https://my.tccd.edu/bbcswebdav/pid-10371384-dt-content-rid-54752800_1/courses/2020FL-ENGL-1301-86069/Is%20Google%20Making%20Us%20Stupid.pdf

For this discussion, you will first need to read the article attached titled “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” Based on what you read, your initial response to this discussion should address the question, “Is Google Making Us Stupid?”

INTRODUCTION

The small city of Waynesville, Texas, has been identified as a candidate for hydraulic fracturing (aka “fracking”). Fracking is defined by the United States Geological Survey (USGS) as an “oil and gas well development process that typically involves injecting water, sand, and chemicals under high pressure into a bedrock formation via the well. This process is intended to create new fractures in the rock as well as increase the size, extent, and connectivity of existing fractures.” The result of this process increases gas or oil flow in low-permeability rocks, aiding extraction. Amid worries of disruption to the small town life afforded by the citizens of Waynesville, and concern for environmental impacts, the city council is considering a ban on fracking within city limits. To aid in their decision, they have sought the opinion of members of the community and experts alike.

Your job will be to debate the following motion: The city of Waynesville should impose a ban on fracking .

You have been assigned a side, either Pro-ban or Anti-ban .

Written debate students will choose a specific role related to their Pro-ban or anti-ban assignment (based on the last digit of their student number).  Oral debate students have been given specific roles by the T.A. debate moderators. 

All students (written debate format and oral debate format) will complete an introductory written assignment worth 5 points.  Instructions are given below:

ASSIGNMENT

1. Introductory Statement – To aid in the initial analysis of the spectrum of the communitys various positions, you have been asked to write a short, 100-150 word introductory statement. In that, you need to succinctly address the following:

a. Who are you? (What is your role?)

b. What is your position on the fracking ban? (Pro or Con?)

c. What are the top three reasons for your position on the ban?

d. Include at least 2 peer-reviewed, scientific articles to support the reasons for your position.

e. End this statement with a clear sentence telling the city council how it should vote. (Impose the ban or not.).
***************************************************************************************
a. Role: Local resident
b. In favor of the ban, arguing AGAINST fracking
c. your choice

Instructions for Critical Response Papers
(1.5-2 pages single-spaced 12pt Times New Roman; Upload separate file for each response)
    Signs (Charles Long) pp. v-10; 139-170 (Response for each Chapter)

Supplemental Readings
    H.R 109 Resolution to Create a Green New Deal (https://www.congress.gov/116/bills/hres109/BILLS-116hres109ih.pdf)
    Carmen G. Gonzalez, World Poverty and Food Insecurity in Penn State Journal of Law & International Affairs Volume 3, Issue 2 , February 2015
        (https://elibrary.law.psu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1095&context=jlia)

1.    Identify and write a sentence or paragraph in the reading that made you stumble or caused a moment of aha. Describe why the particular sentence stuck out or caused a response in you. (Include the page number where the sentence is found)

2.    List and define (Using Gonzalez) words that are new to you

3.    Identify the thesis of this book, chapter, article, video or essay. What is the main argument of this text? (Include the page number where the thesis is found)Example: Author A argues that Christianity in southern states took on an economic emphasis due to the merchant class Christians who dictated its pro-slavery agenda, agrarian calendar-based religious activities, and tobacco worship.

4.    Identify some of the supporting claims and ideas of the text.  Make note of page numbers where claims may be found and include quotes from the text. Example: Author A lists three key points to support the argument. First

5.    List some of your points of contention. Example: Author A suggests X but does not show the connection between X and the alleged events that stem from it.

6.    How does this text inform your ministry/research interest and context?
7.    Generate a critical question you would like to ask the author.

Introduction and objective. Make sure the objective is specific.
Literature Review. Conduct a search on the topic of your paper and summarize works of others similar to what you are writing on. Be sure to follow APA guidelines.
Analysis: Analyze your topic with reference to the objective.
Summary and conclusion.
References. Provide at least five references, at least two of which must be scholarly books and /or journals.

Guidelines for Philosophy 1301 Research Essays

Theme:

The research paper should focus on the philosophical contributions of an individual in the Western tradition. For this research paper, choose an individual from Socrates to the 1950’s C.E. This individual should not include religious figures although some scientific individuals may be appropriate in the period when science and philosophy were fused.

Although some biographical information should be included at the beginning of the essay, it should not be the focus of the paper. Instead, analyze one or two of the individuals major ideas/works and assess his/her contribution to the philosophical tradition and their impact today.  You will need to access the library for databases and books to complete this assignment.  You can do this online through the library guide for philosophy.  I would expect to see at least 5 quality sources including background research and specialized research relating to your thesis.  Sources should be a combination of scholarly books and articles.  Any websites used must be scholarly or authoritative.

http://lee.libguides.com/philosophy

Format:

The essay should be typed, double-spaced with one-inch margins. Any clear 12-point font is acceptable. Include a cover page with your name, date and class information. A bibliography must be included in the essay. Use standard MLA formatting for the bibliography.  Encyclopedias are not appropriate for college-level work. Other inappropriate sources include Wikipedia, biography.com, and any television shows.  EasyBib, a service available on the library homepage, can help you with formatting citations.

Guidelines for Philosophy 1301 Research Essays

Theme:

The research paper should focus on the philosophical contributions of an individual in the Western tradition. For this research paper, choose an individual from Socrates to the 1950’s C.E. This individual should not include religious figures although some scientific individuals may be appropriate in the period when science and philosophy were fused.

Although some biographical information should be included at the beginning of the essay, it should not be the focus of the paper. Instead, analyze one or two of the individuals major ideas/works and assess his/her contribution to the philosophical tradition and their impact today.  You will need to access the library for databases and books to complete this assignment.  You can do this online through the library guide for philosophy.  I would expect to see at least 5 quality sources including background research and specialized research relating to your thesis.  Sources should be a combination of scholarly books and articles.  Any websites used must be scholarly or authoritative.

http://lee.libguides.com/philosophy

Format:

The essay should be typed, double-spaced with one-inch margins. Any clear 12-point font is acceptable. Include a cover page with your name, date and class information. A bibliography must be included in the essay. Use standard MLA formatting for the bibliography.  Encyclopedias are not appropriate for college-level work. Other inappropriate sources include Wikipedia, biography.com, and any television shows.  EasyBib, a service available on the library homepage, can help you with formatting citations.

Guidelines for Philosophy 1301 Research Essays

Theme:

The research paper should focus on the philosophical contributions of an individual in the Western tradition. For this research paper, choose an individual from Socrates to the 1950’s C.E. This individual should not include religious figures although some scientific individuals may be appropriate in the period when science and philosophy were fused.

Although some biographical information should be included at the beginning of the essay, it should not be the focus of the paper. Instead, analyze one or two of the individuals major ideas/works and assess his/her contribution to the philosophical tradition and their impact today.  You will need to access the library for databases and books to complete this assignment.  You can do this online through the library guide for philosophy.  I would expect to see at least 5 quality sources including background research and specialized research relating to your thesis.  Sources should be a combination of scholarly books and articles.  Any websites used must be scholarly or authoritative.

http://lee.libguides.com/philosophy

Format:

The essay should be typed, double-spaced with one-inch margins. Any clear 12-point font is acceptable. Include a cover page with your name, date and class information. A bibliography must be included in the essay. Use standard MLA formatting for the bibliography.  Encyclopedias are not appropriate for college-level work. Other inappropriate sources include Wikipedia, biography.com, and any television shows.  EasyBib, a service available on the library homepage, can help you with formatting citations.

Week 6 Research Analysis Assignment

For this assignment, you will critically review this research study:
https://www.cdc.gov/pcd/issues/2015/14_0392.htm

This assignment will provide an opportunity for you to apply the course concepts in practice as a critical reader of the literature. Remember, it is your assessment of the research study in each of these areas that is important. It is not a matter of just stating the information, but critically evaluating its use, the study methods employed, and the conclusions drawn as a result. Use your own words; do not use directly quoted information.  You should also think about how this study, the study methods, and the outcome might inform contemporary practice and further research in health. The paper should be in the APA format, including a cover page, headers, and a reference page.

Guidelines for HLTH401 Written Research Analysis Paper
Each topic should be labeled with the subheadings as numbered below:
1) Research purpose:  Identify the research purpose as expressed in the assigned research study.
Associations between family income and childrens physical fitness and obesity in California, 2010-2012. Find at least one other research paper on the same or similar topic and give a brief description of how it is the same/different from the assigned research study.
2) Identification of the study:  For the assigned study, identify the type of study, research hypothesis, the variables (independent and dependent), and type of variables used (nominal, ordinal, interval, ratio, etc.).  Do you think this was the appropriate study design to use for this type of study? Why or why not?
3) Description of methods: Describe methods employed including sampling (what sampling strategy was used), data collection, data analysis, level of significance. Is the methods section adequate? Could you replicate the study based on the information presented?
4) Summary of results: Summarize the results, major key findings, significant or non-significant results. This is an area where you may indicate if you think the summary is sufficient or if you wish to see more.
5) Strengths and limitations:  Describe the strengths and limitations of the study with reference to internal and/or external validity. What threats do you see to the internal/external validity of the study? Do you see other strengths or limitations besides what is described in the article?
6) Ethical issues: Discuss any ethical issues/concerns: Informed consent, IRB approval, vulnerable groups, and ethical implications.  Describe what is available in the article and what else might be considered.
7) Applications: Application to clinical practice and future recommendations for research. Describe the authors recommendations plus add your own opinions/thoughts. How might this study encourage other studies or inform clinical practice or policy?

Week 6 Research Analysis Assignment

For this assignment, you will critically review this research study:
https://www.cdc.gov/pcd/issues/2015/14_0392.htm

This assignment will provide an opportunity for you to apply the course concepts in practice as a critical reader of the literature. Remember, it is your assessment of the research study in each of these areas that is important. It is not a matter of just stating the information, but critically evaluating its use, the study methods employed, and the conclusions drawn as a result. Use your own words; do not use directly quoted information.  You should also think about how this study, the study methods, and the outcome might inform contemporary practice and further research in health. The paper should be in the APA format, including a cover page, headers, and a reference page.

Guidelines for HLTH401 Written Research Analysis Paper
Each topic should be labeled with the subheadings as numbered below:
1) Research purpose:  Identify the research purpose as expressed in the assigned research study.
Associations between family income and childrens physical fitness and obesity in California, 2010-2012. Find at least one other research paper on the same or similar topic and give a brief description of how it is the same/different from the assigned research study.
2) Identification of the study:  For the assigned study, identify the type of study, research hypothesis, the variables (independent and dependent), and type of variables used (nominal, ordinal, interval, ratio, etc.).  Do you think this was the appropriate study design to use for this type of study? Why or why not?
3) Description of methods: Describe methods employed including sampling (what sampling strategy was used), data collection, data analysis, level of significance. Is the methods section adequate? Could you replicate the study based on the information presented?
4) Summary of results: Summarize the results, major key findings, significant or non-significant results. This is an area where you may indicate if you think the summary is sufficient or if you wish to see more.
5) Strengths and limitations:  Describe the strengths and limitations of the study with reference to internal and/or external validity. What threats do you see to the internal/external validity of the study? Do you see other strengths or limitations besides what is described in the article?
6) Ethical issues: Discuss any ethical issues/concerns: Informed consent, IRB approval, vulnerable groups, and ethical implications.  Describe what is available in the article and what else might be considered.
7) Applications: Application to clinical practice and future recommendations for research. Describe the authors recommendations plus add your own opinions/thoughts. How might this study encourage other studies or inform clinical practice or policy?