Write a formal deductive essay, 1-2 pages long, based on the subject of critical thinking, logic, and rhetoric. Topic: Has the third party in American national politics been historically unsuccessful in elections? If so, why? If not, why not? Include a title page and reference page, but exclude table of contents. Page count does not include either the title page or the reference page. Use at least 2 but no more than 5 references with at least 1 reference from an academic journal article.
Day: November 22, 2020
1/2 page each for the introduction and 9 blocks plus a conclusion.
1. Choose a company. (your choice)
2. Fill in the building model canvas for your company
3. Explain all nine building blocks in your own words and demonstrate at least one element in each block.
4. Make sure the blocks are under headings so there’s no confusion.
Example:
Customer Segments
Customer Segments are the people an organization wants to serve either through its customers or business alliances (Osterwalder & Pigneur, 2010). As a luxury car representative, Porsche is constantly entering new market segments, and provides different and appropriate products or services for each market segment. Porsche uses two variables to determine which customers to target, including description elements and behavioral elements. According to a scholar’s study, Descriptive elements include demographics, psychology, and geography. Behavioral elements include personal responses to brands, uses, and interests (Zoeller, 2018). Porsche focuses on a niche market of high-income customers. The characteristics of the high-income class consumer psychology are appreciating the prestige of the brand as well as the new and attractive vehicles Porsche produces.
Here is what I am looking for:
10% – Introduce the company briefly. After the introduction, give a thesis statement. In this paper, I will show you how the Acme Plug Company utilizes the nine building blocks to
70% – In your own words, explain what each building block means to you. Give an example of the block. Show one element the company utilizes. Tie them in from the Scaling Up text to support your work if possible. You must show each block on the canvas as it relates to your company.
10% – Conclusion Does the company utilize the building blocks? Would you change anything the company does? What is your outlook on the building blocks?
10% – Grammar, APA & References
Final Project Paper will be a Annotated Webliography
Prepare an annotated webliography listing 3 websites for each of your Top 5 Consumer Health issues.
From your textbook readings, the other readings in the Readings Folders of each module, or your own research. list what you determine to be the TOP 5 Consumer Health issues. Then under each of the TOP 5 Consumer Health Issues, list 3 websites with trustworthy information. So you will have 5 Top Consumer Health Issues and 3 websites with trustworthy information under each of the 5 issues for a total of 15 annotated websites.
Start with a cover sheet including the class and your name at a minimum
An introduction for the final project – An Annotated Webliography -explains what the reader is about to see in the body of the final project paper
Under each Website give its name and the URL of that website (so the reader can go to the website).
Next, in a brief paragraph, describe what the reader will find when they open the website (this is the annotation).
Then, under each annotation, give your evaluation of each website including:
Accuracy. If your website lists the author and institution that published the page and provides a way of contacting him/her, and
Authority. If your website lists the author’s credentials and its domain is preferred (.edu, .gov, .org, or .net), and
Objectivity. If your website provides accurate information with limited advertising, and it is objective in presenting the information, and
Currency. If your website is current and updated regularly (as stated on the page) and the links (if any) are also up-to-date, and
Coverage. If you can view the information properly (not limited by fees, browser technology, or special software requirements), then you may have a Website of research value.
Finally, who is the audience for this website – who might benefit from reading this website?
Then go to the next of the Top 5 Consumer Health Issues and repeat
After all 5 top Consumer Health issues and the 3 trustworthy websites associated with each topic have been completed, write a summary paragraph of this final project paper.
For the Blog assignment, you will create a Blog using Blogger.com. A ‘How-To’ for Blogger is available here. Using the NIMH list below, choose one topic from each category and give a 500-word MINIMUM post providing detailed information about a mental health disorder, treatment or therapy, and a population. For example, you may choose one of your entries to cover depression, available medications, and women. The purpose of this Blog assignment is to be a resource for accurate and well-informed information regarding mental health, using the textbook, and additional resources. All posts must follow APA format, including a References section, with AT LEAST 3 references.
All topics must be tied together
Suicide Prevention-https://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/topics/suicide-prevention/index.shtml
Help for mental illnesses-https://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/find-help/index.shtml
Older adults-https://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/topics/older-adults-and-mental-health/index.shtml
Write an academic paper depicting your Environmental Scanning analysis that includes the following:
1. An introduction with a detailed description of the organization, what they do? product/service? etc.
2. Create a SWOTT Analysis Diagram that includes Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats and Trends.
Provide at least 5 topics for each category. Then, select at least 3 of the topics per category, and explain how these topics will support or not, the overall organizations Business Sustainability and Competitiveness. Convey how your analysis would take advantage of the firms Strengths and Opportunities while avoiding its Weaknesses and Threats to its success
3. Evaluate how specific internal factors and forces (Strengths and Weaknesses) support and/or promote a competitive advantage; topics may include:
a. Resources and capabilities, financial factors, core competencies, etc.
b. Access to natural resources, trademarks, patents, or copyrights, etc.
c. Current processes and best practices (employee programs or software systems, etc.)
4. Evaluate how specific external factors and forces (Opportunities, Threats and Trends) support and/or promote a competitive advantage; topics may include:
a. Market trends (new products or emerging new technologies, competition, etc.)
b. Economic trends (local and/or global)
c. Changes in demographics, psychographics, Globalization, etc.
d. Regulations (political, environmental, or economic)
e. Describe what Trends will benefit the organizations growth
5. Define a succinct Conclusion showing, based on your evaluation of your findings, how your chosen organization can retain its competitive advantage.
Americans have long been proud of their democratic political traditions, yet as we have seen this semester, that democracy has always been imperfect. Historically, not everybody has been allowed equal access to the voting booth. During the 1960s, voting rights became a central focus of the civil rights movement.
For this assignment, watch the film Freedom Summer and in your paper respond to the following questions:
What were the most significant barriers that prevented African Americans in Mississippi from voting? Give at least three specific examples from the film to illustrate.
In your opinion, is America any more democratic today than it was in 1964? Why or why not?
Film website: https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/americanexperience/films/freedomsummer/#part01
Hi there. I have to do to a FINANCIAL ANALSYIS on a simulation in a platform that I can give you access to if accepted. You will be writing down some calculations and the data will be provided. i will show you where and how to find and calculate the data and i have some examples I can show you in the attachments. I WILL BE DOING PERIOD 3&6. The information i provided in the attachment is limited. Once you accept the request I will provide you with all the details.
PLEASE MAKE SURE YOU HAVE BACKGROUND KNOWLEDGE THANKS
This do not need to be well-wording. answer the question is the most important.
PROBLEM QUESTION
Airedale and Beagle are two neighbouring States. Ronald Drump is a prominent businessman living in Airedale; he is the Chief Executive Officer and owns 75% of the shares in a gold mining company, Chihuahua Gold Ltd (CGL), which is incorporated in Chihuahua, another neighbouring State. Chihuahua is a country which has a very conservative faith-based culture, but has very low corporate tax rates, thus making it an attractive place for companies like CGL to call home. The remaining 25% of the shares in CGL are owned by nationals of Airedale. Ronald Drump was born in Beagle, and he therefore holds Beagle citizenship. He lived there until the age of 12, when his family moved to Airedale. His parents are also Beagle nationals. Ronald completed his secondary schooling and attended university in Airedale. At the age of 25, he moved to Chihuahua to take up employment with CGL. Over time, he acquired shares through his salary package, and was repeatedly promoted until he was appointed Chief Executive Officer. In his role as Chief Executive Officer, CGL experienced sustained growth, and controlled interests in gold mines in Chile, Australia, Uzbekistan, and Kyrgyzstan. CGLs success led to Ronald being extremely influential, and he even hosted a late-night television programme on Chihuahuas main commercial television station. Ronald used his position to express his liberal views, which were inconsistent with the conservative belief structure of Chihuahuas strict regime. The Government of Chihuahua began to mistrust Ronald and find his conduct threatening and destabilising. In January 2019, Ronald was arrested at his office in Chihuahua on fabricated charges of fraud. He was taken to the Chihuahua Security Service headquarters, where he was imprisoned for one week. During that time, he was interrogated and subjected to multiple beatings and electrical shocks by Chihuahua Security Service officers (although the beatings and electrical shocks were not part of the officially authorised interrogation techniques, and were carried out by Security Service officers when their superiors were not present.) When he was released, Ronald discovered that Chihuahua had enacted a new statute which had the effect of transferring all the Chihuahua-based assets of CGL to the Chihuahua State-owned Trading Company. Fearing that he would be re-arrested, Ronald fled to Beagle. His substantial personal assets within Chihuahua were then seized by the Chihuahua Government. Chihuahuas treatment of Ronald Drump sparked outrage in Airedale, which had regarded him as one of its favourite expatriates. Airedale nationalists began a campaign of intimidation and fear against ethnic Chihuahuans living in Airedale. One incident got out of hand when a group of four masked Airedale thugs beat up a group of ethnic Chihuahuans in the streets of Airedales capital city. Two of the ethnic Chihuahuans were badly hurt, with one eventually dying from his injuries. Airedale police arrived on the scene and arrested the group of masked assailants. After they had been taken into police custody, it became apparent that one of the thugs was the Airedale Minister for Internal Affairs. The Airedale police subsequently released all of the group (including the Minister) from police custody, and no charges were laid even though the ethnic Chihuahuans wished for prosecutions to be brought, the Airedale police claimed that they lacked evidence. However, news of this episode (and its outcome) quickly spread, and the Chihuahua Government reacted swiftly. It announced: We have no choice but to respond to Airedales clear and wilful violation of international law. We are therefore suspending all Chihuahuas treaty obligations with Airedale, with immediate effect, for a period of at least six months. Chihuahua also quietly dispatched its elite special forces into Airedales territory (without Airedales knowledge or consent), where they searched for and located those responsible for the attack on the ethnic Chihuahuans, including the Airedale Minister for Internal Affairs. The group was abducted and transported to Chihuahua, where they were arrested on suspicion of complicity in murder. They were tried before a Chihuahuan court, convicted, and sentenced to life imprisonment. Airedale, Beagle, and Chihuahua have made optional clause declarations in which they have accepted the compulsory jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) under Article 36(2) of the ICJ Statute. Chihuahua has included a reservation with its declaration, which states that: Chihuahuas acceptance of the Courts jurisdiction does not apply to disputes which Chihuahua considers to be within the national jurisdiction of Chihuahua.
YOUR TASK: You have been engaged by the Government of Airedale to advise it on the international law issues arising in this set of facts. You may find it helpful to approach this task by analysing each incident, issue or potential claim, and: consider what or who might complain, about what violation of international law, against whom or what, and in what forum consider what the response might be assess the strengths and weaknesses of each argument form a view on which argument is likely to prevail in each case. Remember to cite authority for your answers.
Alicia Garza and Black Lives Matter
Article Selections/Choices found in the Wall Street Journal. Must include 2 articles on her and the Black Lives Matter movement.
Alicia Garza Biography
https://www.blackpast.org/african-american-history/garza-alicia-1981/
Add what you found on the Wall Street Journal
Final papers should be between 1250-1500 words, due at the end of Week 8, 12 point font, double-spaced, and formatted in the MLA or APA Style. The case study/topic should be addressed with the environmental ethic of one of our weekly, primary authors. This list includes Holmes Rolston, Aldo Leopold, Rachel Carson, Arne Naess, Peter Singer and Paul Taylor. See the Course Outline in our Syllabus for the weekly readings. Approximately 1/3 of your paper should be a description of the primary author’s work and application to the case study/topic.
You may use a case study from our textbook Sustainability, or other resources. If you choose an established case study, you can summarize it with proper reference, but if there is a relevant section in our Sustainability textbook that should be included in your paper.
Papers can address either theoretical issues or practical concerns. The paper will be evaluated on form as well as content. It should be clearly written, well organized, and free of spelling and grammatical errors. Sources used in research must be included in the bibliography. In-text citations and sources listed on the reference page must correlate. References must be supplied for all quotations and also for any idea, insights, or viewpoints you incorporate from reading the work of others. In-text citations require the page number of the text or paragraph number of the website. The reader must be able to look up the exact place in the text or website cited! The paper is due at the end of Week 8.
