Nel and Sulas friendship is central in the novel. What role does this friendship play in Nel and Sulas lives and what point is Morrison making about the role of life-long friendships in the formation of identity?

—————-

Your literary analysis should be between 2 and 3 pages (600 to 750 words), not including the Works Cited page, should be double spaced in Times New Roman 12-point font and must include: 
    A clearly articulated thesis that states, somewhere in your introduction, the assertion (position, interpretation) that your paper will prove
    An introduction, a minimum of 3 body paragraphs, and a conclusion
    At least two quotes from the novel itself that are integrated into your discussion
    At least two citations of outside sources (such as literary criticism on the novel, preferably from articles from the MDC databases)
    Topic sentences that focus the discussion in the body paragraphs
    Examples, details, explanations in the body paragraphs that clearly support your thesis
    Clear connections between ideas from paragraph to paragraph and within paragraphs
    Proper MLA style format in the heading, in the in-text citations, and in the Works Cited page (see the template for the heading and margins in this lesson)
    Works Cited page includes articles from two sources and from the novel for a minimum of three total listed sources
    Standard usage, grammar, and mechanics

Technology in the Workplace
PLEASE INCLUDE AT LEAST ONE APA STYLE REFERENCE FROM BELOW AND YOUR OWN
Hello Professor and classmates,
Hope everyone is doing great!
Technology has changed the way we work today as compared to years ago. Employees are more satisfied and effective due to the fact that they get to decide on when, where and how they work. Technology is the fuel that enables all these choices.
It has allowed how teams interacts in new ways. Now teams can work remotely and across wide distances. It does not have to be face-to-face meetings and impersonal conference calls.
In How consumer technology is remaking the workplace, Nick Slattery, said it is surprising how quickly companies seem to have lost control of the tool of information revolution. Most employees are not using companys desktop computers any more but uses their personal mobile devices to check work email, review company data, manage projects and create contents.
Using personal devices and tools gives employees more flexibility. It also improves on productivity because they get to work where they feel most comfortable.
We see how technology has helped a lot especially during this pandemic. It made transition from working at the office to working from home easy. In living the coronavirus work-from-home life, there are helpful tech tips that the writer shared with us.
The articles suggested from how to keep our devices charged to getting quality videos when on zoom meetings. Also, on how to alternate between sitting by a desk to using a standing desk just to reduce the pain of sitting for too long. Most employees are able to continue working remotely due to technology without causing a huge loss to their company.
I use the companys desktop right now where I intern. It is a small Care Agency, so they do not even have a computer department. I even found out when they were trying to set me up on outlook, that the computer guy comes in as needed. He gets paid about $250 an hour any time he comes, so try not to use him all the time.

Reference:
Slattery, M.A. (2015, Aug. 07). How consumer technology is remarking the workplace. Retrieved from
https://www.wired.com/insights/2013/03/how-consumer-technology-is-remaking-the-workplace/
(Links to an external site.)

Stern, J. (2020, May 22). Living the coronavirus work-from-home life? Retrieved from
https://www.wsj.com/articles/living-the-coronavirus-work-from-home-life-here-are-all-the-tech-tips-you-need-11585059841

QUESTION: According to Krishna, the reality of persons and their relative lack of control over outcomes implies that they ought to find valor in doing their duty and worry not about outcomes. In this they find a life worth living. Defend or criticize this thesis by philosophical argument. (Hint: you might want to address the question of whether a soldier can think about fighting without contemplating outcomes or whether thinking about such outcomes is not relevant to the duty of the soldier?)

RULES: The essay, like all assignments in this course, must be completely authored and edited by the student themselves. By staying enrolled in this course, students agree not to use essay writing services or essay editing services. A failure to abide by these constraints constitutes a violation of academic honesty requirements. Pass/fail assignments that appear to be professionally edited may receive a 0, graded assignments that seem professionally edited may receive a 20% penalty, or the student may be required to submit to an oral examination to prove that they are the author and editor of the submissionat the discretion of the course director or TA. An unsatisfactory oral examination may result in a 0% in the assignment or further formal academic honesty inquiries that might lead to a permanent note on the students academic record. Instead of professional editing services, students are encouraged to invest in editing software.
Questions about the essay may not be sent to the professor or TA any later than topic 6 or 18 of the respective term. This is to discourage students from leaving their essay until the last minute. Students who send last minute questions about the essay to the professor or TA (past these deadlines) may be docked 2 points from their participation mark. Any feedback provided by the TA or the instructor is the students responsibility to incorporate. The content of your papers is your responsibility. Emails about illness or requests for legitimate accommodation are exempt from penalty. Extensions for the essay can only be sought within the first two weeks of the course. Personal illness or bereavement may be grounds for accommodation if they are the reason for a students inability to hand a paper in on time. Students with special obligations to dependents may also receive last minute accommodation. Students who require accommodation for some other reason must make the request in the form of a philosophical argument. If the argument is valid, philosophical and not obviously unsound, the accommodation will be granted.
All papers must be double spaced, four pages in length. Papers are to be written in 12 point font with one inch margins on 8.5 by 11 inch pages. All scholarly references must be formatted according to the scholarly conventions (see our Moodle site for more information on this). The opinions of authors that are cited must be accompanied by the appropriate page number references. An extra page should be added for the bibliography. No endnotes please: in-text citations only. Every essay should have a separate title-page that states the (a) title, (b) course, (c) student particulars along with (c) the instructors name, (d) the TAs name (in cases where the course has a TA), and (e) the essay question reprinted verbatim. I or your TA do not want to be in a position to have to guess which essay question you are responding to. Title pages that exclude this information, or essays submitted without title pages, may be docked 5% from the final grade (that is, assuming that from the essay itself we can discern which topic you chose to write on). Wrong paper submissions requiring the old submission to be replaced by a new submission will earn a 2% penalty, in addition to any applicable late penalties. Late papers may be penalized 5% per day.
Essays without bibliographies or proper citation may be docked 10% or the percentage equivalent of improperly included material. Essays over four pages in length (excluding the title page and the bibliography) may be docked 5% per extra page, or the extra pages may not be read: which measure is
adopted is up to the discretion of your grader. Essays that rely extensively on class notes or secondary material or do not provide proper primary text references may be docked 10%. (Proper citation ought to provide page number locations for cited ideas or texts. Citing the whole article will often not be specific enough, unless it is an internet source with no page numbers, in which case referring to the source without the page numbers will suffice. Internet sources must be properly cited with in-text citations and the appropriate entry in the bibliography that states the URL. All wording used from other sources must be in quotations with references provided.)
Essay Composition Rule. When writing your essay, do not copy material from other sources without putting the words in quotations and also copying the reference informationeven when making your notes for a paper. Any material that is copied from another source and makes it into your essay without giving proper credit constitutes plagiarism. Proper credit consists in putting quotation marks around borrowed wording while citing the author, or citing an author if you are using their ideas. Even if you change the wording of the quote, you ought to give credit to the original author. Failure to give credit to the original author while changing the wording also constitutes plagiarism. Plagiarism is a type of theft and deception: theft and deception do not go along with learning and personal accomplishment. Aside from any penalty imposed for plagiarism, papers that violate the essay composition instruction may be docked 5%.

STRUCTURE: Please structure your paper with the following headings: (1) Introduction, (2) Explication, (3) Main Argument, (4) Response to Objections, (5) Conclusion. Essays without these headings are harder to read. Your grader has the right to give a paper without headings a grade of C or lower if he or she cannot make out the papers argument structure. Rendering the argument structure clear is the students responsibility. Please make sure you understand what an argument is, before writing and submitting your paper.

Identify the relevant arguments and find examples of them. Classify the arguments. Classify them by position on the arguments (for, against, etc). Even within similar positions there are distinctions. Summarize the arguments. In your own words, accurately and fairly explain the thesis and main points. Provide any compelling evidence the authors use to support their arguments. Respond to the arguments. Explain which arguments you find convincing or not. Do you share the same rhetorical frame? Identify and analyze the persuasive appeals of the arguments: ethos, logos, and pathos. Identify and analyze the language, imagery, and style of the arguments. These are part of the discourses on your subject.

https://www.cdappsweetsuccess.org/Training-Modules

The Training Modules are as follows:
Training Module 1: Diabetes in Pregnancy: preconception and Interconception Care
Training Module 2: Diabetes & Pregnancy Value of Psychosocial Health
Training Module 3: Exercise and Breastfeeding
Training Module 4: Management of Pre-existing Diabetes and Pregnancy
Training Module 5: Diagnosis & Initial Management of Gestational Diabetes
Training Module 6: Treatment of Gestational Diabetes
Training Module 7: Postpartum Care & Testing Following Gestational Diabetes
Training Module 8: Maternal Weight, Obesity and Diabetes in Pregnancy

Write a Reflection Paper to briefly summarize what they learned in each of the 8 modules.  The Reflection Paper is to be professionally written, using 12 Font, double-spaced, title for each module, page numbers, and proofread for grammar and spelling. 

https://www.cdappsweetsuccess.org/Training-Modules

The Training Modules are as follows:
Training Module 1: Diabetes in Pregnancy: preconception and Interconception Care
Training Module 2: Diabetes & Pregnancy Value of Psychosocial Health
Training Module 3: Exercise and Breastfeeding
Training Module 4: Management of Pre-existing Diabetes and Pregnancy
Training Module 5: Diagnosis & Initial Management of Gestational Diabetes
Training Module 6: Treatment of Gestational Diabetes
Training Module 7: Postpartum Care & Testing Following Gestational Diabetes
Training Module 8: Maternal Weight, Obesity and Diabetes in Pregnancy

Write a Reflection Paper to briefly summarize what they learned in each of the 8 modules.  The Reflection Paper is to be professionally written, using 12 Font, double-spaced, title for each module, page numbers, and proofread for grammar and spelling. 

–Request:
Please compare the Double Tax Treaty (DTT) you have been provided with the OECD Model
Convention.
The articles covered are as follows:
Article 4-Residency
Article 5-Permanent establishment
Article 7-Business profits
Article 10-Dividends
Article 12-Royalty
Article 13-Capital Gains
Article 23-Elimination of Double Taxation
Article 25-Mutual Agreement Procedure
–What is expected from you:
your DTT to analyze is turkey-Norway DTT
Select 5 articles from the above
Please find the differences between the turkey -Norway DTT and OECD Model Convention. You will compare
the DTT and OECD Model Convention limited with the 5 articles selected from above
You will only elaborate on the differences and provide your thoughts and comments
concerning the reasons of the differences
You do not need to directly copy/paste the articles to your essay, but it is expected your
thoughts/views on the differences. Therefore, please focus on the differences.
the essay shouldn’t be less than 1100 words
The DTTs, OECD Model Convention and Commentary has been in uploaded files

Topic:
Research alternative energy sources; then make an argument for the three most desirable ones to introduce in South Florida. Here is a link with a list of renewable energy resources to get you started: https://www.renewableresourcescoalition.org/alternative-energy-sources/.
—————-

Your argumentative essay will be on an environmental topic from the list of options below. Consider
your audience for this paper to be your peers. The essay should be between 3 and 4 pages (850 to
1,000 words) in length, not including the cover page, abstract, or reference page. It should be double
spaced in Times New Roman 12 point font and must include:
An introduction, a minimum of 3 body paragraphs, and a conclusion
a clearly articulated thesis that states the claim, position, or stance that your essay will prove in
the introduction to your paper
4 cited sources, at least 2 of these sources should come from the MDC databases
At least 4 quotes from your sources
Topic sentences that focus the discussion in the body paragraphs
Examples, details, and explanations, and other researched evidence in the body paragraphs that
clearly support the claim of your thesis
Counterarguments and refutations that show you understand the complexity of your argument
and can accurately acknowledge the views of the opposition and refute them
Clear connections between ideas from paragraph to paragraph and within paragraphs
(coherence)
Proper APA style format in the cover page, in the abstract, in the in-text citations, and in the
Reference page (see the template and instructional video for creating the APA format)
Reference page listing a minimum of four sources
Standard usage, grammar, and mechanics

The task is to write a piece of scholarly or professional CRITICISM on the subject of RACE or SIZE in the fashion industry. You will develop a researched and complex argument and support it with analysis and discussion of relevant texts and works in the field and be written in a manner suitable for publication in a professional or scholarly publication, including citations and appropriate style, language and tone.

I have attached the guidelines for this workshop version paper (which is the final paper) and I have also attached my pitch which speaks more about the focus and subject that this paper will revolve around with feedback towards the end of the document which needs to be taken into consideration.

Additional research will be required as said in the documents provided.