Coatings?
What is Janmar Coatings’ competitive position in its market area?
Which segment or segments should Janmar Coatings pursue?
What strategy should Janmar Coatings adopt to reach the segment(s) sought?

Pick one question only!

1.    Critically evaluate the role that trade liberalisation has played in Chinas economic growth in the last decades and whether it can be emulated by other developing countries today.

2.    How has the production and appropriation of economic value been transformed by the globalisation of production since the 1970s? Critically discuss with reference to the governance and organisational dynamics of a global value chain within a sector of your choice.

3.    How can an expanded conception of extractivism be employed to critically explore contemporary relationships between extractivism and development?

4.    In what ways can everyday consumption patterns [of a product/service of your choice] contribute to reinvigorating [or unsettling] dominant socio-economic relations?

5.    What stands in the way of meaningfully addressing the global climate crisis?

6.    Critically assess why and how substantial differences in contemporary capitalisms persist despite common economic pressures.
7.    What is financialisation and how has it impacted growth and income distribution in [advanced economies/developing countries/a country of your choice]?
8.    8.1 What caused the global economic and financial crisis that began in 2007-8? Have these causes been overcome?
OR
8.2 What are the main causes of the Euro crisis? Have these causes been overcome?
9.    Why has inequality risen in the past decades?
10.    What are the prospects of social movements changing the neoliberal trajectories of economic development?

Answer one question only
1.    Is outside lobbying inherently less successful than inside lobbying? Discuss with reference to at least two case studies.
2.    Access to EU institutions is biased in favour of business groups. Discuss.
3.    Business actors are more successful than NGOs in influencing EU policy- making. Do you agree?
4.    Why and under what conditions do interest groups lobby in coalition?
5.    How effective have EU actions and measures been in alleviating existing biases in the system of interest intermediation?
6.    How does salience affect lobbying in the EU?

I am an international hotel and events major.
This is a literature review.
1500 words or little bit more +10%. Include an abstract/executive summary, not included in text. Please make it very engaging with literature between text. Include a conclusion, intro as its a literature review. I would say I would like to have 15 references minimum.
*Please note before I select you as a writer you must let me know what topic you are going to write about as I have to forward the topic to my professor ASAP.
PLEASE see IMG_5839 to see what students who were in the same major chose last term such as mega events etc. I was thinking of doing importance of site planning in events or impact of mega events of tourism around the world. But I have no clue of one that would makes sense that can relate to my career as I need to later relate it to my personal report.

Im an international hotel and events major and need to write a literature review 1500 words that relates to my topic. Please see 10B51DD for what students topics were last term. Please note before I ASSiGn a writer I need to know what the topic is so please take a look and tell me. I also attached marking criteria and also, I have circled literature review the literature review must relate to my personal something that can help me in the events in the future. Only do the literature review 1500 words. I also attached marking criteria. I also had this professor before so I attached one essay he gave me an A on. Please reference Harvard format.

The research problem is Social media abuse that football players are susceptible to.

Assignment Task and word count: A Research Plan describing your problem/issue, with a plan for collecting and analysing social media data (no more than 1,500 words).

An Appendix of supporting evidence (screen shots, data samples etc.) showing that your research plan is feasible (all exhibits in the appendix must have a title and brief description of what the exhibit shows no upper- or lower-word limit). Submit ONE Word document containing both parts.

Also needs to follow the assignment brief.

Exercise 1:
for each of the assigned articles identify up to three key ideas and summarise them in three bullet points.
Discuss and compare your points
create one list of up to five bullet points summarising the key ideas across all five articles.

Exercise 2:
identify the following points across all five articles:
Key definitions, concepts and theories
Key findings and conclusions
Methods used to generate the findings
Identified gaps in knowledge
Write down the outcomes of your discussion

Exercise 3: Creating a mind map based on the reviewed articles
create a mind map summarising information drawn from all five articles.
A mind map is a diagram which represents information in a visual way. It has a central idea in the middle of it, and other related ideas spreading out from it.