1. Why is the identification of the real problem the first and most important step in the decision-making process? How does attribution theory explain mistakes that can be made as managers and employees work together to explain why the problem occurred?

Identification of the real problem is critical because it ensures that the group will be “treating the problem instead of the symptom.” Attribution theory suggests that individuals will tend to look to external causes to explain their own failure. This could bias the problem-solving process.

the discussion!  Below, I’ve listed a couple of questions to get the conversation started.  You have to respond all 5 questions. One page of each question. So a total of 5 pages.
please No plagiarism.

1) According the Vavreck, how do you win a general election? What do you think about this argument?

2) What is the doctrine of responsible parties?  What did the 1950 APSA Commission recommend, and why?  Given the benefit of hindsight, what do you think about this?

3) What are the causes of congressional polarization?  Is this a problem?

4) What does prior say about the effect of the media?  What sort of divide does Prior see emerging?  What do you think about his argument?

5) Is the American party system in good shape or bad shape?  What might we do to make parties work better?

Compare the demographics of two countries using the information available at www.Census.gov, using the worksheet provided within the module.

Go to www.census.gov, in the search bar enter International Data Base. In the middle of the screen, choose the country you are interested in and then choose 2010 for the year. If the data for the country says NA, you will need to choose a different country.

Assignment:  Choose two different countries that are located on two different continents. Complete the questions in the assignment. Assume all questions are for the year 2010.

Directions:

Go to the Freakonomics website:
https://freakonomics.com/archive/ (Links to an external site.)
Find an episode of interest.
Make sure that the topic you choose is related to Macroeconomics.  Most of the episodes are micro rather than macro, but there are still many to choose from such as;
Does anyone really know what Socialism is? (#408)
America’s hidden duopoly (the Democrats and Republicans) (#356)
Is economic growth the wrong goal? (#429)
The simple economics of saving the Amazon rainforest (#428)
Remembrance of economic crises past (#425)
How to prevent another Great Depression (#421)
so many more.  If you’re not sure if one is suitable for macro, send me the title and description to request approval
Listen (this is an audio podcast)
Write your analysis. Include the following in your paper:
Episode Title, with link
Why did you choose this topic?
What was this episode about (brief overview)?
What was something of significance from the episode?
What concepts from this class (micro or macro) relate to the episode? Explain with examples from the episode.
Write a 2-page typewritten double-spaced paper (about 1,000 words) describing how the episode topic relates to the subject of Macroeconomics.
Optional
Find another source (article, podcast, website) about this same topic
Include the title, source, and link
How does this source compare with what was said about the topic in Freakonomics? Are there any areas of agreement or disagreement?
Grading: see syllabus for details about format, points, due dates, etc.

Please read the attachment files, for the textbook file, please read from “6 The Absurd” onwards. Then answer the following questions.

Camus reading

1. What does Camus say is the one truly serious philosophical problem?

2. What does Camus say is the subject of this essay?

3. What is Camuss view of Ancient Greek philosophers like Aristotle and Socrates? Why

do you think he holds these views?

4. Camus describes recognizing absurdity as a harrowing experience associated with

passion and intense feeling, as opposed to what? Do you think this is accurate?

Textbook reading

5. What is the most well-known existentialism claim regarding the absurd?

6. What does an existentialist mean by absurd? How do you generally use the term, and

do you find any differences between the existentialist definition and your everyday use of

the term?

7. What is a teleological view? Give an example. Do existentialists accept this view as the

right one?

8. What is the Enlightenment? How does it contribute to the rise of the existential view of

absurdity?

9. How does Sisyphus solve his endless problem?

10. Which of the absurd thinkers mentioned in the last section most interest(s) you, and

why?

1.Keep a diary of your listening behaviors for a period of at least 4 waking hours. Indicate what you were doing during that time frame & the listening behaviors you engaged in.
2.You will submit a 2-page report. The first page will be the notes from your listening diary (described in point 1 above).  The second page will be your responses to the following questions:

1.Identify your listening types during that time period (e.g., appreciative, evaluative).
2.Which types of listening did you use most often and least often? Why do you think thats the case?
3.Identify your general listening style (e.g., action-oriented, content-oriented). Why do you think this is your general style?
4.How would you evaluate your use of listening styles/types during this time frame? What might you change in the future to be a better listener?

I have been admitted to Chapman University in the spring term. Now I have to submit an essay for the waitlist to fall term. I have put all my essays that I have already submitted to Chapman University for the admission down below. I also put the direction from the university down below. Please read all my essay and do some research on Chapman before you start writing the essay.

The paper should address one artist book. Your papers should include 1. an introduction to the book you are writing about (information about the artist and/or press, title of work, when and where this book was produced, etc.). 2. describe what the book is communicating (what is narrative or concept? Is this being communicated via text, images or form?) 3. thoroughly describe the physical book (details about binding, dimensions, media, color, material choices, number of pages, front versus back, etc.). 4. your thoughts on why the artists made all of those choices. 5. a strong conclusion

Artist name: Radha Pandey’s
Book: Taxonomy of Shapes
website about the book: https://wsworkshop.org/2015/04/taxonomy-of-shapes/
her website: https://www.radhapandey.com/about
other website: https://miscellanynews.org/2016/04/06/arts/radha-pandey-to-trace-history-of-papermaking-in-lecture/

-All examples should be fashion brands or company.
-Please follow the requirements and the teachers feedback to make changes for Assignment 1.
-Use the form plate in “requirements” to write assignment 2-quantity research, just fill in the lines and blanks.
-Interview Questions should be separate into 4 sections, each section 2-3 questions , ask for interviewee’s experiences, attractions. For example “Have you ever participate learning opportunity, if yes, what factor attracts you to? “