You need to:
*show your work with the solution (use an embedded image or the fx button on the Rich Text Editor), and explain in text form how you approached and worked through the problem.
*explain in the text how you approached and worked through the problem
33. How are the Bohr model and the quantum mechanical model of the hydrogen atom similar? How are they different?
76. Based on their positions in the periodic table, list the following atoms in order of increasing radius: Sr, Ca, Si, Cl.
You will need a minimum of 6 references, preferably 3 from peer-reviewed journals and 3 from governmental agency reports (e.g. OSHA or NIOSH). All pictures and images must be cited. Each slide must include content, not just a picture. Each slide must indicate which reference(s) was used and a slide containing a complete reference list in APA format must be included.
The information on this topic should include, but not be limited to:
-The industries and occupations relevant to the issue
-The potential health effects related to the issue
-The regulatory requirements related to the issue
-Mitigation strategies for related hazards
-Methods for communicating safe work practices regarding the issue.
For simplicity and organization, it would help to make the previous bullet points the titles of your individual slides.
32 slides including the title page and references in APA format
1. Introduction: Your introduction introduces the problem, raises your level-3 question, and announces your argument. It needs to be at least a paragraph and include the thesis. The question being answered by your papers argument needs to be clearly stated, either as an explicit question or a very clearly implied one. Include the following elements in whatever order works best for the flow of your argument:
-Frame the problem in an interesting way that shows its significance
-Introduce texts and/or traditions you will be analyzing
-Pose a level 3 question–the issue your essay will address
-Answer your question with a thesis
2. Thesis: The thesis answers the level 3 question you ask in your introduction and lays out the structure of your argument, creating the readers expectations for what is to come in the essay:
Acknowledges an alternative view of the subjectthe opposition (an although point)
Refers to the subject of the question
Makes an assertion about the subject (your position on the issue)
Provides at least 3 reasons (sometimes fewer, sometimes more) to support the assertion, listed in the most logical and persuasive order for your argument
Stated as a formula: TS = O + S + A + R (3+)
Thesis Sentence = Opposition + Subject + Assertion + Reasons (3+)
3. Significance: This is the so what argument of your paper: How do your essay, and your thesis/assertion, in particular, contribute to a better understanding of air pollution and climate change? Why does it matter that the problem is addressed and resolved as well as possible?
4.Context: Accurately establish the historical and cultural contexts of relevant events and texts for both 1) the topic you are exploring and 2) any sources you use.
Provide enough context for a reader outside of the course to follow your reasoning. For instance, the first time you refer to an author, even if the author is in your Works Cited and even if the people in your course know who you are talking about, write the full name and give enough background information to make it clear why you are referencing this author. The context can be woven into any part of the paper where it is appropriate and needed for the reader to understand and be persuaded by your argument.
5. Opposition (Counterargument) and Rebuttal: Consider at least one alternative view to your assertion. Discuss its merits and flaws fairly, presenting evidence for it. Then show why your argument is better, rebutting the counterargument with evidence for your argument. You dont have to claim that your interpretation is right or true; you just have to persuade that it is the strongest among competing views.
6. Conclusion: Write a conclusion that ends your argument persuasively. It needs to briefly and non-repetitively summarize the argument, elaborate on the implications and significance of your thesis, and suggest a direction for further study or action. The conclusion should be at least 1 paragraph.
7. Sources: For this paper, you will need
-The allegory of Cave pdf
-2 sources from 1_1,1_2,and 1_3 pdf.
– At least 2 peer-reviewed articles from academic journals
Investigating the Green House Effect
You are a citizen concerned about the greenhouse effect and decide to do some research about the issue. You come across a great website that has a simulation on just this topic. Once you have run some simulations and made some observations you become more than concerned, you are downright outraged! The next step is to write a letter to the editor detailing your concern and using what you have learned as evidence in support of your position.
1. Go to http://phet.colorado.edu/en/simulation/greenhouse
2. Open up The Greenhouse Effect and explore all of its features.
3. Write down your observations of what happens during the three featured time periods: Today, 1750 and Ice Age.
4. Change the number of clouds for each time period and write down your observations.
5. Scientists predict CO2 levels to increase to 490 1260 ppm by the end of the century. Run a simulation that will help you predict how this change will affect temperature. What do you find?
6. Write a letter to the editor detailing your findings.
Formulate an organized, clearly worded, and succinct initial post that substantively covers all discussion points stated for your chosen topic. Because your initial post will be scored on the degree to which you meet these standards, there is no set minimum word requirement. However, there is a set maximum word requirement confine your initial post to 500 words. Remember that we are all reading each others posts, and one that is succinctly written is more likely to be read and responded to, thus furthering our discussion on that topic.
Include at least one graphic, video, or image that visually adds to some aspect of your post – as they say, pictures are worth 1000 words!
Using A DIFFERENCE SCIENCE SOURCE, answer the question posed: DO NOT USE THE SAME SOURCE I LINKED, it is what the writer used to ask the questions.
https://www.fireadaptedwashington.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Resources-Threatened-and-Endangered-Species.pdf
“Shrub Steppe: Threatened and Endangered Species”
Pygmy rabbits are in areas with limited habitat that is crucial to their productivity and success. With that being said, in your opinion, what would you propose to do to mitigate/ manage for wildfire occurrence while protecting these endangered species?
The reading reflections will consist of one-two-page analytical reflections over specific assigned texts of your choosing from five different class meetings. These assignments should develop a critical analytical reflection on a key argument or problem in the text. You do not need to advance an explicit thesis or conclusion in these assignments, and you should not simply summarize the readings, but rather critically explore specific claims or arguments made in the readings.
The reading reflections will consist og one-two-page analytical reflections over specific assigned texts of your choosing from five different class meetings. These assignments should develop a critical analytical reflection on a key argument or problem in the text. You do not need to advance an explicit thesis or conclusion in these assignments, and you should not simply summarize the readings, but rather critically explore specific claims or arguments made in the readings.
The reading reflections will consist one-two-page analytical reflections over specific assigned texts of your choosing from five different class meetings. These assignments should develop a critical analytical reflection on a key argument or problem in the text. You do not need to advance an explicit thesis or conclusion in these assignments, and you should not simply summarize the readings, but rather critically explore specific claims or arguments made in the readings.
1. Slide 1: topic slide
2. Slide 2: INTRO: general BG (can mention effects to show importance) + aim
3. Slide 3 (or 3 & 4) BODY: Give 1-3 solutions (and evaluate +/-)
4. Slide 4 or 5: CONCLUSION: re-state solutions + give academic comment
5. Last slide: List of References (URL, CITATION)
** Citation to everything if there is any statistic
** Need presentation notes ( because I will present during the class )
