Unit 3 Questions

 
1. Differentiate between the consensus, ratio, and apportion methods? Provide an example for when each method is used.

 

2. Identify the steps of the risk management process. Discuss each in detail.

 3.Why is service area competitor analysis so important for effective health care planning? Provide some specific examples to support your answer. 

 

4. What are the benefits of strategic group analysis and strategic mapping as components of the health care strategic planning process? 

 

 5.  Many Americans are now traveling outside of the U. S. for elective medical procedures. What does this mean in terms of service area competitor analysis? What would you do as a hospital CEO or senior manager to keep your own patients at home and receiving services at your own facility rather than traveling abroad for care? 

 

Quality Improvement Presentation Poster

The second is to identify a new issue related to a biopsychosocial (BPS) clinical issue, or a clinical issue related to one of the items from the list of conditions, diseases, and disorders presented in the Resources section for the Concept Map assessment. The focus should be on a community rather than on a specific patient or health care setting. 
Create an abstract and a poster for a presentation to executive-level leadership of the organization, to the community, or to your colleagues that will sell them on your quality improvement plan.

Abstract Requirements 
Your abstract should be 100–250 words. 
It should summarize the key information in your poster. 
Do not put your abstract on your poster itself; submit it as a separate document. Or, if you are using PowerPoint to help create your poster, create a new slide that is clearly labeled as your abstract. 
Poster Requirements 
Your poster should include the following sections: 
Quality Improvement Methods. 
Evidence Supporting QI Methods. 
Change Strategy Foundation. 
Interprofessional Team Benefits. 
Overall Project Benefits. 
Propose quality improvement methods to promote continuous improvement related to a specific biopsychosocial consideration. 
Evaluate specific evidence that supports the quality improvement methods proposed. 
Explain how the project is grounded in successful change strategies. 
Analyze the way in which interprofessional teamwork will improve the effectiveness or efficiency of the quality improvement project. 
Communicate quality improvement considerations to relevant stakeholders in a way that is clear, concise, and compelling for the audience. 
Integrate relevant sources to support assertions, correctly formatting citations and references using current APA style. 
Additional Requirements 
Length of submission: 
Abstract: 100–250 words. Your abstract should be succinct and precise.

discussion 4

Kantian ethics (KE) and Deontology (D): Is it possible that the utilitarians are wrong in considering pleasure and consequences as primary in moral judgments? What is Kant's alternative, and how does his Catagorical Imperative (CI) work in practice? Consider whether the two formulations of the CI are equivalent, looking at particular examples. What are the strengths and weaknesses of this theory, and how does it compare, in your final analysis, to Utilitarianism, or to the other theories covered in the course?

Abortion: Critically evaluate the following argument. How would the authors from our reading view this argument? Refer to specific passages in the texts.

Columbine

Columbine had an impact on all of us. What impact did it have on you? (I was too young to have followed Columbine closely but a decade after the shooting I was learning and hearing about it in school, back when I first learned about I remembered it as the biggest school shooting the US had experienced) What did you think were the reasons behind the mass murder? (Mental Illness and bullying were my initial thoughts) After you answer these questions, read the following article.

10 years later, the real story behind Columbine
http://www.cnn.com/2009/CRIME/04/20/columbine.myths/

Did the news reporting during Columbine influence your opinion on school shootings? (Yes , since I originally thought bullying had been a major influence and it wasnt the case) Are you surprised about the findings in the article? (No because the media always uses the story that they think will be most captivating, so I'm not surprised the true reasons behind the shooting didn't come to light back then) Given your readings from your textbook and after reading this article, what do you think would be the best course of action in handling school violence?

BAM 313 Introduction to Financial Management Unit 3

BAM 313 Into to Financial Management Unit 3 (page 141)
Any references must be made from the following book:
BAM313 Foundations of Finance 8th Edition Arthur J. Keown, John D. Martin, J. William Petty Prentice Hall 2014 9780132994873
Writer Choice – Please answer ONE of the following:
1. Why is the search for new profitable projects so important? 
2. J.B. Corporation is considering the purchase of equipment that has an invoice price of $450,000. The equipment was recommended by a consulting firm that did an analysis for 
J.B. Corporation. J.B. paid the consulting firm $12,000 for its report. The cost of shipping and
installation is $50,000. The equipment will be depreciated on a straight-line basis over its
useful life of 10 years, assuming no salvage value. The equipment will replace existing assets
that have a current book value of $100,000 and which could be sold for $150,000. Additional
net working capital of $15,000 will be required to maintain the equipment and to support
higher sales. J.B.’s marginal tax rate is 40%. Calculate the initial outlay required to fund this
project.
3. Toto and Associates’ preferred stock is selling for $27.50 a share. The firm nets $25.60 after
issuance costs. The stock pays an annual dividend of $3.00 per share. What is the cost of 
existing, and new, preferred stock respectively?

Excluding Probation?

In this country, there are certain situations where someone convicted of murder or rape will be sentencing to probation as opposed to prison. Do you think that murderers and sexual offenders should be sentenced to probation? Why or why not? What factors contribute to courts relying on probation for these types of offenders? Are there any other offenses for which you would exclude probation as a sentencing option? Explain your answer.

Examine the arguments for the reform of the house of lords

Demonstrate wide reading and a clear grasp of the question. All major points covered. Provides a brief background history on the House of Lords – include and discuss critique of the HOLs i.e. undemocratic due to it being unelected, lack of representation for large parts of UK, discussion on how reform would give the HOLs a full mandate to initiate and amend legislation. Candidates should also include arguments against the HOLs reform, i.e. how it might cause more problems. How the House of Commons would no longer be supreme – the HOLs would become more career based politicians rather than have experts from different fields. Legislation would be harder to pass and therefore would not be able to carry out their manifesto promises as easily because it would become more party based as is with the US model. Offer a brief discussion about the 3 Rs. Candidate offers critical evaluation and independent discussion of all major points with respect to facts, principles, theories and interpretations. Show originality and ability to identify connections between all major points. Present argument in a strong confident writing style; excellent organisation and presentation.

Murder of the black youth in the inner-city/ analytical argumentative paper

This is a 1,200-1,500 word analytical argumentative paper on a contemporary moral issue that you isolate and develop. You will have the topic approved in week 4. You will choose a moral issue, consider and charitably state opposing views on this issue and offer a clear argument in support of one of those views. The paper will apply moral theories and arguments using logical analysis, in order to demonstrate your understanding of complex real-world issues with moral implications. See the grading rubric for more details.

Structural requirements for this paper are the same as for Paper 1 (see Outline here). This paper is just supposed to be more developed and to offer a more extended philosophical analysis than Paper 1. 

This assignment is due by the end of the eighth week of class on Sunday by 11:30 PM ET. 

The grading rubric for this final project paper is holistic:

A papers: (90-100) Are strong in grammar, organization, clarity and argumentation, have a clear thesis and an argument or analysis supporting that thesis and are clearly linked to the eResources with some use of at least three citations and short quotations. The paper must be between 1,200 and 1,500 words in length. The paper must contain at least one full paragraph of fair arguments by people with the opposing view. Then in another paragraph, you must specifically address the issues brought up by opponents and refute them.

B papers: (80-89) Lack some of the qualities of A papers but are still reasonably strong.

C papers: (70-79) Lack a good number of the qualities of A papers, and are solid but not strong.

D papers: (60-69) Lack enough of the qualities of this paper that they are below acceptable college standards.

F papers: (0-59) Miss the boat entirely or violate plagiarism rules.