A reaction paper is an analysis and an evaluation of the material presented. For this assignment, view one or two of the documentaries identified and write a reaction paper. You may watch and respond to one or two documentaries, write a minimum of 600 words total. Submit your paper to the Digital Drop Box by the due date. Submit assignments early to avoid problems. Any arrangements for late submission must be made directly with the professor. This paper needs to be written in APA format with a title page, abstract, and reference page with the reference of the video you watched and any other material you used. This is a formal paper, which includes an intro, body and conclusion. Keep your originality score at 15% or lower. 

LINK: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tk_ZlWJ3qJI&index=14&list=PLyJucQzcNo8rZAlBifwoC_wZFuPM-9fsP&app=desktop

React to the ideas presented. Are they clear and suitable? Explain the ideas, give examples of their application in the material presented, and compare/contrast the ideas with your own.
Discuss specific insights or facts you have learned or gained from reading the material presented. Discuss each insight or fact you have learned in a detailed paragraph, using direct examples from the material presented. Include a page reference to the material to which you are reacting.
Make a judgment about the material presented and support it. Did you like it? Why/why not? Elaborate on your answer by commenting on the content, style, clarity, and validity of ideas and method of presentation.
Analyze the material presented. What is its purpose? How does it go about achieving its goal? What is the plan/method of presentation?
Tell what others might gain from the material presented. Is it valuable? Is it informative, entertaining, or accurate? Do you think your instructor should use it again? Why/why not?
In your conclusion, summarize your ideas and tie them together.

A few comments:

If I am struggling to figure out which point you are addressing, then you won’t receive the points for that paragraph.It must be clear and address the questions and ideas presented in the instructions. Remember, the word count is a minimum . . . you can go over to get your ideas across. This paper is clearly outlined and the instructions are detailed in what is expected.

Here is how I am grading:

APA format: 3 points (An abstract is to tell me what you are going to address in your paper . . . it is NOT a summary of the material you will be talking about.)

Word count minimum reached: 3 points

Summary: 2 points

Each major point covered: 3 points each if three are chosen, 4.5 points each if only two are chosen

Conclusion: 3 points

Be sure to follow these instructions before you submit your assignment. If you have already submitted your assignment, please evaluate it and decide if you need to rework it and resubmit it by the deadline.

your proposal should be about 250 words, it should include a link or embedded short educational video, such as from Youtube or a TED Talk, and you should relate your case study or environmental topic to one of our weekly, primary authors throughout the course. This list includes Holmes Rolston, Aldo Leopold, Rachel Carson, Arne Naess, Peter Singer and Paul Taylor. See the Course Outline of our syllabus for the weekly readings). You should also survey our Sustainability textbook for any relevant case study/topics or section(s) and include that in your proposal. However, you may select a case study or topic in the public domain, and include that reference material.

your proposal should be about 250 words, it should include a link or embedded short educational video, such as from Youtube or a TED Talk, and you should relate your case study or environmental topic to one of our weekly, primary authors throughout the course. This list includes Holmes Rolston, Aldo Leopold, Rachel Carson, Arne Naess, Peter Singer and Paul Taylor. See the Course Outline of our syllabus for the weekly readings). You should also survey our Sustainability textbook for any relevant case study/topics or section(s) and include that in your proposal. However, you may select a case study or topic in the public domain, and include that reference material.

You will submit a paper analyzing the process and content of either one or two relationships in your life, using as many terms and concepts from the text and lecture notes as you can. If you write about two relationships, you will need to compare and contrast the experience you had with each person.  The paper should be typed, double-spaced, and no fewer than four full and no more than six pages. THESE PAPERS MUST BE IN ESSAY FORM and conform to the conventions of English grammar and usage.

Consider any of the following questions as potential issues to examine:

1)  How did this relationship begin?  Describe the process of relationship development, using the Knapp model of stages of relationships.

2)  Has the relationship experienced deterioration?  Describe and discuss.

3)  Discuss the role played by self-disclosure in the relationship

4)  Discuss the role by your self-concept and the process of perception in your relationship.  How have misunderstandings arisen?  How have they been resolved?

5)  Discuss the use of words/verbal language in the relationship.  Have there been instances of ambiguity or an excess of you language that you can recall?

6)  Discuss the use of nonverbal communication in the relationship.  How have body language, vocal tone, time, clothing, and distance/space played a role in the relationship?

7) Discuss how listening has played a part in the success and/or failure in the relationship.  What style of listening is used most often in the relationship?  How can the listening process be improved?

8)  If the relationship in ongoing, what do you see for the future?  Does the relationship require a significant amount of maintenance or repair?  What would be required for the relationship to terminate?

9)  How have the concepts of power and control played out in the relationships?  Who is the more dominant party you, or the other party?  Why?  Is there a significant amount of power inequity?  If so, what would be required for the power structure to be more equally balanced?

10) What theory of relationship development and/or deterioration most closely characterizes this relationship attraction, reinforcements, social exchange, or equity?

11)  How is conflict managed in the relationship?  What cultural and gender differences exist in the relationships, in terms of expectations, communication patterns, and conflict management?

For romantic relationships: What category of love is most approximated eros, agape, philos, storge, ludus, pragma, or mania?  What is your love language and that of your partner?
For friendship relationships: By what type of friendship is this relationship characterized?  Have gender or cultural issues played a role in this friendship?  Describe any issues raised in pgs. 326-332 of Adler/Proctor which have any bearing on this friendship relationship.
If this is a family member, discuss the communication pattern that most closely describes the relationship. Describe any issues raised in pgs. 319-326 of Adler/Proctor which have any bearing on this family relationship.

your proposal should be about 250 words, it should include a link or embedded short educational video, such as from Youtube or a TED Talk, and you should relate your case study or environmental topic to one of our weekly, primary authors throughout the course. This list includes Holmes Rolston, Aldo Leopold, Rachel Carson, Arne Naess, Peter Singer and Paul Taylor. See the Course Outline of our syllabus for the weekly readings). You should also survey our Sustainability textbook for any relevant case study/topics or section(s) and include that in your proposal. However, you may select a case study or topic in the public domain, and include that reference material.

You will submit a paper analyzing the process and content of either one or two relationships in your life, using as many terms and concepts from the text and lecture notes as you can. If you write about two relationships, you will need to compare and contrast the experience you had with each person.  The paper should be typed, double-spaced, and no fewer than four full and no more than six pages. THESE PAPERS MUST BE IN ESSAY FORM and conform to the conventions of English grammar and usage.

Consider any of the following questions as potential issues to examine:

1)  How did this relationship begin?  Describe the process of relationship development, using the Knapp model of stages of relationships.

2)  Has the relationship experienced deterioration?  Describe and discuss.

3)  Discuss the role played by self-disclosure in the relationship

4)  Discuss the role by your self-concept and the process of perception in your relationship.  How have misunderstandings arisen?  How have they been resolved?

5)  Discuss the use of words/verbal language in the relationship.  Have there been instances of ambiguity or an excess of you language that you can recall?

6)  Discuss the use of nonverbal communication in the relationship.  How have body language, vocal tone, time, clothing, and distance/space played a role in the relationship?

7) Discuss how listening has played a part in the success and/or failure in the relationship.  What style of listening is used most often in the relationship?  How can the listening process be improved?

8)  If the relationship in ongoing, what do you see for the future?  Does the relationship require a significant amount of maintenance or repair?  What would be required for the relationship to terminate?

9)  How have the concepts of power and control played out in the relationships?  Who is the more dominant party you, or the other party?  Why?  Is there a significant amount of power inequity?  If so, what would be required for the power structure to be more equally balanced?

10) What theory of relationship development and/or deterioration most closely characterizes this relationship attraction, reinforcements, social exchange, or equity?

11)  How is conflict managed in the relationship?  What cultural and gender differences exist in the relationships, in terms of expectations, communication patterns, and conflict management?

For romantic relationships: What category of love is most approximated eros, agape, philos, storge, ludus, pragma, or mania?  What is your love language and that of your partner?
For friendship relationships: By what type of friendship is this relationship characterized?  Have gender or cultural issues played a role in this friendship?  Describe any issues raised in pgs. 326-332 of Adler/Proctor which have any bearing on this friendship relationship.
If this is a family member, discuss the communication pattern that most closely describes the relationship. Describe any issues raised in pgs. 319-326 of Adler/Proctor which have any bearing on this family relationship.

Select a psychoactive drug that is of pharmacological interest to you, but not one you will review as part of your Critical Review. For this paper, you may choose drugs of abuse; however, the paper must focus on the pharmacology of the drug and not on the social or addictive aspects. If you focus on addiction and social impact, your paper will not receive credit.

In addition to the text, research a minimum of three peer-reviewed articles published within the last five years on your selected drug. Prepare a three-page summary of the drug using the PSY630 Rapid Review Example paper (Links to an external site.) as a guide.

In your Rapid Review, analyze and explain the pharmacological aspects of the drug as they relate to the following: neurotransmitters affected, receptors, route of administration, half-life, doses, side effects, drug interactions, contraindications, and other important facets of the drug. Explain these aspects of the drug in terms of the psychiatric disorders indicated for the drug and the issue(s) associated with that use. If there is no accepted therapeutic use for the drug, evaluate and describe the actions of the drug with regard to the abuse process.

The paper:

Must be three to five double-spaced pages in length, excluding title page and references page, and it must be formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center. (Links to an external site.)
Must include a title page with the following:
Title of paper
Your name
Course name and number
Your instructors name
Date submitted
Must address the topic of the paper with critical thought.
Must use at least three peer-reviewed sources in addition to the text.
Must document all sources in APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
Must include a separate references page that is formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.

You will submit a paper analyzing the process and content of either one or two relationships in your life, using as many terms and concepts from the text and lecture notes as you can. If you write about two relationships, you will need to compare and contrast the experience you had with each person.  The paper should be typed, double-spaced, and no fewer than four full and no more than six pages. THESE PAPERS MUST BE IN ESSAY FORM and conform to the conventions of English grammar and usage.

Consider any of the following questions as potential issues to examine:

1)  How did this relationship begin?  Describe the process of relationship development, using the Knapp model of stages of relationships.

2)  Has the relationship experienced deterioration?  Describe and discuss.

3)  Discuss the role played by self-disclosure in the relationship

4)  Discuss the role by your self-concept and the process of perception in your relationship.  How have misunderstandings arisen?  How have they been resolved?

5)  Discuss the use of words/verbal language in the relationship.  Have there been instances of ambiguity or an excess of you language that you can recall?

6)  Discuss the use of nonverbal communication in the relationship.  How have body language, vocal tone, time, clothing, and distance/space played a role in the relationship?

7) Discuss how listening has played a part in the success and/or failure in the relationship.  What style of listening is used most often in the relationship?  How can the listening process be improved?

8)  If the relationship in ongoing, what do you see for the future?  Does the relationship require a significant amount of maintenance or repair?  What would be required for the relationship to terminate?

9)  How have the concepts of power and control played out in the relationships?  Who is the more dominant party you, or the other party?  Why?  Is there a significant amount of power inequity?  If so, what would be required for the power structure to be more equally balanced?

10) What theory of relationship development and/or deterioration most closely characterizes this relationship attraction, reinforcements, social exchange, or equity?

11)  How is conflict managed in the relationship?  What cultural and gender differences exist in the relationships, in terms of expectations, communication patterns, and conflict management?

For romantic relationships: What category of love is most approximated eros, agape, philos, storge, ludus, pragma, or mania?  What is your love language and that of your partner?
For friendship relationships: By what type of friendship is this relationship characterized?  Have gender or cultural issues played a role in this friendship?  Describe any issues raised in pgs. 326-332 of Adler/Proctor which have any bearing on this friendship relationship.
If this is a family member, discuss the communication pattern that most closely describes the relationship. Describe any issues raised in pgs. 319-326 of Adler/Proctor which have any bearing on this family relationship.

Select a psychoactive drug that is of pharmacological interest to you, but not one you will review as part of your Critical Review. For this paper, you may choose drugs of abuse; however, the paper must focus on the pharmacology of the drug and not on the social or addictive aspects. If you focus on addiction and social impact, your paper will not receive credit.

In addition to the text, research a minimum of three peer-reviewed articles published within the last five years on your selected drug. Prepare a three-page summary of the drug using the PSY630 Rapid Review Example paper (Links to an external site.) as a guide.

In your Rapid Review, analyze and explain the pharmacological aspects of the drug as they relate to the following: neurotransmitters affected, receptors, route of administration, half-life, doses, side effects, drug interactions, contraindications, and other important facets of the drug. Explain these aspects of the drug in terms of the psychiatric disorders indicated for the drug and the issue(s) associated with that use. If there is no accepted therapeutic use for the drug, evaluate and describe the actions of the drug with regard to the abuse process.

The paper:

Must be three to five double-spaced pages in length, excluding title page and references page, and it must be formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center. (Links to an external site.)
Must include a title page with the following:
Title of paper
Your name
Course name and number
Your instructors name
Date submitted
Must address the topic of the paper with critical thought.
Must use at least three peer-reviewed sources in addition to the text.
Must document all sources in APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
Must include a separate references page that is formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.

Critical Review
The final assignment for this class will be a 10-page critical review of the drug treatment for a neuropsychological disorder.  The review will use peer-reviewed and/or scholarly sources to provide an evidence base for the evaluation of current drug treatment modalities for the disorder.

The paper will be evaluated on the inclusion of the following information.

Introduction:

Evaluate the disorder in terms of symptomatic and behavioral presentation. Include the time, course, and progression of the disorder. Evaluate and explain special features of the disease epidemiology including risk factors for development of the disorder, lifespan and reproductive factors increasing risk of developing the disorder, and any genetic, environmental, or behavioral factors that increase risk.

Theory:

Evaluate the predominant theory or theories regarding the biological basis of the disorder. Explain the disorder in terms of pertinent neurotransmitter and receptor theories and use your references to provide an evidence base for these theories. Analyze neurotransmitter system(s) involved in the pathology of the disorder, including a description of: 1) the involved neurotransmitter(s) and receptor(s), 2) regions of the nervous system (brain, spinal cord, or peripheral nervous system) involved with any pathological anatomical changes, and 3) abnormalities of neural circuits and pathways. Include an explanation of how receptor agonists or antagonists would theoretically treat the disorder to reverse the pathology and restore normal function, or why they would be expected to improve symptoms.

Treatment:

Evaluate drug therapies for treating the disorder based on the current understanding of the biological basis of the disorder. Include a description of the behavioral symptoms and physical signs of the disorder, and identify the drug class(es) used in pharmacological therapy with a discussion of the mechanism of action of the drug class(es). Explain why the pharmacodynamics of the drug class(es) would affect the pathology of the disorder to restore function and/or improve symptoms. Include a discussion of the drug pharmacokinetics for each drug class. Provide examples of available marketed drugs within each class. Describe any drug side effects and/or adverse effects of the drug treatment and their biological basis, including issues related to contraindications, interactions, drug metabolism, and elimination. In addition, explain risks, benefits, and ethical implications for high-risk and exceptional treatment conditions.

Conclusion:

Summarize theories of neuropsychological disorders as they relate to principles of drug action for that selected disorder. Provide a synopsis of the evidence base that supports or disproves current theories regarding the pathology of the disorder, advantages and disadvantages of current drug treatment(s). Lastly, evaluate any controversies regarding ethical and/or risk-benefit perspectives associated with the current treatment(s). Describe possible areas for future research.

The paper:

Must be 10 to 12 double-spaced pages in length (not including title and reference pages) and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center. (Links to an external site.)
Must include a separate title page with the following:
Title of paper
Students name
Course name and number
Instructors name
Date submitted
Must use at least six peer-reviewed and/or scholarly sources to provide an evidence base for your analysis. You may cite and reference the DSM-5 as one of your sources used for the grading credit.
Must document all sources in APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
Must include a separate reference page that is formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.