Category: Harvard

Hi there Academic Shredder,
I hope you are doing well. I want your help in a case analysis, that requires a call of conduct.

This is a link to the case that the essay should be about

https://hbr.org/2001/06/go-global-or-no

also, the image provided has keen elements that need to be included in the essay, you can choose any from each section, but for the second section I would like you to use Hofstede’s cultural dimension.

also there’s a partial sample of the paper as a reference.

in case anything is needed from my part please don’t hesitate in contacting me

PLEASE STICK WITH THE CURRENT REPORT WHICH IS ATTACHED IN THIS ORDER

This is the feedback that was given in regards to my report, the below areas are what I failed to achieve therefore can this feedback be considered and the correct information be added in the right sections in the rework

1. Engagement with Literature Skills
You engage with a very limited number of sources. Your in-text citations are mostly accurate. You should not provide page numbers for sources unless referencing a direct quote, however. There are also larger chunks of text that I would expect to see without any references. Your reference list is mostly accurate, though you should provide accessed on information for all URL sources.

2. Knowledge and Understanding Skills
You demonstrate major gaps in your knowledge. You show a lack of understanding of both knowledge managemtn as a disciple and relevant typologies. You provide a brief organisational profile, though this could have been developed further and included employee demographics. You show an appreciation of the differences between data, information and knowledge. I would like to have seen discussion of the transition process between them, including the 5Cs and 4Cs. You demonstrate awareness of Drucker as a relevant theorist but I would like to have seen reference to the idea of knowledge workers and his 1959 work. You draw on the work of Lewin and Kotter but these theories relate to change management, not knowledge management, and are not used effectively in the scope of this report. You demonstrate awareness of Nevis but not specifically the relevant typology. You present limited discussion of the SECI model and no discussion of Nonaka and Takeuchis typology. You also show awareness of Wiig and Davenport but not their typologies. There is no mention of Amidon & Skyrme, Quinn or Walsh & Ungson. Overall, you do not sufficiently demonstrate a clear understanding of relevant typologies or their application to your chosen organisation.

3. Cognitive and Intellectual Skills
You show limited attempt at critical evaluation. Your recommendation is appropriate, though I would expect to see more than one offered. The wording of it is clumsy and I would expect to see some indication as to how Samsung could go about actioning this recommendation.

4. Practical Application Skills
You demonstrate rudimentary practical application skills. You provide a SWOT analysis but this is not sufficiently focused on KM. There is also no discussion of this.
You should have discussed relevant support systems at Samsung, as required by the task brief.

5. Transferable Skills for Life and Professional Practice
Your communication is not where I would expect of Level 5. There are some formatting errors in your work. Please proof read to avoid issues like these. You also do not use paragraphs particularly effectively. The introduction to your report does not capture its purpose; in fact, in does not mention knowledge management at all. There is a lack of consistent focus on the specific task brief in your report generally. This has led to an ineffective, and confusing, structure. You do not capture key elements of the task brief. You do not provide, and have not presented, a knowledge management value chain. It is not sufficient to just discuss the four stages; you were required to produce a KMVC for your chosen organisation.

This is the feedback that was given in regards to my report, the below areas are what I failed to achieve therefore can this feedback be considered and the correct information be added in the right sections in the rework

I HAVE ADDED MY ACTUAL REPORT WHICH JUST REQUIRES CHANGES
1. Engagement with Literature Skills
You engage with a very limited number of sources. Your in-text citations are mostly accurate. You should not provide page numbers for sources unless referencing a direct quote, however. There are also larger chunks of text that I would expect to see without any references. Your reference list is mostly accurate, though you should provide accessed on information for all URL sources.

2. Knowledge and Understanding Skills
You demonstrate major gaps in your knowledge. You show a lack of understanding of both knowledge managemtn as a disciple and relevant typologies. You provide a brief organisational profile, though this could have been developed further and included employee demographics. You show an appreciation of the differences between data, information and knowledge. I would like to have seen discussion of the transition process between them, including the 5Cs and 4Cs. You demonstrate awareness of Drucker as a relevant theorist but I would like to have seen reference to the idea of knowledge workers and his 1959 work. You draw on the work of Lewin and Kotter but these theories relate to change management, not knowledge management, and are not used effectively in the scope of this report. You demonstrate awareness of Nevis but not specifically the relevant typology. You present limited discussion of the SECI model and no discussion of Nonaka and Takeuchis typology. You also show awareness of Wiig and Davenport but not their typologies. There is no mention of Amidon & Skyrme, Quinn or Walsh & Ungson. Overall, you do not sufficiently demonstrate a clear understanding of relevant typologies or their application to your chosen organisation.

3. Cognitive and Intellectual Skills
You show limited attempt at critical evaluation. Your recommendation is appropriate, though I would expect to see more than one offered. The wording of it is clumsy and I would expect to see some indication as to how Samsung could go about actioning this recommendation.

4. Practical Application Skills
You demonstrate rudimentary practical application skills. You provide a SWOT analysis but this is not sufficiently focused on KM. There is also no discussion of this.
You should have discussed relevant support systems at Samsung, as required by the task brief.

5. Transferable Skills for Life and Professional Practice
Your communication is not where I would expect of Level 5. There are some formatting errors in your work. Please proof read to avoid issues like these. You also do not use paragraphs particularly effectively. The introduction to your report does not capture its purpose; in fact, in does not mention knowledge management at all. You should avoid overly-emotive writing, such as, by the information master; that is far too blog-like. There is a lack of consistent focus on the specific task brief in your report generally. This has led to an ineffective, and confusing, structure. You do not capture key elements of the task brief. You do not provide, and have not presented, a knowledge management value chain. It is not sufficient to just discuss the four stages; you were required to produce a KMVC for your chosen organisation.

1.    Explain the principles, purposes, and practice of job analysis.

1.1    Explain the principles and purpose of job analysis.
1.2    Compare and contrast different methods of job analysis.

2.    Contribute to the process of job analysis.

2.1    Develop a plan to undertake a job analysis.
2.2    Undertake a job analysis.
2.3    Interpret and present the results of the job analysis, making recommendations to meet organizational requirements.

Your task
Assessment Criteria 1.1, 1.2, 2.1, 2.2, 2.3
Total 1,500 words
Identify a new role in your organization (or one with which you are familiar), and undertake a job analysis. The role can alternatively be an existing one that has undergone significant change since it was first introduced. The analysis is to establish the key components required for the job, in order that the Head of Department can write a job description and person specification.
The following activities should be undertaken:
Part 1

Write a short report to the Head of Department to briefly explain:
    Why job analysis is important;
    The principles and purpose of job analysis;

Compare and contrast (differences and similarities) three different job analysis methods.

Produce a plan showing how you will carry out the job analysis using at least two of the methods outlined above (include timeframes, steps, individuals involved, etc., this could be presented in a table format) 
It is important in your plan to indicate how you have considered issues such as equality, confidentiality and the wider organizational culture.
Part 2

Undertake the job analysisYou will need to upload your evidence of having carried out your activities.
    This should include copies of documentation you used in an appendix, e.g. SWOT analysis, completed observation log, questionnaire, copies of email exchanges, questions to be asked and responses, meeting notes with a Line manager, data to be accessed etc.,

Part 3
Having completed the job analysis exercise and reviewed the evidence, you need to write to your line manager and;
    Give a brief overview of the job analysis activities you carried out and your key findings.
    Make realistic recommendations of what should be included in the job description and person specification as well as any learning & development needs or safety measures that might need to be considered.

Please note you are not asked to write or revise the job description or person specification itself.

Assessment submission checklist
– Your 1500 word assignment answering the 3 questions posed
– Bibliography
– Appendices with the notes and documentation from the job analysis exercise

it is a practicum for my last term in master. It is with a company that operates a terminal in an airport.
1- I attached what is the company and what they want (you have to read it).
2- I want you to help me in finding the most appropriate headlines or titles in the (literature review) that I will write in this practicum.
3- under every headline, it is nice to write a small paragraph (40-70 words approximately) about it from peer-reviewed literature.
4- I decided the topic of this research “Identifying the Key Driver for Passenger Satisfaction at Terminal (the name of the terminal) In (the name of airport)  to improve (the name of the company) in Targeting New Business”.
please if you have a better topic you can write it.

all that will be 275- 300 words.