https://www.greenriver.edu/campus/campus-resources/holman-library/
The resource has to be from the website I provided, it’ll ask for a Student ID to access the Gale webpage. The ID number is 830221143.
Notes- You can choose any text you feel comfortable writing about but it has to meet the professor’s needs. And can we communicate throughout you writing the essay? I never used a writing service before, I am kinda nervous.
Starting on page 242 of the reading, “Puppies, Pigs, and People,” Norcross discusses “moral agents” and “moral patients”. This is medieval language that is unusual outside of philosophy, so it might have been a bit unclear. You can think of an agent as “the one who acts” and a patient as “the one who is acted upon.” (This is the original sense of a patient in a medical setting, too.) In general, agent and patient need not be human or even sentient; they can be any two beings. The key point is that one is active and the other passive.
The last section of Norcross’s article argues that the fact that animals are not (and cannot be) moral agents does not mean they are not moral patients. That is, even though they are not moral beings (i.e., we cannot judge them as behaving morally or immorally), nevertheless, because we are moral agents, we owe moral duties towards animals. In other words, there is no guarantee that just because something has moral standing that it therefore has moral responsibility.
explain why you agree or disagree with this position. looking for quality, not just completion
PLEASE ONLY USE MATERIAL PROVIDE IT.
https://youtu.be/8OgzgY9Oj4c
The prompt for the essay is: With specific reference to current public debates surrounding hate speech and freedom of speech, discuss the strengths or weakness of Mills own position in chapter 2 of On Liberty. What are the dangers of silencing false, dangerous, or morally repugnant positions? Be sure to include in your discussion an explanation and assessment of Mills harm principle and the role of rights in assessing limits to speech.
The essay is supposed to be between 1700-2000 words. Using the source J.S. Mill On Liberty. Specifically pgs. 1-5, 9-22, 33-36, 44-52.
Short Answer
One short essay response concerning your reading with two quotes minimum of MLA citation evidence.
FOCUS:
Subjects / Themes/ Intentions / Agenda
OR
Historical moment / Environment / Situation
400-600 words (not to exceed one page) / double-spaced / 12 pt. font / minimum of two MLA formatted sources/ thesis statement / original title / MLA heading / MLA works cited
http://www1.udel.edu/History-old/figal/Hist138/Text/er/atsumori.pdf
Synthesize material to analyze arguments
Before Columbus, three great explorers traveled thousands of miles and encountered many societies on their trips through the Old World: Marco Polo in the thirteenth century, Ibn Battuta in the fourteenth, and Zheng He in the fifteenth. Controversy confronts each: for two, did they travel as far as they said they did; for the third, did he travel even farther?
For this and the next two assignments, you will read articles and synthesize the material in order to answer the questions asked. You have material on how to synthesize on the home page just before this assignment. This assignment requires an outline; the next two require the essay.
Assignment directions
Read the material on synthesizing (the PowerPoint and the matrix example) included in the course just before this assignment.
Select ONE of the explorers below and read THREE of the related sources.
Answer all parts of the question: Where did the explorer travel to? Whose arguments make the most sense? Explain.
Identify information from the three articles to answer the question. Identify four points to make and organize the information from the three articles under the four points. Organize by point, not by source. Each article must contribute to at least two of your four points. The matrix can help organize your draft but you submit a written outline of the paper.
You are submitting a detailed outline, not the actual paper. Clearly identify your four points and which information from each article you would use to support each point. Clearly identify whether something is your idea, was said by the author of the article, or was said by someone quoted in the article.
Use only the information from the three sources you chose (and the Lecture Notes if needed). I want your analysis, not something you found on the Internet on the subject. Work alone.
2-3 pages (in addition to the Works Cited page), 12 point font, 1 inch margin all around, double-space. You don’t need a title page. Include a Works Cited page: author, title, publication, date. Alphabetize by author’s last name. Single-space within entries, double-space between them. Use proper American English spelling, grammar, punctuation, capitalization, and paragraphs.
1800-2400 words
At least 4 sources (3 library sources)
Typed
MLA Format
Double-spaced
Include a title
Times New Roman 12 font
1 inch margins
create a thread where you summary the main idea (or *hint* ideas) in Wade’s essay. Your post should be between 300-400 words and should respond to the following questions:
What is the main idea of this essay? How can you tell?
What is the claim being made about “aliens” in this essay?
What evidence does this author present in support of her claims?
article link: https://aeon.co/essays/what-are-our-rights-and-duties-towards-alien-life
Please write your thesis statement for our next essay, “On Conversation/Verbal Communication.” It should be no longer than one or two sentences. (You are free to modify or change your thesis later as you progress with research on the subject.) Keep in mind the following points:
thesis: n. the claim, purpose, or main point of an essay.
The thesis answers the question, So, what are you saying? What is your point? A thesis is about ideas, insights, interpretations, solutions.
Be prepared to answer So what? about your thesis. Dont just restate the obvious. Imagine your reader saying, So, tell me something I dont already know. Seek out novelty and paradox. Challenge conventional wisdom. Uncover what is hidden.
Where should the thesis be? Early in the essay, usually at the end of the introductory paragraph, and after a hook that piques the readers interest.
How long should a thesis be? One or two sentences, stating the topic and your position on the topic.
I would also love to work with you to do this essay, but for now I just need a short thesis statement. I have attached further instructions for this assignment just in case you need more information.
Introduction and thesis
– Quality introduction that grabs interest of reader and states the topic
– Thesis is exceptionally clear, well-developed, and a definitive statement
– Good setup for main research sections
Content knowledge: quality of research
– Well researched topic
– Excellent analysis of the topic and supporting evidence sited from at least 3 articles in a logical manner
– References are sited correctly and flows well with the content
Content application: support of thesis and analysis
– Exceptionally critical, relevant and consistent connections made between evidence and thesis
– Excellent analysis of the topic
– Creativity and innovation
Conclusion
– Quality summary of thesis argument with concluding ideas that impact reader
– Does not introduce new ideas or information in the conclusion
Writing
– Paper if free of grammar and spelling errors
– Up to 10 references
– Reference section is properly formatted, 12 point Calilbri Font, 1.5 line spacing
– Used page numbers
analyze a speech in terms of Aristotles ethos, logos, and pathos …
****THE SPEECH CAN BE ANY FROM A POLITICAL FIGURE FROM THE USA ******
——MAKE SURE YOU FOLLOW ALL OF THE BELLOW INSTRUCTIONS YOU CAN PICK THE SPEECH BUT I NEED TO APPROVE IT PLEASE LET ME KNOW WHAT SPEECH FIRST—–
Introduction: A one-paragraph introduction, ending with a clear thesis statement that previews the three main points you will discuss (e.g., I will analyze this speech in terms of Aristotles three key components of a speech: ethos, logos, and pathos).
Body: Three subsequent paragraphs or sections, each devoted to developing one of your main points (e.g., paragraph on ethos, paragraph on logos, and paragraph on pathos). In each paragraph/section:
State one proof and define/explain what the proof is/means (e.g., Ethos refers to .).
Identify the degree to which each Aristotelian proof is present within the speech and support with all of the examples that you see in the speech (e.g., This speaker establishes a high degree of ethos by specific examples from speech.). This means you dont want to be general, but, rather, be specific in your examples (e.g., when discussing logos in a paper, dont just say the speaker used supportspecify the exact support used in that speech).
Conclusion: A one paragraph conclusion that reviews the main points and then evaluates the overall effectiveness of the speech in terms of the ethos, logos, and pathos. Does the speech achieve its communicative purpose or intent? Why/why not? Answer this question in terms of the three proofs. Then end by noting the key take aways you have gained from completing this analysis.
Please note: By the end of this paper, you should clearly identify a minimum of 10 different ways in which the Aristotelian proofs (ethos, logos, and pathos) are established or created in the speech (10 total, not 10 for each proof). For each of the 10 examples that you provide, bold, italicize, or in some other way highlight it, so that you will be able to see easily (as will I) that you have, in fact, provided 10 examples.
Use of public speaking principles to inform the analysis clarity of thought (points are easily understandable), and quality of writing (proofread). This should be a critical analysis that shows some depth and insight into the application of ethos, pathos, and logos in oratory, and displays your knowledge of the finer aspects of public speaking.
A complete text of the speech analyzed must be attached or included or the website where the speech may be seen is given.
View less
