Tesla – Product/Service and Quality Management

Prepare a 1000-word minimum paper, no abstract (excluding title page and references), that addresses the following:

1. Explain quality management and the concept of total quality management.
2. Given your research, identify the types of quality management systems or approaches you observed by the selected type of firm or organization and/or within the selected industry. Define each. Does the research suggest a preference for any one or two quality management systems or approaches?
3. Describe several different types of product or service development processes you observed by the selected type of firm or organization and/or within the selected industry revealed by your research. Critique each of them.
4. Develop a substantiated opinion on the following: Does quality management have a role to play in the product or service development process?

Tesla – Human Resources

UNIT 4
Prepare a 1000-word minimum paper (excluding title page and references), that explains the 

1. Explain the major issues in job design you observed for the selected type of firm or organization and/or within the selected industry.
2. Appraise the major ergonomic and work environment issues you observed for the selected type of firm or organization and/or within the selected industry.

Intergovernmental Management

Transportation/Energy Health Care Reform
Medicare/Medicaid Homeland Defense/Disaster Response
Housing Welfare Reform
Education Immigration
Environment Internet Commerce
This is an analytical paper; it is not intended to be a polemic. While many of the suggested topics are controversial, your focus is not to persuade the reader on the issue per se; but rather, to analyze how intergovernmental relations/management impacted the development, passage, or implementation of a particular policy.
Consider how the process influenced the outcome whether for success or failure. You should present a balanced view of the issue, for example explaining unemotionally why the federal government chose preemption in a particular case and why one or more states found it objectionable. Based upon your analysis, you may then conclude that a particular approach was or was not appropriate. Or, in the case of an issue that is still under consideration, you can describe which approaches you deem most appropriate. You need to draw at least 20 references from scholarly articles/academic journals to support your approach. In addition to academic journals, you may wish to look at legislation (available through the Government Printing Office at https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/? ) and the Congressional Record (available at https://www.congress.gov/quick-search/legislation?n=Record ). Supreme Court cases are available at http://www.supremecourt.gov/ and https://supreme.justia.com/.

Political science

1. Pick two (2) issues that your legislator ( Kevin Kiley) is working on that interests you. In your own words, summarize each issue and what your representative is doing about the issue. Do you agree with his work (for each issue selected) on your behalf? Why? 
2. Pick two (2) issues that your legislator (Ted Gaines) is working on that interests you. In your own words, summarize each issue and what your legislator is doing about the issues. 6) Do you agree with his work (for each issue selected) on your behalf? Why? ( http://district1.cssrc.us )
3. Pick two (2) issues your Representative (Tom McClintock) is working on that interests you. In your own words, summarize each issue and what your representative is doing about the issues. 6) Do you agree with his work (for each selected issue) on your behalf? Why? (https://mcclintock.house.gov)

"The Meal: Fast Food" 

Choice 8: Write a brief summary of chapter seven, "The Meal: Fast Food" (109-). What does Pollan find out in his investigation and participation in the fast food meal?

read the detail and the article page85–133

no reference . last week you already read the page1–84

 Leadership Styles

The assessment will be comprised of an essay or report within which students are required to select two leaders whom they have studied, and compare and critically appraise both leadership styles and organizational impact as well as aspects of Culture and Ethics. This will test student’s rational reasoning, knowledge and analytical skill as well as clarity of concepts and other course learning outcomes. It will assess the students’ ability of notional learning through face-to-face class room interaction with faculty, guided and independent studies.