Day: March 4, 2018

Case Study

For this assignment you will write a formal legal brief on a cybersecurity case, United States v. Nosal.   The case brief has to follow the IRAC method (please go to the following web site for help with IRAC Format http://www.lawnerds.com/guide/irac.html), made up of  the following.      FACTS (including who were the petitioner(s) and respondent(s); who delivered the opinion of the Court; and  a brief background of the case):  ISSUE: (The problem of law)  RULE: (The court's resolution of the problem of law)  ANALYSIS:  CONCLUSION:      Your brief should be double spaced and not exceed 4 pages in length. For the most part the content of the brief should be in your own words. You should paraphrase and simplify the words of the court in the full court opinion to concise wording in your brief. At times, you may want to use the exact wording from the court opinion. In these circumstances, please be sure to use quotation marks and proper Blue Book citation.

The effectiveness of pain management interventions in improving health outcomes and quality of life among adults with Sickle cell disease

Chapter 1: Introduction (why sickle cell disease is important as a health problem globally, backed up with statistics 
Contextual background for the study; a critical a review of existing the literature, evidencing contemporary knowledge base and current debates ; Studys rationale to conduct the re SLR; leading to establishing the Research Question/Aim and Objectives which is to explore the effectiveness of pain management interventions in improving health outcomes among adults with sickle cell disease, Concluding with the relevancy of the review.
Critical exploration and evaluation of key literature 
Identification of key themes within the current knowledge base 
Identification of gaps in knowledge current 
Justification for study 
Short Conclusion

Operational Risk Management System in an Enterprise Risk Framework

Assume that you are the Operational Risk Manager of a large financial institution where you report to the Chief Risk Officer (CRO). The CRO is responsible to manage the enterprise risk at the corporate level that includes all significant risks of the firm including but not limited to financial (i.e., market, credit, interest rate); strategic; operational and reputational risks. In the past, the firm measured operational risk using Value at Risk (VaR) technique that is frequently used to quantify market and credit risk. However, the CRO is not comfortable with the use of VaR in quantifying operational risk of the firm. 
She argues that operational risk is fundamentally different from financial risk and that managerial judgments in business decision making relevant to operational risk cannot be replaced by quantitative risk models. In her understanding a significant part of operational risk management involves the management of people, process and system, where individual biases and associated subjectivity play dominant role. She comments that “the current industry practice of managing operational risk takes the objective view of a subjective problem”. With this understanding she is determined to change the culture of the organisation in conceptualising and managing operational risk associated with the business. 
For the purpose of this coursework you are required to do the following;
1. Use the hypothetical operational loss data on GCULearn to demonstrate how operational risk capital is quantified in practice and calculate the following:
A. The bank’s Value at Risk (VaR)
B. The bank’s Expected Loss (EL) and
C. The capital charge. 
2. Assume that the operational loss series follows a Poisson distribution and the loss severity series follows a lognormal distribution.
3. Write a report to explain your views on the quantification and management of operational risk that could help the CRO in managing operational risk under the wider focus of Enterprise Risk Management (ERM). 
Your report must in addition to other factors address the following;
➢ A critical analysis of the characteristics of operational risk with other types of risk in a typical financial institution,
➢ A discussion of the strengths and weakness of the output of your quantification exercise that contributes in the decision making of the business in relation to operational risk,
➢ The importance of creating a risk culture that reflects the behaviour of a financial institution toward risk-taking in Operational Risk Management (ORM), and
➢ Role of Operational Risk Management (ORM) in an Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) Framework, amongst others.

An important element of this course work is the ability to critically appraise the literature and theory gained from variety of sources, developing own ideas in the process. You should conduct extensive literature search to gain a comprehensive and detailed knowledge of key issues in operational risk management.
This coursework should be written in a report format. A well written report will demonstrate your ability to:
• Understand the aim(s) and objective(s) of the report and adhere to its specifications;
• Gather, evaluate and analyse relevant information;
• Structure material in a coherent and logical manner;
• Make correct conclusions that are supported by the evidence and analyses of the report;
• Make practical recommendations where necessary.
The report should have the following features:
Title page
Terms of reference
Summary (Abstract)
Table of contents
Introduction
Methods
Results (include the results from the OpRisk quantification exercise with any necessary diagrams, graphs or tables that support your results).
Discussion
Conclusion
References 

Project Data extraction

Use the format and look at data extraction, Use the reference from inclusion and exclusion document to help you complete this format. You may use the introduction to help you. Can you do 2 table's landscape, for minocycline and magnesium sulfate? To make it easier and organized

ADINSTRUMENTS ECG LAB REPORT

The title is very important. it should be several phrases(not sentences).It should include all variables studied Temp, pressure, substances).
Introducton define revelant terms to the experiment in the introduction. Do not use bullets or glossary format. Define the words as you use them in the paragraphs about the experiment. State the hypothesis in the introduction. a good hypothesis is testable. specific to the experiment conducted, should explain what you expect will happen to one variable when second variable is altered. 
Materials and methods, using lab tutor and ADInstruments(dont forget to cite) brifley explain what eqipment was used and the steps that you did.
results, this section include the graphs generated. yuo also write the other observations made that are not represented in the printouts. make a data table to summrize data all in one data.Remember to clearly label tables and graphs.
Discussion, where to analayze data. do the support or reject the hypothesis you stated in the introduction. this section shold discuss all problem. 
refrences list minimum 3 refrences, use cse format

Essay Topic: CONFEDERATION AND THE NATIONAL POLICY
These 8 articles (attached) provide political background to Confederation and the immediate economic policies – National Policy – following Confederation to enable you to examine the economic causes of Confederation. 
.
.
1)Donald Creighton, "The Economic Objectives at Confederation". 1937.
2)Glazebrook, G. de T. “Confederation and Transportation”, Revista de Historia de América, no. 65/66 (Jan. – Dec., 1968), pp. 41-51.
3)Donald V. Smiley, “Canada and the Quest for a National Policy”, Canadian Journal of Political Science, vol. 8, no. 1 (March, 1975), pp. 40-62.
4)Andrew Smith, “Toryism. Classical Liberalism, and Capitalism: The Politics of Taxation and the Struggle for Canadian Confederation”, Canadian Historical Review, 89, 1 (March, 2008), pp. 1-25.
5)Fowke, Vernon. “The National Policy – Old and New”, Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science. Vol. 18, no. 3 (Aug. 1952), pp. 271-286 but read only 271-278
6)Smith, Peter J. “The Ideological Origins of Canadian Confederation”, Canadian Journal of Political Science, vol. 20, no. 1 (March, 1987), pp. 3-29
7)Martin, Ged. “Launching Confederation: Means to Ends, 1836-1864”, The Historical Journal, vol. 27, no. 3 (Sept., 1984), pp. 575-602 
8)Vipond, Robert C. “1787 and 1867: The Federal Principal and Canadian Confederation Reconsidered”, Canadian Journal of Political Science, vol. 22, no. 1 (March, 1989), pp. 3-25.
.
.

The Science Behind Food Preservation and Leveraging Natural Abundance

The proposal was written perfectly but for the final paper, please include how the method changes some of the physical characteristics of the food. Final Paper will be a 7 page paper with properly cited references on The Science Behind Food Preservation and Leveraging Natural Abundance.

Tesla – Product/Service and Quality Management

Prepare a 1000-word minimum paper, no abstract (excluding title page and references), that addresses the following:

1. Explain quality management and the concept of total quality management.
2. Given your research, identify the types of quality management systems or approaches you observed by the selected type of firm or organization and/or within the selected industry. Define each. Does the research suggest a preference for any one or two quality management systems or approaches?
3. Describe several different types of product or service development processes you observed by the selected type of firm or organization and/or within the selected industry revealed by your research. Critique each of them.
4. Develop a substantiated opinion on the following: Does quality management have a role to play in the product or service development process?

Tesla – Human Resources

UNIT 4
Prepare a 1000-word minimum paper (excluding title page and references), that explains the 

1. Explain the major issues in job design you observed for the selected type of firm or organization and/or within the selected industry.
2. Appraise the major ergonomic and work environment issues you observed for the selected type of firm or organization and/or within the selected industry.

Intergovernmental Management

Transportation/Energy Health Care Reform
Medicare/Medicaid Homeland Defense/Disaster Response
Housing Welfare Reform
Education Immigration
Environment Internet Commerce
This is an analytical paper; it is not intended to be a polemic. While many of the suggested topics are controversial, your focus is not to persuade the reader on the issue per se; but rather, to analyze how intergovernmental relations/management impacted the development, passage, or implementation of a particular policy.
Consider how the process influenced the outcome whether for success or failure. You should present a balanced view of the issue, for example explaining unemotionally why the federal government chose preemption in a particular case and why one or more states found it objectionable. Based upon your analysis, you may then conclude that a particular approach was or was not appropriate. Or, in the case of an issue that is still under consideration, you can describe which approaches you deem most appropriate. You need to draw at least 20 references from scholarly articles/academic journals to support your approach. In addition to academic journals, you may wish to look at legislation (available through the Government Printing Office at https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/? ) and the Congressional Record (available at https://www.congress.gov/quick-search/legislation?n=Record ). Supreme Court cases are available at http://www.supremecourt.gov/ and https://supreme.justia.com/.