Statistics show that one in four families in the United States is struggling to put food on the table. Our new technology promises more crops for the same acre in the United States. We’ve always worked on improving crop yield and protection from harmful pests and intrusive weeds, but now companies have GENETICALLY ALTERED our most plentiful crops. While the promise is great, there are problems, both chemically and socially.  In 100-250 words, either argue for or against the use of GMOs in out food products. **This is NOT Rogerian – TAKE SIDES!

**NOTE: Your post must quote from one outside source and contain that URL at the end of the post.

Let’s put your critical thinking skills to use. There is a debate about what Theodore Roethke poem, “My Papa’s Waltz.  Some see this as a thinly disguised depiction of child abuse. Others interpret the poem as a  fun-filled (if rough) evening between loving father and his son.

Read the poem below, then In 100-200 words,  write a ROGERIAN FIRST PARAGRAPH for a paper, explaining both positions equally without taking sides. Study the document on “Rogerian Argument” in this week’s module for the details.

**This is going to be tough for those of you who have strong opinions. give it a try!
My Papas Waltz
BY THEODORE ROETHKE (Links to an external site.)
The whiskey on your breath 
Could make a small boy dizzy; 
But I hung on like death: 
Such waltzing was not easy.
We romped until the pans 
Slid from the kitchen shelf; 
My mothers countenance 
Could not unfrown itself.
The hand that held my wrist 
Was battered on one knuckle; 
At every step you missed
My right ear scraped a buckle.
You beat time on my head 
With a palm caked hard by dirt, 
Then waltzed me off to bed 
Still clinging to your shirt.

You must prepare a research paper on the Administrative Law Case below:

Heckler v. Chaney, 470 U.S. 821 (1985)

To prepare your paper, you must first read the FULL case.

Next, research the case by accessing other sources that discuss the case.

Discuss why the decision was or was not correct and why the rule based on this decision should or should not be changed;

i.e. review the decision and discuss whether the rule should be changed and why. 

You must use at least 5 sources and your paper must include in-text citations.

BE AWARE, it is far more difficult to write a quality paper that is shorter in length. To help achieve the highest grade possible, before writing your paper, please assure that you have
1) carefully researched the issue to be studied (at least 5 scholarly or academic resources should be consulted, considering BOTH sides of the issue identified)
2) carefully analyzed the pertinent issue
3) REMOVE any excess or unneeded verbiage
4) clearly, articulately, and concisely addressed the issue raised (this will require considerable time and thought on each students part).

The Research Paper will emphasize CRITICAL THINKING, and will require incorporating into the analysis of the issue identified the various concepts discussed in class, in outside readings, and in the textbook.

Below is the rubric your work will be scored against:

Paper effectively presents research in support of the approved topic. Research is professional, articulate, presented without error and follows the guidelines detailed in the syllabus.

Paper logically and methodically analyzes an approved topic with appropriate research support.

Paper examines theoretical and historical development of law in a manner that is both descriptive and applies directly to the topic selected.

Paper examines the relationships between ethics, policy and biblical principles and is without error and logical in argumentation. Paper effectively describes whether or the decision (law/ruling/case examined) was correct and explains either position effectively.

Mature, scholarly and polished, and has a clear academic voice, including APA standards. Paper is well organized, visually pleasing, effective, professional, and ready to be presented.

Please use following books:

Jerry L Mashaw, Richard A Merrill, Peter M Shane, Administrative Law, The American Public Law System: Cases and Materials, 6th ed (Thomson/West, 2009)  ISBN-13: 978-0314195852  ISBN-10: 0314195858

Peter Strauss (Editor), Administrative Law Stories (Foundation Press, 2006) ISBN10: 1587789590 ISBN13: 978-1587789595

The program is Optical Dispensing program

Write a letter of intention to CIC Canada to issue you a study permit to enable you study optical dispensing program in of of Canadian institution.

This is a letter you have to write explaining the reasons why you copse the program you want to study and how that program will help you in furthering your professional profile once you go back to Nigeria.

Explain why you did not study this program in Nigeria but in Canada.

Instructions are listed in the “article review assignment” file below.

The 3 articles I chose are “Deep Play” by Clifford Geertz, “Institutional Ecology” by Star and Griesemer, and “Interpellation and Affect” by Daniel Solomon, but feel free to choose whichever interests you, as long it adds up to 3 points.

From Student’s Guide to Critical Thinking I will attach the book that assignment is referring to as on where to get topic from on pages 210-217. I will also attach a SAMPLE essay that she gave for us to read. But a new paper has to be written from a selection topic on pages 210-217. Writing a Critical Essay A critical essay is one in which you analyze and critically evaluate another persons argument. Write an 800- to 1,000-word critical essay on one of the selections on pages 210217. Your essay should include the following four elements. Introduction: Identify the title, author, and context of the essay you are critically evaluating. Summarize very briey the writers basic position and state in general terms your overall evaluation of the argument. Argument summary: Standardize the writers argument using the ve-step method presented in Chapter 7 (or, if your instructor prefers, summarize the argument in paragraph form). Critical evaluation: Evaluate the argument; that is, say whether you think the argument is a good, convincing argument and give reasons to support your view. You may nd it helpful to keep in mind the following general guidelines on evaluating arguments, discussed earlier in this chapter: Are the premises true? ( Note: You may need to do some research to make an informed judgment on this issue.) Is the reasoning good? Is the argument deductively valid or inductively strong? Does the arguer commit any logical fallacies? Does the writer express his or her points clearly and precisely? Are the arguers claims logically consistent? Is the argument complete? Is all relevant evidence taken into account? CHAPTER 8 Evaluating Arguments and Truth Claims Is the argument fair? Is the arguer fair in his or her presentation of the evidence and treatment of opposing arguments and views? Conclusion: Briey restate the key points of your critical response to reinforce them in the readers mind. If possible, end with a strong concluding line (e.g., an apt quotation) that nicely sums up your response or puts the issue in a larger context. A sample critical essay is included in an appendix to this chapter. You may use other sources to support your points–be sure to include proper MLA in-text citing and works cited.

Two Emotional Intelligence Assessments.
Students will write a no more than two concise, well-written pages
(Times New Roman, 12-point font, Double-spaced) Peer Assessment Reflective Writing
Assignment. This reflection should describe and analyze the experience of working through the
discussion of strengths and weaknesses of a peers emotional intelligence and the way in which
that experience may be translated into their work as health leaders and managers of others who
will inevitably be required to discuss similarly important and sensitive matters with their direct
reports and peers in the workplace.
cite a minimum of 3 articles.

TASK 5b – BTEC Art & Design Unit 2: Ideas Generation and Development in Art and Design (LO4: 4.1) Following on from task 5a (Visual Communicatiuon in Art & Design), you need to demonstrate an understanding of the various cultural contexts in which ideas are visually transmitted. For example, the development of different design styles and materials is impacted by location (global, national and regional), ethnic and social backgrounds and trends in fashion, music and media (to name a few). No doubt you will have discovered many new facts and developed your own thoughts while you have conducted research throughout the course to date.

The best way to demonstrate this ongoing process is to submit your design journal with referenced notes.
If you want to do a separate piece of work then please do so.

The highlighted sections above focus on what you need to do and indicate that this is something you should have come across over the course of your research throughout the course and for this project. Rather than doing a separate piece of work you should be able to give your own explanation and make notes about how you came to your conclusions within your notes you could indicate (or reference) areas or pages of your design journal that support your thoughts and ideas.

*Propose new approaches to developing own work through the application of visual communication techniques;

*Record and analyse how specific contexts interact with ideas.

Would you be able to help?
Thanks!

Prior to beginning work on this assignment, read Chapter 8 and 9 of Making Connections: Understanding Interpersonal Communication (specifically Section 9.2), I will provide link to the video of the television program

In this assignment, you will write a two- to three-page (500 to 750 word) paper in which you apply some of the communication-based conflict resolution strategies outlined in your textbook to a conflict in a fictional television program or film.

In your paper,

Define conflict, utilizing Bevan.
Describe one interpersonal conflict that was not handled effectively in the television episode or film.
Explain how this situation meets the criteria for interpersonal conflict, utilizing Bevan, Section 9.2.
Note: Focus on one exchange that illustrates one conflict and not the entire plot of the episode. If possible, provide some dialogue so the reader can clearly see how the characters handled the situation.
Explain why the conflict was not handled effectively, utilizing Bevan (Chapters 8 and 9).
Describe two strategies outlined in Bevan that the characters used to address the conflict, utilizing Bevan.
Describe two strategies outlined in Bevan that the characters could have used to resolve this conflict more effectively, utilizing Bevan.

The Interpersonal Conflict in Television or Film paper

Must be two to three double-spaced pages in length, which is 500 to 750 words (not including title and references pages) and formatted according to APA Style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Centers APA Style resource.
Must utilize an academic voice.
Must include an introduction and conclusion paragraph. Your introduction paragraph needs to end with a clear thesis statement that indicates the purpose of your paper.
Must use at Bevan multiple times, including to define conflict and explore ways the characters can overcome it.
Must include a separate references page that is formatted according to APA Style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.