The Saudi Arabian economy has developed with the use of large numbers of expatriate workers. In a critical essay, indicate the benefits and risks associated with the dependence on large numbers of expatriate workers. Should Saudi Arabia seek to include or exclude labor mobility in future regional free trade agreements? Why or why not? What implications does the Saudi Vision 2030 have on labor mobility?

Your essay is required to be  five pages in length, which does not include the title page and reference pages,

Support your submission with course material concepts, principles, and theories from the textbook and at least three scholarly, peer-reviewed journal articles.

follow APA style guidelines.

Description of the critical thinking:

The Saudi Arabian economy has developed with the use of large numbers of expatriate workers. In a critical essay:
a)  Indicate the benefits and risks associated with the dependence on large numbers of expatriate workers.
b)  Should Saudi Arabia seek to include or exclude labor mobility in future regional free trade agreements? Why or why not?
c)  What implications does the Saudi Vision 2030 have on labor mobility?

Structure of the Critical Thinking Assignment

In this critical thinking assignment, you are required to address following three questions with sub questions:
1)  The first part of the question asks you to discuss the following two issues:
a.  Discuss the benefit of dependence on large number of expatriate workers.
Comment: Make sure you cite the textbook in this section by discussing how cheap imported labor can promote economic growth, according to the textbook. Also, make sure you cite statistics related to immigrants and their contribution to Saudi Economy.

b.  Discuss the risk associated with dependence on large number of expatriate workers.
Comment: Make sure you cite the textbook in this section by discussing the how cheap imported labor can harm local population (by raising unemployment rate and creating social and economic unrest by increasing income inequality), according to the textbook.
You must answer both parts of question 1 to satisfy the requirement.

2.    The second part of the question the following question:
Should Saudi Arabia seek to include or exclude labor mobility in future regional free trade agreements? Why or why not?

Comment: Finding textbook related material that discusses the integration of labor mobility and trade agreements can be difficult. However, I have uploaded several papers that discuss this very issue. Please read those or find more peer-reviewed journal articles related to this.
3.    The third part of the question ask you to analyze the following critical issue:

What implications does the Saudi Vision 2030 have on labor mobility?

Comment: Saudization is an integral part of the Saudi Vision 2030, although the process started before Vision 2030. Vision 2030 has integrated the Saudization with the overall growth prospect for the Saudi Economy. Analyze these issues. You can also use the articles that I uploaded along with your chosen set of peer-reviewed journal articles to discuss this question.

the textbook (9781337558938 ebook: 9781337671224    International economics    17    Cengage Learning.    Carbaugh, R. J.    2019)
and at least 4 scholarly, peer-reviewed journal articles.

make sure the refrncess is scholarly, peer-reviewed journal articles or use the below
EBSCO
EMERALd
Proquest
Science direct

Part 1:
Provide your description of what happened during the reading and your impressions (informal profile) about the students reading and the retelling. Use specific examples from your data and your required readings to support your observations.

o What did you learn about your student as reader from the read aloud and later from her miscues? Which were the most common miscues? Did you identify patterns? Check the quality of the students miscues (were they mostly low or high quality). Use examples from the miscues documented to support your assessment of the student.

o What did you learn from the students retelling? Were you surprised by anything? How did the reader respond to the unaided retelling? How did he respond to the aided retelling?

o Look at the Coding Form you completed (Appendix G). What did the numbers for Question 1 & Question 2 tell you about your students use of the Syntactic system, and the Semantic system? How does his/her use of these two linguistic systems, impact his understanding of the story (Question 3)?

o Look at the Table of Graphic Similarity that you created. What does it tell you about your reader? How do you think she/he is using the graphophonic language system? Perhaps too much or too little?

Part 2:
Reflection
What did you learn from this experience as an evaluator documenting the reading process of a bilingual reader? What did you learn about the reading process of bilingual readers or emergent bilingual readers? What would you do differently the next time?

The Saudi Arabian economy has developed with the use of large numbers of expatriate workers. In a critical essay, indicate the benefits and risks associated with the dependence on large numbers of expatriate workers. Should Saudi Arabia seek to include or exclude labor mobility in future regional free trade agreements? Why or why not? What implications does the Saudi Vision 2030 have on labor mobility?

Your essay is required to be  five pages in length, which does not include the title page and reference pages,

Support your submission with course material concepts, principles, and theories from the textbook and at least three scholarly, peer-reviewed journal articles.

follow APA style guidelines.

Description of the critical thinking:

The Saudi Arabian economy has developed with the use of large numbers of expatriate workers. In a critical essay:
a)  Indicate the benefits and risks associated with the dependence on large numbers of expatriate workers.
b)  Should Saudi Arabia seek to include or exclude labor mobility in future regional free trade agreements? Why or why not?
c)  What implications does the Saudi Vision 2030 have on labor mobility?

Structure of the Critical Thinking Assignment

In this critical thinking assignment, you are required to address following three questions with sub questions:
1)  The first part of the question asks you to discuss the following two issues:
a.  Discuss the benefit of dependence on large number of expatriate workers.
Comment: Make sure you cite the textbook in this section by discussing how cheap imported labor can promote economic growth, according to the textbook. Also, make sure you cite statistics related to immigrants and their contribution to Saudi Economy.

b.  Discuss the risk associated with dependence on large number of expatriate workers.
Comment: Make sure you cite the textbook in this section by discussing the how cheap imported labor can harm local population (by raising unemployment rate and creating social and economic unrest by increasing income inequality), according to the textbook.
You must answer both parts of question 1 to satisfy the requirement.

2.    The second part of the question the following question:
Should Saudi Arabia seek to include or exclude labor mobility in future regional free trade agreements? Why or why not?

Comment: Finding textbook related material that discusses the integration of labor mobility and trade agreements can be difficult. However, I have uploaded several papers that discuss this very issue. Please read those or find more peer-reviewed journal articles related to this.
3.    The third part of the question ask you to analyze the following critical issue:

What implications does the Saudi Vision 2030 have on labor mobility?

Comment: Saudization is an integral part of the Saudi Vision 2030, although the process started before Vision 2030. Vision 2030 has integrated the Saudization with the overall growth prospect for the Saudi Economy. Analyze these issues. You can also use the articles that I uploaded along with your chosen set of peer-reviewed journal articles to discuss this question.

the textbook (9781337558938 ebook: 9781337671224    International economics    17    Cengage Learning.    Carbaugh, R. J.    2019)
and at least 4 scholarly, peer-reviewed journal articles.

make sure the refrncess is scholarly, peer-reviewed journal articles or use the below
EBSCO
EMERALd
Proquest
Science direct

Part 1:
Provide your description of what happened during the reading and your impressions (informal profile) about the students reading and the retelling. Use specific examples from your data and your required readings to support your observations.

o What did you learn about your student as reader from the read aloud and later from her miscues? Which were the most common miscues? Did you identify patterns? Check the quality of the students miscues (were they mostly low or high quality). Use examples from the miscues documented to support your assessment of the student.

o What did you learn from the students retelling? Were you surprised by anything? How did the reader respond to the unaided retelling? How did he respond to the aided retelling?

o Look at the Coding Form you completed (Appendix G). What did the numbers for Question 1 & Question 2 tell you about your students use of the Syntactic system, and the Semantic system? How does his/her use of these two linguistic systems, impact his understanding of the story (Question 3)?

o Look at the Table of Graphic Similarity that you created. What does it tell you about your reader? How do you think she/he is using the graphophonic language system? Perhaps too much or too little?

Part 2:
Reflection
What did you learn from this experience as an evaluator documenting the reading process of a bilingual reader? What did you learn about the reading process of bilingual readers or emergent bilingual readers? What would you do differently the next time?

Philosophers of Technology have often argued that technologies are value-laden rather than being merely value-neutral. One reason for thinking so is because the act of building or making always presupposes value-judgments about what we think is worth building or making in the first place. Put another way, what we make or build often reveals what we think is worth doing: making and building reveal what we take to be a problem, and whether that problem is worth solving.

Consider a social media platform of your choice that is being used in a country outside the US and Canada. Consider the influence of values (through the concept of values infrastructures) upon the designers and the adopting populations. Explain how the adopting culture has changed in response to internal and external pressures made manifest by the social media platform.(See also the Rokeach Values Survey and Hall-Tonna Values Inventory for examples of values.)

Required Reading/Citation: S.D. Noam Cook, Design and Responsibility

In your write up, be sure to:

1. Describe what you social media platform you are investigating and the country in which it is being used.

2. Explain: what reasons can you think of for why it exists?; how was it made?; who made it?; and for whom was it made?

3. Try to list specific values that best explain the intentions behind the social media platform that you picked (using Cook’s concept of a ‘values infrastructure’). Consider the intentions behind the design (as you perceive them) and the intentions of the targeted end users. Can you anticipate or foresee unintentional consequences as a result of the platform? Can you foresee whether the platform will be used ethically or unethically?

4. Give a reasoned defense for how you reached your conclusions and defend your position appealing to the theories of technology discussed in class and readings.

Part 1:
Provide your description of what happened during the reading and your impressions (informal profile) about the students reading and the retelling. Use specific examples from your data and your required readings to support your observations.

o What did you learn about your student as reader from the read aloud and later from her miscues? Which were the most common miscues? Did you identify patterns? Check the quality of the students miscues (were they mostly low or high quality). Use examples from the miscues documented to support your assessment of the student.

o What did you learn from the students retelling? Were you surprised by anything? How did the reader respond to the unaided retelling? How did he respond to the aided retelling?

o Look at the Coding Form you completed (Appendix G). What did the numbers for Question 1 & Question 2 tell you about your students use of the Syntactic system, and the Semantic system? How does his/her use of these two linguistic systems, impact his understanding of the story (Question 3)?

o Look at the Table of Graphic Similarity that you created. What does it tell you about your reader? How do you think she/he is using the graphophonic language system? Perhaps too much or too little?

Part 2:
Reflection
What did you learn from this experience as an evaluator documenting the reading process of a bilingual reader? What did you learn about the reading process of bilingual readers or emergent bilingual readers? What would you do differently the next time?

Philosophers of Technology have often argued that technologies are value-laden rather than being merely value-neutral. One reason for thinking so is because the act of building or making always presupposes value-judgments about what we think is worth building or making in the first place. Put another way, what we make or build often reveals what we think is worth doing: making and building reveal what we take to be a problem, and whether that problem is worth solving.

Consider a social media platform of your choice that is being used in a country outside the US and Canada. Consider the influence of values (through the concept of values infrastructures) upon the designers and the adopting populations. Explain how the adopting culture has changed in response to internal and external pressures made manifest by the social media platform.(See also the Rokeach Values Survey and Hall-Tonna Values Inventory for examples of values.)

Required Reading/Citation: S.D. Noam Cook, Design and Responsibility

In your write up, be sure to:

1. Describe what you social media platform you are investigating and the country in which it is being used.

2. Explain: what reasons can you think of for why it exists?; how was it made?; who made it?; and for whom was it made?

3. Try to list specific values that best explain the intentions behind the social media platform that you picked (using Cook’s concept of a ‘values infrastructure’). Consider the intentions behind the design (as you perceive them) and the intentions of the targeted end users. Can you anticipate or foresee unintentional consequences as a result of the platform? Can you foresee whether the platform will be used ethically or unethically?

4. Give a reasoned defense for how you reached your conclusions and defend your position appealing to the theories of technology discussed in class and readings.

Philosophers of Technology have often argued that technologies are value-laden rather than being merely value-neutral. One reason for thinking so is because the act of building or making always presupposes value-judgments about what we think is worth building or making in the first place. Put another way, what we make or build often reveals what we think is worth doing: making and building reveal what we take to be a problem, and whether that problem is worth solving.

Consider a social media platform of your choice that is being used in a country outside the US and Canada. Consider the influence of values (through the concept of values infrastructures) upon the designers and the adopting populations. Explain how the adopting culture has changed in response to internal and external pressures made manifest by the social media platform.(See also the Rokeach Values Survey and Hall-Tonna Values Inventory for examples of values.)

Required Reading/Citation: S.D. Noam Cook, Design and Responsibility

In your write up, be sure to:

1. Describe what you social media platform you are investigating and the country in which it is being used.

2. Explain: what reasons can you think of for why it exists?; how was it made?; who made it?; and for whom was it made?

3. Try to list specific values that best explain the intentions behind the social media platform that you picked (using Cook’s concept of a ‘values infrastructure’). Consider the intentions behind the design (as you perceive them) and the intentions of the targeted end users. Can you anticipate or foresee unintentional consequences as a result of the platform? Can you foresee whether the platform will be used ethically or unethically?

4. Give a reasoned defense for how you reached your conclusions and defend your position appealing to the theories of technology discussed in class and readings.

A reaction paper is an analysis and an evaluation of the material presented. For this assignment, view one or two of the documentaries identified and write a reaction paper. You may watch and respond to one or two documentaries, write a minimum of 600 words total. Submit your paper to the Digital Drop Box by the due date. Submit assignments early to avoid problems. Any arrangements for late submission must be made directly with the professor. This paper needs to be written in APA format with a title page, abstract, and reference page with the reference of the video you watched and any other material you used. This is a formal paper, which includes an intro, body and conclusion. Keep your originality score at 15% or lower. 

LINK: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tk_ZlWJ3qJI&index=14&list=PLyJucQzcNo8rZAlBifwoC_wZFuPM-9fsP&app=desktop

React to the ideas presented. Are they clear and suitable? Explain the ideas, give examples of their application in the material presented, and compare/contrast the ideas with your own.
Discuss specific insights or facts you have learned or gained from reading the material presented. Discuss each insight or fact you have learned in a detailed paragraph, using direct examples from the material presented. Include a page reference to the material to which you are reacting.
Make a judgment about the material presented and support it. Did you like it? Why/why not? Elaborate on your answer by commenting on the content, style, clarity, and validity of ideas and method of presentation.
Analyze the material presented. What is its purpose? How does it go about achieving its goal? What is the plan/method of presentation?
Tell what others might gain from the material presented. Is it valuable? Is it informative, entertaining, or accurate? Do you think your instructor should use it again? Why/why not?
In your conclusion, summarize your ideas and tie them together.

A few comments:

If I am struggling to figure out which point you are addressing, then you won’t receive the points for that paragraph.It must be clear and address the questions and ideas presented in the instructions. Remember, the word count is a minimum . . . you can go over to get your ideas across. This paper is clearly outlined and the instructions are detailed in what is expected.

Here is how I am grading:

APA format: 3 points (An abstract is to tell me what you are going to address in your paper . . . it is NOT a summary of the material you will be talking about.)

Word count minimum reached: 3 points

Summary: 2 points

Each major point covered: 3 points each if three are chosen, 4.5 points each if only two are chosen

Conclusion: 3 points

Be sure to follow these instructions before you submit your assignment. If you have already submitted your assignment, please evaluate it and decide if you need to rework it and resubmit it by the deadline.

A reaction paper is an analysis and an evaluation of the material presented. For this assignment, view one or two of the documentaries identified and write a reaction paper. You may watch and respond to one or two documentaries, write a minimum of 600 words total. Submit your paper to the Digital Drop Box by the due date. Submit assignments early to avoid problems. Any arrangements for late submission must be made directly with the professor. This paper needs to be written in APA format with a title page, abstract, and reference page with the reference of the video you watched and any other material you used. This is a formal paper, which includes an intro, body and conclusion. Keep your originality score at 15% or lower. 

LINK: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tk_ZlWJ3qJI&index=14&list=PLyJucQzcNo8rZAlBifwoC_wZFuPM-9fsP&app=desktop

React to the ideas presented. Are they clear and suitable? Explain the ideas, give examples of their application in the material presented, and compare/contrast the ideas with your own.
Discuss specific insights or facts you have learned or gained from reading the material presented. Discuss each insight or fact you have learned in a detailed paragraph, using direct examples from the material presented. Include a page reference to the material to which you are reacting.
Make a judgment about the material presented and support it. Did you like it? Why/why not? Elaborate on your answer by commenting on the content, style, clarity, and validity of ideas and method of presentation.
Analyze the material presented. What is its purpose? How does it go about achieving its goal? What is the plan/method of presentation?
Tell what others might gain from the material presented. Is it valuable? Is it informative, entertaining, or accurate? Do you think your instructor should use it again? Why/why not?
In your conclusion, summarize your ideas and tie them together.

A few comments:

If I am struggling to figure out which point you are addressing, then you won’t receive the points for that paragraph.It must be clear and address the questions and ideas presented in the instructions. Remember, the word count is a minimum . . . you can go over to get your ideas across. This paper is clearly outlined and the instructions are detailed in what is expected.

Here is how I am grading:

APA format: 3 points (An abstract is to tell me what you are going to address in your paper . . . it is NOT a summary of the material you will be talking about.)

Word count minimum reached: 3 points

Summary: 2 points

Each major point covered: 3 points each if three are chosen, 4.5 points each if only two are chosen

Conclusion: 3 points

Be sure to follow these instructions before you submit your assignment. If you have already submitted your assignment, please evaluate it and decide if you need to rework it and resubmit it by the deadline.