Theorist Presentation about Jerzy Grotowski.

    REQUIRED ELEMENTS
Foundational Focus:
Purpose: artistic and socio-political (if applicable);
Cultural influence and/or historic background; and
Language and terminology necessary to understand the techniques or methodologies.
Examples:
Audio and visual images to support work i.e. influences; and 
Examples of works:  plays, video excerpts, audio excerpts.
Technique:
Skills required of the actor. Be specific and distinguish from other acting techniques or methodologies;
What training is necessary to create performance work as defined by the theorist you have researched? Be specific and distinguish from other techniques or methodologies;
What process is defined or emphasized in rehearsals and how would an actor prepare for this?
Exercises:
present a minimal of  two exercises that would be of benefit to actors developing a familiarity with the techniques and/or methodologies that you are presenting
exercises must be clearly and carefully set up in they are to be successful

Create a short narrated PowerPoint for presentation to a specific employer, government agency, or civic organization that includes the following:

6 slides total (one title slide at the beginning, one reference slide at the end, and 4 content slides)
Use any PowerPoint theme or template of your choosing; however, it should be appropriate for your audience (i.e. employer, government agency, or civic organization)
Your 4 content slides should include 1 slide as the introduction to your issue and its relevance to your audience; 2 slides presenting strong evidence/data from both perspectives as to why your audience needs to take action on your issue; 1 slide that identifies a recommended plan of action to take.
Do not simply read your paper! Your narration script should summarize the relevant details and present your position in an engaging way appropriate to the medium.

Be prepared to report your findings and evidence to the rest of the class in a 4-5 minute presentation.  I will modify the grading according to the video, if it is a video of you or a power point voice over. 
*(please make a power point with a script not on the presentation)
* Attached it a Term paper i have written please use information off the term paper

Visual aids are required.

Grading: Content: 50%; Presentation: 30%; Grammar: 10%; Sources: 10%.

You will be graded on the following standards:

Presentation Grading Rubric

CONTENT:  (25 points) Explanation of Ideas & Information

(0-10 points) Does not present information, ideas or design clearly, concisely or logically. Too much information or too little, or does not bring in specifications for project.

(11-19 points) Presents information, findings and is mostly clear. May be hard to follow part of the time. Develops ideas, and supports. Presented well.

(20-25 points) Information, findings, arguments, are supported, logically, and uses clear language that can be clearly followed. Presentation is easy to follow and slides are above average. Excellent level of detail and unique information.

CONTENT:  (25 points) Organization

(0-10 points) Does not meet requirements that all speak equally. Does not have clear introduction, conclusion, and does not stay on time. Poor transitions, if at all.

(11-19 points) Meets requirements, has good transitions, a solid introduction and conclusion, kept within time limit, and supporting information is clear.

(20-25 points) Superb information flow, slides and speaker are linked, clear introduction and conclusion for all points, is interesting and includes an aviation quote.

PRESENTATION:  (15 points) Eyes, Body, Appearance

(0-5 points) Seldom looks at audience, mostly read notes / slides, few gestures, slouches, fidgets, not dressed appropriately.

(6-9 points) Good eye contact, some reading of notes/slides, some gestures/movements, good posture, and normal college clothes.

(10-15 points) Excellent eye contact, only references notes/slides, natural gestures/movement, poised and confident, excellently dressed!

PRESENTATION:  (15 points) Voice

(0-5 points) Mumbles, too soft/loud, lots of filler words (um, er, and ah so, etc.). Does not adapt speech for room and audience.

(6-9 points) Speaks clearly, proper timing / tempo, and has few filler words. Adapts for audience and room.

(10-15 points) Fantastic eloquence, rarely seen in college students. Few (if any) filler words, great use of inflection, volume and pitch of voice. Adapts and answers questions powerfully.

GRAMMAR:  (10 points) Slides

(0-3 points) Too many lines of text, improper use of punctuation/bullets, typos, no pictures/graphs.

(4-7 points) Good balance on slides, has title slide and flows well.

(8-10 points) Fantastic slides!  No grammar errors, good transitions, balance of text and objects.

SOURCES:  (10 points) Slides

0-3 points) Does not have any sources, not listed in presentation, not referenced.

(4-7 points) Uses some data, has at least 2 sources and used a reference.

(8-10 points) 3 or more sources, good balance of data and personal analysis, information well presented on slides, easily readable sources in proper APA format.