This order is for a project management class. The following is a paper with a group project. I need to do some parts while others will do another parts of the paper. The paper is about an imaginary project with an imaginary company that they need to have an item locator in their stores around the U.S (more details will come later). My part is this time is
Project Constraint. the Constraint section in the RFP (Request For Proposal). First, before you start writing read what is the constraint section is about. Open the attached file and read (Discussion of Constraints) part. This part should give you a better understanding about what I need from you in this order. Second, read the next file (Term Paper – Draft). This paper talks talks about an imaginary company that do retail business (like Walmart or Target) and they are looking for proposal to develop devices to locate items in their stores and help their customers to make the shopping easier. Also in this file you will see Request For Proposal (RFP) is the part that my groupmates wrote so far. Read this part and go through the requirement that should be in the part you will need to write about it. Make sure you understand the last part because your writing will be about the requirements from the RFP.
Day: May 16, 2020
PLEASE USE 3 REFERENCES
Clinical decision making is the process by which we determine who needs what and when. While not exactly arbitrary, this exercise can be quite subjective. Each provider compiles their own data (hence the emphasis on learning to perform an accurate H&P) and then constructs an argument for a particular disease state based on their interpretation of the “facts.” The strength of their case will depend on the way in which they gather and assemble information. There may then be no single, right way of applying diagnostic and therapeutic strategies to a particular case. Medicine involves playing the odds, assessing the relative chance that a patient is/is not suffering from a particular illness. Codifying the way in which providers logically approach problems and deal with this uncertainty is a difficult task. Relying solely on the classic features of a disease may be misleading. That is because the clinical presentation of a disease often varies: the symptoms and signs of many conditions are non-specific initially and may require hours, days, or even months to develop.
Generating a differential diagnosis; that is, developing a list of the possible conditions that might produce a patient’s symptoms and signs, is an important part of clinical reasoning. It enables appropriate testing to rule out possibilities and confirm a final diagnosis.
This case portrays a poor patient outcome after a misdiagnosis.
Case scenario
A previously healthy 35-year-old lawyer presents to a primary care office with a chief complaint of chest pain and a non-productive cough. The pain started suddenly 2 hours prior to coming to the office while the patient was sitting at his desk. The patient describes the pain as sharp in nature, constantly present but made worse with inspiration and movement, and with radiation to the base of the neck. His blood pressure in the right arm and other vital signs are normal.
On physical examination, the only findings of note are chest wall tenderness and a faint cardiac murmur. The ECG in the office is normal. The patient is observed for an hour in the office and assessed. He is diagnosed with viral pleurisy and sent home on non-steroidal analgesics.
The following day the patient collapses at home and cannot be resuscitated by the paramedic service. An autopsy reveals a Type 1 aortic dissection with pericardial tamponade.
Discussion Assignment:
Developing a list of possible conditions that might produce a patient’s symptoms and signs is an important part of clinical reasoning.
As an NP in primary care, what would you have done differently?
Discuss the importance of creating a list of differentials for this patient. How could it have changed this outcome?
If a serious diagnosis comes to mind based on a patient’s symptoms:
Ask yourself: Have you considered the likelihood of a serious diagnosis and whether it needs to be ruled out by testing or referral?
Because many serious disorders are challenging to diagnose, have you considered ruling out the worst-case scenario?
Ask yourself: Do you have a sufficient understanding of the clinical presentation to offer an opinion on the diagnosis?
What other diagnoses could it be? How might the treatment to date have altered the patients outcome?
What other diagnostic and laboratory or imaging was needed in order to make a complete differential list? What support tools would you consider using in helping to create a differential diagnosis list?
Are you familiar with the current clinical practice guidelines for the investigation of a suspected condition such as chest pain?
Please support with up-to-date evidence-based standard of care guidelines.
This is a textual analysis of at least 1000 words.
Your essay should be at least 1000 words and follow the formatting guidelines for all our essays and papers in this course. Any quotes or paraphrased content from the readings (or outside research, if you choose to use it) must be properly cited in text and with a reference list at the end of your document. The format of all essays is a double-spaced paper using 12 pt. Times New Roman font, 1-inch margins, and MLA style guidelines.
Discuss Implementing Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) deployment and utilization in healthcare industries.
10 Pages of content, 2 to 4 pages of which have to be an annotated bibliography of peer-reviewed resources. At least 7 are needed.
I have attached a list of articles that could be used, they do not have to be those specific ones, just a suggestion
APA formatting.
1. For assigment 1, the only information I have is only the PPT photo, it might be a bit difficult to read when zoom in, but still readable.
2. Assigment 2, there is an essay outline feedback from instructor, very valuble as the instructor marks very hard.
I also attach reference reading for the assigment 2.
****This assignment utilizes Turnitin. This means that this assignment has two Drop boxes; one for submitting a paper to Turnitin as a draft and one for submitting the final version to the instructor for grading. Both submissions are required for this assignment. Since a draft is required, please allow yourself time to complete the draft, submit to Turnitin, and make any needed updates prior to submitting the final paper. Please see instructions for using Turnitin in the Course Overview module under Useful Resources.
Scenario:
The government has created a committee to investigate the potential of implanting a radio-frequency implantable device (RFID or commonly known as a chip) in every U.S. citizen OR on the use of the smart card (i.e. card that incorporates an individuals medical care record). In order to reduce the issues surrounding patient safety including patient identification, and maintenance of a complete and accurate history of disease processes and medications, this RFID or smart card will contain all of the individuals medical information.
When the patient arrives at a point-of-care, the RFID or the smart card is scanned, and all of the information is uploaded into the provider Electronic Health Record (EHR) system. Upon discharge, information is then downloaded back to the RFID or the smart card.
You have been invited as a nursing representative for your state to provide a report to the committee regarding the use of the RFID or the smart card. Choose one of these technologies and complete the following information to produce your report.
Introduction:
Create and introduction paragraph describing the topic (RFID or Smartcard), explain what will be addressed in the paper, and evaluate the pros and cons of using implantable devices or the Smartcard.
Create an introduction: Introduce the topic (RFID or Smartcard)
Body of the Paper:
Evaluate the Pros and Cons:
Analyze the pros and cons of the use of the implanted RFID or the Smartcard. To assist you in analysis, explore the US Food and Drug Administration Guidance Document (https://www.fda.gov/Radiation-EmittingProducts/RadiationSafety/ElectromagneticCompatibilityEMC/ucm116647.htm (Links to an external site.) ) and investigate other sources on the internet or in the current literature. There are companies currently producing chips. Read marketing information found online for companies producing chips for additional background information.
Explain how you use smart devices in your personal life. How has this technology been incorporated in society?
Assess the Ethical, Legal and Social Implications:
What are the potential legal, ethical, and social implications, which should be considered if implementing and using RFID or the Smartcard if it is instituted, in your practice setting?
Identify populations who might greatly benefit from the use of the RFID or the Smartcard? (e.g. people with Alzheimers, children, those with cognitive disabilities, etc.).
Refer to the scenario above. How would the redundancy of information be addressed for the RFID or the Smartcard
Evaluate the Scenario and Discuss a Policy to Incorporate
Identify how your organization could incorporate the use of either of these technologies (RFIDs or other smart devices, such as Smart phone) in the practice setting?
Discuss the logistics. How would a healthcare provider access the information from the patients RFID or the Smartcard?
In thinking of the scenario above, identify the extent that patients can access their own information? Can the user access the exact same information as the healthcare provider?
What types of policies might be needed at your healthcare facility to safeguard patients who have an implanted RFID or the Smartcard?
Conclusion and Recommendation
Draft a conclusion statement which summarizes a possible recommendation for using RFID or Smartcard devices or explain why you feel further consideration of use is not warranted.
Formatting:
Grammar and APA Format
Present your analysis in a scholarly, 4-6 page, APA-formatted paper with the following elements:
Title Page (not included in page count)
Citations throughout
Introduction Catch the readers attention with interesting facts and supporting sources.
Body of analysis:
Present the pros and cons about the RFID or the smart card. Think globally and historically.
Identify the ethical, legal, and social implications of RFID or the Smartcard
Discuss policies to incorporate at your facility to safeguard patients with RFIDs or the Smartcard.
Conclusion and Recommendation Summarize the analysis and offer a recommendation. Is the RFID or the Smartcard a plausible method for the future of health care interoperability and portability of health information?
Reference Page (not included in page count)
Important note to students: Pay close attention not only to the details of this assignment but also to the spelling, grammar, and syntax of your work. You are encouraged to use your Galen resources such as Grammarly, APA Style Central, etc. to complete this assignment.
Rubric
RFID Smartcard Implantation APA Paper Rubric 2019
RFID Smartcard Implantation APA Paper Rubric 2019
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroduction
5.0 pts
Excellent
Provides a thorough introduction paragraph which serves to introduce the choice of topic (RFID or Smartcard).
0.0 pts
Does not complete.
5.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePros and cons about the RFID or the Smartcard.
5.0 pts
Excellent
Excellent and thorough assessment of the pros and cons of smartcard implantation.
4.0 pts
Satisfactory
Satisfactory assessment of the pros and cons of smartcard implantation.
3.0 pts
Fair
Fair assessment of the pros and cons of smartcard implantation.
2.0 pts
Inadequate
Inadequate assessment of the pros and cons of smartcard implantation.
1.0 pts
Substandard and unacceptable
Substandard and unacceptable assessment.
0.0 pts
Does not complete.
5.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAssess the Ethical, Legal, and Social Implications for using the RFID or the Smartcard
5.0 pts
Excellent
Excellent articulation of ethical and legal issues regarding smartcard implantation.
4.0 pts
Satisfactory
Satisfactory articulation of ethical and legal issues regarding smartcard implantation.
3.0 pts
Fair
Fair articulation of ethical and legal issues regarding smartcard implantation.
2.0 pts
Inadequate
Inadequate articulation of ethical and legal issues regarding smartcard implantation.
1.0 pts
Substandard
Substandard and unacceptable articulation of ethical and legal issues regarding smartcard implantation.
0.0 pts
Does not complete.
5.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEvaluate the Scenario and Discuss a Policy, or Policies, to Incorporate Related to the Use of RFIDs or Smartcards
5.0 pts
Excellent
Excellent, insight and articulation into the policies enforced at students current place of employment or other facility. Relates his/her own experience directly to the topic in a clear and concise manner.
4.0 pts
Satisfactory
Satisfactory insight and articulation into the policies enforced at students current place of employment or other facility. Discusses his/her experience and somewhat relates the experience to the topic in a clear and concise manner.
3.0 pts
Fair
Fair insight and articulation into the policies enforced at students current place of employment or other facility. Discusses some of his/her experience but is somewhat unclear about how it relates to the topic.
2.0 pts
Inadequate
Inadequate insight and articulation into the policies enforced at students current place of employment or other facility. Discusses very little of his/her experience but does not directly relate it to the topic in a clear manner.
1.0 pts
Substandard
Substandard insight and articulation into the policies enforced at students current place of employment or other facility. Fails to explain how his/her experience directly relates it to the topic.
0.0 pts
Does not complete.
5.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusion and Recommendation
5.0 pts
Excellent
Excellent conclusion of the topic with clear, thorough and well written and recommendation. Summarizes analysis to a high level.
4.0 pts
Satisfactory
Satisfactory conclusion of the topic with clear and well written recommendations properly summarized from analysis.
3.0 pts
Fair
Fair conclusion of the topic that is somewhat unclear in structure. Summarization of the analysis is not directly addressed in the recommendations.
2.0 pts
Inadequate
Inadequate conclusion of the topic that is unclear and lacking structure. Fails to summarize the analysis in recommendation and/or is unclear about recommendations.
1.0 pts
Substandard
Substandard conclusion lacking in content, unorganized or unstructured. Offers unclear recommendations that are not properly drawn from analysis.
0.0 pts
Does not complete.
5.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar and APA Formatting
5.0 pts
Excellent
APA Paper in proper format, complete with title page, introductory paragraph, conclusion paragraph, headings, formatting and reference page, within 4-6-page limit. Excellent use of grammar with proper formatting. Presentation has been proof-read and free of errors.
4.0 pts
Satisfactory
APA Paper with a rare minor APA formatting error, but with title page, introductory paragraph, conclusion paragraph, headings, formatting and reference page and is within 4-6-page limit. Satisfactory use of grammar with proper formatting. Presentation contains minor errors.
3.0 pts
Fair
APA Paper with a few APA formatting errors with title page, introductory paragraph, conclusion paragraph, headings, formatting and reference page, or outside 4-6-page expectation. Fair use of grammar with proper formatting. Presentation contains some errors in grammar and contains minor spelling errors.
1.0 pts
Inadequate
Many APA errors, missing many aspects of APA paper with title page, introductory paragraph, conclusion paragraph, headings, formatting and reference page and is outside 4-6-page expectation. Inadequate use of grammar with proper formatting. Presentation contains obvious errors in grammar and spelling.
0.0 pts
Not written in APA Format
0.0 pts
Substandard and unacceptable
Substandard and unacceptable APA Paper. Lacks attention to most if not all APA formatting with title page, introductory paragraph, conclusion paragraph, headings, formatting and reference page, and is outside 4-6-page expectation. Substandard and unacceptable use of grammar with no proper formatting. Presentation was clearly not proofed for grammar or spelling.
5.0
NOTE : USE STRONG VERBS AND PLEASE SEE ATTACHED FILE
CREATE YOUR OWN MYTHOLOGY OR MONOMYTH
The Monomyth or Hero’s Journey is a popular formula used in many modern movies, like Star Wars, Lord of The Rings, and Harry Potter.
It outlines a series of trials, tribulations, and obstacles that a character must endure on their journey or quest.
The following articles outline The 17 Stages of the Monomyth.
http://changingminds.org/disciplines/storytelling/plots/hero_journey/hero_journey.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monomyth
There is also an important document attached to this email.
YOUR FINAL ASSIGNMENT
For your assignment, you will choose / create / imagine a character and run them through various stages of the monomyth.
You may use yourself as the lead character; i.e. you may use your real life as the monomyth, or make it up, creatively.
You may also make it based on a person in history, whether a family member OR a celebrity.
You may NOT use a movie or book or television show.
Basically, you are creating an outline for a movie or a book.
This should be approximately 7 to 8 pages and will require revision.
Use the attached handout as your guide. Erase my writing under the headline, keep the headline, and write your answers.
For example:
The Call To Adventure
Under each headline you will identify the moment the character goes through the stage.
Refusal of the Call
These moments do not have to be explained in-depth. It could be anywhere from a couple sentences to a paragraph.
Supernatural Aid
You can just summarize what happens during the stage OR you can write it in scene, with dialogue and movement, ectera.
Crossing of the First Threshold
Think of it like this. The assignment is basically answering twenty questions. For example, just put “What is” in front of each stage. Like, “what is” the Call to Adventure, “what is” the Refusal of the Call, ect.
Belly of the Whale
This is easier than it may sound. And if you have questions, ask.
Road of Trials
This stage is a three part question. There will be three trials in your monomyth.
Meeting with the Goddess
Hope all of this is clear. Just take your time and follow directions.
You will do fine.
Select a facility from below to use in your final project. You will use this facility in Weeks 3 through 5. If you would like to use a facility not listed here, please check with your instructor for approval.
Birthing center
OR
Doctors office
Research the facility.
Write a 260- to 350-word summary. Your summary should:
Describe the facility you selected and its purpose in the health care industry.
Identify the populations who use the facility.
Identify key characteristics of the facility.
Explain why you have selected this type of facility.
1. Find a current news story related to a sustainability topic and write a one page summary of the story. Topic I picked is Climate change.
2. How does the news story apply to what we have learned in class, please cite 2 references to course readings or materials.
NOTE : USE STRONG VERBS AND LOOK THE FILE ATTACHED
The first novella we will read this semester is Dec (2.0)
It’s an easy read — it’s set in Miami, and I wrote it.
If ya didn’t order it, I’m attaching a free .pdf of the book. It’s attached below.
You can also still order a hard copy of the book but it’s up to you. Order here if you want a hard copy..
SATIRE
If you don’t understand satire, study the definition of satire.
To truly understand satire this video example is really strong.
YOUR ASSIGNMENT IS AS FOLLOWS
You are to write at least a 6 page creative satire based on Dec 2.0..
As always, typed, double space, Times Roman, 12 pt font.
Here are some ideas..
1. Write your own chapter of the book.
Capture Miami in your own personal satire. It’s you as the main character..
Do something or go somewhere Miami-related. Something that you would do, maybe down here in South Miami or Kendall.
A holiday gathering. A trip to the roller rink or santa’s enchanted forest. Anything.
But make sure you interact with at least one character from the story..
2. Tell a story though one of the characters. Put yourself in their frame of mind and write away.
If you have another idea, go for it. I won’t say no –but it needs to be a satire and connect to the materials or themes satirized in Dec 2.0.
Your satire will be due at the end of the term in your final portfolio.
