The paper must be 3-4 pages in length. (3-4 FULL pages!)

You can pick your own definition argument, use any of those suggested in chapter 9, or use the default topic, above.  Your thesis sentence (which MUST be in your intro) will contain a definitional claim.

You must use MLA documentation. You may NOT use a paper submitted for another class. All work is run through Turn-It-In.com, and if your paper has been submitted elsewhere, you will not receive credit.

Be sure to read the attached rubric carefully so that you will see how you will be assessed.

You must include at least 3 quotes. One quote must be a long quote (4 or more lines) while one will be a short quote (2 lines or less).

Practice using the skills you have already learned, such as arguing from the heart,  etc 

Remember to come up with a purpose for your paper and find the voice you would like to use. Ill let you decide who your audience is!!

And finally:  no cliche topics!  That means, please do not write on the death penalty, gun control, abortion, legalizing MJ, or euthanasia.  These topics have officially been “done to death” in college papers. Also be sure your topic lends itself to using credible and scholarly sources.

For this weeks journal entry, you will complete what is known as an annotated bibliography. In an annotated bibliography,
you will summarize, assess, and reflect on your references. Completing an annotated bibliography will help you read your
sources more carefully. You may even find that a source really does not fit the needs of your essay, which gives you the
opportunity to find a better one. For this assignment, find at least two sources from the Waldorf Online Library, and
summarize the information from them. You will then assess the usefulness of the source for your essay, and then you will
reflect on how the source will be used to support your essays topic. You should have at least three paragraphs written for
each source.

Tines new Roman 12 point. Use three scholarly sources and APA format. Analyze two leadership styles and corresponding communication skills that drive organizational effectiveness. Analyze a theory that corresponds to my personal leadership style and describe how leadership styles can affect organizational culture that drives innovation.

One of the reasons it is important to learn about different cultures is that it allows us the ability to better recognize our unconscious conceptions/misconceptions of people that differ from us. When you first meet/see/interact with someone who is visibly different than you, it is likely that you already have a preconceived expectation of how they are going to act, what values and beliefs they hold, and even the style of communication in which they will engage. This is especially true if your only experience with these cultural differences has been learned via the media. What often happens is once you engage with members from other cultures first-hand, you will find media portrayals may have mislead you and falsely shaped your unconscious expectations of how others exist.

The discussion is intended to get you thinking about the way you perceive others who are different than you. Please watch the following videos and respond to the prompts below (500 word min. in total).

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fL5WzpuvXfY

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=18zvlz5CxPE

Please describe a time where you have felt that someone else has unfairly judged you based on the way you look, or because of a group membership you belong to (e.g., religious, political, sexual orientation, ethnic, etc.).
How did this make you feel about yourself?
How did this make you feel about the person who incorrectly passed judgment on you?
Describe a time when you unfairly stereotyped an individual from a different culture? How did this make you feel once you realized you unfairly judged them?

Overview
The purpose of this assignment is to practice with the rhetorical, academic moves you are learning in your textbook, the “They Say, I Say” format, in order to compose a short response to a text. In They Say, I Say, you are learning how to define what others are saying, as well as craft your own response in order to produce academic writing and response. For this essay, you will work on synthesizing your skills in comprehension, analysis, summary/paraphrase/quotation, and response.

Furthermore, today’s employers place a lot of value on thinking critically, ethical judgment and integrity, intercultural skills, innovation, and a life-long desire to learn. One way to continue to learn outside of school, get exposure to new ideas, and hone your own position is by regularly reading, viewing, and listening to high quality material, as well as discussing it with others. This assignment will allow you to organize your use of the templates in They Say, I Say, as well as show the progress you are making in the acquisition of academic skills and desirable professional qualities.

Academic Values: Critical Thinking, Critical Analysis, Discourse, Claims Based on Evidence, Close Reading

Process
For this assignment, you will choose and respond to one of the articles in Chapter 17 or Chapter 20 of They Say, I Say. After reading this assignment all the way through, you should choose a few articles to read that might interest you before finalizing your choice.

In order to respond to the text, you must first read it and comprehend the author(s) viewpoint, position, or argument. The first part of your assignment will therefore be an explanation of the author’s position using summary, paraphrase, and perhaps some quotation. The second part of the assignment will be your response, using the concepts you learned in Chapter 4, “Yes/No/Okay, But.”

Your essay will start to bring together and synthesize your growing understanding of the templates in They Say, I Say, and the practice with them we have been doing in class. Therefore, on this assignment you will be assessed on comprehension, summary, analysis, understanding of the rhetorical situation, and the logic of your own response. You will also begin to use MLA format in order to design your document and cite your source(s). You may use the Short Template linked in Canvas as the basis for this assignment.

Remember, you are not expected to know everything there is to know about academic reading, writing, and rhetoric, but to show that you are building the skills necessary for success in academic and professional contexts. The more practice you have, the better you will become!

Assignment Criteria
An essay that “Achieves Excellence” will be distinguished in the following criteria:

The writer explains the authors ideas, position, and/or point of view using the concepts and methods addressed in Chapters 1-3 of They Say, I Say.
The writer identifies the reasons and/or evidence upon which the author is basing his or her position.
The writer identifies the conclusions drawn by the author(s)/speaker(s)/producer(s).
The writer uses summary, paraphrase, and/or some quotation appropriately in his or her explanation of the text.
The writer responds to the text with his or her position using the concepts and methods addressed in Chapter 4 of They Say, I Say (“Yes/No/Okay, But”).
The writer defends and supports his or her position with sound evidence and reasoning.
The writer draws well-supported conclusions about the position taken by the author in the text.
The writer demonstrates reading comprehension, analysis, and critical thinking.
The writer meets the standards for effective communication (clarity, logic, precision, accuracy, significance, and fairness).
The writer adheres to MLA guidelines for formatting, in-text citations, and the Works Cited page.
The essay is 500-750 words.

This assignment is for you to collect and analyze some examples of assessments that are relative to your area of expertise or upcoming teaching position.  For this task, you are to collect electronic copies of at least five assessments used by another teacher at your grade level/subject area or the grade level you hope to teach.  Ideally you will collect these from teachers directly; however, you can find good assessments online as well.

Once you’ve collected these five or more assessments, write a 2-3 page essay about the assessments’ strengths and weaknesses.  (The essay should include the strengths and weaknesses of each of the five assessments.  You do not have to write 2-3 pages per assessment; it should be collective.)  Would your collection represent a good array of assessments for a given marking period?  Why or why not?  Your assessments and essay need to be submitted as one file. 

OVERVIEW

The purpose of this assignment is to practice with the rhetorical, academic moves you are learning in your textbook, the “They Say, I Say” format, in order to compose a thesis and support it with evidence. In They Say, I Say, you are learning how to define what others are saying, as well as craft your own claims and engage in synthesis of sources as evidence in order to produce academic writing. For this essay, you will work on your skills in comprehension, analysis, summary/paraphrase/quotation, and supporting a thesis with evidence. You will also engage in some preliminary steps toward research.

Today’s employers place a lot of value on thinking critically, ethical judgment and integrity, intercultural skills, innovation, and a life-long desire to learn. One way to continue to learn outside of school, get exposure to new ideas, and hone your own position is by regularly reading, viewing, and listening to high quality material, as well as discussing it with others. In particular, for this essay you will be engaging with quality sources and making a claim using those sources as evidence in order to share your point of view with others. This assignment will allow you to organize your use of the templates in They Say, I Say, as well as show the progress you are making in the acquisition of academic skills and desirable professional qualities.

Academic Values: Critical Thinking, Critical Analysis, Discourse, Claims Based on Evidence, Close Reading, Synthesis, Documentation, Compare/Contrast

PROCESS

For this assignment, you will compose a rough draft and a final draft of an essay about a topic you think is significant and meaningful. You will use three sources gathered from the web or FSW databases in order to demonstrate your thesis and support it with evidence. You should anticipate “counter claims” (Chapter 6, They Say, I Say) when composing your assignment. Your topic can fall under any of these three areas: 1) Science and Technology, 2) Entertainment and Popular Culture, 3) History and Culture, or an interdisciplinary topic that spans areas. Here are some examples of professionally written articles (“mentor texts”)1 that share similarities with the purpose of this assignment:

Andrew David Thaler, “The Politics of Fake Documentaries  (Links to an external site.)”
Chloe Angyal, “Romantic Comedies Teach Women That Stalking is A Compliment  (Links to an external site.)”
Laurie Penny, “What to Do When You’re Not the Hero Anymore  (Links to an external site.)”
Claudia Rankine, “The Meaning of Serena Williams  (Links to an external site.)”
Your essay should identify a topic that you think is meaningful and significant, and compose a thesis statement supported by evidence (sources and your analysis) for why other people should pay attention. In order to satisfy the requirements for this assignment, you should complete the steps below.

Compose a first draft of your essay. While your first draft does not have to be the full 900 words of the final draft, it should not be less than 600 words. Your first draft should include a working thesis, body paragraphs, and an outline of your conclusion. You will submit your rough draft to Canvas for peer review. During the peer review workshop period, you will be giving and receiving feedback on your essay.
After you have received feedback on your draft during the workshop period, you should make a revision plan. Your revision plan should identify key areas for improvement and identify specific actions you will take to revision your essay. You should enter those specific actions into your calendar between the workshop and the due date.
Revise your response essay based upon the feedback you received in the draft workshop. Make sure your essay has an original title. Submit your final draft by the due date.
Example Student Essay Preview the document

ASSIGNMENT CRITERIA

Drafting Workshop and Revision

The writer participates in the drafting workshop and has a draft of at least 600 words.
The writer participates constructively in the draft workshop period by giving thoughtful feedback to his or her peers.
The writer takes notes on his or her Revision Plan.
The writer makes a revision plan with a specific calendar based upon the feedback he or she receives.
The writer demonstrates a sound process of drafting and revision.
Final Draft

The writer has composed a strong introduction and thesis statement (Intro-Ch. 7).
The writer uses summary, paraphrase, and/or some quotation appropriately in his or her use of sources (Chapters 2 and 3).
The writer demonstrates strong reading comprehension of his or her three sources (Ch. 1-7).
The writer supports his or her thesis with compelling evidence (Ch. 1-8).
The writer’s claim and support demonstrate sound reasoning (Ch. 1-8).
The writer has a strong, well-supported conclusion (Ch. 1-8).
The writer makes his or her claim and supports it with three sources using templates and methods from Chapters 1-8 in They Say, I Say.
The writer demonstrates reading comprehension, analysis, and critical thinking.
The writer meets the standards for effective communication (clarity, logic, precision, accuracy, significance, and fairness).
The writer includes a Works Cited page (NLSH).
The writer adheres to MLA style (NLSH).
The essay is 900-1100 words.

The writer
…seeks to persuade audiences to accept a particular position on a controversial issue.
…describes the problem, proposes a solution, and provides justification.

Pick out a topic that you would like to persuade your audience to accept a particular position on. Then complete the graphic organizer with the following information:

1. Describe the problem you would like to present to your audience.
2. Provide 5 solutions to your problem.
3. Provide justification for why you problem is still an issue in modern society. Then provide justification for why your solutions would be beneficial.

Once you have completed the graphic organizer begin drafting your paper based the following outline:

Part 1: Describe the problem. Define the problem. Who says it is a problem, and why do they say so? Does your audience need convincing that this is a problem? Try to use specific facts and figures in describing the problem.

Part 2: Propose a solution. Describe your solution(s). Are your solutions practical? Are they obtainable? How so? Be very specific in outlining the steps of your solution.

Part 3: Defend your proposal. Why will your ideas work? Anticipate what the opposition will say and counter their concerns. Recognize that people may be reluctant to get behind your proposal and explain to them why they should overcome their reluctance.

Part 4: Conclude. Remind the readers why this problem needs their attention. Readdress why they should care. What action do you hope is prompted by the writing of this piece? Tell the readers what they can do or how they can help.

THE CORONADO YOUTH EMPLOYMENT AND RECREATIONAL SERVICES CASE

The Youth Employment and recreational Services (YERS) program has a
long and distinguished history in Coronado, California, a growing city
of 1.2 million.  In recent years, however, minority community members
have pressed for increased services and facilities in parts of town
with substantial minority populations.  These requests have created
dissension and growing controversy among YERS staff and members of the
board of directors.

            Margaret Rims was promoted to executive director of the
Coronado YERS in 1993 after having been with the organization for
twenty-five years.  Margaret began her career in recreational
development while attending Coronado University and has seen the YERS
program grow from a one-person staff with limited programs in a single
location to a staff of fifteen offering services at seven Coronado
sites.

            Over the years, Margaret Rims has been given credit for
the growth of the recreation program.  She has also been asked by the
National Council of Youth Employment and Recreational Services to lead
several regional and national workshops on recreation program
development.

            When Margaret Rims applied in 1993 for the position of
executive director, several staff and board members were surprised
because most assumed Margaret was happy in her recreational
development role.  Several members of the board voiced concern
regarding Margarets overall administrative qualifications, but the
prevailing sentiment supported her promotion.

            Margaret Rims became executive director of the Coronado
YERS in the climate of mounting pressure to increase services and
facilities in the heavily populated minority areas of northeast
Coronado.  Several local groups also questioned minority
representation on the YERS staff and board.  Margaret felt these
pressures were best ignored.  She disagreed with several members of
the board and staff who urged her to develop plans to increase
minority involvement.

            Margarets strongest staff support came from her friend
and personnel director, Jack Smith.  Hack has been TERS personnel
director for eighteen years. He has not been pleased with increasing
personnel requirements established by the national executive council
of YERS.  Specifically, he has disagreed with detailing job
descriptions and the institution of grievance procedures for
employees.  Jack believes employers should have more latitude than
these policies and procedures affords.  Some minority job applicants
have charged that Jack was responsible for keeping them from being
employed at YERS.

            In early 1994, several influential minority community
members met with Margaret Rims to discuss YERS program expansion.
Margaret told the group she could not recommend the expansion they
desired.  At the meeting, William Hung, an Asian lawyer in Coronado,
confronted Margaret with questions about jack Smiths hiring
practices.  Margaret stoutly defended Jack.

            The citizens group was not content with Margarets
responses.  William Hung contacted the YERS president, Dr. Atkins, and
requested a formal meeting with the board of directors.  The group,
with Hung as the spokesperson, also expressed concern to national YERS
officials.  National YERS funds, along with membership dues, are the
primary source of funding for the YERS programs.

            The national director of YERS contacted Dr. Atkins to
express his concern.  He further stated his apprehension that any
publicity of the issue might adversely affect the YERS fund drive
scheduled to begin within the month.

            Unknown to Margaret Rims, the board of directors met with
William Hung and the group who originally confronted Margaret.  Dr.
Atkins and the board pledged support of program development in
northeast Coronado and promised to look into the hiring practices
directed by Jack Smith.

            At the next formal meeting, the board informed Margaret of
the need to include this promised expansion in 1995 planning.  No
specific actions were taken regarding either Jack Smith or current
hiring practices.  At the same meeting, the firm of Jones and Belew,
certified public accountants for YERS, reported that revenues from
membership were down 10 percent from the previous year and that
facilities maintenance costs were increasing an unexpected 8 percent.
Those board members who had originally questioned Margarets
capabilities become vocal in their criticism.

            In the next few months, the division between the board and
Margaret Rims became open and hostile.  Dr. Atkins received reports
that Margaret stated in a staff meeting that she had been in YERS
before any of the board and would be there when they were all gone.

            The rift flared into open with Margaret submitted the YERS
program proposal for 1995 to the board of directors.  No inclusion of
the promised programming in northeast Coronado was made. Margaret
walked out of the meeting in anger.  She refused to return telephone
calls from Dr. Atkins.

            Dr. Atkins called an emergency meeting of the board of
directors. Sentiment ran high and the board voted to terminate
Margaret Rims.  Two members objected claiming the action was in direct
violation of national YERS policy, which called for warning or
probation before termination of any employee.  One member further
expressed concern about community reaction to terminating a
twenty-five-tear employee.

            Community leaders openly criticized both Margaret Rims and
the board. Margaret retained a lawyer and named Dr. Atkins and several
member of the board in a defamation of character suit.  She also
claimed specific damages for loss of retirement benefits because of
termination.  During the initial months of 1995, membership revenues
dropped by 12 percent and staff morale and productivity were extremely
low. Jack Smith was believed by Dr. Atkins to be a focal point if
internal disruption and a source of continuing information for
Margaret Rims. Amid these problems the search for a new executive
director began.

1.  What are the ethical and value issues in this case?

2.  Describe how the flow of information throughout YERS affected the problem.

3.  How would you describe the communication climate?

4.  What should Margaret Rims do?  What should the board do?

For this journal entry, you will read and reflect upon “The New Jim Crow” by Michelle Alexander in They Say, I Say (Ch. 16). In order to successfully complete this journal entry, you will need to identify the conversation Alexander is participating in about race, criminal justice, and mass incarceration. You should use the templates we have learned about so far in order to help you write a reflective journal entry of 300-500 words based on the questions and assignment criteria below. One way to approach this assignment would be to use and adapt the “Template of Templates” in the Introduction to your textbook.

For your consideration:

What conversation is Alexander participating in? Who is her “They Say” and what does she think about their point(s) of view?
What is the general claim made by Alexander in this essay?
What is the most important critique she offers in her essay?
What do you think about her claims and evidence?
Assignment Grading Criteria

The journal entry reflects critical thinking and the ability to apply concepts from the relevant textbook chapters.
The journal entry illustrates careful reading and college-level comprehension of the assigned text.
The journal entry is well-developed and shows thought and planning.
The journal entry is well-written and organized.