12pt Times New Roman or Arial font, headers
Title
A clear thesis that takes a clear stance on the topic
An introduction
Support paragraphs (minimum of 3) that include quotes and/or paraphrases (correctly parenthetically cited)
A conclusion
A proper MLA formatted works cited page.
Day: May 7, 2020
- Review this weeks Learning Resources on how laws and policies are developed.
- Review the interactive media Public Health Policy Process.
- Research your federal and state legislative processes. For those of you who reside outside the United States, focus on your local and territorial legislative process.
- Select a law addressing a public health issue that was passed in your state. For those of you who reside outside the United States, select a law passed at the local or territorial level. Think about the process of how your selected law was passed.
- Consider the potential impact of your selected law on future national laws.
- Identify your federal and state representatives. For those of you who reside outside the U.S., identify your local and territorial officials.
Post a comprehensive response to the following:
- Describe the law you selected.
- Explain in detail the process of how it became a law within your state or territory.
- Describe the potential impact of your selected law on future national laws.
- Identify your federal, state, and/or territorial representatives/officials.
For the storage system presentation assignment, each group or individual will conduct extensive research about a particular storage system. The best point to start from is a vendor site; however, do not limit your research to vendor documentation. You should also research other industry whitepapers and/or academic journals that might have an interesting insight into a particular storage system.
The students are required to submit a PowerPoint presentation. The students are also expected to record their presentation using PowerPoint Voice-over narration utility. Watch the video for how to record the presentation https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=selYsj94RQg .
At a minimum, your presentation should demonstrate the state-of-art knowledge about the
Technical architecture encompassing storage systems
Concepts related to services, security, performance, scalability backup, administration, among others
Software-based applications to administer or manage storage
Anything else you consider relevant
Some of the suggested storage systems are listed below. However, please feel free to choose a one to your liking.
1. HP
2. Google Cloud Storage
3. NetApp
4. Microsoft Azure
5. Oracle
6. Dell EMC
In eight hundred words or fewer, provide a thorough legal analysis (preferably using the suggested IRAC format) of the legal issue presented related to the case with format attached.
THE FORMAT AND GRADING WEIGHT ARE MENTION IN THE ATTACHED FILES.
As you can see based on the files I submit and the instructions on the screenshots, I completed the Lab1 (I attached since you will need in to complete lab1 and lab2). I need you to complete both the Lab2 and Lab3 by following the instructions
Read “Read-Only Participants: A Case for Student Communication in Online Classes” by Nagel, Blignaut, and Cronje.
After reading the Nagel, Blignaut, and Cronje article, write a 250-500-word summary of it.
Be sure to include a discussion of the research problem, questions, method, findings, and implications discussed by the authors.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
Please note: Read the directions for the Rogerian Argument essay BEFORE completing this outline.
Choose a topic on which you wish to develop a middle ground for compromise or discussion. Try to choose a topic on which you have some ownership, something you have experienced and know enough about to write a Rogerian essay. In any case, choose a topic that you care about, so you will care about writing the essay, and the reader will be able to care about grading it.
Also, the Rogerian argument and the research paper are two entirely different arguments that you will be writing this semester. The Rogerian argument presents two sides of an issue and the common ground or compromise between the two sides. You will not take a stand on the issue.
Please review the lecture notes on Rogerian argument before completing this assignment.
For this assignment you will complete a topic outline (phrases that indicate the main points and supporting points to be used in the research paper). Use Roman numerals for the main point and capital letters for the supporting points. A working thesis needs to be included in the outline.
Rogerian outline
I. Introduction
A. A brief background of the topic
B. Explore the common ground (briefly)
C. state the issue question and set a neutral tone
II. Explain key supporting points on the issue
III. Explain key supporting points for the alternate side of the issue
IV. Explain a balanced view of the issue by reviewing valid points from the two sides (common ground)
V. Conclusion
A. Describe a balanced and concise summary of the main points that represent the sides of the issue
B. Present a middle ground position/common ground
C. Reprise the middle ground position and present a position that will benefit both sides.
As you are presenting a Rogerian argument you will need to have clear thesis placed in the conclusion. Remember, as this is a Rogerian argument, the thesis should not take a stand on the issue. You will need to present both sides of the issue and a section that shows how the two sides do have some common ground. The paper also will need to have a conclusion that wraps everything up for the reader and presents the common ground. Remember, for the actual paper you will need to have more than five paragraphs in the paper.
INTRODUCTION
- Lead-in sentences
(“hook” strategies: a scenario or an example, a related current event in the news, a startling statistic, a provocative question or statement) - Rhetorical context/brief synopsis of the discussion surrounding the issue
- Issue stated as an issue question to set neutral tone of inquiry and investigation
BODY
- Two or three paragraphs to examine key supporting points that support one prominent position on the issue
- Two or three paragraphs to examine supporting points that support an alternative position, opposing the above viewpoint
(The writer’s use of transition/signal sentences, such as On the other hand, critics argue . . . ; or, Despite these compelling arguments for . . . , many persons strongly oppose . . . helps prepare readers for the writer’s switch from examining one position to an opposing viewpoint.)
CONCLUSION
- Paragraph which presents a balanced and concise summation of the most compelling points representing different sides of the argument
- Closing paragraph which presents the writer’s middle-ground position, drawing elements from each position examined earlier
(A common ground value appeal can lay the groundwork for a united front in approaching a resolution to the issue; e.g., In the debate over legalization of physician-assisted suicide, we can all agree that we wish to make the process of dying more humane and comfortable for the individual person who is suffering from a terminal illness. Even so . . . . Also, as illustrated, the writer may choose to use the inclusive first-person, plural point of view, we, to reinforce the collective spirit of his or her proposal.)
Example of Topic Outline Format
Several aspects must be considered in writing a topic outline.
Recall that all headings and subheadings must be words or phrases, not sentences.
Also, the wording within each division must be parallel.
Finally, as in any outline, remember that a division or subdivision cannot be divided into one part; therefore, if there is an “A” there must be a “B,” and if there is a “1” there must be a “2.”
I. Family Problems
A. Custodial: Non-custodial Conflicts
B. Extended Family
C. Adolescent’s Age
II. Economic Problems
A. Child Support
B. Women’s Job Training
C. Lower Standard of Living
D. Possible Relocation
1. Poorer Neighborhood
2. New School
III. Peer Problems
A. Loss of Friends
B. Relationships with Dates
Attached you can find the complete instructions for this assignment:
First section Description of the Company you are going to analyze (provide details on revenue, funding, etc. that are not in page 2 of the report). This is easy, just find the relevant data
Please add all the necessary and important information about the company that is NOT included in the second part.
Second section Please solve all the questions per each section. The more specific the better.
Second: Use the benchmark tool to analyze your proposed Company. Provide details.
Please go deep in the analysis and make sure that all the questions are addressed.
The task should be straight forward. If its done as bullet points would be even better as it would be shared as a presentation.
The company is a startup named HUNGRY. I will also share a file with general information.
Research is super important and make sure they are from reliable sources (crunchbase, orbis (financials), etc.
MID-EAST METALS
Jesse Parker sells for Mid-East Metals. He has been calling on Richmond Distributors for close to two years. Over the course of 15 calls, he has sold nothing to date. During an early call, Parker had Richmonds engineers in to look over and test the quality of his products. The tests and the engineers responses were positive. He thinks that he is extremely close to getting an order. Parker knows that Richmond is happy with its present supplier, but he is aware that they have received some late deliveries. Terry Kitchel, Richmonds senior buyer, has given every indication that he likes Parkers products and Parker.
CURRENT SITUATION
During Parkers most recent call, Kitchel told him that hed need a couple of weeks to go over Parkers proposal. Kitchel really didnt have any major objections during the presentation. Parker knows his price, quality, and service are equal to or exceed Richmonds present supplier.
QUESTIONS
- Kitchel told Parker that he needed a couple of weeks to think about his proposal. How should Parker handle this?
- What should Parker have done during the sales presentation when Kitchel told him that he needed to think it over?
- What techniques should Parker have used to overcome the forestalling tactic?
The main goal is to edit my resume.
Please the description of my resume is from this link below (copy and paste it). My resume was looked by an expert and she gave me the feedback from the link. One thing she mentioned is that on my resume, it seems like I’m describing myself more like a doer than an achiever. If you can modify my wordings to make me sound like a doer, that will be great. I’m an achiever; it’s just my way of wording things make sound more like a doer. But please take a look at what the expert says and go from there. Also make it look so beautiful with a nice visual presentation.
Finally, I will appreciate if you write a nice career summary for me.
NOTE: if everything can be fit in one page, that will be great. I heard resume shouldn’t be more than a page.
https://www.topresume.com/?action=resumecritiqueview&at=y31RTKVZXkU0FwwjlTnD6Ojm8Lj5xft5j&rs=&utm_medium=email&utm_source=critique-funnel&utm_content=cr_html&utm_campaign=cr_html
