Day: October 1, 2020

1. Double space your paper.
2. Use formal language: do not use I, you, we, slang, or contractions.
3. The first sentence of your opening paragraph should state what you think the articles main argument is and include the article’s full title, the author’s name, and where and when it appeared.
4. After introducing the authors first and last name, only refer to them by their last name.
5. Provide at least two paragraphs of summary.
6. Provide at least one paragraph of critique. 7. Use MLA Style to cite the source.
8. Do not use more than 3 short quotations (1-2 lines). One of the main goals of the assignment is to assess your writing. If you use a lot of quotations from the article, it is difficult more me to assess your writing.
Things I am looking for in this assignment:
1. Accuracy: your summary should be an accurate representation of the article. This may mean reading the article several times and checking your summary against the article.
2. Covering the important points: your summary should provide a full overview of the article’s argument. This means making sure all the important points and supporting evidence is covered in your summary.
3. Balanced critique: be careful not to attack the author. If you think the article made some good points, say that. If you have issues with some of the points made, say what they are and why you found them questionable.
4. Clarity and precision: your writing should be easy to read and understand. The easiest way to achieve this is to write in the most straightforward way possible.
5. Grammar and syntax: your writing should follow basic rules for grammar and syntax.

FORMAL ESSAY # 1: Conformity VS Non-Conformity / Collectivism VS Individualism

Overview: In this formal essay assignment, you are first asked to explore the particular concepts of conformity and non-conformity in the broad sense; however, related concepts of individualism vs collectivism, free thinking vs prescribed thinking, authoritarianism/totalitarianism vs democracy are all under consideration as well.  The concepts of self-censorship and peer pressure are even fair game to explore. There are other relatable terms within this large realm of concepts, but exploring these particular terms will provide a good foundation to understanding the larger theme of this assignment.

The interpersonal level is where people are involved in all sorts of personal relationships with others feel compelled/pressured, are directly told/ordered, or are merely expected to conform to others’ desired behaviors, ways of thinking, or practices. Such relationships can be between members of a family, friends, co-workers, or even romantic relationships.

The social level is where people are involved in a variety of societal relationships with mere acquaintances, complete strangers, and/or anyone who only knows a limited amount of information about anyone else.  Consider all the different areas of society and the many interactions that occur in all of them daily–from stores to restaurants to bars to entertainment venues to sport/recreational activities to all the modes of public transportation–and this a very incomplete list!

The cultural level is where people are involved in relationships that are either directly/formally or indirectly/informally framed around cultures, such as an Indian community within a large US city for example. Be they formal ethnic cultural groupings and situations (which tie closely to the social and interpersonal levels above) to less formal or traditional sub-cultures within established cultural groups to even fringe counter-cultural groups that are formed around particular sport or interest (for example, consider skateboarders or car enthusiasts).

The institutional level is where people are involved in relationships, both personal and impersonal, that revolve around common enrollment, membership, or participation in such institutions as schools, religious organizations, or the military as examples.

Note: the four areas above are not official sociological categories; they are not intended to serve as any sort of final or definitive analysis of where or how relationships exist. Rather, they are just my own groupings, based upon common sense and observation.

As you consider the areas above, can you see, for example, how this concept of “conformity” to a group of peers is vastly different than “conformity” to the expectations of superiors on a job or in an institution?

Assignment
So now that you’ve explored the concepts above thoroughly, and you’ve discovered just how vast and complex they are in terms of application to nearly every aspect of life, your job in this assignment will be to devise a focused and defensible position that directly answers the following question in the form of a thesis:
As a governing principle for life, is it better to live life by principles of conformity or non-conformity to others’ expectations? Is it more important to be an individual or to be a member of a group?

Now, regardless of how you answered the question, you should find yourself in somewhat of a dilemma because NO ANSWER to the question accurately covers all of the various scenarios or all of the people or all of relationships or all of the contexts that apply to this large concept of conformity vs non-conformity! You may now be asking why I assigned it in the first place then? I’m glad you asked! A. Because in this English course, in which the skills of critical thinking and analysis are optimized, I wanted to assign a topic that is intentionally complex and/or does not allow for an “easy out” with regard to simple answers.

“A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds” – Ralph Waldo Emerson

Sure, you will answer the question with a thesis that obviously goes one way or another–as required. You may find yourself sticking to the opinion you express in it for the most part throughout the essay–perhaps. However, regardless of which way you go, you will inevitably find yourself needing to provide exceptions or adjustments or contingencies in order to provide a thorough, honest, and accurate treatment of the topic if you are thinking critically and analyzing thoroughly. Here are just two simple examples to help illustrate my point: 1. Student X, a future business major, leans towards conformity as a better way to live, yet considers the corporate world in which he plans to one day enter and realizes that such an environment may require compromises of what he knows to be true ethically–or even legally;  2. Student Y, a recent immigrant to the US from Vietnam, leans towards non-conformity as a better approach to life, yet finds herself considering examples of how conforming to some the ethnic/cultural expectations of her family and community would eliminate possible strained relationships and hurt feelings. Again, these are just two scenarios/examples that illustrate how going one way in response to the question above will lead to a collision of ideas and beliefs about this concept of conformity if the complexity involved with it is truly embraced.

Your essay, in addition to being highly focused and structured around your reply to the question posed above, needs to demonstrate categorization, organization, thorough development, and cohesion. In short, it needs to be a well-developed and unified essay that thoroughly explores and offers opinions about the concept of conformity versus non-conformity. 

Basic Requirements:
1.    4.5 – 5 pages in CORRECT MLA FORMAT (Essays that are not formatted according to correct MLA guidelines will NOT be accepted)
2.    Third Person Voice Only (absolutely no first or second person)
3.    The Five Stages of the Writing Process must be applied and demonstrated (pre-writing, drafting, peer-responses, revision, and editing)

Notes: please discuss philosophy, psychology, and sociology in this essay

Progression 1, Locus of Inquiry
For the first essay, as writers, were exploring the basic relationship between close reading and analytical writing.  Howand whydo artists, scholars, and critics rely on description and then move from description to analytical interpretation? To do this work, we will focus on texts that have something to say about the meaning of taste as a social practice. Carefully analyze the text you choose in order to shed light on its embedded ideas about these issues. Use this close reading practice to illuminate, critique or refine the central texts ideas and thus articulate your own evolving idea about the relationship between taste and knowledge.
 
Essay One, The Writing Prompt:
Deepen your readers understanding about the way a selected poem or short story makes an argument about the relationship between taste and knowledge (of the self, of the culture, of the past, etc.).  Draw upon evidence from your chosen text to perform a motivated close reading of the piece you have selected. You may find you need to draw upon other relevant sources to support your analysis, but that is not a requirement of this essay.

As you draft:
Strive to render the selected text fully and fairly, stage the analytical question that drives your inquiry, then artfully integrate evidence from the text in order to support your interpretation and invite your reader to follow your thought process. As suggested above, you may find it necessary to draw on other sources from this progression of readings and exercises in order to deepen your idea. Aim for an effective balance between description, analysis, and interpretation in the service of your argument.  (3-4 pages)

Use this poem below to write the paper

https://www.gwarlingo.com/2011/the-sunday-poem-gregory-pardlo/