Answer just one out of the three following questions below in approximately 1,000 words. (choose just one of the 3 questions)

Recommendations

Provide a well-constructed and reasoned essay to one question in a thoughtful, considered manner. You should not simply take a position about how particular ethical issues should be addressed. Rather, you should provide reasons, arguments, and evidence in support of your claims. The more specific and detailed your essay, the better grade you will receive.
Focus on key ideas, competing arguments, and how to address conflicting moral considerations.
Acknowledge and address moral complexity that arises from philosophical frameworks.
Proceed beyond questions and concerns and develop analyses that provide insight into how an individual should address particular topics.
Focus upon specific issues and avoid simply providing an overview of the subject matter and readings.
Do not merely repeat arguments made in assigned course material. Rather, use this material to develop your own ethical analysis of assigned topics.

Questions:

1.You are at a dinner party and someone says to you, I believe that abortion is wrong and you believe that abortion is right, but we dont disagree because ethics are relative. Provide an argument against this position.

2.Explain in detail Kant’s notion of the first formulation of the categorical imperative, how it is the basis of doing one’s duty as opposed to acting on one’s inclinations, how rationality is the cornerstone of the categorical imperative, and why Kant says a person is morally autonomous. Use the following as the framework for answering this exam question; according to Kant, why can’t one say, “I can lie whenever it’s in my interest to do so?”

3.Explain in detail the relation among the concepts of habit, the recognition of the “mean,” virtue and happiness according to Aristotle.

Thomson uses the example of the violinist to argue that abortions are sometimes morally permissible, specifically in cases of pregnancies due to rape. One major premise of her argument is the assumption that the violinist is analogous in all morally relevant ways to pregnancies due to rape. This is perhaps the most controversial premise in her argument, as there are several differences between the violinist case and pregnancies due to rape, differences that some have thought are also morally relevant.
If you choose to write on this prompt, complete the Expository Task for it, or specifically:
First: Explain Thomsons argument, based on the example of the violinist, for the conclusion that abortion is morally permissible in pregnancies due to rape.
Second, brainstorm one (or two maximum!) difference between the violinist case and pregnancies due to rape that you think could potentially be a morally relevant difference. Describe the difference you have in mind and explain the reasoning behind thinking that this difference could be morally relevant and thus undermine Thomsons argument.

(500 Word Reflection Due on Discussion Board by the 18th)

Read : Shouler /Chapter 1 Soccio Chapters 2-3 and
          Nagel, Shouler Chapter 1, Chapter 2 , Soccio 2-3

https://studylib.net/doc/8429009/archetypes-of-wisdom

https://books.google.com/books?id=aF_sDQAAQBAJ&pg=PT25&lpg=PT25&dq=The+Everything+Guide+to+Understanding+Philosophy:+Understand+the+basic+concepts+of+the+greatest+thinkers+of+all+time+by+kenneth+Shouler+chapter+1&source=bl&ots=qx2L3Pz5uR&sig=ACfU3U07pcvxA6Qy0aXnQpvoCq9wCxgBng&hl=en&ppis=_e&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjs3cLO4uzmAhXNqp4KHRS5CoYQ6AEwA3oECAoQAQ#v=onepage&q=The%20Everything%20Guide%20to%20Understanding%20Philosophy%3A%20Understand%20the%20basic%20concepts%20of%20the%20greatest%20thinkers%20of%20all%20time%20by%20kenneth%20Shouler%20chapter%201&f=false