i need a 5 paragrah essay about how we need more gun laws in the united states . it wont let me add this but for the website go to https://gun-control.procon.org/ copy and past that link in the browser we are on the pro side of getting more gun laws
Category: English and Literature
Assignment 3 consists of the introduction and problem statement of your research proposal. The introduction should create a contest and background to your research. It is the introduction to your topic. You will explain your research, why your research is important and reiterate your research question and/or hypotheses.
It should also include your problem statement, which is a clear statement about an area of concern in criminal justice that should be improved upon.
Healing Hands Hospital is an acute care community hospital that serves a suburban community outside of a large city with two competing large academic medical centers. Both Healing Hands Hospital and the academic medical centers have a long history of service to the region, but their business and fundamental practices are different. Your manager, Ms. Woods, Healing Hands’ Chief Operating Officer, is part of the Task Force working on the strategic plan for the hospital and needs to understand the fundamental practices of these academic medical centers.
In a 2-4 page paper, describe the similarities and differences between academic medical centers and acute care community hospitals like Healing Hands Hospital in terms of the following:
Mission, goals, and objectives Staffing and management structure Accreditation, Policies, and ProceduresReimbursement modelResearch and clinical trials
Be sure to document your references using APA format.
Reference:
Dyrda L., Rosen T., Wood, M., and Hoefner, M.. (2017). 100 Great community Hospitals Becker’s Hospital Review. Retrieved from https://www.beckershospitalreview.com/lists/100-great-community-hospitals-2017.html
The purpose of this research study is to explore Black or Asian students experiences of counselling that have Black or Asian background; to understand individuals view within a diverse background and culture. As strongly recommended in an Article; Lost by David Palmer (2007), it is paramount to listen and empower individuals from a minority group that has a major gap in providing support services. To achieve this, it was also published in the same articlerecommended by Palmer to conduct a qualitative research to incorporate individuals perspectives, as it has been reinforced that individuals have a meaningful and valid view that would contribute positively to the balance of prioritising perspectives.
ANALYZING AN ARGUMENT THROUGH MULTIPLE LENSES
So far this term we have looked at a discussion on animals and morality through multiple
perspectives. Mark Twain sarcastically told us that humans are the lower animal because
of our morality. On the other hand, E.B. White draws parallels against humans and farm
animals as he contemplates the world as suffering. Lastly, David Foster Wallace
navigates through lobster consumption and asks us to confront our own behavior in this
consumption.
In this assignment you will discuss the arguments from at least two articles that have
been discussed in the second unit this term. Using a discussion of animals, you will first
develop an argument by answering the question: is morals what determines negative
human behavior? (However, you may develop whatever argument you want). There are
three texts that you can use to support your argument: The Lowest Animal by Mark
Twain, Death of a Pig by E.B. White, and Consider the Lobster by David Foster
Wallace. You must use at least two texts in developing your argument however you may
use all three if you wish.
The purpose of this paper is to synthesize multiple texts to support an overall argument.
You will discuss the arguments of your outside sources and put them in conversation with
one another. You can use the texts to illustrate your argument (support). You may also
complicate or challenge your outside sources to support your argument (or show how
they complicate/challenge one another).
Requirements:
1.
Formulate one singular thesis statement (debatable argument) that answers the
question: is morals what determines negative human behavior?
2.
Choose texts that illustrate your argument or that you are interested in
complicating or challenging.
3.
Introduce your sources and articulate their arguments (must use at least two texts)
4.
Put the texts into a conversation with one another. How do they play off of each
other?
DETAILS
Length: 5-7 full pages, not including Works Cited page
Format: Standard MLA, including:
– uniform double-spacing throughout document
– title
– 1 margins all around
– Works Cited page
– Times New Roman, size 12 font
This is not an essay. It is to answer 3 questions per page. Answer the questions in order. Use the book attached as the only source (it’s actually a link to the book). And use in text citations as well. in case you want to quote anything from the book passage. Please Answer these 8 questions in order as they are listed. Thank you. No plagiarism
1. Title, author, publication information for the biography you read:
2. What does it think about Dickenss love life? Does it have much to say about Maria Beadnell? What does it think about Dickenss marriage? What does it have to say about Dickens and his wifes sisters?
3. What does it tell you about Dickenss tour of America?
4. Does the biography talk about the novels? About other kinds of writing by Dickens? In what way? What does it think is the relation between Dickenss life and his work?
5. Tell something you learned from the biography that was news to you and that you found interesting.
6. Does the biography you read like Charles Dickens?
7. What can you tell about the biographer from reading the biography?
8. What did your biography not talk about that you wish it had?
David Foster Wallaces speech This is Water presents a way to perceive situations through multiple lenses. He believes a default way of thinking can lead to an overall unhappy life and urges students to step outside of their singular perspective. Unfortunately, David Foster Wallace exhibited that he was perhaps dealing with the symptoms of his argument and committed suicide at the age of 46.
In this paper, you will analyze the argument put forth by David Foster Wallace in his speech, This is Water. You should articulate his main argument, analyze its rhetorical appeals and discern elements of the context that affect its overall efficiency (i.e., Who is the audience? Who is the author?) Then you will evaluate whether the argument was likely to be persuasive in the context.
In this paper, you will do the following:
Formulate one singular thesis statement that posits a debatable argument on why Wallaces argument does (or does not) persuade his audience.
Articulate Wallaces argument and the basic contextual situation in the introduction.
Analyze the three rhetorical appeals that are specifically intended to sway his listeners.
Support your thesis with textual evidence from the speech
Discern why the speech would (or would not) likely be effective given the context
Evaluate whether the argument is ultimately effective.
I have posted the article for the questioned to be answered
page 1 the APA cover page
Page 2-3 the introduction and the question to be answered.
the question:
The Introduction to the article says the author argues we need a better understanding of our relationship with the data What do you think our relationship with data means? And why is this relationship important?
Part one:
Do you use excuses? As a leader how would you respond?
The kaizen philosophy seeks to encourage suggestions, not to find excuses for failing to improve. Typical excuses are, “If it’s not broken, don’t fix it,” “I’m too busy to work on it,” “this is how we have always done this,” and “It’s not in the budget.” Think of at least 3 other excuses people give for why they don’t try to improve.
As a leader, how might you respond to 3 of 4 of these statements?
Part two:
Ask three questions related to topic with content.
Part one:
Do you use excuses? As a leader how would you respond?
The kaizen philosophy seeks to encourage suggestions, not to find excuses for failing to improve. Typical excuses are, “If it’s not broken, don’t fix it,” “I’m too busy to work on it,” “this is how we have always done this,” and “It’s not in the budget.” Think of at least 3 other excuses people give for why they don’t try to improve.
As a leader, how might you respond to 3 of 4 of these statements?
Part two:
Ask three questions related to topic with content.
