Day: May 11, 2020

The Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which was proclaimed by the General Assembly of the UN on December 10th 1948, exhibits that people from different cultures can be in agreement on a set of “universal rules”.

As we continue to face this pandemic, let’s look at the ethics of those making decisions in the United States at a state level vs the federal level.

State governments are making major decisions still to keep people at home and closing businesses down. Looking at this from a multiplicity perspective- the numbers:

According to the CDC, the “at least 38 million flu illnesses, 390,000 hospitalizations and 23,000 deaths from flu.” (Link: https://www.cdc.gov/flu/weekly/index.htm )

and Compare that to the Corona virus: 26,959 cases in the US with 349 deaths. (Link: 
https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/us/)

Additional perspective – there’s a medicine for this – Japanese medication. Much like the flu, there’s a medication for this.

When looking at the moral quality of leadership – explore this at the New York state’s level vs the federal level.  We have some fascinating perspectives to critically explore.  Apply critical thought using this week’s course topics and scientific data to compare. 

For example, for the federal side, when was the budget cut for the CDC and how does it impact the current capabilities of the CDC? Are the current decisions of the various state/federal government’s decisions necessary and ethical?

Then Give 2 examples on what you can do in the current COVID-19 situation to LEAD ethically? (1 CAN BE STATE LEVEL, FEDERAL AND LOCAL Level)

Write a reading response to WEEK11’s Reading and link to any resources from other week’s reading that I provide

– Requirements:
Students will submit short responses of 450 – 550 words that engage with the readings for that week.
Students must respond to one of the required readings but may draw from other readings and weeks to support their responses.
Responses should summarize the main points of the article and the central argument
Responses could address one or more of the questions below

– Writing Prompts:
What is the author’s main argument?
What is the goal of paper?
What other articles are being cited?
How does this article attend to race, gender, class, or ability?
What questions guide the author?
What answers does the author provide?
What makes this research unique?
What theory or theories does the author use and why?
What methods does the author use, why did they choose these methods?

Do task 3-2-1 for financial part and 3-3 use 2 method to analysis the restaurant, use the simulation for financial management in the excel, and I write about how I calculate the numbers and the basic information about the restaurant in the word document named simulation. And here is an example as well that you can see how others write the project, but we are the different restaurant.