The literature review document must be at least 5 pages long in Week 6.  For Week 7, students will add and/or remove content to meet the Week 7 assignment goal of a ten page paper. There should be a total of ten articles. (I have provided five)

For this assignment, your goal is to present what you have learned about your topic across all of the articles you gathered and read. If your thoughts have evolved since you turned into your outline, it is OK to deviate from what you submitted in your outline last week! You are encouraged to:

Use headings within your literature review to guide the reader through your thoughts as you summarize the key points you want to make.

Be scholarly, but don’t use overcomplicated language. Be direct. Do not use colloquial expressions, and do not use first person (e.g., “I,” “me,” “my”).

Do not simply write a paper that brings the reader through a summary of what you read article-by-article (like mini article critiques). Instead, each paragraph should be about a different point you want to make about your topic and what the combined literature demonstrates about that point. Expect to use multiple citations in each paragraph.

Take a look at the introduction for the article you critiqued in Week 3 if you are unsure how to write your literature review. Notice how their literature review is focused on topics and a synthesis of others’ research and theory. Model your structure, tone, and “flow of thoughts” after theirs. Also, note how the authors have used citations and where they are placed.

Create a References page that only uses references (not annotations). Be sure that your page lists your references in the proper order and that formatting and punctuation are correct.

For Week 6, we will discuss Area 51.

Please answer and discuss the following in the Discussion Board:

[1] What did you learn about Area 51 that would be so mysterious and controversial?

[2] What do you think Area 51 showed about the Cold War era during the 1950s?  How have we changed in such attitudes, if at all?  Explain.

During the 1950s, Area 51 was a secretive government site, perceived as a representation of Cold War era tension in the USA.

Please address the following questions in your short essay:

1. Do you think the creation of secretive sites, such as Area 51, were justified? Why or why not?

2. If you were in charge of the CIA during the Cold War period, what methods would you use to ensure domestic security?

Goal

Write a 750-1,000-word essay that analyzes the rhetorical situation of a public document. This public document is the Centers for Disease Controls (CDC) website on Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) found at: http://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/adhd/facts.html. Your analysis should include at least TWO scholarly sources outside of class texts.

Directions

Complete a close reading of the assigned public document. Then, write a cohesive essay that:

1.      Introduces and summarizes the CDC website on ADHD.

2.      Analyzes the rhetorical tools used on the site (here, you will want to incorporate ideas from your preanalysis below). For instance, your essay could analyze the CDCs use of ethos, pathos, and logos.

3.      Evaluates the sites effectiveness (again, ideas from your preanalysis below will be helpful).

This essay is NOT simply an expository or descriptive essay or an analysis of ADHD. It is an analysis of the site and how effectively the site uses rhetorical tools to get its point across.

First Draft Grading

        You will receive completion points for the first draft based upon the successful submission of your draft.

        Because your first draft is a completion grade, do not assume that this grade reflects or predicts the final grade. If you do not consider your instructors comments, you may be deducted points on your final draft.

Final Draft Grading

The essay will be graded using a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations.

Sources

        Include in-text citations and a References page in GCU Style for at least TWO scholarly sources outside of class texts.

        These sources should be used to support any claims you make and should be present in the text of the essay.

        Use the GCU Library to help you find sources.

        Include this research in the paper in a scholarly manner.

F

Preparing to Write the Essay

Read the site closely:

1.      Read the webpage on Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) found at  http://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/adhd/facts.html

o  Do a first reading that uses underlining, annotation, and summary to make sure you understand what the writer is saying. Go back to any sections that need clarification.

o  On a second reading, pay attention to what the writer(s) of the CDC site is doing by describing the writers strategy.

Conduct a preanalysis:

1.      Use your close reading to analyze the rhetorical situation of the site.

2.      Here are some questions to guide your analysis.

3.      You do NOT need to answer all of thempick three that make the most sense to you. Your close reading will help you generate ideas for your essay.

        What is the context of the issue(s)?

a)      What do you know about the topic?

b)      What issues does the topic raise?

c)      Is there a larger debate, discussion, or controversy already going on?

d)      What seems to be at stake?

        Who is the writer?

a.      What do you know about the writers background, credibility, knowledge of the topic, beliefs, and social allegiances?

        What is the publication?

a.      What do you know about its intended readers, reputability, political slant, and the topics it covers?

        How does the writer define the rhetorical situation and identify the call to write?

a.      What is the writers orientation toward the issues involved?

b.      What is at stake for the writer?

        Who is the intended audience?

a.      Is the writer addressing one group or more than one group of readers?

b.      Is the writer trying to bring an audience into being?

c.      What kind of relationship is the writer trying to establish with readers?

d.      What assumptions about readers does the writer seem to make?

        How does the writer use language?

a.      How does the writer use ethos, pathos, and logos to appeal to the audience?

b.      What is the writers tone?

c.      What does the writers word choice show about his or her assumptions about readers?

d.      Does the writer use specialized terms or slang?

e.      Are there memorable figures of speech?

f.        Does the writer stereotype?

        What is your evaluation of the rhetorical effectiveness?

a.      Does the writer accomplish his or her purposes?

b.      What constraints, if any, qualify the writings effectiveness?

Draft the essay:

Once youve completed the pre-analysis, draft the essay. The essay should include:

1.      Header, essay title, heading in GCU Style

2.      An introduction paragraph with a thesis statement

3.      At least three body paragraphs

4.      A conclusion paragraph

Also, you will need to include a References page and in-text citations formatted in GCU Style with at least TWO scholarly sources outside of class texts.

Submit this assignment to your instructor in the assignment drop box AND post this draft as an attachment in the Module 2 Rhetorical Analysis Peer Review forum

The cost to incarcerate offenders when compared to community supervision alternatives is significantly higher. This is especially true for elderly inmates, which are a growing segment of the incarceration population as a result of stricter sentencing approaches.

In your initial response, identify and discuss costs that are specifically associated with the incarceration of elderly inmates. Next, keeping in mind existing legal mandates with respect to the rights of inmates (e.g., right to medical care, basic needs, etc.), propose at a possible approach for controlling the rising costs of incarcerating elderly inmates.

Must use at least 2 scholarly sources

Read chapter 4 and answer question and reply to the people in your group. You should answer question by Wednesday and replies by end of week!! This is a Discussion!

Maria, a nurse, views the social media pages of her work colleagues in her spare time. One evening while perusing the page of Sonja, she notices that Sonja has posted a photo of herself taken the previous weekend in which she appears to be drunk. Maria also sees a photo of a patient on Sonjas page. Maria makes a mental note to talk to Sonja about these photos the next day at work .
What should Maria tell Sonja should be Sonjas concerns regarding the protection of her professional practice associated with the use of social media?

February 10
Read: Abbate-Parker, 113-116
Also check out the synopses of Idomeneo and La clemenza di Tito
Watch: Idomeneo, Act I (Met Opera on Demand, 1982); La clemenza di Tito, Sestos first-act aria Parto, parto, ma tu ben mio (Met Opera on Demand, 2012)
Analyze: Illias aria Padre, germani, addio and Electras aria Tutte nel cor vi sento from Idomeneo; Sestos Parto, parto, ma tu ben mio from La clemenza di Titofind .pdf scores + text/translations on Blackboard

Study Questions:
How does Mozart differentiate the two female heroines of Idomeneo in their introductory arias?

What are the main differences between the forms of the arias from Idomeneo and that from Tito?

In what ways does the first act of Idomeneo incorporate ideals of Glucks reform operas?

February 12
Read: Abbate-Parker, 117-144
Also check out the synopsis of Le nozze di Figaro
Watch: Mozart, Le nozze di Figaro, Acts I and II (Met Opera on Demand, 1998)
Analyze: second-act finalefind .pdf score and text/translation on Blackboard

Study Question:
How do the first two acts of Le nozze di Figaro reflect general characteristics of late eighteenth-century opera buffa?

Using the text/translation and a score, sketch out the first part of the second-act finale (up to the arrival of the gardener Antonio), showing all the different shifts in style as well as key and signature changes. Explain how these musical changes and shifts fit with the drama.

Please take the Multiple Intelligences Test which can be found in a google search.

Once you have the results of the test, you can address the following discussion board prompts with your own personal results in mind.

Do you think multiple intelligences is a valid construct? In other words, do multiple intelligences exist?  (Be sure to include connections to the textbook/research when building your argument.)

Do you think that the test you took in Module 5 gave an accurate picture of your intellectual abilities?  In other words, do you think that test accurately measured what it is supposed to measure?

Provide at least one recommendation about how the developers of this multiple intelligences test could demonstrate evidence for the validity of the test.  Your recommendation should focus on one of the types of validity described in the textbook [i.e., content-related validity, predictive validity, concurrent validity, or construct validity (using convergent or discriminant evidence)].

Finally, make a Biblical argument either for or against the existence of multiple intelligences.  Whichever stance you take, be sure to back it up with meaningful and relevant scripture references.

MAKE SURE CONTENT IS 350 WORDS

Once each learner has chosen their topic, they need to identify at least 2 recent (no earlier than 2005) articles that address the topic. Each learner is encouraged to identify both a research/scientific (academic) and a practitioner oriented article. The research/scientific (academic) article will assist in providing a comprehensive definition of the topic and a description of key aspects of the topic, whereas the practitioner oriented article will provide more how to information.

1.    (Section 1) Define and briefly describe the topic using the information provided in the articles and other sources if necessary (try to secure a comprehensive definition of the topic and identify any classifications, typologies and dimensions e.g. branded video is defined as and has the following types and the first type is made up of the following dimensions , second type is made up of etc.).
2.    (Section 2) Identify the key points that the articles are making about the topic and present the information in a series of bulleted statements (suggest that you highlight the key points that the articles are making about using branded video as a marketing tactic). If necessary, expand briefly on each point to assist the reader in understanding the point being made.
3.    (Section 3) Briefly describe why the topic is important for organizations (what impact will the topic have on society, organizations, environment etc. (e.g. why are branded videos important for organizations). If no direct information is provided then you need to make thoughtful inferences.
4.    (Section 4) Briefly recommend key actions that should be taken with regard to this topic (e.g. how might this practice/activity be executed e.g. how should branded video be developed and deployed? Provide some information about the key general steps required execute this activity, and any other things that support efficient and effective execution (there should be information about recommended steps within the practitioner oriented literature). If no direct information is available then you need to make thoughtful inferences. Section 4 is only applicable if you chose a topic that is an activity or practice.
5.    Paper must be structured using the 4 sections indicated above (unless section 4 is not required) and must reference all sources on a separate page at the end (use the APA referencing format – http://www.apastyle.org ). The paper should be 3 pages in length (excluding the cover page and reference page), 11/2 line spacing, 12 point arial or verdana font, normal margins (typically 1 inch all around), cover page with topic title, course name, instructor name and student name and number. The paper must be saved in PDF format