The assignment is to code an algorithm/project using Haskell as a functional programming language while undergoing test driven development. The test should use property based testing (QuickCheck) and can include unit testing (HUnit) for further marks. The algorithm can be anything but having thorough test is the main element of the coursework. Further writing is required however i have completed all the writing, i am just struggling with coding using Haskell
Day: August 9, 2020
-The length of the essay should be approximately 500 words long. Please, provide word count.
-A good essay/answer should:
answer the chosen question
include background information (facts) AND your own arguments/motivations for your answer
be structured as an academic essay, i.e. it should include an introduction, a body part (background and arguments/motivations) and a conclusion
include use of subject-related terminology and vocabulary
be written in grammatically correct, academic English.
Writing no more than 600 words for this argumentative essay. Reading the 7 pages I will attach from Voices from the Whirlwind and follow the prompt I will also attach.
Analyze the relationship of family loyalty and class patriotism. How did the author make sense of harm against family members for the sake of the revolution (pp. 148-154)?
Read the Week 1 Scope Document about the instruction. And only need to complete the 1.0 Project Purpose and 2.0 Project Scope of the Week 1 Project Scope Template.
For this assignment, you will reviewing completed FSCN project scope questionnaires. . You will develop your own version of a project scope document based upon the information in these completed questionnaires. Optionally you may want to do additional research on FSCN and call center operations in general.
Please reference the attached document for specific assignment instructions and the assignment rubric.
PLEASE SUBMIT WITH THE TEMPLETE THAT PROVIDED
We need your expertise:
A) 1/3 of the work, 5 pages. Please give us a detailed, scientific(!) description of HOW keras workes, how it is designed and how Tensor Flow gets into the field
B) 2/3 of the work, 15 pages. Please give a RESERACH paper reference to each section of KERAS and its technology used. Please target a MINMUM of 20 Research papers of HIGH quality that really EXACTLY are referenced by Keras as source of the method and technology used by Keras.
https://keras.io/getting_started/intro_to_keras_for_researchers/
Instructions are noted in the attachment below.
**Be detailed and comprehensive in your approach**
A rubric and an outline will be attached to help you develop the paper, as well as ensure if all of the criteria are met and exceeds a level A+. Please, on a separate document or the text editor, complete THE PROPOSAL (Appendix A) and APPENDIX B before you start the FINAL DRAFT. APPENDIX A and APPENDIX B are considered to be the rough draft of the work so I have an idea of what the paper will discuss/highlight.
This paper should be taken very seriously as it is a summative worth 30% of my overall mark. Please adhere to university or post-grad readability and writing devoid of grammar and punctuation mistakes.
If you do have any questions or concerns regarding the order, feel free to let me know and I will respond back as soon as possible.
Response to Play 2 (MUCH ADO ABOUT NOTHING)
Here’s the link to the video: https://www.pbs.org/wnet/gperf/much-ado-about-nothing-full-episode/10194/
WHEN YOU ARE READY TO RESPOND ONLINE
You are not graded on your opinion, but rather how you express your opinioncan you give specific examples from the production that will illustrate your point.
The online responses for the plays will be longer than your previous discussion responses. However, try to be brief if you can between three to five paragraphs. Youll be hitting those points you think are most pertinent to your experience.
Here are the basic points you might touch on
What is this play trying to say about the human condition?
Remember, all plays are meant to entertain. But even the lightest, silliest comedy is saying something about people (as individuals and/or a collective)
Did this production succeed? What were its strengths? What were its weaknesses?
This is where you break down and analyze the various elements to see what works or doesnt. Consider the following elements and discuss ones you feel are most pertinent:
Text
Plot
Dialogue/language
Acting
Sets, costumes, lights and other design elements
Pacing of the play
Moments that stood out in the play
Special performance or production elements that stood out in the play
The audience. YES, the audience does have an affect on the experience.
Was the experience worthwhile? Why or why not?
Maybe a production was good and temporarily entertaining, but the subject matter was mediocre or is not relevant to us today.
Or, maybe the play was not executed well, but something about the themes are very relevant today and it made you ponder on the world or your life.
Or maybe just one element was soooooo good, it was enough to hold you and make you glad you went.
Or maybe just one element was soooooo bad, it didnt matter how good everything else was.
Or, maybe it was somewhat worthwhile for various reasons.
Or, maybe it was very worthwhile to you, but not for some other person. Or vica versa. Why might that be the case?
View the scenario called “Critical Decision Making for Providers” found in the Allied Health Community media (https://lc.gcumedia.com/hlt307v/allied-health-community/home.html).
In a 7501,200 word paper, describe the scenario involving Mike, the lab technician, and answer the following questions:
1.) What were the consequences of a failure to report?
2.) What impact did his decision have on patient safety, on the risk for litigation, on the organization’s quality metrics, and on the workload of other hospital departments?
3.) As Mike’s manager, what will you do to address the issue with him and ensure other staff members do not repeat the same mistakes?
A minimum of three academic references from credible sources are required for this assignment.
Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment; therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance.
Instructions are noted in the attachment below.
**Be detailed and comprehensive in your approach**
A rubric and an outline will be attached to help you develop the paper, as well as ensure if all of the criteria are met and exceeds a level A+. Please, on a separate document or the text editor, complete THE PROPOSAL (Appendix A) and APPENDIX B before you start the FINAL DRAFT. APPENDIX A and APPENDIX B are considered to be the rough draft of the work so I have an idea of what the paper will discuss/highlight.
This paper should be taken very seriously as it is a summative worth 30% of my overall mark. Please adhere to university or post-grad readability and writing devoid of grammar and punctuation mistakes.
If you do have any questions or concerns regarding the order, feel free to let me know and I will respond back as soon as possible.
I hope that by now you have come to understand that in some ways the different aspects of cultures are consistent (e.g., why hunters and gatherers practice reciprocity) and that in other ways they are contradictory (that is, that there are often differences between what people say and what they do). American culture, of course, has its own contradictions and complexities. Ron Kovics book Born On the Fourth of July describes some important aspects of American life. What are some of the contradictions in American culture that he portrays? Can any of these be observed in our wars in Iraq and Afghanistan? Provide specific examples.
