A) Compare Ulrich Becks concept of the Risk Society to Elizabeth Rushs discussion of risk on pp. 149-156 of the book Rising. To what extent are they talking about the same thing? How are these notions of risk different from each other? How does Rushs concept of risk apply to peoples experiences with climate change/disruption?  (4 points)

B) On pages 53-54 of the book Rising, Elizabeth Rush presents a particular way of thinking about the history of the world. How do you interpret this framing for thinking about our climate, both past and future? In other words, what does this framing mean to you and how does it affect your thinking about environmental and climate protection?
(4 points)

C) Discuss at least 1 example of climate injustice or climate justice from the course materials in Week 5 (readings, films). If you are focusing on an example climate injustice, then what are the causes and consequences of that injustice and what might be a solution? If you are focusing on an example of climate justice, then offer an assessment or critique of those ideas and/or actions (in other words, how effective or inspiring are they and why?). (4 points)
no outside resources

WATCH FIRST: Love Canal, a New York Times Documentary (11 minutes): https://youtu.be/Kjobz14i8kM

There are many Superfund sites that need to be cleaned-up, and not enough money in the “fund” for EPA to pay for it. Often finding private parties solvent to clean-up is just as difficult as finding increased money.  How does this macro problem affect the specific locations near such sites?  READ this article for one example: https://www.rgj.com/story/news/2018/04/30/after-nevada-tribe-sues-bp-cutting-off-bottled-water-native-american-tribe-fight-over-nevada-superfu/566178002/ (Links to an external site.)
For your initial discussion post, you may choose one of the following:
(1) Read the Superfund Task Force Report to EPA and comment on your opinion of the proposals to handle the timing, cost, and ability to clean-up, list/de-list, and handle Superfund sites: https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2017-07/documents/superfund_task_force_report.pdf (Links to an external site.)
(2) Find an article (or more) about a specific Superfund site (like the Nevada one described in the article above) that is perhaps languishing on the list or switching between listing and de-listing decisions in various EPA administrations. Briefly describe and comment on your opinion of the situation and how it could be resolved at the state or federal level.

Review the video and the links provided above.

This is a brief exercise designed to get you some cool information about what’s happening in Astronomy right now, as you are reading this. The enclosed assignment sheetPreview the document will give you the information you need to get started.

Make sure to read the requirements carefully, since you will be turning in several of these reports (and each report must be on a different article or announcement) throughout the semester.

Once you have read the requirements, fill out your report on this report sheet.Preview the document

For South Florida, what are the different air pollutant hazard and exposure factors? Discuss the extent to which they are preventable or can be managed to reduce their impacts. Also discuss whether you think there are long term impacts on health and economics in your area due to air pollution episodes.

Resolution stating that global warming exists and that steps must be taken to address the situation.
The resolution is not stating that global warming is man-made
It is stating that it exists and action must be taken to reverse the warming.
The science question is whether the globe is warming up over the last few decades.

Section 1
–    300+ words
–    Introduction of the controversy being investigated
–    Not biased view, neutral assessment of what is being debated
Section 2
–    200+ words
–    Pro/con assessment of taking action
–    Pros= environmental and potentially positive economic benefit of taking action
–    Cons= costs of taking action and potentially negative economic benefit
Section 3
–    300+ words
–    Discussion of the science related to the controversy (topic)
–    Present 3 or more testable predictions for OR against the claims made in the topic
–    Can include tests both for OR against a claim
–    State to what extent you feel that any of these tests have already been performed
–    Be sure to include the prediction that the test is addressing
Section 4
–    150+ words
–    Assessment of the situation
–    Recommendation as to how the congressman/woman should proceed
–    Recommendation could be to act FOR or AGAINST the legislation
–    Could also be to push for a specific study to be performed

* Clearly label and separate each section

Anthropological Description of the Neolithic Revolution
For the Paper, you will choose one civilization from the resource list (Links to an external site.) (also covered in Chapters 10-14 of the textbook), and summarize the impact of the Neolithic revolution on the selected civilization. The textbook also lists and explores seven characteristics of a civilization (pp. 345-349). You will choose three of these characteristics and assess how they are manifested in your chosen civilization. You must use a minimum of one scholarly source from the provided list of Ashford University Library resources, in addition to the text.
In your paper:
    Describe one of the civilizations from the list provided (i.e., location, environment, and relevant history of the civilization).
    Explain how the Neolithic revolution contributed to the origins of your chosen civilization.
    Summarize three of the characteristics of civilizations and assess how they are manifested in your chosen civilization.
    Provide supporting archaeological evidence that those characteristics manifested within your chosen civilization.
    Explain the factors that led to the downfall of the chosen civilization.

For this assignment, you’ll actually be working to write a story based on your answers to the homework.  You’ll see that there are 10 questions on the homework.  To do this assignment, you can pick any 5 questions that you would like the answer to, and then use those as the basis for writing your story.

You can find more information about how to write the assignment here:

Assignment Instruction Sheet for Weaving a Story from our HomeworkPreview the document

Please read it carefully, since you’ll need to do things like format the assignment with highlighting where you put in your homework answers, so I can read it more easily.  Also, if you want an example of a story that uses homework answers, so you can get an idea of how to do this, check out this example: The Time Warp EncounterPreview the document

This homework aligns with the chapter of our OpenStax Astronomy textbook mentioned in the title of the assignment (also you can find this on the last page of the Syllabus).

Finally, don’t forget that I check submissions for plagiarism using software that checks all submissions against each other and the Internet… and if you copy from another source, I’ll be forced to refer you to the Dean’s office for Academic Fraud.

Click here for the homework assignment with 10 questions.  Remember you only need to use 5 of them in your story.Preview the document

A journal entry is a 400 word personal reflection on the topic under discussion. The three journal assignments for this course make up 10% of the final grade. This journal assignment is due on the date shown in the course schedule. Journals may be submitted up to 24 hours after the deadline with a 20% deduction in grade. A high similarity score from Turnitin (>25%) will result in the rejection of the essay. Quotations are included in the 25% similarity score. A student may resubmit the essay within 24 hours for grading with a 20% late deduction. Failure to submit your assignment to Turnitin will result in an automatic 0 grade for the journal assignment.

The topic for Journal Assignment #1 is a Reflection on TED Talk titled Nature is Everywhere, we just need to learn to see it (Links to an external site.) by Emma Marris

Consider and reflect on the following after viewing the video:

What is the central argument that Ms. Marris makes in her talk?
When you think of Nature, what do you think of? Bill McKibbens notion of Nature, separate and untouched by humankind, or Ms. Marriss idea?
Why does Ms. Marris argue that the vacant lot is more wild than a National Park? Why might children get more engaged with Nature in the vacant lot?
Why does Ms. Marris believe that it is important to avoid stealing Nature from children?
Has this talk caused you to think of Nature differently?

1.In addition to the what of our course (meaning facts about things), it’s also critical to consider how we know things. In this case, the question is “How can we know we actually went to the Moon, and it wasn’t a hoax of some sort?”

In order to see how we can examine such claims, you’ll need to complete the enclosed assignment sheetPreview the document, where you’ll be watching Mythbusters, and seeing how they do their tests!

And here is:

The episode of Mythbusters to watch (Links to an external site.)
https://www.3cmediasolutions.org/privid/106782?key=3e894c3cebae3780e62b450055ad3eaf90aafb95

The episode of Mythbusters to watch (with subtitles)
https://www.3cmediasolutions.org/privid/106784?key=c70471f387e65736bea3a21e7d96d233578b4290

2.”Why People Accept Claims” Forum

For this Forum, we will be having a discussion about “Why People Accept Claims”.

(Before you participate in this Forum, please complete the “Did We Land on the Moon?” Assignment and your response, so you’ll have a starting point.)

Our purpose in this forum is to reflect upon our own thinking (and the thinking of people in general), when it comes to how a person decides to accept a claim.  Of course, in science, we expect adherence to the scientific method … meaning we are expected to gather evidence, try to be objective, perform tests, and compare results with others performing tests.  Finally, and most importantly, we are expected to change our mind if that’s where the evidence leads.

Making one post to answer one of the questions below
  Of course, you are welcome to post more as the discussion unfolds, if there are things you’d like to say.
For your possible questions (pick one you’d like to give your assessment of.  You are, naturally, welcome to post answers to more than one, if you’d like to discuss it) pick one of these:

In the Mythbusters episode, a claim to whether or not there was evidence we landed on the Moon was refuted using tests. And yet, presumably, some people might refuse to change their minds, even in the light of evidence.  Do you have any ideas in your mind that you would refuse to change, even if tests were performed to show you were wrong?  If you do, why would you refuse to change your ideas?
Frequently, claims that are being dealt with like those in the Mythbusters episode are “conspiracy” types of claims.  Notice how complex and difficult it is to disprove a claim like this, since anyone who disagrees may be “part of the conspiracy”.  How would you attempt to unravel a claim someone presented to you that was a “conspiracy claim”?