This is a reflection paper not a summary. You will find instructions in the assignment 4 pdf. answer the question directly. Your only reference is the Al-faruqi.pdf. Please read suggestions for writers and understanding reflection paper. In the bibliography use the same style of citation as the one in Suggestions for writers. I have uploaded a sample of a reflection paper and a pdf on how to write one. English is not my first language so please use simpler terms. I REPEAT AGAIN DO NOT SUMMARIZE, I WANT OPINIONS
Day: September 4, 2020
Hello, the research report includes a discussion of 1 of the following topics focusing on discussing the type of technology and its impact on the surrounding environment: 1. Water Consumptions & Treatment Objectives 2. Wastewater Treatment & Reuse 3. Pollution & Contamination 4. Climate Change
Attached below is the assignment guideline.
Informative Speech Evaluation: Less Stuff Ted Talk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L8YJtvHGeUU
Watch the above Ted Talk (5 minutes) and evaluate this informative speech on ‘Stuff’.
*Your evaluation needs to be at least 150 words and written in complete sentences, using the following categories as a guideline. You should need to discuss each of these points in order to receive full credit!
1. Introduction- was it attention-getting? Why or why not?
2. Speech Organization – How did he organize his speech? Was it easy to follow? Why
3. Audience – how was his speech organized for the audience in front of him. Was it effective?
4. Overall Speech Delivery- was it effective?
5. Presentation Aids- What types of presentation aids did he use? Think about the visuals and mention/describe at least 3 specific visuals and tell whether they were effective and why.
6. Conclusion – In what ways was it memorable and provided a summary as well as closure?
6. What would you change or what criticism would you offer?
Hello, the research report includes a discussion of 1 of the following topics focusing on discussing the type of technology and its impact on the surrounding environment: 1. Water Consumptions & Treatment Objectives 2. Wastewater Treatment & Reuse 3. Pollution & Contamination.
Attached below is the assignment guideline.
CRIME, FILM AND REALITY (Violence AND Court and Juries)
Film 12 Angry Men
The discussion question should help you to formulate your ideas, hypothesis and reflections. In other words, you need to write two three paragraphs of reaction to a specific theme, topic, or characterization common amongst assigned film and readings. DO NOT summarize or critic the film. Your focus should be on the major themes in the film. By using the discussion questions, it is expected that you will be able to identify main themes that connect assigned film to the readings. The assignment will illustrate your understanding of the material. site the page and author for your hypothesis. No need to use any other reading other than the ones that where provided.
QUESTIONS TO THINK ABOUT Do not answer all the questions, use them as to find the major theme as it reflects from the readings attached and criminal justice theories.
1. Describe the dynamics and personalities of the jury room.
2. What ideological message does this film convey?
3. How do the jurors arguments crumble, including those of the racist (played by Ed Begley) and the final juror who holds out for guilt (played by Lee J. Cobb) until the end?
4. Explain some of the errors of the defendants lawyer. How common are these errors? Would they occur in contemporary death penalty cases?
5. Using concepts developed by Rafter, was there a justice figure in 12 Angry Men? How did the plot focus on a typical courtroom film theme: the difficulty of achieving justice?
6. Discuss some of the realistic insights about the jury system raised in 12 Angry Men.
7. Did the defendant have a jury of his peers? (Contrast this to the short story A Jury of Her Peers
8. Despite its realism, the film is misleading in portraying important rules governing jury deliberations. What were the mistakes?
9. Why does Rafter believe that there is an absence of critical or alternative traditions within contemporary trial or courtroom films?
10. Think about how racism, gender bias, and other kinds of discrimination surface and occur as one has contact with the criminal justice system. Be able to discuss several of these points and their implications for carrying out the principle of equal justice under law. Where have some of these issues surfaced in films we have viewed? (e.g., Do the Right Thing, Boys Dont Cry, 12 Angry Men etc.).
11. How does ones social location (status) influence the quality of justice she or he receives? Again, relate these arguments and examples back to short stories and films we have covered in class.
Please respond to each discussion post (a total of 2 responses). Each response should include additional information in response to the discussion post. Please note, you are responding directly to the person by name such as Hi James, or Hi Jane, etc.
Instructions:
Length: at least 135 words each response, not including references
Citations: At least one high-level scholarly reference in APA per post from within the last 5 years
The entire paper should not be in APAP format but the in-text citation and reference should be in APA format.
Respond to 2 of the 5 prompts below. Be sure to complete all parts of the prompt. You need to write in complete sentences and in essay form. Thus, you must have a proper introduction, body paragraphs, and a conclusion for each response. Each response should be no less than 250 words. There should be NO outside research. If you cite from the text, please do so in proper MLA form. Upload this document as a Microsoft Word file or it will not be graded. To do so, save the document on your computer and upload that file into this link.
1. Explain your stance on the idea of rationality vs. spirituality. Use at least 2 examples from the texts that support your theory.
2. How is Benjamin Franklins idea of virtue connected to Winthrops Model of Christianity? Use at least 2 examples from the texts to support your response.
3. Compare the Iroquois Creation Myth to any other stories you know. How can we understand the story in reference to our own stories? Use at least 2 examples from the texts to aid your response.
4. How can we find elements of America in the Iroquois Creation Myth? Use at least 2 examples from the text to support your claim.
5. How does a point of view play a critical role in literature? How does it shape our idea of what is true? Use at least 2 examples from the texts to support your claim.
Book used: The Norton Anthology of American Literature Pre-1865, Ninth Edition
I can provide the login for the digital copy of the book for reference and information purposes.
https://digital.wwnorton.com/7509/r/goto/cfi/40!/4
Write a speech for the ventricular septal defect with the document I have provided you below. It talks about the treatment and risk factors, and the prognosis. Go into detail and only use the sources I have provided in that document. Split each section so I know which one is which! There is only two sections 1. Treatment and risk factors and 2. Prognosis
Select a community organization or group that you feel would be interested in learning about ethical and policy issues that affect the coordination of care. Then, develop and record a 10-12-slide, 20-minute presentation, with audio, intended for that audience. Create a detailed narrative script for your presentation, 4-5 pages in length.
As coordinators of care, nurses must be aware of the code of ethics for nurses and health policy issues that affect the coordination of care within the context of the community. To help patients navigate the continuum of care, nurses must be proficient at interpreting and applying the code of ethics for nurses and health policy, specifically, the Affordable Care Act (ACA). Being knowledgeable about ethical and policy issues helps ensure that care coordinators are upholding ethical standards and navigating policy issues that affect patient care.
This assessment provides an opportunity for you to develop a presentation for a local community organization of your choice, which provides an overview of ethical standards and relevant policy issues that affect the coordination of care. Completing this assessment will strengthen your understanding of ethical issues and policies related to the coordination and continuum of care, and will empower you to be a stronger advocate and nursing professional.
It would be an excellent choice to complete the Vila Health: Ethical Decision Making activity prior to developing the presentation. The activity provides a helpful update on the ethical principles that will help with success in this assessment.
Demonstration of Proficiency
By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the course competencies through the following assessment scoring guide criteria:
Competency 4: Defend decisions based on the code of ethics for nursing.
Assess the impact of the code of ethics for nurses on the coordination and continuum of care.
Competency 5: Explain how health care policies affect patient-centered care.
Explain how governmental policies related to the health and/or safety of a community affect the coordination of care.
Identify national, state, and local policy provisions that raise ethical questions or dilemmas for care coordination.
Competency 6: Apply professional, scholarly communication strategies to lead patient-centered care.
Communicate key ethical and policy issues in a presentation affecting the coordination and continuum of care for a selected community organization or support group. Either speaker notes or audio voice-over are included.
Preparation
Your nurse manager at the community care center is well connected and frequently speaks to a variety of community organizations and groups. She has noticed the good work you are doing in your new care coordination role and respects your speaking and presentation skills. Consequently, she thought that an opportunity to speak publicly about contemporary issues in care coordination would be beneficial for your career and has suggested reaching out to a community organization or support group to gauge their interest in hearing from you, as a care center representative, on a topic of interest to both you and your prospective audience.
You have agreed that this is a good idea and have decided to research a community organization or support group that might be interested in learning about ethical and policy issues related to the coordination of care. Your manager has suggested the following community organizations and support groups, but acknowledges that the choice is yours.
Homeless shelters.
Local religious groups.
Nursing homes.
Local community organizations (Rotary Club or Kiwanis Club).
To prepare for this assessment, you may wish to:
Research your selected community organization or support group.
Review the Code of Ethics for Nurses With Interpretive Statements and associated health policy issues, specifically, the ACA.
Review the assessment instructions and scoring guide to ensure you understand the work you will be asked to complete.
Allocate sufficient time to rehearse your presentation before recording the final version for submission.
Note: Remember that you can submit all, or a portion of, your draft presentation to Smarthinking Tutoring for feedback, before you submit the final version for this assessment. If you plan on using this free service, be mindful of the turnaround time of 2448 hours for receiving feedback.
Hello! This is a 2 part essay, both needing two pages. Part 1 is the short creative assignment. I have opted to take on the persona of a person defending himself to the family of a young man killed in a hate crime, the purpose of this essaying being taking on the persona of someone who needs to make an argument. I’ve written a portion of it (it’s been uploaded), but I am absolutely stuck, as it’s been years since I wrote with anything resembling creativity. Part two is a rhetorical analysis of the creative portion. This is the analytical side of the assignment. We were instructed to examine the diction, title, tone, transitions, organization, and the rhetorical appeals used in part 1. Specifically, “You are looking at how you put your argument together and whether or not you made an effective argument. Look back at part 1 and examine the types of rhetorical appeals you used. Then evaluate why you used those specific appeals and if you deem them effective or not.
In part 2, you dont necessarily have to say that your argument in part 1 was effective. Instead, you could say that the rhetorical appeals you used in part 1 were not effective, but then you would also need to explain why you chose to use those ineffective appeals. Regardless of whether you claim that your argument in part 1 was effective or ineffective, you should use evidence from part 1including at least three direct quotationsto support your argument.”
