Write a three to four (3-4) page paper that answers the following three (3) items using headers to separate each item:

  1. Discuss either two (2) civil liberties or two (2) civil rights events. One event must be from within the last two years, and the other may be from the past. Select events that have influenced a sense of social responsibility in the American government today. Provide examples to support your answer. In your response, consider how the events influenced the way state, local, or national political leaders or agencies responded in a socially responsible or ethical manner toward the community. Please cite your sources in APA style.
  2. Discuss two (2) media events (past or present) that have positively and/or negatively influenced the public’s opinion of a government agency. One event must be within the last two years, and the other may be from the past. Provide examples to support your answer. Consider how a news story or media coverage of an event positively or negatively changed the public’s opinion (or perception) regarding how responsible a government agency should be towards meeting the needs of its customers (i.e., the American people). Please cite your sources in APA style.
  3. Discuss two (2) differences between the Republican and Democratic parties that may have an ethical impact (positively or negatively) on the American people. Provide examples from the past 2 years to support your answer. Consider the different ideologies, values, morals, and/or goals held by the Republican and Democratic parties, and their different views on the ethically or morally right way to govern and make the best policies for the people they serve. Determine if your example presents any type of ethical concerns for or against the public best interest of the American people. Please cite your sources in APA style.

• Every module will have a graded discussion board activity with a specific start and end date. Please check the “Course Schedule” for more details.

• Participating is measured by posting on 1 different days

• You must give your opinion to the assigned question in the discussion board at least a paragraph long (100+ words) with reference if applicable.

• You must make a minimum of 2 postings in total: one new thread and one thoughtful response to different members

• Postings that are in response to other students’ posting are expected to be substantial and meaningful. As an example, an unacceptable posting would be stating your agreement with the previous post

• Do not wait till the last minute to start discussion, you will cause difficulties to your classmates.

• For the “Discussion Board Etiquette”, please check the “Essential Information and Documentation” section in your GeorgiaView course.

• SELF-CHECK: Assess your posts before posting by using the Grading Criteria for the discussion below. The minimum expectation is 3 point out of 5

• Cut off Date: if the discussion assignments are not posted by the END date, point will be lost.

Describe drug court.  How is drug court different from a regular criminal court?  What are some of the advantages for a person to be enrolled in drug court?  Does drug court have any disadvantages?  Why or why not?  Explain your answer.

Steve is renting a property from Billy.  One evening Steve tripped and fell down the stairs. The issue is that one of the stairs in the common area was faulty. Billy knew about the stair, but he had never got around to fixing it.

Steve injured his leg, so he decided to return to his room. The heater was not working (and it was in the middle of winter). Steve had told Billy about the faulty heater for months, but Billy never got around to fixing it. There is a local ordinance that requires landlords to repair heaters.  Additionally, assume that this jurisdiction includes the implied warranty of habitability. The jurisdiction recognizes constructive eviction, and it follows the majority rule of when landlords are liable for injuries.

  • What causes of action does Steve have?
  • What remedies does he have for the faulty heater?

1, (150 words minimum): What are the differences between a computer hacker and a voyeur? Which is most dangerous? Explain why.

2.  (150 words minimum): Why is it difficult to collect relevant digital evidence?

Explain.

3, (150 words minimum): Why is cybervictimization increasing? Name at least two things people may do to limit their chances of becoming a victim

George Jotson, sole shareholder and chief executive officer of Orbital Sprockets Incorporated, wanted to develop a qualified pension and profit sharing plan for his 1,250 employees. Of the 1,250 employees, only 30 employees earned over $100,000 in 2016. Jotson was concerned with high turnover in the manufacturing plants and so he wanted to restrict plan participation. Orbital’s qualified pension plan has the following requirements:

·Minimum plan entry age of 35.

·Minimum plan waiting period of two years.

·Plan vesting should be immediate

·Plan participation should be limited to employees who earn over $100,000.

Rosa Singleton, age 28, has been an employee of Orbital for the last 6 years. She earns $50,000 a year but wants to participate in the pension plan. When she is told she does not qualify, she sues Orbital.

Part 1: Discuss the issues and determine how a court is likely to rule.

Part 2: What advice would you give Mr. Jotson? Please write a letter outlining your proposal.

Please cite appropriate authority for all statements of law.

Locate two recent legal decisions that are of interest to you in a newspaper (paper or online news source). One legal decision should be local (i.e. in the state of Indiana) and the other should be a national legal decision. Please be sure to locate an article that is at least( 4 paragraphs in length) and has enough substance so that you can summarize the article, and develop your opinion

Be sure to print off or scan each article and include it as part of your assignment.

For each article, be sure to do the following:

1. Read the article to ensure that you understand what the legal decision was regarding.

2. Write a paragraph summarizing the article. Be sure you have factual information included in your summary. Make sure you state where you found the article (i.e. name of newspaper or online news source).

3. Write a paragraph stating your opinion about the legal decision. Be sure to address the following questions:

  • What did you think about the article?
  • Based on the article, and the facts provided to you, do you agree with the decision? Why or why not?
  • Did you learn something new about the law? If so, what did you learn?
  • Are you more informed about what is going on in your area, the nation and/or the world?

What kind of reasonable accommodation for religious practices could management offer to an employee in a situation where reassignment to a less visible work setting is impossible—for example, when the employee is an NBA player? If possible, find an article online or case in LexisNexis that involves a similar situation.

2.  What is the labor exemption to antitrust? What is its relevance to professional sports labor relations?

500 word

discuss some of the legislative actions that have impacted upon law enforcement concerning recruiting and/or hiring.  In addition, discuss the type of training environment you feel is best for real learning, as you compare and contrast the training method ideologies associated with how the Federal Bureau of Investigations trains agents versus the quasi-militarism (also called para-militarism) characteristic methodology typically used in the typical police academy.