PLEASE READ CAREFULLY:Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach. In addition, you are required to complete Group Problem G171: Uncertainty. As you are evaluating your current company, address the following decisions in your response (500750 words):

  1. What environmental factors and risks must be considered in the company’s decisionmaking process?
  2. Evaluate cost factors influencing the company’s decision.
  3. Determine strategies that would provide value to the outcome your company is seeking relating to this decision.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

YOU MUST APPLY the theories and ideas you have read from the Lussier book. (Book Attached).

Read the case “You Are Not Hurt?  Good, Youre Fired!” ( Lussier Case 14.2 p.538 ).  Submission for this case should be in essay form and adhere to full APA requirements.  Use headings to identify each of the assignment requirements.  Include reference to the facts from the case and citations from the book:

Case Study 4 Questions

1.  This case was a civil case. How might it have become a federal case under OSHAs charge?

2.  How might ActioNet have not upheld their OSHA responsibilities?

3.  Although a federal investigation 2 days later indicated no wrongdoing on Yangs part (he was called a complete victim), ActioNet took no further action in the matter. If these were OSHA investigators, under what category of violation might ActioNet be subject to penalty?

4.  Stress might have been the cause of Tymonys intolerable conduct. Which cause(s) of stress might have accounted for his inexcusable behavior?

5.  What are the causes of workplace violence, and how might they help us better understand this case?

6.  What are the signs of potential violence, and were any exhibited in this case?

7.  What trends or issues in workplace safety apply to this case?

8.  What Christian principles are in question in the case? How do your personal values and beliefs inform your examination of the case?

Critical Assignment Rubric

Fully developed examination of the factors of the case that would constitute it to be a federal case under OSHAs charge. Corresponding OSHA factors are explicitly identified and thoroughly examined.

Fully developed and insightful examination of how ActioNet did not uphold their OSHA responsibilities. Analysis is thoroughly and consistently supported with OSHA references.

Fully developed examination and explicit identification of the OSHA category(s) of violation that AcioNet would be subject to penalty under OSHA for not taking further action.

Fully developed examination of cause(s) of stress that might have accounted for the inexcusable behavior in the case.

Fully developed and insightful examination of what are the causes of workplace violence, and how might they help us better understand this case.

Fully developed and explicit identification of the signs of potential violence, and insightful examination if any were exhibited in this case.

Fully developed and explicit identification of trends and issues in workplace safety that applies to this case.

Fully developed evaluation and identification of what Christian principles are in question in this case. Insightful introspective evaluation of how personal values and beliefs inform your examination of the case.

Write a critical appraisal that demonstrates comprehension of two quantitative research studies. Use the “Research Critique Guidelines Part II” document to organize your essay. Successful completion of this assignment requires that you provide a rationale, include examples, and reference content from the study in your responses.

Use the practice problem and two quantitative, peer-reviewed research articles you identified in the Topic 1 assignment to complete this assignment.

In a 1,0001,250 word essay, summarize two quantitative studies, explain the ways in which the findings might be used in nursing practice, and address ethical considerations associated with the conduct of the study.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CWCKlAcxESA&feature=youtu.be Watch the below video and discuss if you agree or disagree with the speaker.      Your initial response is due by Thursday 11:59PM. It must be at least 250 words and have references.  Your grade will reflect both the quality of your initial post and the depth of your responses. Refer to the Discussion Forum Grading Rubric under the Settings icon above for guidance on how your discussion will be evaluated.  Guided Response: Respond to at least two of your classmates’ posts. Evaluate their discussions by agreeing, disagreeing, or adding other ideas to strengthen or enhance the perspectives presented in their initial posts.

Please write a brief paragraph of what you learned this week.

 

Go through and complete each tutorial

 Complete each of the tutorials shown

Please make sure that you are saving your models as you go

Please take screenshots of some of your work

At the end of each of the tutorials there are some suggestions to modify the model that you have created.

Make some suggested modifications to the models

Take screenshots of the changes that you have made and the results of how this changed the outcomes.

Put together an individual Word document with the screenshots of the changes/modifications.

Please write a couple paragraphs on what you learned in each one of the tutorials

Include general observations and analysis

  -Tutorial 1

  -Tutorial 2

  -Tutorial 3

Week 6 Prompts:

1. Has Pink persuaded you about the gap between what science knows and what organizations do? Do you agree that we need to upgrade our motivational operating system? ‘Why or why not?

2. How has Motivation 2.0 affected your experiences at school, at work, or in family life? If Motivation 3.0 had been the prevailing ethic when you were young, how would your experiences have differed?

3. Do you consider yourself more Type I or Type X? Why? Think of three people in your life (whether at home, work, or school). Are they more Type I or Type X? What leads you to your conclusions?

Use the book attached to answer the questions above.

 

Chapter 5 Review the Roles of Line Management and Social Network and Information Technology sections.  Note the various roles in the organization and note the similarities and differences within each role.  Also, note how innovation technology management shapes how we communicate amongst coworkers within an organization. (Information Technology and Organizational Learning)

The above submission should be one-page in length and adhere to APA formatting standards.

**Remember the page length does not include the APA cover page or any references**

Upload Assignment: Module 5 Weekly Writing Assignment 

Writing Assignment – respond to the following questions.

1. What are the three most important takeaways/lessons from the material provided in this module? (150 words or more)

2. Drawing on the material that was provided what else would like to know? What other related questions/ideas/topics would you like to explore in the future? (100 words or more)

3.  Public private partnership have become a very popular form of financing public projects.  Discuss in detail at least two risks/weaknesses/issues associated with such financing options?  (100 words or more)

Video address:https://csusb.blackboard.com/bbcswebdav/pid-2500035-dt-content-rid-14906895_1/xid-14906895_1

https://csusb.blackboard.com/bbcswebdav/pid-2500037-dt-content-rid-14906896_1/xid-14906896_1