Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed:
II. Trends
A. Business Environment: Analyze the current internal and external factors related to the business environment of your company. In other words,
what are the internal and external factors, and how do they influence the business environment of your company?
B. Description: Based on your analysis of internal and external factors, describe the trends in corporate social responsibility, sustainability, and
business ethics that will impact your business. Use CSR resources to support your response.
C. Impact: What will be the impact of these trends on your company, and how can your company prepare for the impact?
III. Ethics
A. Issues: Describe the potential business ethics and regulatory issues that could impact your business. How could these ethics and regulatory
issues affect your corporate strategy, brand development, and decision-making processes?
B. Alignment: How will you align your corporate strategy, brand development, and decision-making processes to the business ethics and regulatory
issues that you described?
C. Sustainability: How will the alignment of corporate strategy, brand development, and decision-making processes to the business ethics and
regulatory issues you described optimize the sustainability of your business?
Day: January 30, 2020
Font: 10pt. Summarize the article attached including the answers for the following questions: 1. What is the basic research question or problem the article is trying to address? Try to state this in a single sentence.
2. What is the hypothesis (or hypotheses) of the study? What are the predictions? Were there competing hypotheses?
3. Was the background presented in the introduction sufficient for the authors to pose the research question(s) addressed in the paper? How did the authors justify the purpose of their research? Briefly summarize the background or theoretical framework.
4. Was the research question appropriate given the background? Can you think of another different hypothesis or perspective that could have been proposed?
5. What methodologies (general, not specifics) were used to address the question? Were these appropriate? Do not get into details of methods, but rather the broad, general methods.
6. Did the authors adequately present their results clearly? Were any important results not presented?
7. Examine the presentation of the data carefully were the figures and tables correctly presented?
8. Were patterns in the data obvious from the figures/tables? Or did the authors have to show you how they interpreted their results to fit their hypothesis?
9. What were the conclusions from the study? Did the results presented actually support these conclusions? Did the authors draw all of their conclusions from their own data, or did they reference other sources?
10. In your opinion: What is the most important result of this study and why? Which figure/table presented the strongest evidence to support the hypothesis and why? What is the main strength of the study/paper? What is the main weakness?
11. What do you think is the next step for the authors in terms of their research?
Find a peer reviewed research article that is a casestudy. Focus on the introduction and methods sections of the article. Describe what information was collectd to conduct the case study. Were there other pieces of information you feel could have helped the study and why? Why you choose this case study. Cite references
A.The Service Profit chain is important to organizations. The real bottom line of any organization is the creation of customer value, which means pleasing customers as the bottom line. Research and describe the Service Profit chain and discuss if you agree or disagree and why. How does a focus on the service profit chain aid in the development of customer vslue and a customer service culture.
B. Describe what you have learned about Custmer Service in a local supermarket. cite references. APA guidlines for refence
ou will choose one of four (4) articles and write a three-four page (approximately 750 – 1000 words) critique of it. This should be 12 pt. Times New Roman font and double-spaced. This assignment will give students experience in assessing evidence and a chance to offer opinion and analysis. A good analysis should focus on the main arguments/central thesis of the article, identify theory and methodologies the author uses, offer a critique of the authors arguments, and highlight its strengths and weaknesses. It should also be clear on whether or not you enjoyed the article along with details on any new knowledge you gained.
Articles For Review
Hugh J.M. Johnston, The Komagata Maru and the Ghadr Party, B.C. Studies 178 (Summer 2013), 9-31. http://ojs.library.ubc.ca/index.php/bcstudies/article/viewFile/183768/184043
Roderick MacLeod and Mary Anne Poutanen, Little Fists for Social Justice: Anti-Semitism, Community and Montreals Aberdeen School Strike, 1913, Labour/Le Travail 70 (Fall 2012), 61-99.
http://www.lltjournal.ca/index.php/llt/article/view/5657/6520
Liz Millward. Making a Scene: struggles over lesbian place-making in anglophone Canada, 19641984, Womens History Review 21.4 (August 2012).
https://www-tandfonline-com.proxy1.lib.trentu.ca/doi/full/10.1080/09612025.2012.658176
Christabelle Sethna, Beth Palmer, Katrina Ackerman, and Nancy Janovicek, Choice, Interrupted: Travel and Inequality of Access to Abortion Services Since the 1960s, Labour/Le Travail, 71 (Spring 2013), 2948.
http://www.lltjournal.ca/index.php/llt/article/view/5689/6552
The Case:
12-year old, Maximillian is suffering from cancerous tumours in his brain and spinal cord. His physician, Dr. Jones, deems that the tumours are not currently life threatening though she expects they will become so if they are not treated.
Everyone involved in Maximillians case wants to promote his best interests. There is, however, disagreement about the best way to do this.
Dr. Jones has recommended a plan of treatment that includes radiation to shrink the tumours. She has explained the process of administering radiation to Maximillian and his parents. She has also presented the expected benefits and risks associated with the plan of treatment proposed. Dr. Jones estimates a 70% chance that radiation will eliminate the tumours and she has explained that she judges radiation treatments will give Maximillian the best chance for a full recovery without the need for more invasive interventions. Dr. Jones has explained that chemotherapy and surgery may be recommended if the size of the tumours increases. She has been happy to answer any of the familys questions.
Maximillian has been involved in all of the discussions about his treatment with Dr. Jones. Dr. Jones judges that Maximillian is very intelligent and wants him to understand both the nature of his tumours and the treatment recommended.
Maximillian has stated that he doesnt want radiation. He is worried that this is going to make him feel really sick and really tired. He is especially concerned that he wont be able to play on his schools soccer teamone of the best teams in Quebecthis year.
Maximillians parents have stated that they dont want Maximillian to undergo radiation. They believe the best option is to feed Maximillian a vegan diet of organic vegetables, free of sugars and free of animal products. This plan, they believe, will allow Maximillians body to heal itself with the right nutrition.
Following Maximillians desires and their own beliefs, Maximillians parents have informed Dr. Jones that they are refusing radiation treatment and they have indicated this in writing.
Dr. Jones believes that Maximillians parents are making a loving, but nevertheless irrational, decision and has petitioned the courts to intervene so that Maximillian will be treated with radiation before his tumours become life threatening.
The Assignment:
Draw on the relevant readings from Modules 1 and 2 to complete the tasks identified in one of the following options. (You should choose only one of option 1 or option 2 or option 3.)
1. State whether or not Maximillians parents are making an informed decision in one or both of the two senses introduced by Faden and Beauchamp and support your judgment. If you think they are making an informed decision to refuse radiation treatment in both senses, could the courts have any grounds to deny their refusal and order that Maximillian receive radiation treatment? If you think their decision to refuse treatment is not informed in both senses, who should have the power to make medical decisions for Maximillian in this instance? Defend your answers.
2. This option involves answering two questions. Are Maximillians parents making an informed decision according the transparency standard model as this is presented by Brody? In answering this question, make sure to explain what the transparency standard is, how this standard could be used to assess the parents decision-making, and why you think the standard is met or not met in this case. Is meeting the transparency standard sufficient in this case? (In other words, should more rigorous standards be applied?) Defend your answers.
3. Use the four principles of biomedical ethics outlined in Chapter 1 of your text to make clear the ethical issue that arises in Maximillians case. To do this, identify which principles are most relevant to understanding the case and explain how the principles you identify conflict in Maximillians case. (It might help to draw on the concept of paternalism to explain the conflicting principles.) Then, say whether you think the parents should be allowed to make the decision for Maximillian and defend your answer by saying why certain principles should be given more weighting than others.
To Prepare:
– Review the Resources on healthcare policy and regulatory/legislative topics related to health and nursing informatics.
– Consider the role of the nurse informaticist in relation to a healthcare organizations compliance with various policies and regulations, such as the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act (MACRA).
– Research and select one health or nursing informatics policy (within the past 5 years) or regulation for further study.
The Assignment: (1 page)
Create a 1-page fact sheet that your healthcare organization could hypothetically use to explain the health or nursing informatics policy/regulation you selected. Your fact sheet should address the following:
– Briefly and generally explain the policy or regulation you selected.
– Address the impact of the policy or regulation you selected on system implementation.
– Address the impact of the policy or regulation you selected on clinical care, patient/provider interactions, and workflow.
– Highlight organizational policies and procedures that are/will be in place at your healthcare organization to address the policy or regulation you selected. Be specific.
Create an E-portfolio of important learning and resources each week through the course. You will share the E-portfolio with your professor at intervals and with your course colleagues in Week 7. The final e-portfolio document containing all 7 parts, it will be submitted on week 7 for a grade.
Within Week 1, create a page entitled Who is in my community? and upload your work from E-portfolio 1.1. 2.
2. Within Week 1, create another page entitled What is the health status of my community? and upload your work from E-portfolio 1.2.
1. Within Week 3, create a page entitled Disease epidemiology exploration and upload your work from E-portfolio 2.1.
2. Within Week 2, create a page entitled Disease trends in my community and upload your work from E-portfolio 2.2.
3. Within Week 2, create a page entitled Home Environment Assessment and upload your work from E-portfolio 2.3.
Within Week 3, create a page entitled Community Health Improvement Plan and upload your work from E-portfolio 3.1.
Within Week 3, create a page entitled My Personal Preparedness Plan and upload your work from E-portfolio 3.2
1. Within Week 5, create a page entitled Family Strengths & Characteristics and upload your work from E-portfolio 4.1.
2. Within Week 5, create a page entitled Family Case Study and upload your work from E-portfolio 4.2
That will be it for now.
Write at least 1 full page, 5 points
4 points – Accurately and thoughtfully identifies articles key arguments or ideas using YOUR OWN words. This is not a summary of the article. Writes clearly and uses specific examples. Concludes by answering any of the following: *What do you think about the ideas presented in the reading? *How does this relate to your life and/or schooling experiences? *What questions do you have
1 points – Uses correct APA format to reference quotes, page numbers, and ideas from the readings.
Write a 750-1000 word essay which demonstrates how Oscar Wilde’s The Picture of Dorian Gray follows the steps of narrative structure (exposition, rising action, climax, falling action, resolution/denouement).
Include an outline and Works Cited page where you will list the novel you are discussing.
You must use MLA format, but you are not to use outside sources for this paper; this is your own analysis.
Cite examples from your text in support of your argument, either as direction quotations or paraphrases.
This is not simply a summary of the story. Instead, you should identify how each part of the narrative structure develops in the story.
