Instructions   
Choose a product/service (not the same one you are using for the final project (marketing plan). Answer the following questions:
1.    Considering direct, online, social media and mobile marketing options, which 2 options do you feel would be the best to use in relation to the product/service you have chosen? Why?
2.    Describe the options you justified above and outline specific methods you would adopt in using those 2 options. Discuss specific uses, platforms, and messages you would ensure are marketed through these options.
3.    What one strategy could be adopted to create a competitive advantage for that product/service? Provide an analysis of this decision.
(For all dropbox assignments, remember to reference at least 2 sources;

ALSO INCLUDE ON A SEPARATE PAGE
Personal selling involves an understanding of how to handle objections of potential customers/buyers. Consider a product/service that could be sold through personal selling (through a sales person).
1.    What objection, query or concern could a consumer have relating to that product/service before purchasing?
2.    How could a salesperson overcome that objection or answer the query or concern effectively for the consumer? 

Background fo the research
Introduction: Identifies the purpose and rationale of the research
Hypotheses: Explains the background research and expected findings 
Methods: Describes the methods used to conduct the research ( e.g., participants, sample, measures, procedures, etc.)
Results: Explains the findings of the research study(ies)
Study implications: Explains how this research can be applied to current diversity issues

Please read the entire article:
https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2018/07/11/activism-in-the-social-media-age/

This assignment is focused on how social media has changed the behavior of people specifically people who are growing up with social media.  Answer the following in a short essay.

How has social media affected your perceptions of activism? 
Do you think a voice amplified by social media is more or less powerful?  Why?

YOU DON’T HAVE TO RESTATE THE QUESTIONS:

introduction:

1.  After reading the introduction, explain in your own words the reason(s) why the authors chose to conduct this particular research study (be specific). (3 pts)

2.  What scientific question is being addressed? (2 pts)3.  What is the authors hypothesis? (2 pts)

Subjects and Methods:
 
4. What inclusion and/or exclusion criteria were used to select the subjects for the study? Why? (2 pts)

5.  Describe the study design: type of study (e.g. correlational, clinical trial, etc.) and overall structure/format of the study (what did they do?). (3 pts)

Results:

6.  Briefly summarize the results described in the text or shown in the figure(s)/table(s).      (3 pts)

7.  What conclusion(s) do the authors draw from these results? (2 pts)

Discussion:

8.  Do you think that the study results supported the authors hypothesis? Why or why not?  How strong/convincing did you find the results? (3 pts)

9.  What were the limitations of this study?  (2 pts)

10.  How could you design a study that could provide additional answers to the question asked? What are the possible future experiments/research areas related to this topic? (3 pts)

** TOPIC: Research based on Depression **

Using research databases, look for a scholarly/peer-reviewed quantitative research study on the topic “Depression”. In your initial post,

– Appraise the differences between experimental and non-experimental research.
– Differentiate between a correlational study and an experimental study.
– State the hypothesis being tested in the selected quantitative research study.
– Identify the major variables and categorize them as independent or dependent.
– Describe the methods and results of the study.
– Determine whether the study is descriptive, correlational, or experimental, and explain why it fits this classification.

this task/paper, was done and completed by a scholar in this website, when i submitted it, my professor said that there is a part that needs to be revised.

NOTE: I requested the same scholar that worked on it, so please others, do not waste ur time and bid, cuz i will only assign the writer that worked on it previously to avoid confusion.

My professor said (((((it was perfect, but he said that part C1 needs revision, therefore, parts C2, C3, D1, D2, D3 need to be revised as well, cuz they rely on C1. If C1 needs to be revised, then the rest cannot be assessed because they rely on part C1. ))))))

Therefore, I will be uploading a doc named “Professor Comment”, please read it carefully, so that you can revise whatever needs to be revised. plz make certain u do exactly as my professor comment and feedback. Anyways, I will also be providing u with a doc called “paper TASK 2”, that is basically the paper u worked on dear scholar.

TEXTBOOK PAGES ATTACHED

For this first Exam One, you have a writing assignment: I want you to go back through the five theories we have discussed and read about to dateCultural Relativism, Ethical Subjectivism, Ethical Egoism, Utilitarianism and Immanuel Kants deontologyand a new one I am adding “rights and justice.”  You will think about these SIX ethical theories and respond to a dilemma in the book based on each of the six theories. You will read Case 3 in Chapter 3, starting on page 127 and going through page 133. It is called Canadas oil sands: most destructive project on Earth or ethical oil?   Your answers are based on this Case Study.

Read this entire case study and answer each of the five questions that come after this case study, on Page 132, numbers 1-5 in full. For Question #3, note that we have yet to cover rights and justice. For that part of the question, you will need to refer to pages 104-111 of your book and consider rights and justice as it is covered here. You will also answer that question based on a duties approachKants deontologyversus what you read about rights and justice in pages 104-111.  Finally, for either question 4 or 5, think of how oil sands relate to the Enron movie we just watched.  Tell me very briefly (i.e. in one sentence) how you draw comparisons or differences in the way these two business-related ethical dilemmas were handled and why.

You do not have to use each of the other six theories in every answer, but you do have to make certain you cover ALL six thoroughly throughout the Exam paper you are handing in. So if it were me, for instance, in Question 1, I would briefly outline each of the five ethical theories weve discussed so far and give examples of how/why the actors deciding what to do about this ethical dilemma would do A, B or C, based on their position from said ethical theory. When you define the theory, make certain you refer back to notes Ive provided you, particularly in Discussions and/or if youve handed in a longer response paper and I commented on that, clarified things for you.

When you answer all questions, make certain you reference our book and the page number or my lecture notes for your answer. For example, if I wrote, Immanuel Kant would want to make sure people were paid full wages. Otherwise, they might be treated as means rather than ends.  Kant wants people to be respected for their intrinsic value as human beings” (Evans lecture, September 13, 2019) or (Crane and Matten, 2016, p. 109), if it comes from the book.

Note that you should NOT need to reference any material outside our class notes, lectures, the book, or other links I provided you. For Exam Two (the final) you will, but not for this exam, please.

This paper will be no longer than three typed pages (single or double spaced, I dont care about the line spacing as long as questions are answered fully)

This week you will submit your final journal reflection for your public health observational experience. For this reflection you will address the 3rd objective you identified in week 3 of the course.  Review the course content, resources, and literature related to your objective to prepare for your experience.

After completing your observation, create a video reflection documenting your experience.

The video should include:

Identify your total number of hours this week for your OLE
The objective you focused on
What you learned in your preparation
What you learned in your observation including any questions you asked
Report if you were able to meet your objective with rationale
The video journal will be graded on utilizing the rubric attached. The video should not exceed 5 minutes.

QUESTION 3

Identify the relevant laws and standards that are used to ensure best practices in industrial and hazardous waste management. Discuss how these standards prescribe the laboratory testing to differentiate different key attributes of waste types.

Your response should be at least 200 words in length.

After you have explored the documents (see attachments) then post a one paragraph (about five thoughtful sentences) summary of what you learned. This could be either something you found of interest, or answers to the activity questions or comments regarding the interactive map.

Be sure you have explored at least THREE of the documents. Be sure that at least one document is a written document,  the second document may be either an image or a map, and the third and fourth documents are the student’s choice.

Discuss the document’s content (What did it say), context (What is the rational for writing it), and significance.