Prior to beginning work on this assignment, it is recommended that you read Chapter 1 in Turning Points in Dynamic Psychotherapy: Initial Assessment, Boundaries, Money, Disruptions and Suicidal Crises and Chapters 1, 2, and 4 in The Psychiatric Interview: Evaluation and Diagnosis.

Respond to at least one of your colleagues in the discussion forum before creating your assignment submission.

For this assignment, you will take on the role of a mental health professional providing a consultation to a colleague. Your colleague in this case happens to be a licensed clinical psychologist. Carefully review the PSY645 Fictional Mental Health Consultation Scenario (Links to an external site.) which provides information on your colleague’s patient and specific questions your colleague has posed to you as a consultant. Once you have reviewed the scenario, research a minimum of two peer-reviewed articles in the Ashford University Library related to the situation(s) presented in the scenario and how these have been approached and treated in previous cases.

Write an evaluation of the patient’s symptoms and presenting problems within the context of one theoretical orientation (e.g., psychoanalytic, cognitive, behavioral, humanistic, etc.). Summarize views of these symptoms and presenting problems within the context of at least one historical perspective and two theoretical orientations different from the one used in your evaluation (e.g.:, cognitive, humanistic, psychodynamic, integrative) in order to provide alternative viewpoints. To conclude, justify the use of diagnostic manuals and handbooks besides the DSM-5 that might be used to assess this prospective patient.

The Mental Health Consultation:

  • Must be two to three double-spaced pages in length (not including title and references pages) and  must be formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center (Links to an external site.).
  • Must include a separate title page with the following:
    • Title of paper
    • Student’s name
    • Course name and number
    • Instructor’s name
    • Date submitted
  • Must use at least two peer-reviewed sources in addition to the course text.
  • Must document all sources in APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
  • Must include a separate references page that is formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.

Carefully review the Grading Rubric (Links to an external site.) for the criteria that will be used to evaluate your assignment.

 
 
 

1. Explain the difference between incident command and unified command.

2. Research the internet and find an article, video or webpage detailing an emergency incident that used a unified command.

3.  Post the link to the article, video or webpage.

4.  Was the command structure effective for this incident?  If yes, describe why.  If no, what could have been done better?
 

Please write a minimum of 350-400 words for this 

 

  1. Answer each of the following questions. 3 page response should be provided for each question. References (in APA format) are required. 
  2. Assess the impact of the convergence of public and private sector security in the post-9/11 world. How is it being accomplished? 
  3. Identify two key obstacles to convergence of public and private sector security efforts. Provide potential solutions to the problems you discuss. 
 

Assignment Instructions

Map (diagram) the criminal justice process stages from arrest through final appeal.  You may use a simple flow chart or you may choose another type of chart to diagram. 

 

After diagramming, take three of the stages and explain them in detail. please ensure you produce high quality graduate work.  Ensure you properly Bluebook your resources.

 

The grading rubric is:

Accurately diagram the process 

Describe in detail three of the stages 

Quality of writing

Proper Bluebook or APA citations 

Review the instructions for the Psychiatric Diagnosis assignment in Week Six (attached). This week’s assignment will build upon the work you have completed on your chosen case study in Weeks One and Two (attached).

For this assignment, you will construct an outline of your Psychiatric Diagnosis paper. This outline is meant to provide structure for your final assignment, jump-start your thought process on your case study, and ensure you are on the correct path toward the successful completion of your diagnosis.

Your outline should be one to two pages of content and include a brief two- to three-sentence description of each of the required areas listed in the Psychiatric Diagnosis prompt, except for the following two areas:

  • Justify the use of the chosen diagnostic manual (i.e., Why was this manual chosen over others?).
  • Evaluate symptoms within the context of an appropriate theoretical orientation for this diagnosis.

For these two areas, provide a complete draft of your justification and evaluation based on the case study. You must include explicit information on the theoretical orientation chosen for the case and justification of the use of the diagnostic manual chosen. Research a minimum of five peer-reviewed sources published within the last 10 years to support your choice of theoretical orientation and diagnostic manual. These sources will also be used for the Psychiatric Diagnosis paper. The outline should specify which sources will apply to the justification and evaluation areas.

The Outline for the Psychiatric Diagnosis:

  • Must be one to two single-spaced pages in length (not including title and references pages) and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center (Links to an external site.).
  • Must include a separate title page with the following:
    • Title of paper
    • Student’s name
    • Course name and number
    • Instructor’s name
    • Date submitted
  • Must use at least five peer-reviewed sources published within the last 10 years.
  • Must document all sources in APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
  • Must include a separate references page that is formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.

Carefully review the Grading Rubric (Links to an external site.) for the criteria that will be used to evaluate your assignment.

 Assignment 4: Part D: Your Marketing Plan–Presentation

Due Week 10 and worth 200 points

Create a PowerPoint presentation in which you present your full marketing plan from Assignments 1, 2, and 3. References are required. This presentation does not require any video or audio narration.

Instructions

Create a PowerPoint presentation in which you:

Present the major points of your marketing plan.
Clearly convey your ideas.
Create a professional presentation.
Use technology (title slide naming conventions) to convey ideas.
Use proper grammar.
The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:

3. Create an effective marketing plan.

a. Develop recommendations based on market analysis and strategy.

b. Develop strategies to assess performance and achieve marketing goals.

c. Develop dynamic strategies for competing.

d. Develop branding strategies for new products or services.

e. Develop pricing strategies and distribution channels for products or services.

f. Develop a fully integrated marketing communications plan for products or services.

Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic / organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric found here.

This is the information to include on your PowerPoint title slide:

Your First Name, Your Last Name – Shark Tank Investment Pitch

MKT500 Marketing Management

Strayer University

Instructor’s Name Goes Here 

 
 

Write a 1000-1200 word paper that:

  • Describes the results of your assessment of the labor market from which your selected organization draws candidates for open positions.
  • Explains the population, demographics of the population, levels of education, and how much training may be required to prepare new workers drawn from this pool for positions in the firm.
  • Use regional economic corporations, US Department of Labor and other sources to provide data.

In addition to the requirements above, your paper:

  • Must be double-spaced and 12 point font
  • Must be formatted according to APA style
  • Must include an introductory paragraph with a thesis statement
  • Must conclude with a restatement of the thesis and a conclusion paragraph
  • Must reference a minimum of two  recent scholarly resources

Must include a reference page written in APA format

Carefully review the Grading Rubric (Links to an external site.) for the criteria that will be used to evaluate your assignment.

 

Grading Rubric:

Possible Score: 5.00

The Labor Market

Total: 2.00

Distinguished – Provides a comprehensive assessment of the labor market from which the organization draws candidates for open positions.  Cohesively and clearly analyzes the labor market by providing specific examples.  

Proficient – Provides an assessment that explains the labor market from which the organization draws candidates for open positions.  Assessment is not clearly discussed and is lacking some pertinent details.  Adequately analyzes the labor market. 

Basic – Provides a limited assessment which briefly explains the labor market from which the organization draws candidates for open positions.  Assessment is not clearly discussed and is not supported with examples.  Analyzes the market, but the analysis is either incomplete or lacking in detail. 

Below Expectations – Provides an assessment which does not clearly explain the labor market from which the organization draws candidates for open positions.  The assessment is vague and not supported with examples.   Market analysis lacks relevance. 

Non-Performance – The description of the results of the labor market is either non-existent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.

Population, Demographics, Education, and Training 

Total: 1.00

Distinguished – Clearly and comprehensively explains the population.  The explanation provides detailed and relevant information on the demographics, levels of education, and how much training is required to prepare new workers.  

Proficient – Sufficiently explains the population.  The explanation is missing some details that are relevant to understanding the demographics, levels of education, and how much training is required to prepare new workers. 

Basic – Briefly explains the population.  The explanation is missing several details that are important to fully understanding the demographics, levels of education, and how much training is required to prepare new workers. 

Below Expectations – Fails to adequately explain the population.  The explanation is missing information on either the demographics, levels of education, or how much training is required to prepare new workers. 

Non-Performance – The explanation of the population is either non-existent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.

Research and Resources

Total: 1.00

Distinguished – Excellent use of scholarly sources for data.  The sources are academically valid and diverse. 

Proficient – Appropriate use of scholarly sources for data.  The sources are scholarly, but more diverse sources could have been used. 

Basic – Limited use of scholarly sources for data.  A limited number of sources are used, and some sources are not appropriate for this analysis. 

Below Expectations – Inadequate use of scholarly sources for data.  The sources are not scholarly in nature and lack pertinent information for an appropriate analysis. 

Non-Performance – The use of scholarly sources is either non-existent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.

Critical Thinking: Evidence

Total: 0.25

Distinguished –  Employs persuasive information from credible source(s), to develop an ample analysis or synthesis of the topic. Viewpoints of experts are scrutinized thoroughly.

Proficient – Employs applicable information from credible source(s), to develop an analysis of the topic.

Basic – Identifies applicable information from credible source(s), but may neglect the application of such information toward the analysis of the topic.

Below Expectations – Displays information from external source(s), but such information may lack credibility and/or relevance.  Neglects the application of such information toward the analysis of the topic.

Non-Performance – The assignment is either non-existent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

Written Communication: Control of Syntax and Mechanics

Total: 0.25

Distinguished – Displays meticulous comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains no errors, and is very easy to understand.

Proficient – Displays comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains only a few minor errors, and is mostly easy to understand.

Basic – Displays basic comprehension of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains a few errors, which may slightly distract the reader.

Below Expectations – Fails to display basic comprehension of syntax or mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains major errors, which distract the reader.

Non-Performance – The assignment is either non-existent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

APA Formatting

Total: 0.25

Distinguished – Accurately uses APA formatting consistently throughout the paper, title and reference page.

Proficient – Exhibits APA formatting throughout the paper; however, layout contains a few minor errors.

Basic – Exhibits basic knowledge of APA formatting throughout the paper.  Layout does not meet all APA requirements.

Below Expectations – Fails to exhibit basic knowledge of APA formatting.  There are frequent errors, making the layout difficult to distinguish as APA.

Non-Performance – The assignment is either non-existent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

Written Communication: Word Requirement

Total: 0.25

Distinguished – The length of the paper is equivalent to the required number of words.

Proficient – The length of the paper is nearly equivalent to the required number of words.

Basic – The length of the paper is equivalent to at least three quarters of the required number of words.

Below Expectations – The length of the paper is equivalent to at least one half of the required number of words.   

Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

Addie, age 15, is brought to the school nurse after fainting during gym class. She is grossly underweight, wears baggy clothes, and has dry skin. She complains of feeling cold despite wearing two sweaters. As the nurse examines her perfunctorily, she notices that Addie’s skin seems slightly yellow, and a gentle scrape of her skin shows signs of dehydration.

  1. Based on the findings, what is the likely diagnosis?
  2. What are contributing factors?
  3. What would be an appropriate treatment plan? (Include possible medications, interventions, etc.).
  4. List one short term and one long term goal for this client.
 
 

Contracts Mini-Essay Exam Assignment

Please follow the steps below to complete your mini essay Assignment. Please note – this is a CLOSED BOOK ASSIGNMENT. Do not use your notes, outlines, books, or any other resource to complete this Assignment.

INSTRUCTIONS:

————————————————-

This Mini-Essay Exam Assignment has two components:

1. Draft an exam outline for the following Mini-Essay Exam fact pattern.

2. Write an exam answer to the Mini-Essay Exam fact pattern.

All two components must be included in the document that you upload.

Mini-Essay Fact Pattern

Majestic, feeling particularly generous one day, says to her wicked cousin, Empress, “I promise to sell you my silver sparkle slippers for $350 unless I change my mind.” The next day, Empress tells Majestic, “Here’s the $350. I’ll take those slippers now.” Majestic says, “Forget it, you wicked thing. There’s no way you’re getting my slippers for any price.”

Can Empress enforce Majestic’s promise?

 

 

deadline: 6-8 hours from now, today

3 PAGES MAX:

1 for outline and 2 for answer to the fact pattern

I have attache a past solution you can use for directions and guidance. Please don’t plagiarize.

If done perfectly, you’ll help me with further online discussions/problems for the course. 

I only need  LAW SCHOLAR for this work. Please send your bid message starting with the words ‘Law tutor‘  so i can know you read the entire instructions first.