Project: U.S. Government Relationships
Select one of the following options and write a 1,000-word essay. Incorporate the precise terminology for your topic, and make sure you check punctuation and spelling before submitting your work.
Option 1.
Conflicts over the respective roles of national and state governments have been around since America’s beginning. The Civil War was fought over questions of states’ rights: Can a state create a law that allows for slavery? Does a state have the right to secede from the Union?
Even today people disagree on how much power the federal government should have; some would like the states to have more power. An area where this debate has made the news in recent years includes:
Illegal Immigration – Is protecting America’s border with Mexico mainly a federal or a state issue? What laws – state or federal – have been broken when a person enters the U.S. illegally? What should a state do if the current federal methods aren’t working? Does a state governor have the authority to enforce federal laws against illegal immigration? Can a state use its laws against trespassing as a means to arrest illegal aliens?
Analyze the historical conflict including the limits on national and state government, and draw conclusions as to whether you agree with decisions that were made. Identify the pros and cons of limiting state powers and give your opinion on how much power the states should have as compared with the federal government.
Option 2.
Using the Supreme Court decision McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) and other sources, analyze the sharing of powers within the federal government. In your report, place your emphasis on defining and explaining the following:
federalism
expressed powers
implied powers
inherent powers
concurrent powers
How do the different branches of our government use these powers to pass laws and establish regulations? Are these powers abused or used properly by our government officials? Why or why not?
Also include in your essay a section on the sovereignty of tribal governments, such as the Native Americans of New Mexico and Arizona. Can the federal government intervene in the affairs of Native Americans on reservations? If so, when and to what extent?
Option 3.
Research America’s open door policy with China beginning in 1899. Explain how relations with the United States and China have changed and the effects of the open door policy on both countries.

The book used Barbour, Christine. AmGov: Long Story Short, 2019, CQ Press.

At least 750 words on one of the provided topics (see below), as well as a works cited page with at least three sources containing information used in the essay (note: there must be a parenthetical citation at the end of each sentence that contains information from a source). The assignment is to be formatted according to the Modern Language Association (MLA) style. Students should research this style in order to properly format the assignment (see the Purdue Online Writing Lab).

Students should use 12 point as the paper’s font size, double space the text, and create one inch margins on all four sides of the page. In addition, the writing assignment does not need to have a separate title page.

After reading the two articles, “Laptops are Great. But not During a Lecture or a Meeting” by Susan Dynarski and ” (Links to an external site.)No, Banning Laptops is Not the Answer” (Links to an external site.)by James M. Lang, write a synthesis of them. Your synthesis should accurately summarize what each of these two authors is saying, while showing your reader–in an organized way–where their ideas are similar and where they differ.

Do not give your opinion. You are trying to clearly communicate to your readers what these two writers are arguing, including what points they agree on and what points they disagree about.

Length: 1 page

link to  “Laptops are Great. But not During a Lecture or a Meeting” by Susan Dynarski: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/22/business/laptops-not-during-lecture-or-meeting.html
link to No, Banning Laptops is Not the Answer” :https://www.chronicle.com/article/No-Banning-Laptops-Is-Not-the/237752

write an essay in which you identify one piece of technology or one invention that has had a large impact on modern society. Some examples might be: the MP3 player, tablet computers, HD television and video cameras, hybrid vehicles, recycling plants, Webcams and programs like Skype, social networking, etc. This is an informative essay so you will need to describe the technology or invention thoroughly, explain what it is and how it came to be invented, and then explain how it has transformed the way people do things in the modern world and why this is important to society.

In 400 to 500 words, answer the following question. Is writing necessary for civilization? Be sure to be clear about your definition of civilization. Consider the evidence and sources available to scholars (written or otherwise) and how they’re used to inform us about the past.

I believe writing is not necessary for civilization. There was civilization before writing had began being used widely. Civilization really emerged after the emergence of homo sapiens. Civilization is about much more than writing, an early civilization has agriculture, raising of livestock, densely populated cities, social hierarchy, government/rule of law, possible trading, religion, and spoken language. Those are all things that make up early civilizations and all could happen without written language.

If you could write an essay about early civilization not needing writing to be considered civilization that would be perfect. Please cite your sources in MLA format (I need sources) along with defining what is a civilization.

Video of Obama’s “Eulogy for Clementa Pinckney”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x9IGyidtfGI&feature=emb_logo

“Eulogy for Clementa Pinckney” text version
https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2015/06/26/remarks-president-eulogy-honorable-reverend-clementa-pinckney

This assignment will be in two parts: 1) an annotated bibliography and 2) a research essay.

==========

Part One of Research Essay
Annotated Bibliography Assignment
***You must have four (4) outside sources minimum

Directions:

Thinking about the essay Eulogy for Clementa Pinckney, find 4 outside sources that
    The history of Jim Crow laws in the United States
    Explain the controversies regarding Americas race relations in our current political climate.
    THEN create an Annotated Bibliography using your 4 outside sources.

==========

Part Two of Research Essay
Essay must be between 6-8 pages

PLEASE READ EVERYTHING ON THIS HANDOUT CAREFULLY

Directions:
Read the essay Eulogy for Clementa Pinckney. Write a 6-8 page essay with outside research that discusses what happened to Reverend Pinckney (and the 8 other congregants who were murdered by Dylan Roof). What Obama was trying to tell us regarding the concept of Americans and our history?
Use a minimum of 4 outside sources: Please find and use a minimum of 4 outside sources (scholarly articles, newspaper or magazine articles).

Background:
    This essay is the eulogy that President Obama gave that paid tribute to Reverend Clementa Pinckney (male) as well as to the other victims of the Charleston shooting.
    Definition of Eulogy: A speech, usually spoken at a funeral that praises the person who died.
    President Obama sang Amazing Grace at the end of his eulogy, before reading out the names of the nine victims.
    The murders have reignited debate about race relations in the US.

*********

ESSAY PROMPT:
The essay Eulogy for Clementa Pinckney references the bad parts of American history: slavery in the 19th century, and Jim Crow laws in the 20th century. When President Obama repeats Rev. Pinckneys words [a]cross the South, we have a deep appreciation of history – we havent always had a deep appreciation of each others history (p. 554) what does he mean? Decide if acknowledging the bad parts of Americas history (specifically racism) is equally important as celebrating the good parts of its history? Why? If citizens acknowledge the bad parts of Americas history do you think that this acknowledgement might help fight racism in America? Why or why not?

***Note:  I am an ESL student.  Please write a research essay as simple as possible, so that I can understand.  I also upload a document that shows an example of my English level.

You will receive 15 points extra credit (added to the homework portion of your grade) for locating and submitting a summary of a legal news article that was (1) published within the preceding year and (2) that is relevant to one of the topics that we have previously covered in the course (e.g., Torts, Contracts, Constitutional Law, Franchising, etc.).  You may find appropriate legal news articles at findlaw.com, on the websites of many news organizations (i.e., the Associated Press, Reuters, the Los Angeles Times, NBC News, etc.), or from any other reputable online or print sources.

Your summary must:

1. Discuss facts of the legal news story

2. Explain how the news story relates to a topic previously discussed in class, and

3. Either attach a copy of the new story or provide a functioning link to the article online that will allow me to easily find it.

Your summary must be neatly typed and free of spelling, punctuation, and grammar errors.

You have read Parable of the Sower.  Your 4th paper will use Parable of the Sower but may incorporate other arguments (articles, books, and/or films, short stories, novels).
You have two options.  One is more of a cultural analysis paper while the other is more grounded in science.  Either way, you must present a clearly stated thesis and support it with specific, focused, relevant evidence, including at least four (4) credible sources (not counting Parable of the Sower).  Your paper should be 5-6 pages long.  Films, short stories do not count as sources but should be listed in your bibliography. 
Remember to submit your paper to Canvas turnitin on time. 
Option 1
Generally speaking, you want to identify some specific theme, image, plot pattern, image, reference, type of relationship, event or set of related events and figure out how that specific thing relates to, or illuminates, or helps us understand the larger themes of the novel (and other texts, films if you choose to include them).  How might some specific set of incidents or explanations or comparisons or whatever help a reader understand these texts quests for community, for safety and survival, for freedom from oppression and exploitation and control, for a better future, for hope.  The Book of Eli, The Road, The Road Warrior, and other post-apocalyptic films might be useful for comparison. 
Your essay should not simply answer these questions as I have posed them.  Use these passages as starting points for your own thinking and exploration, or go beyond them to find another relevant topic for discussion.  In any case, make sure the topic you explore and the thesis you advance add to the readers understanding of the texts.  Do NOT simply retell the stories.
Possible topics would include, but are not limited to, the following:
Leadership/Power.  While slaveowners and employers and the corporation that buys Olivar seem willing to exploit, control, dominate, or even enslave those without power, Lauren has a different approach.  How does she lead, how does she inspire, guide, persuade, share governance, make decisions, and create a cohesive pack?

Difference.  As much as some people seem to want a sense of community, they still see significant differences that may keep them apart.  Consider the ways people react to racial/ethnic differences as well as gender differences, class differences, education differences, physical differences, even age differences.  How do these differences, or rather peoples belief that they matter, affect or relate to larger themes of community, survival, building a future?
Caretaking.  Who parents, and how?  Who doesnt?  Who takes responsibility for children, and why?  What does it mean to people to raise and protect children, and what does it mean to others to see them do it?  Why are certain people so concerned with, so conscious of, how children are treated?  How might the treatment of children relate to the overall point of the story, the overall movement of the community?  Why are children apparently so important, even though they pose a number of problems?  How far will people go for children, and why do some limitations exist on the level of sacrifice theyll make for children?  Is the treatment of children (or the sick, or the weak, or the elderly) a way to measure or evaluate characters?  If so, how, why, and with what insights as a result? 
Love, trust, community, interdependence.  Who loves?  Who gets trusted, and why?  What criteria are in use?  Who is not trusted, not a member, not included?  Why, and with what consequences?  Who relies on someone else, and with what consequences?  Who wont, who cant?  What makes a community?  Who gets to join, and why?  And how quickly?  Who doesnt, and why?  Do the rules for whos invited stay the same?  Does everyone want to be in a community?  Are there different kinds of communities?  What are the purposes or advantages of communities?  What does the nature of a community say about, or how does it relate to, or how does it offer insight into, the story as a whole, the situation presented in the book/movie?  What might be the point the author is trying to make by representing the community (or communities) in this way?  How does thinking about the community, and how it works (or doesnt) illuminate the story as a whole?
Consumption.  Environments get used up, people get eaten, structures get burnt, money runs out, space programs get cancelled, workers get used up, cities die, knowledge fades, families get destroyed, planets get poisoned.  How do people seem to relate to their possessions, assets, resources, responsibilities, opportunities?  If people relate differently, act differently as stewards or owners or employers or parents or consumers, what is the point being made?  Who succeeds, who fails and why, whose methods are represented favorably?
Cannibalism.  Who will, who wont, and why?  What point is being made about dying societies resorting to cannibalism?  What point is made when some characters refuse to do so, or react in horror, or reject those who commit cannibalism?  If cannibalism is symbolic, what is it a symbol of?  What is it a measure of?  How does it relate to other problems in these imagined worlds? 
Metaphors.  The novel uses a number of different metaphors or symbols to convey the narrators perspective of the brutal realities of her world.  Explore the types of symbols she uses, the symbols she chooses, and what they convey or suggest about her world. 

Option 2
In an organized essay of 5-6 pages, offer a specific thesis and explore it with discussion of specific examples from Parable of the Sower.  (You can also incorporate films if you choose.) 
You will be researching your topic and must include at least four (4) credible sources (not counting Parable and any films you might include). 
What real-world comparisons can you make to the phenomena you see in Parable?  You will identify a specific phenomenon in the novel, explore how it happens in the imagined future of the text, and explain how it really is now (or how it really was in the past). 
Make sure that your paper explores both the reality and the fiction.  Do not simply mention Parable in the introduction and then write a straight research paper; your essay should engage with Parable throughout, using it as a prediction for what might happen and how it would affect human life/society/well-being if a specific problem escalated beyond our present-day experience.  Use Parable specifically, thoughtfully, and relevantly to frame your analysis of a specific present-day real-world problem and its possible effects in the future.  (Do not just write a bland scientific explanation of climate change with a few quotes from Parable tacked on.  This should be a deep analysis, using Parable as a projection of a present-day problem if it were to escalate and get much worse in the future.) 

Possible topics would include, but are not limited to, the following:
Loss of farmland (topsoil, water, the land itself)
Lack of access to clean, potable water
Illiteracy and lack of access to public education
Lack of access to health care, including birth control/family planning
Company towns
Debt slavery
Exploitation (including sexual exploitation) of workers
Slavery (unpaid, unsafe work)
The psychological effects of constant fear and hopelessness
Survivalists, bunker-builders, people who mistrust the government or fear its collapse
Communes, collectives who share resources and ideologies, who protect each other
Shared child-rearing
Polygamy, multiple wives, exploited women, bought women
Inflation, the collapse of trade, massive unemployment, monopolies
The effects of hunger, starvation, malnutrition on peoples behavior, decisions, outlooks on life, and values

If the novel is making predictions, or projections, or exaggerations, based on real life, on real history or the actual present-day problems we see, you should be able to discuss the real-life phenomenon and the fictional representation together. 
Offer a thesis, an insight, a comparison, a prediction, or another claim that specifically guides the readers understanding of this phenomenon as it is represented in the novel. 

Whichever option you choose, your essay should be well-written, clear, focused, specific, and organized.
A successful essay will contain:
An interesting title (not Paper #4) and an introduction that gets the reader interested. 
A clear thesis (claim, argument, position, idea, point), effectively expressed, insightful, and useful.  Plot summary and general facts are not an argument.  Go beyond telling me what happens, and provide something new:  why it happens as it does, or how its similar or different in the novel and real life, or why it didnt happen some other way, or how the novel is a realistic extension or projection based on what has really happened in history (or the present) .A thesis statement should probably express an idea like because, however, in contrast, as a result, similarly, or despite the fact that.)  A literary-analysis thesis will be a little different from a real-world-comparison thesis, but in either case your own insights should be expressed clearly, directly, not generally. 
Logically ordered paragraphs, focused on specific points, using topic sentences to focus each paragraph and transition sentences to connect them.  A new idea or example needs a new paragraph and topic sentence.
Specific evidence, quotes, and examples (drawn, for this paper, from the novel and your research, as well as any other science fiction films or novels you think are appropriate).
Clear discussion of what the evidence means, describing it for a reader who hasnt seen or read it, explaining what it means, and tying it to your thesis.  (Try to imagine, as you describe and explain your evidence, that I have not read the novel.  Itll help you be more specific about what happens and what it means.) 
An effective conclusion that sums up and comments on the overall point youve made, ideally with some sense of its significance.  Your significance might point to a specific comment on human society, in science fiction or real life.
Solid grammar, punctuation, and mechanics, including MLA format.
An appropriate tone, without sarcasm or vague generalities about how we should treat each other or the planet.
You might want to review some of the material we read in A Brief Guide to Arguing About Literature before tackling this project. 

Please submit, with your final version,  a SELF-TEST of your essays organization.
You will turn in this outline and any inked changes, stapled to the front of your essay, with your name and paper title at the top.

Re-read your draft and type a one-sentence paraphrase of the main idea of each paragraph. 
(If you find this difficult to do, it might be because a paragraph lacks a specific idea or has too many ideas for one paragraph.) 
Print out your paraphrase of each paragraphs point, double-spaced.
Then, on this printed paraphrase, indicate needed changes:
Break long paragraphs and unfocused paragraphs into smaller units of thought.
Delete paragraphs (or parts of paragraphs) that are off-topic or redundant.
Move paragraphs into a better order, if possible.  Arrows would be useful to indicate where things should move. 

Then, going back to your complete draft,
Revise your draft to reflect the changes suggested by the paraphrasing exercise. 
Review and Clarify the topic sentences in your essay.  Each topic sentence should focus and set up the subject and point and insight of the paragraph.  A general fact or vaguely stated idea makes for a poor topic sentence. 
Develop clearer transitions and a stronger thesis that more clearly states your overall insight. 
Proofread and re-read for content, clarity, and organization.

This assignment must be typed, double-spaced, and in Times New Roman 12-point font. In total, you should only write about 250 to 350 words. How you distribute your words is up to your discretion. You must upload your document to Canvas. Please ensure you put your name on your paper; you should not include any other headings, titles, dates, or anything else.

Your answers should demonstrate:

that you read and engaged with the book.
your ability to analyze and compare concepts across related subject matter.
an ability to be clear and succinct in your writing.
a proper understanding of the terms and concepts you cite as examples.
Directions: Respond to the following prompts, using your own words (i.e. no big quotes copied from the book).

1) Explain Pellows argument that prisons are a site for environmental injustice (ch3). Provide at least one example from the book in the process of your explanation.

2) Explain Pellows argument that the Israeli/Palestinian conflict is a matter of environmental justice concerns (ch4). Provide at least one example from the book in the process of your explanation.

3) In a sentence or two, describe one major way in which the issues presented in chapters 3 and 4 are thematically connected to one another. This is a critical thinking and reading comprehension question. I am not asking for you to repeat anything about the four pillars or the organizational structure of the chapters; rather, I am asking you to think critically about connections between the overarching injustices presented in Pellows arguments in both chapters.