The cognitive and educational evaluation is a main data source for MET teams to determine eligibility and placement for special education services. All team members must make decisions and advocate for educational instruction, strategies, and placement based on evaluation report results. Collaboration with parents about sharing evaluation results and seeking consent for special education services is also a required professional and legal element. Teachers should gain valuable skills and knowledge regarding analysis, decision-making, and sharing results that pertain to cognitive and educational evaluations.

Part 1: Formal and Informal Assessment

Read the “Analyzing Cognitive and Educational Evaluation Report” provided for student Adam Gallery. Based on the report, create a table with a column for each formal and informal assessment. Complete the table with the following information, labeling each column and row:

1.      In the first row, clearly identify each assessment.

2.      In the second row, describe how each assessment is technically sound and minimizes rater bias

3.      In the next row, provide a summary of Adams results on each assessment that will help guide appropriate educational decisions. (Do not simply cut and paste the findings.)

4.      In the last row, explain why the selected assessment tool is appropriate for diagnosing Adam’s strengths and needs.

Beneath the table, in a 500-750 word analysis, advocate for the appropriate educational decisions for this student based on the assessment results. The analysis should include:

Recommendations for any needed classroom accommodations or modifications, and placement for specific content areas.

Appropriate accommodations for Adams assessments or testing conditions, including the use of technology for these accommodations.

Reflection on the role of special education teachers as advocates for students to help students realize and develop their unique talents and skills.

Part 2: Parent Script

Using the “Analyzing Cognitive and Educational Evaluation Report, compose a 250-500 word script seeking consent for special education services from Adams parents. Your script should include a hypothetical conversation (e.g., provide the actual verbiage/wording that would be exchanged) with the parents where results of the MET report are appropriately relayed and specific wording seeking consent for services is included.

Support your findings by citing the Analyzing Cognitive and Educational Evaluation Report where appropriate.

While APA format is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and in-text citations and references should be presented using APA documentation guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

Discussion: Managing a Project From Project Charter to Project Management Plan

Some projects have ambitious goals, and some fill in small pieces of a larger puzzle. An organization must evaluate whether a project is necessary to support the business vision and whether it is worth the time, money, and risk to implement. The organization must also assess the effect of any new project on other established projects.

An organization creates a Project Charter to help in the evaluation. This document summarizes the goals, benefits, risks, costs, and major stakeholders for the project. The Project Charter also names the Project Manager and, once signed by the Project Sponsor(s), allows the project to officially begin. The Project Manager creates and maintains the Project Management Plan, a compilation of living project documentation that tracks all aspects of project.

This Discussion enables you to exchange opinions with students about the role of the Project Charter and the Project Management Plan.

To prepare for this Discussion, read the provided Case Study document, which can be found in the Learning Resources, and create a list of project stakeholders.

IN YOUR OWN WORDS, summarize everything that you have learned in Med-Surge 1. Pathophysiology, Signs and symptoms, Interventions and Patient Teaching if applicable (FOR EACH DISEASE)

>YOUR WORK MUST BE SUBMITTED IN PDF FORMAT!!!

***Any form of plagiarism or academic dishonesty will have consequences*** Refer to the student’s handbook for more information.

Write a 500 word definition essay on one of the terms or concepts from the list provided below. Use other modes of writing, such as description, exploratory, and persuasion (argumentation) to produce a well-developed definition for your term or concept. Choose your terminology carefully; you want to select a term/concept that is rich in personal meaning. When defining complex and abstract concepts, your ultimate goal is to provide a specific and concrete meaning for your reader. Extended definitions, such as the one I am asking you to produce as your final essay, depend on examples, illustrations, and narratives. Personal observation and opinion should also serve as the basis for your definition.

Select one of the following terms or concepts to produce your Final Definition Essay Exam :

1- Integrity

2- Honor

3- Pride

4- Joy

Choose your essay structure carefully. Avoid including details that do not serve to advance or complete your definition. As always, I expect your essay to contain a strong introduction that includes your essay’s thesis, a coherent and focused body that effectively transitions from paragraph to paragraph, and a rich conclusion that provides closure for your definition.

Use all the resources you have available to complete this exam. Refer to your Course Documents folder and your textbook for strategies and tips on student writing. I strongly recommend that you reread chapter six’s introduction and conclusion to refresh your knowledge of the definition mode. Be sure to reference the revisions I have provided you for prior assignments, as these revisions specifically speak to your writing style.

Find at least five peer- reviewed, academic sources that explain the truth of this issue or what is wrong with the misconception of it. You will need to defend why you find those sources credible in your annotated bibliography.

Here is a specific format to follow. In a brief paragraph before you begin the bibliography, clearly state your topic, how you arrived at it, and your tentative thesis for the research paper. Then you will list each source alphabetically in MLA format. You will then annotate each source in the following format (note that this is the format for an online article; if you have other kinds of sources, the format will be a little different):

Sample, George A. This is an Article in an Academic Journal. Grey Haired Academics Monthly, Volume #, Issue #. Date of publication. pp. Academic Database. Web. Date Accessed.

3-4 sentences: Summary What is the author’s thesis? What are the main ideas supporting that thesis? What is the purpose?

3-4 sentences: Analysis Is the author clearly identifiable? Can you establish her or his credibility? Is the sources presentation clear and reasonable, or is the language biased? Is there any reason to suspect bias on the authors part (philosophical, religious, political, cultural)? If so, what do you think are the biases? Is there any evidence backing the purpose? Is it verifiable? Anecdotal? Relevant to the purpose? Is it testable? Can it be independently verified through another source not related to this one?

3-4 sentences: Evaluation What is your opinion of this source? What is its potential value to your research paper? Is it topical, timely, and relevant to your paper? How exactly do you plan to use it?

Write a complete paragraph:

Log on to the OIG website
*Click on the Americas most wanted fugitives
*Click on a person and write about the following topics:
-What is the alleged charge?
-What insurance did the patient have?
-How much was the fraud for?

Part 2

Why is our atmosphere important for plants and what does this have to do with lava??

Part 3

What were Richard Nixons greatest foreign and domestic policy achievements, and how was his presidency destroyed by the Watergate crimes? What differences do you see between Nixon’s crimes and President Trump’s current ordeal with impeachment proceedings?

historical figures that
deserve a statue erected in their honor. Look at his list of people and choose one that you feel
should be celebrated for their contributions to society. If you wish to argue for a person who is
not on the list, please email me the name of the person and your reason for wanting to write on
him/her.
Details
Follow MLA guidelines
Works Cited Page
3-4 Reliable Sources
3-4 Pages in Length

synopsis paper of  the talk iran podcast  LINK and SECTIONS PROVIDED

each Conversation needs its own paragraph

A Conversation with Armin Navabi 1hr 26 mins
A Conversation with Yara Elmjouie 59 mins
A Conversation with Anna Eskamani 31 mins
A Conversation with Bahman Kalbasi  52 mins
A Conversation with Lior Sternfeld  31 mins
A Conversation with Reza Zia-Ebrahimi 49 mins
A Conversation with Narges Bajoghli 44
A Coversation with Amir Afkhami 58 mis

Total time 350 mins

https://podcasts.google.com/feed/aHR0cHM6Ly9mZWVkcy5idXp6c3Byb3V0LmNvbS8xOTY2NDIucnNz?sa=X&ved=0CAYQrrcFahcKEwjQ1PH0jZTsAhUAAAAAHQAAAAAQAg

Suppose you are the narrators attorney, assigned to defend him in the aftermath of the murder he committed. Since the narrator freely admitted to the police that he committed the crime, you have decided to have him enter a plea of not guilty by reason of insanity. First, identify evidence in the text that you believe most strongly illustrates the narrators psychological state before, during, and after the murder. Then, identify details that you would advise the narrator to leave out during his testimony, as they reflect poorly on his character and might alienate or offend the jury. Finally, based on text evidence, construct a brief closing argument to the jury that makes the case that the narrator is not guilty by reason of insanity for the crime of murder.

Raise an counterexample to the article provided.  A counterexample consists in a well-reasoned challenge to any point discussed in the article. Any counterexample must have a source such that it comes from someones life experiences, which include, but are not limited to, your personal observations, stories you read, conversations you hear, etc.