Responses must fully address each question.
In addition, students must use text/cite text to highlight and support ideas. Each is worth 6 points.

1. For Goffman, what does interaction order represent? (p. 356)

2.  According to Goffman, how may criminals use situational norms to their advantage? (p. 356)

3. Identify and briefly describe two of Goffmans five interaction entities (p. 357-359)

4. For Goffman, how do social structures rely on individual interactions to be functional? (p.359-361)

5. Is Goffman more similar to the American middle years social thought or European middle years social thought? Explain your choice. 

You will search and review two empirical research articles in your field within the last three years that employ mixed methods design. You will submit a summary for each research article based on Journal of Mixed Methods Research (JMMR) criteria (Links to an external site.).

The information required on the review form (Links to an external site.) include:

Article Citation Information
Article Summary (100-150 words) and Keywords
Article Review and Comments:
Noteworthiness of the problem
Theoretical framework
Fit of questions to MM design
MM sampling
MM analysis and integration
Insightfulness of discussion
Writing quality
Quality of conclusions
Contribution to MM literature

Your annotated bibliography should include 5 academic sources.

More than summaries, each entry should demonstrate your critical awareness of the sources related to the topic and their various connections. Consider the following 3 Cs:

Content: Provide a thorough summary of the source, including information about the author(s), the main points and/or the hypothesis or purpose of the study, the methods and data used, and the findings and implications.

Comparison: Point out the comparisons and contradictions between and among sourcesthat is, what a source is saying or not saying about a particular topic and how it relates to other research sources youve found. Doing so demonstrates you know and can enter scholarly and scientific conversations, and it will position this source within those conversations.

Commentary: Comment on the usefulness of each source to your particular topic and how it will help you communicate your ideas to a larger audience. For example, does it support or counter your argument and how so? does it provide background information? present useful data? offer new insights or a different perspective?