Attached, please find Case Analysis 17.2 NRT New England, LLC v. Jones and answer the Legal Reasoning Questions.
Note: All requirements below must be followed, or points will be deducted from v
grade.
Midterm Requirements and Formats:
4-5 Pages: Typed, Times Roman Double Spaced, Proofread and Spell Check.
Must have minimum of three (3) sources NOT including the textbook. Must use outside sources such as legal journals, cases periodical, etc.
Have proper citations. See Owl Purdue.
Day: November 9, 2020
For this paper, read the article The Only Thing You Cant Subscribe to Now is Stability, by Amanda Mull. Using the guidelines from the online readings, write a paper analyzing standout points in the article. Your paper must have a title, thesis, and quotes from the article. The paper must be in Times New Roman, 12 pt font, double-spaced, in APA format, and three pages in length. website:https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2019/05/how-amazon-helped-turn-daily-life-subscription/588526/
The theme of the Unit reflects a waning of the credibility and prestige of the Office of the President. Why did the actions of Lyndon Johnson, Richard Nixon and Ronald Reagan contribute to this process? Why did such determined Republican opposition hamper the effectiveness of the Clinton and Obama presidencies? Why did the George W. Bush push for an open ended War authorization (War on Terror) in the aftermath of 9/11? Did his decision to go to War in Iraq contribute to the arc of credibility erosion of the Presidency?
Instruction from Professor:
In this Chapter there is considerable information on the years encompassed by the Reagan and George HW Bush administrations. Incorporate that into a broader discussion of the information contained in the entire course. Identify persistent trends or themes in US history. In that context place the implications of the level of historical knowledge among graduating College seniors on future US leadership decision making.
Use all the supplemental items in each chapter of the course to fill out the discussion.
Topic to Discuss:
Discuss Professor Cronon’s thesis and identify where we find our past and why understanding of it is important.
The impact of unregulated industrialization, the advances in science and technology, rush to market philosophy leading to inadequate testing, and people themselves littering, wasting and simply being more interested in consumerism led to serious environmental degradation by the 1960s. Use the supplemental material, the text, and Books read, if selected and discuss the Environmental movement.(Use the supplemental items preceding this discussion board but do not limit the conversation to just those items.)
A common Protestant criticism of Catholicism during this period was that it was insufficiently attentive to the gift of salvation that comes through Christ and that it ignores much of the Bible in favor of church teaching.
Read the selections from Teresa of Avila’s spiritual autobiography (p. 49-52).
First, where do you see allusions and references to the Bible? Please reference any specific texts (If you are not familiar with the Bible, these will be harder for you to catch, but go ahead and try!)
Second, where do you see her describing how we are to relate to God or Christ? Where do you see encouragements to faith? to work? How are they related?
Write a 2-3 (full) page journal entry (double-spaced, 12 pt type, and 1″ margins) reflecting on Teresa’s biblical theology of faith.
In his farewell address President Eisenhower warns against the expansion of the Military Industrial Complex. In his Presidency he successfully resisted continual pressure from the military to robustly and unilaterally to attack multiple countries (A few: Vietnam, Korea, Dominican republic, Congo Cuba, Iran, Egypt) on the assumption of anti-communism. Eisenhower resisted such pressures. Discuss U.S Foreign policy, the role of the Military Industrial Complex (As Eisenhower defines it) from the Truman policies of Containment, Involvement in Korea, Overthrow of undesirable rulers and so forth through Eisenhower’s and Kennedy”s administrations. Then perhaps consider the role of the Military Industrial complex in Presedencies from Johnson forward in context of this warning. Useful hint: Military spending amounted to 20% of the 1959 budget and about 60% of the 2016 budget.
>Interview a minimum of 25 citizens based on their views of the police (you can make people up)
>These citizens must be randomly chosen and represent several groups based on age, occupation, residence, etc. These citizen can not be family members
>Each citizen must be interviewed on a personal, face to face basis. Written questionnaire’s, surveys, etc. are NOT acceptable ways of gathering information
>a minimum of ten (10) minimum specific questions must be developed to ask each citizen
Basic format of paper
>Introduction: How does your project relate to the idea of Police community relations? What do you expect to find? Provide a brief summary of the project (an abstract). Include how you conducted the questioning of any and all subjects
>Results regarding your topic of choice
>List of the questions you developed and utilized
>Report the citizens answers and reactions to the questions
>Analysis of the results. “What do the answers mean?”
These results are an analysis of the information, not simply the presentation of raw data. Draw your own conclusions based on all information
>No outside sources (no research is necessary)
a) What is Descartes argument in favor of an affirmative response to this question? I
expect that it will take you more than one paragraph to complete this task.
b) Name at least one of the objections made by Princess Elisabeth and explain how it is
meant to disprove Descartes position.
c) Who do you agree with?
If you agree with Princess Elisabeth, I want you to consider at least one of the
replies that Descartes offers in his defense and why it is insufficient.
If you agree with Descartes, I want you to explain why Princess Elisabeths
objections do not hold.
If you do not agree with either author (or agree with them in part) I want you to
provide an alternative explanation to support your position.
>Interview a minimum of 25 citizens based on their views of the police (you can make people up)
>These citizens must be randomly chosen and represent several groups based on age, occupation, residence, etc. These citizen can not be family members
>Each citizen must be interviewed on a personal, face to face basis. Written questionnaire’s, surveys, etc. are NOT acceptable ways of gathering information
>a minimum of ten (10) minimum specific questions must be developed to ask each citizen
Basic format of paper
>Introduction: How does your project relate to the idea of Police community relations? What do you expect to find? Provide a brief summary of the project (an abstract). Include how you conducted the questioning of any and all subjects
>Results regarding your topic of choice
>List of the questions you developed and utilized
>Report the citizens answers and reactions to the questions
>Analysis of the results. “What do the answers mean?”
These results are an analysis of the information, not simply the presentation of raw data. Draw your own conclusions based on all information
>No outside sources (no research is necessary)
