Day: October 19, 2020

Assignment: Methodology: Reliability and Validity Factors
The key to developing a quality Prospectus, Proposal, and Dissertation is that all components must be aligned, with a logical flow of ideas from one section to the next. In other words, your population and sampling plan must be logically connect withgoing back– your methodology, research design, research questions, purpose, and problem statement. What will answer your research question? For example, if the gender of your population is irrelevant in answering your research question, then you need not seek a population for data collection that includes an equal number of men and women, nor do you need to ask participants their gender on a survey. In this Assignment, you will identify, explain, and create aspects of your methodology, to include selection of method; alignment among sections; population; data collection; reliability, validity, and ethical issues; and data analysis.

Review the readings, websites, and media listed in this weeks Learning Resources, write 3-4 pages on the following:

Describe, briefly, the design you have selected, and whether your design supports quantitative, qualitative, or mixed methods research.
Describe, briefly, the methodology you have selected, whether quantitative, qualitative, or mixed.
Explain why you chose this design and method and how you differentiate design from method. In what ways it is a logical method to answer your research question?
Describe the alignment and consistency of the research questions, research design, and methodology.
Describe, briefly, the population or type of data you plan to sample for your Dissertation, and why.
Describe the data collection and sampling methods you plan to use and explain why you plan to use them.
Describe at least two issues (e.g., reliability, validity, and/or ethical issues) that might arise when using the data collection and sampling methods.
Explain how you would prevent and/or minimize each of these issues.
Describe the specific type of analysis you might use (ANOVA, MANOVA, SEM, theming, concept analysis, etc.) to analyze your data and explain why.  Be specific.
Support your Assignments with specific references to all resources used in its preparation. You are asked to provide a reference list for all resources, including those in the Learning Resources for this course.

By Day 7
Submit your assignment.

Submission and Grading Information
To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:

Please save your Assignment using the naming convention WK8Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension) as the name.
Click the Week 8 Assignment Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.
Click the Week 8 Assignment link. You will also be able to View Rubric for grading criteria from this area.
Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as WK8Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension) and click Open.
If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.
Grading Criteria
To access your rubric:

Week 8 Assignment Rubric

Check Your Assignment Draft for Authenticity
To check your Assignment draft for authenticity:

Submit your Week 8 Assignment draft and review the originality report.

Submit Your Assignment by Day 7
To submit your Assignment:

Week 8 Assignment

Discussion: Walden Universitys IRB Review of your Proposal
Some of your Week 6 Learning Resources and Week 6 Discussion 1 focused on the role of the IRB and your responsibilities for addressing ethical issues in your proposed research. In Week 7, you completed Part I (of II) of the Nature of the Study:  You have created research questions, and identified your research design and rationale for that design.  Now that you are this far along in drafting your Prospectus, this week you will revisit IRB requirements and your responsibilities for designing an ethical study, completing Part II of the Nature of the Study.

To prepare for this Discussion, review both the IRB and ethics resources in your Learning Resources. In addition, review the section on receiving IRB approval on Waldens Doctoral Capstone Resources website located in this Weeks Resources. Consider your selection of research design, methodology, population, sampling procedures, and data collection and analysis plans.
By Day 3
Post:

An explanation of the potential ethical issues, risks, and benefits of your proposed study, based on the questions in Section III, Potential Risks and Benefits, on the IRB Application.
What you can do in formulating your entire research plan to ensure that it will pass initial IRB review?
By Day 6
Respond to at least two of your colleagues who have not yet had a reply, in any of the following ways:

Provide feedback on your colleagues assessment of potential ethical issues, risks, and benefits. Offer suggestions to help them anticipate and identify these issues.
Suggest ideas that may help them minimize risks and increase benefits, to strengthen their IRB applications.
Comment on the ethics of their research plans. What can they do to enhance the ethical basis of the plan?
Return to this Discussion in a few days to read the responses to your initial posting. Note what you have learned and/or any insights you have gained as a result of the comments your colleagues made.

Submission and Grading Information
Grading Criteria
To access your rubric:

Week 8 Discussion Rubric

Post by Day 3 and Respond by Day 6
To participate in this Discussion:

Week 8 Discussion

Workshop: Qualitative Research Workshop: Week 8
Note: This weeks Workshop is scheduled for later in the week than most Workshops in the course. This is to allow you the opportunity to complete the participant recruitment and interview steps and then reflect on your experience in the Workshop environment.

If you are collecting phone or face-to-face interviews, the audio recorder is the most important tool for ensuring accuracy in capturing the interview. In addition, you may or may not want to take notes during the interview.
If you are conducting e-mail interviews, format your document using the following guidelines:
The questions are clearly numbered.
The language is clear.
The entire protocol is included.
Include a way to reach you (e-mail or phone) should the participant have questions.
Remember to take notes for your audit trail of your prep work for the interview. As soon as possible, write down everything going through your head when the interview is concluded.
Between Day 5 and Day 7
Reach out to one of your classmates to serve as your peer-debriefing partner. Then, describe your recruitment experience, including responses to the following:

How hard was it to find people to interview?
Which interview format was used: e-mail or other electronic media (social media, text apps), in person, or by phone (including Skype, FaceTime, and WhatsApp)?
Was this your preference? What was the process of setting the appointment and working out the format?
What did you do to make the interview process go smoothly?
By Day 7
Provide your debriefing partner with your interview audio (if possible) or the transcript. Listen to your partners audio or read the transcript, and provide to your partners Workshop space feedback on the quality of the interview.

Submission and Grading Information
Grading Criteria
To access your rubric:

Workshop Rubric

Post Between Days 5 and 7 and Respond by Day 7
To participate in this Workshop:

Week 8 Workshop