OVERVIEW

The purpose of this assignment is to practice with the rhetorical, academic moves you are learning in your textbook, the “They Say, I Say” format, in order to compose a thesis and support it with evidence. In They Say, I Say, you are learning how to define what others are saying, as well as craft your own claims and engage in synthesis of sources as evidence in order to produce academic writing. For this essay, you will work on your skills in comprehension, analysis, summary/paraphrase/quotation, and supporting a thesis with evidence. You will also engage in some preliminary steps toward research.

Today’s employers place a lot of value on thinking critically, ethical judgment and integrity, intercultural skills, innovation, and a life-long desire to learn. One way to continue to learn outside of school, get exposure to new ideas, and hone your own position is by regularly reading, viewing, and listening to high quality material, as well as discussing it with others. In particular, for this essay you will be engaging with quality sources and making a claim using those sources as evidence in order to share your point of view with others. This assignment will allow you to organize your use of the templates in They Say, I Say, as well as show the progress you are making in the acquisition of academic skills and desirable professional qualities.

Academic Values: Critical Thinking, Critical Analysis, Discourse, Claims Based on Evidence, Close Reading, Synthesis, Documentation, Compare/Contrast

PROCESS

For this assignment, you will compose a rough draft and a final draft of an essay about a topic you think is significant and meaningful. You will use three sources gathered from the web or FSW databases in order to demonstrate your thesis and support it with evidence. You should anticipate “counter claims” (Chapter 6, They Say, I Say) when composing your assignment. Your topic can fall under any of these three areas: 1) Science and Technology, 2) Entertainment and Popular Culture, 3) History and Culture, or an interdisciplinary topic that spans areas. Here are some examples of professionally written articles (“mentor texts”)1 that share similarities with the purpose of this assignment:

Andrew David Thaler, “The Politics of Fake Documentaries  (Links to an external site.)”
Chloe Angyal, “Romantic Comedies Teach Women That Stalking is A Compliment  (Links to an external site.)”
Laurie Penny, “What to Do When You’re Not the Hero Anymore  (Links to an external site.)”
Claudia Rankine, “The Meaning of Serena Williams  (Links to an external site.)”
Your essay should identify a topic that you think is meaningful and significant, and compose a thesis statement supported by evidence (sources and your analysis) for why other people should pay attention. In order to satisfy the requirements for this assignment, you should complete the steps below.

Compose a first draft of your essay. While your first draft does not have to be the full 900 words of the final draft, it should not be less than 600 words. Your first draft should include a working thesis, body paragraphs, and an outline of your conclusion. You will submit your rough draft to Canvas for peer review. During the peer review workshop period, you will be giving and receiving feedback on your essay.
After you have received feedback on your draft during the workshop period, you should make a revision plan. Your revision plan should identify key areas for improvement and identify specific actions you will take to revision your essay. You should enter those specific actions into your calendar between the workshop and the due date.
Revise your response essay based upon the feedback you received in the draft workshop. Make sure your essay has an original title. Submit your final draft by the due date.
Example Student Essay Preview the document

ASSIGNMENT CRITERIA

Drafting Workshop and Revision

The writer participates in the drafting workshop and has a draft of at least 600 words.
The writer participates constructively in the draft workshop period by giving thoughtful feedback to his or her peers.
The writer takes notes on his or her Revision Plan.
The writer makes a revision plan with a specific calendar based upon the feedback he or she receives.
The writer demonstrates a sound process of drafting and revision.
Final Draft

The writer has composed a strong introduction and thesis statement (Intro-Ch. 7).
The writer uses summary, paraphrase, and/or some quotation appropriately in his or her use of sources (Chapters 2 and 3).
The writer demonstrates strong reading comprehension of his or her three sources (Ch. 1-7).
The writer supports his or her thesis with compelling evidence (Ch. 1-8).
The writer’s claim and support demonstrate sound reasoning (Ch. 1-8).
The writer has a strong, well-supported conclusion (Ch. 1-8).
The writer makes his or her claim and supports it with three sources using templates and methods from Chapters 1-8 in They Say, I Say.
The writer demonstrates reading comprehension, analysis, and critical thinking.
The writer meets the standards for effective communication (clarity, logic, precision, accuracy, significance, and fairness).
The writer includes a Works Cited page (NLSH).
The writer adheres to MLA style (NLSH).
The essay is 900-1100 words.

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/olympics-executives-engaged-in-unconscionable-concealment-of-nassar-sex-abuse

https://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/local/michigan/2019/09/06/nassar-victims-new-michigan-state-president/2230143001/

https://coachad.com/news/congress-passes-bill-protect-athletes-sexual-abuse/

https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/2019/02/22/olympic-sports-scandal-full-list-banned-coaches-finally-available/2945056002/

https://www.npr.org/2019/09/05/757909245/michigan-state-university-to-pay-4-5-million-fine-over-larry-nassar-scandal

Two examples included.
Investment Rationale/thesis for each company (why to invest in it)
Financial Analysis and relative valuation based on the financials provided on the excel and using online research.
Do not do company overview not needed.
about 1 paragraph for each section (3-4 paragraphs per company)

The writer
…seeks to persuade audiences to accept a particular position on a controversial issue.
…describes the problem, proposes a solution, and provides justification.

Pick out a topic that you would like to persuade your audience to accept a particular position on. Then complete the graphic organizer with the following information:

1. Describe the problem you would like to present to your audience.
2. Provide 5 solutions to your problem.
3. Provide justification for why you problem is still an issue in modern society. Then provide justification for why your solutions would be beneficial.

Once you have completed the graphic organizer begin drafting your paper based the following outline:

Part 1: Describe the problem. Define the problem. Who says it is a problem, and why do they say so? Does your audience need convincing that this is a problem? Try to use specific facts and figures in describing the problem.

Part 2: Propose a solution. Describe your solution(s). Are your solutions practical? Are they obtainable? How so? Be very specific in outlining the steps of your solution.

Part 3: Defend your proposal. Why will your ideas work? Anticipate what the opposition will say and counter their concerns. Recognize that people may be reluctant to get behind your proposal and explain to them why they should overcome their reluctance.

Part 4: Conclude. Remind the readers why this problem needs their attention. Readdress why they should care. What action do you hope is prompted by the writing of this piece? Tell the readers what they can do or how they can help.

for this assignment, attend a local sporting event in your community.  This could be a professional game, an athletic race or competition, or  even a high school match. Take notes during the event, keeping track of  exciting plays but also noting factors like a coach’s involvement, the  reactions of teammates, or any other noteworthy occurrence. After the  event, compose a recap as if you were going to publish it as a press  release. Your written response should contain the following components:

  1. Background   In two to three sentences, relate to your instructor what event you  attended, when and where it was held, and for which platforms you are  writing this recap.
  2. Communication Assessment  In 150-200 words, describe the types of communication you observed at  this event. Were there any reporters from local TV stations or  newspapers at the event? Was the event broadcast on social media? Did  the event have an announcer? Was the scoreboard digital? Think outside  the box about how technology influenced the event not only for the  spectators attending, but for those hearing about it after the fact.
  3. Initial Game Recap   In 100 words or less, craft a succinct but informative summary of  what happened in the event, something that you could write up while the  event was in action and post immediately when it ended. If the event was  a game, you may want to include the final score along with some details  about what made the event interesting. This communication is meant to  be straightforward and to the point, letting fans know how the event  played out.
  4. Main Recap Elaborate on your  Initial Game Recap and round it out into an article that could be  published in a newspaper, sent out as a press release, or posted on a  blog or online news site. In 500-700 words, provide more detail and  context for what happened at the event, perhaps in a chronological  format. If you had a chance to speak with the coach or any of the  players, you may want to include quotes from a pre- or post-game  interview. Or maybe you could spin the recap from a human-interest  angle, focusing on the efforts of an individual player.

this has to be a sporting event in the US 

In this exercise, you will be given the opportunity to consider several ethical questions involved in making “encouragement payments” overseas. You will make choices, and as in real life, you will deal with the consequences of your choices as they relate to the handling of a criminal case.

The simulation presented several areas for decision making, involving profitability for the organization, ethical considerations, and potential legal liability.

Business ethics is the study of how managers and other employees are to act in certain
situations. This simulation provides an opportunity to consider challenges presented to
employees seeking to act ethically in the performance of their duties within a
multinational corporation.
MegaComp International, Inc. is a leading manufacturer of antivirus software, firewall
software and other computer security components. The company enjoys an excellent
reputation among its customers and suppliers. Employee morale is high, and ethics is a
priority at the company.
The systems and products of MegaComp have been selling well in its already existing
markets in the United States, Japan and Europe; but like any company, MegaComp is
eager to grow the business.
At a strategy session, the MegaComp CEO, Jan Werner, and division managers decide to
explore the potential of expanding their business to China. The market looks like a good
fit to MegaComp products, but there could be a problem. MegaComp managers tell CEO
Werner that China makes franchise decisions city-by-city, district-by-district. A payoff is
usually required to get licenses.
What should CEO Werner say to the division chiefs?
Ethical decisions made by senior officers in a corporation can impact their subordinates
as they try to carry out their duties. A natural loyalty to the company can come into
conflict with ethical decision making.
MegaComp begins business in China, making facilitating payments through
intermediaries to ensure the necessary licenses. The business contacts in China are
pleased with the arrangement and do not see any ethical implications to the practice.
You have been recently hired by MegaComp and just relocated to its Hong Kong
contracting office, handling the new business in China. You have just gone over the
business arrangements and have noticed the facilitating payments issue. You can also see
that the CEO approved the plan. You’ve just received a phone call from CEO Werner,
who asks you how you are enjoying the new position in Hong Kong.
Leaders have a special role in setting ethical standards within a corporation and are
frequently asked to be mentors for junior personnel who face ethical issues in the
workplace.
One of your subordinates comes to you with questions regarding the facilitating payments
aspect of business operations in China. She tells you that she is uncomfortable with the
practice and wonders if she will face criminal liability when she makes the first payments
next week. You assure her that Chinese law does not prohibit these payments in any
way. Relieved, she returns to her office and makes plans to meet with her intermediaries
to make the facilitating payments. As you sit in your office, you wonder if you should
check with the legal office back at MegaComp’s American headquarters to see if there is
any liability under United States law.
Even though giving bribes, or facilitating payments, is an acceptable business practice
around the world, bribery is becoming more expensive around the world because of its
business transparency. This has led to more government agencies cracking down on the
practice. Globally, consumers are also becoming aware of the costs of corruption. While
bribes and payoff requests are frequently associated with large construction projects,
turnkey capital projects and large commodity or equipment contracts overseas,
companies that do business internationally, and their employees, must be aware that
bribes are an ethical issue subject to legal scrutiny. Prudence, as with all ethical issues,
should be the starting point in analyzing such situations.

Write a 4-page paper with your answers to the questions.

1, What should CEO Werner say to the Division Chiefs? Is the decision ethical? Why or why not?

2, How are you enjoying the new position in Hong Kong? Do you keep your job? Why or why not?

3, What are the implications of payments being made by the subordinate?

4, Epilogue: From your perspective, how does the simulation impact ethical considerations for organizations?

he wants us to pretend to propose a funding opportunity for artist, as a practice. you only have to do the part of 1: a short proposal (approximately 350 words) 2: a simple budget including: artist fees, materials, travel, shipping, other expenses

see attachment for more information

 

“Data Collection” Please respond to the following:

  • Using your planned evaluation project, assume that the client paying for the evaluation has requested that you primarily use audio/visual interview and observation techniques. The client envisions using clips in the evaluation report and in marketing campaigns. Discuss the appropriateness, advantages, and disadvantages of using digital capabilities to capture sound, video, and photographs of the interviewees, focus groups, and observations. Provide reasons for opposing or supporting the request (partially or completely).

“Benefits of Meta-Evaluation” Please respond to the following:

  • Your client told you that a meta-evaluation should not be included in the plan or budget. Explain two (2) reasons for including a meta-evaluation in the evaluation plan. Recommend two (2) ways to reduce the costs