APA page and citation format
using 3rd PERSON: He, she it
2 Topics, 2 paragraphs
1.DESCRIBE JAQUES BENVENISTES EXPERIMENTS
2. PRESENT FRAUD BUSTERS FINDINGS AND SUBSEQUENT RESULTS OF THE TEST. ADD YOUR OWN ACCOUNT OF WHAT A DOUBLE-BLINDED TRIAL EXPERIMENT MEANS AND WHY IT IS ESSENTIAL TO A SCIENTIFIC TRIAL EXPERIMENT.
DESCRIPTION: The preservice teacher/candidate will review and reflect upon the Code of Ethics of the Education Profession in Florida and identify situations in the K-12 setting that relates to the Code of Ethics of the Education Profession in Florida and educational law. Describe how the foundation and history of education and the K-12 professionals roles and responsibilities related to the Code of Ethics of the Education Profession in Florida has impacted society today. Describe a personal situation where ethics played a role in the learning process. The paper must be 2 to 3 pages following Standard English using APA format.
Coe of Ethics Link: http://www.fldoe.org/teaching/professional-practices/code-of-ethics-principles-of-professio.stml
Summarize the article.
Minimum of 300 words-Points will be deducted if paper is less than 300 words.
No outside materials used. I want to hear your views on the reading. You can reference the reading. Turnitin report must be under 5% or no credit will be given.
We have all committed fallacies at one point or another in our lives, so for this discussion we ask you to reflect on the fallacy that you find that you commit the most frequently.
Write: Present an example of an argument (or arguments) that you have made that commits that particular fallacy. Present the reasoning in standard form. Evaluate your argument(s) by indicating the name of the fallacy that you committed and explaining why this argument is fallacious. What might you do to avoid committing that type of fallacy in the future? How might learning to avoid this fallacy benefit your life?
Identify Three Fallacies
Once you learn the names of the major logical fallacies, you will probably start noticing them all over the place, including in advertisements, movies, TV shows, and everyday conversations. This can be both fascinating and frustrating, but it can certainly help you to avoid certain pitfalls in reasoning that are unfortunately very common. This exercise gives you a chance to practice identifying fallacies as they occur in daily life.
Write: Present three distinct informal logical fallacies you have discovered in these types of sources or in your life. Make sure to identify the specific fallacy committed by each example. Explain how the fallacies were used and the context in which they occurred. Finally, explain how the person should have presented the argument in order to avoid committing this logical error.
Please based on the professor’s feedback, revise the pervious paper MGTHW2 Draft ( Order#160058065 ), I uploaded the rubric and the feedback (Image Revise1&2&3)from the professor.
Guide Line:
Select a company from the Fortune 500 Most Profitable Companies (Links to an external site.) list and evaluate its Corporate Social Responsibility performance. To do this, you need to go to the company’s website and find whatever reports it may have posted there on CSR (the company website may use different terms, e.g., sustainability, community involvement, diversity, transparency, etc.) Do a Google search to see if there have been any big scandals recently (or currently underway). Write an assessment giving your views on how well the company is addressing its social responsibilities. You should identify what are the key issues that this company SHOULD be addressing, and compare that to what you find about what they actually ARE doing. Does it sound like “window dressing” or do the programs seem substantive and effective? Do not just quote or summarize the corporate website. Be critical and show that you’ve done your own research and included your own original thinking in your essay.
Reminders from professor:
1. I suggest that when you’re deciding which aspects of CSR to cover in your next Homework assignment, given the word limits, you think about which aspects are most significant for the particular industry your company is in. For example, what are the big issues related to apparel, or to electronics, or to banking. It’s good to mention that there are other CSR efforts underway, or problems in other areas of a particular company’s operations, but use your limited space to address the most significant CSR issues.
2. Be sure to include sources. Even if you didn’t quote directly from them, I want to see where you looked and how much research you did to find perspectives beyond the corporate report.
Give your opinion and base it on evidence. The discussion should support whatever conclusion you come to – that the company is doing a good job or not doing enough, or doing fine in some areas and not in others. Don’t tell me how you feel about it – tell me what your analysis supports.
In “Just and Unjust War,” Howard Zinn presents a pacifist position against World War II. What do you think are the strongest points he makes that could be generalized beyond World War II to war in general? If you do not think he makes any strong arguments, tell me why you think his argument is weak? Is his position consistent with just war theory discussed in Amstutz, Chapter 7? Explain. Draw upon Zinn’s argument and just war theory to respond to the question, “Does the failure to find weapons of mass destruction invalidate the moral justification for going to war against Iraq?”
Shouler 5/ Soccio 7
(500 Word Reflection Due on Discussion Board by the 15th)
https://studylib.net/doc/8429009/archetypes-of-wisdom
https://books.google.com/books?id=aF_sDQAAQBAJ&pg=PT25&lpg=PT25&dq=The+Everything+Guide+to+Understanding+Philosophy:+Understand+the+basic+concepts+of+the+greatest+thinkers+of+all+time+by+kenneth+Shouler+chapter+1&source=bl&ots=qx2L3Pz5uR&sig=ACfU3U07pcvxA6Qy0aXnQpvoCq9wCxgBng&hl=en&ppis=_e&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjs3cLO4uzmAhXNqp4KHRS5CoYQ6AEwA3oECAoQAQ#v=onepage&q=The%20Everything%20Guide%20to%20Understanding%20Philosophy%3A%20Understand%20the%20basic%20concepts%20of%20the%20greatest%20thinkers%20of%20all%20time%20by%20kenneth%20Shouler%20chapter%201&f=false
The Case:
12-year old, Maximillian is suffering from cancerous tumours in his brain and spinal cord. His physician, Dr. Jones, deems that the tumours are not currently life threatening though she expects they will become so if they are not treated.
Everyone involved in Maximillians case wants to promote his best interests. There is, however, disagreement about the best way to do this.
Dr. Jones has recommended a plan of treatment that includes radiation to shrink the tumours. She has explained the process of administering radiation to Maximillian and his parents. She has also presented the expected benefits and risks associated with the plan of treatment proposed. Dr. Jones estimates a 70% chance that radiation will eliminate the tumours and she has explained that she judges radiation treatments will give Maximillian the best chance for a full recovery without the need for more invasive interventions. Dr. Jones has explained that chemotherapy and surgery may be recommended if the size of the tumours increases. She has been happy to answer any of the familys questions.
Maximillian has been involved in all of the discussions about his treatment with Dr. Jones. Dr. Jones judges that Maximillian is very intelligent and wants him to understand both the nature of his tumours and the treatment recommended.
Maximillian has stated that he doesnt want radiation. He is worried that this is going to make him feel really sick and really tired. He is especially concerned that he wont be able to play on his schools soccer teamone of the best teams in Quebecthis year.
Maximillians parents have stated that they dont want Maximillian to undergo radiation. They believe the best option is to feed Maximillian a vegan diet of organic vegetables, free of sugars and free of animal products. This plan, they believe, will allow Maximillians body to heal itself with the right nutrition.
Following Maximillians desires and their own beliefs, Maximillians parents have informed Dr. Jones that they are refusing radiation treatment and they have indicated this in writing.
Dr. Jones believes that Maximillians parents are making a loving, but nevertheless irrational, decision and has petitioned the courts to intervene so that Maximillian will be treated with radiation before his tumours become life threatening.
The Assignment:
Draw on the relevant readings from Modules 1 and 2 to complete the tasks identified in one of the following options. (You should choose only one of option 1 or option 2 or option 3.)
1. State whether or not Maximillians parents are making an informed decision in one or both of the two senses introduced by Faden and Beauchamp and support your judgment. If you think they are making an informed decision to refuse radiation treatment in both senses, could the courts have any grounds to deny their refusal and order that Maximillian receive radiation treatment? If you think their decision to refuse treatment is not informed in both senses, who should have the power to make medical decisions for Maximillian in this instance? Defend your answers.
2. This option involves answering two questions. Are Maximillians parents making an informed decision according the transparency standard model as this is presented by Brody? In answering this question, make sure to explain what the transparency standard is, how this standard could be used to assess the parents decision-making, and why you think the standard is met or not met in this case. Is meeting the transparency standard sufficient in this case? (In other words, should more rigorous standards be applied?) Defend your answers.
3. Use the four principles of biomedical ethics outlined in Chapter 1 of your text to make clear the ethical issue that arises in Maximillians case. To do this, identify which principles are most relevant to understanding the case and explain how the principles you identify conflict in Maximillians case. (It might help to draw on the concept of paternalism to explain the conflicting principles.) Then, say whether you think the parents should be allowed to make the decision for Maximillian and defend your answer by saying why certain principles should be given more weighting than others.
There are several types of fallacies equivocation, false authority, ad hominem, appeal to ignorance, and bandwagon. Please provide two (2) different examples of advertising that show any of the above topics. Which of the above fallacies is used in each advertisement? Why do you think the advertisers used that fallacy in the ad? Did the advertisers use the fallacy effectively? If you were an advertiser, what would you have done differently to better use the fallacy?
