The project is to be composed as a PowerPoint slide deck with a maximum of 10 slides.
The team must be a real team (of your choice) and can be from any domain (sports, business, politics, etc.).
The team must be a team that most people would see as exceptional.
In the project, please address the following:
o A description of the team.
o An analysis of why the team is outstanding.
o Discussion of specific 2-3 dimensions of this teams success (relate these to the concepts from class).
o Reflections on what other teams can implement from your analysis.
o Advice on 2 additional things this team could do additionally / differently based on content from this course.
Day: October 31, 2020
Answer the following 2 questions separately. No sources/references to be used please. Shouldn’t be in essay format. No point form either.
Just answer the questions please.
1. In what ways does the notion of fiduciary obligation apply to off-duty conduct of teachers?
2. Some commentators have criticized private schooling as taking away resources from public schooling, or for creating a multi-tiered approach to education. Do you agree with this? Explain your answer.
* Project summary
* The project we have completed is a mock consulting firm. Where we have identified a problem that a local business deals with, and tried to find the best solutions. the problem we focused on is how covid-19 effected the business. for the solutions we focused on three main categories for the business which is food & beverages, gambling, and marketing. we looked for the best solutions to improve these categories in the business.
* Team Roles
1. Project Manager (student 1)
2. Research Director (student 2)
3. Senior Editor (student 3)
4. Design Director (me)
5. Quality Assurance (student 4)
Please write one page of content only. I do not want or need an abstract, no intro, no conclusion. I specificallly need questions and answers and a paragraph pertaining to my section. See attachment for my sections (Megan) highlighted in blue. Ignore but read other colors to understand expectation of my sections. Assignment due in 24 hours. No time for revision. Please ask questions if unclear. Do not assume. Thank you.
Watch the following video (debate) ONLY from minutes 2:00-9:00:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YZalFWqfdVk&feature=youtu.be&t=2m48s
Then write 2 paragraphs (no bullet points) based on:
1. summarizing the main points of the speaker of the video (Akala)
2. from a cultural studies perspective, How can you paraphrase Akala’s approach the main question of the debate?
Further instructions from my professor:
– provide comprehensive answers that demonstrates an awareness of the course material (you will find the material we took so far in the “additional materials”, just read the first few slides in order to understand what the professor means by “cultural studies” so they can help you with writing the 2 paragraphs)
– Grading is based on the quality of the answer:
1. using appropriate spelling/grammar/punctuation.
2. sentence structure and flow.
Please choose 2 of the following 3 Essay Questions. To assist you in formulating your answers, students may refer to the assigned texts as well as written materials provided and their own class notes and power point presentations. This so-called Open Book examination approach is in keeping with the breadth of the inter-relationships of the ethical and legal underpinnings of the practice and administration of contemporary healthcare.
Best of Luck,
Judge A.
I.
The New Jersey Health Commissioner is keenly aware of the excellent reputation of the Masters of Health Administration Program at the Bloustein School of Rutgers University and its outstanding students. In light of this, she seeks your advice concerning an upcoming regulatory inspection concerning the Departments compliance with state, federal and professional licensure requirements of its Institutional Ethics Committees.
Please prepare an in-depth memorandum addressing the genesis, purpose, function, structure and goals of the Committee as well as the current role of its consultation process and its contribution to the institutions overall mission.
II.
The prestigious New England Journal of Medicine, mindful of the students reputation in the MHA Program at the Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy, is seeking monographs concerning the rapidly growing use of traditional, genetic and gestational surrogacy reflecting your knowledge and insight into the emerging efforts to legalize and monetize a medical protocol now accepted, in some form or other, by 15 of the United States. Moreover, the Journal wishes to do a definitive update on the practice and the historical contribution of the landmark Baby M case.
The Journal solicits from you an analysis of the renowned legal opinion and an elaboration of the medical, ethical and legal concerns that endeavor to shape a national consensus. Please prepare an overview of past, present and anticipated surrogacy practices that will inform and authenticate your conclusions.
III.
The New Jersey Medical Society (the nations oldest Society of physicians, founded in 1766) mindful that Bloustein students are in the forefront of medical-ethical scholarship, has submitted an important question concerning a Louisiana abortion law which requires doctors performing abortions to have admitting privileges at nearby hospitals. This is of concern to the Societys members as the requirement may place some doctors at legal and licensure risk for potential failure to be able to comply. Please analyze the ethical and legal arguments against the backdrop of the Roe v Wade, Planned Parenthood v Casey and Right to Choose v Byrne decisions. The question is designed to elicit a fair and balanced catalogue of societys differing viewpoints concerning womens reproductive rights and gender equality.
You will be required to write review essays three times during the term, with due dates specified on the syllabus. Please note that while your review essay may invoke themes from our class discussion, it should not be a cut-and-paste of your discussion posts. Work that repeats class discussions with little or no additional insight may receive a failing grade.
The goal of a review essay is to take stock of the assigned readings, by discussing and critiquing various arguments/sides about a phenomenon/issue area. Review essays should be about 4-6 double-spaced pages with paragraph structure, in-text citations, and a bibliography, not to mention correct grammar and spelling. Review essays (but not the grades or my comments) may be shared with the class and should be seen as a useful tool for preparing for more specialized MSIR courses and your comprehensive exams or capstone. The essays should try to bring together the literature by finding common ideas as well as discussing the differences. This means I expect you to cite multiple readings from the course in each essay and to analyze rather than summarize. You are also highly encouraged to make connections between different weeks readings.
It is best to organize a review essay thematically, integrating your discussion of the readings rather than discussing each separately. Thus, rather than simply outlining one authors argument in one paragraph, and a second authors argument in another, you should focus on ideas. A good tip for doing this is to look at question stems based on Blooms Taxonomy of learning. A review essay should focus on higher-order learning, especially questions about application, analysis, synthesis, and evaluation. The question stems located under those categories here can provide a starting point for your essays: http://www.mandela.ac.za/cyberhunts/bloom.htm.
German Expansion 1936-1939
Question 1: Put the Source in Context
Situate the source, its creator, and its purpose in the context of other historical events, developments, or processes (nationally or regionally). What conclusions can you draw from this source based on this contextualization?
Question 2: Consider a Question
Evaluate and analyze the source in relation to this historical question: In evaluating this map consider what it demonstrates about the goals of a rearmed Germany. What does it demonstrate in regards to German’s attitudes toward the countries created during the Paris Peace Conference of 1919 (Including but not limited to the Treaty of Versailles)? Also consider both Hitler’s and Stalin’s motives regarding Poland.
Question 3: BEFORE READING
Analyze Reflection of Time Period
What is the source designed to portray about a time period? Consider the creator’s purpose and point-of-view. How is the information presented representative of the time period?
Question 4: REFLECTION
Analyze your process
Use this space to reflect on the process of source analysis and interpretation used during the assignment. Which strategies helped you the most? Which strategies posed the greatest challenge?
Read Velasquez, Chapter 2: Ethical principles in business, pp. 54-81; pp. 95-100 [2.5: An Ethic of Care; 2.6. Integrating Utility, Rights, Justice and Caring; and pp. 104-110 [2.7.3, Moral Virtues; 2.7.5, Studying Virtue Theory in the Real World and 2.7.6, Virtues and principles]
(i) Question #1, p. 116. In your viewJustice? Explain.
(ii) Working for Eli Lilly and Company, p. 72. Questions #1&2
(iii) Case study 2.2: Testing Drugs in Developing Countries, pp. 118-120. Questions #1&2
1. What have been the two most important things you have learned while an undergraduate student and how will each idea impact or influence your future life as a professional after graduation? ( health informatics major) 500 words
2. What has been the biggest challenge or obstacle you have experienced while an undergraduate student and how has it prepared you for your life as a professional after graduation? 500 words
