1) Be sure to read the tutorial on Lanham’s Paramedic Method. There is no way to complete this assignment without that tutorial. It will help you recognize prepositions, “is” forms, and figure out how to replace them with active verbs. It will also explain how to calculate the “lard factor.”

2) Choose five of the most convoluted, tortured sentences from your final project rough draft. Copy and paste them into a separate Word document. Keep the original version alongside the revised version so that we can see the changes that you have made.

3) Apply the Paramedic Method to those five sentences and bring them back to life. The problems may be different in each case. Some will have “is” forms that you can eliminate. Some will have too many prepositions. Some will start with a bunch of “blah, blah, blah….” that you don’t need. Figure out the right fix for each sentence and cut out as much “lard” as possible without altering the meaning and nuance of the original sentence. It’s not enough to simply cut out information and make the sentence shorter. Keep all the relevant information and improve the readability.

4) Choose five of the most convoluted, tortured sentences from your peer’s final project rough draft. Copy and paste them into your “Paramedic Method” Word document. Apply the Paramedic Method to those five sentences and bring them back to life. (See #3 for additional guidance.) When you proceed to the next step, keep the original sentence alongside the revised version so that we can see the changes that you have made.

5) After you’ve trimmed, re-arranged, and modified everything from those sentences that does not spark joy, calculate the lard factor for each one. How well did you do? Remember, it’s not about cutting out information and making the sentence shorter. I won’t give you credit if that’s all you do.

Grading

This assignment is graded on completeness. To receive full credit, you must complete all five steps above as instructed.

Rubric

What were the causes of the Great Depression?  What were its major social, economic and political effects?  How did President Franklin Roosevelts New Deal attempt to lessen the impact of the Depression on the people of the U.S. and prevent a similar economic collapse from ever occurring again?

Dinosaur Extinction, what caused it ? Contrast tow Hypotheses

There are two main hypotheses about dinosaur extinction
The “intrinsic gradualists”

The “extrinsic catastrophists”
Read these two links and  decide what hypothesis you agree more
https://ucmp.berkeley.edu/diapsids/extinctheory.html

https://newscenter.lbl.gov/2010/03/09/alvarez-theory-on-dinosau

Activities: (2)1.Read notes on La Ngritude and the excerpts on this movement (Pdf)2.Read Ferdinans Oyonos The Old Man and the MedalDeliverable: (1)For this final assignment, students will write a comparative research paper based on the readings from Module III and Module IV concentrating on Memmis The Pillar of Salt and Oyonos The Old Man and the Medal.Topic: Identity crisis in the works of Memmi and Oyono in the context of French Colonization.Format: The paper must be:6 pages ( roughly 1800 words) NOT counting  the Works Cited pageDouble-spaced (2)Times New Roman12- font sizeContent: You must use your primary sources and you must quot from the text (5 short quotations maximum FOR EACH NOVEL) No paragraphs!!Feel free to use the notes as well as the excerpts I posted on the Negritude for ideas.Feel free to use the notes I posted on The Old man and the Medal for ideas and any other secondary sources. (You need to have a minimum of 2 secondary sources)Follow the MLA forma

Write a small essay.

Choose a new area of technology or invention and discuss its advantages and disadvantages. Choose technology or inventions that are not covered in the two articles you’ve been reading, these need to be your original ideas and writing.

You can use the phrases and wording you’ve been using in the past few activities, these are here to help you write your essay.! 🙂

attachment: my solutions so you can use these ideas to solve it

Using at least 5 (if not more) sources from academic books or journal articles:  using APA including title page, reference page, citations, third person language, double spacing and 12 point times roman font

Outcomes:
describe the various perspectives on family values as they pertain to changing families
explain the theoretical frameworks and perspectives as they apply
explain the issues involved in that are related to divorce
describe the consequences and the process of divorce

Analysis Essay
1. Consequences of divorce on couples, families, children, society
2. how do these changes to the family structure impact the family of origin? blended family? society? What is the process of divorce in the given society? how does this impact the couple? family? what are the benefits and consequences of going through the legal process of marriage? describe theories that apply to marriage and family to explain divorce

Rubric attached

Paper 2-1: In this paper, you are asked to, Create a clear and comprehensive implementation plan for your concept or idea and propose a clear and comprehensive plan for implementing and managing the concept from inception to completion. This is a really important paperit forms the core of the final project. What is your actual implementation plan?

Look at the rubric for detailed instructions on each of the critical elements of the paper. The easiest place to find this is under the assignment in the modules. Look for the link at the bottom of the assignment. The .pdf file has detailed instructions on this assignment. I suggest that you use the critical elements 3-6 as headers in your paper as well as a short introduction and conclusion, as follows:

Introduction
Physical and Technological Resources
Implementation Schedule [notethis REALLY means put a schedule herenot a discussion of what should go into a schedule or the importance of a schedule, but a schedule. A Gantt chart is great.]
Project Review Processes [noteconnect the project review with the milestones from the schedule above; discuss metrics to determine progress.]
Intrapreneurship or Entrepreneurship [notethis gets beaten to death. Just tell whether it is one or the other or neither and describe how the project fits the definition. Dont define intrapreneurship or entrepreneurship or tell the reader that it is important, all of us know that already.]
Conclusion [no absolutely necessary, but a summary of your ideas can tie everything together.]
Note that the elements called main elements, critical thinking, and articulation of response are my evaluation of your whole paper rather than topic areas for you to explore.

Headers will help you make sure to address each topic clearly. The paper should be 5-8 pages long, not including the title page, references, and abstract (if you choose to include one).

PART 2:

Career choice :Veterianarian
Can choose any personality characteristics.

In a 3 page essay, discuss how each skill and each value and your 3 personality characteristics  relate or  don’t relate to your chosen career choice.

PART  3:

Explain  what steps you are going to take to achieve your chosen career path.  Include such things as what major you plan to pursue, what university (Uc Davis) you plan to transfer to(if applicable), appropriate tests, licenses and graduate programs needed, etc.

Below I have attached the assignment

Book reviews are usually 600 to 2,000 words in length. It is best to aim for about 1,000 words, as you can say a fair amount in 1,000 words without getting bogged down. Theres no point in making a book review into a 20-page masterpiece since the time would have been better spent on an academic essay that would count for more on your c.v.
Classic book review structure is as follows:
Title including complete bibliographic citation for the work (i.e., title in full, author, place, publisher, date of publication, edition statement, pages, special features [maps, color plates, etc.], price, and ISBN.
One paragraph identifying the thesis, and whether the author achieves the stated purpose of the book.
One or two paragraphs summarizing the book.
One paragraph on the books strengths.
One paragraph on the books weaknesses.
One paragraph on your assessment of the books strengths and weaknesses.
Writing the Review
Once youve read the book, try to spend no more than one or two weeks writing the review. Allowing a great deal of time to fall between reading the book and writing about it is unfair to you and the author. The point of writing something short like a book review is to do it quickly. Sending a publication to a journal is always scary, sitting on the review wont make it less so.
Avoiding Five Common Pitfalls
1. Evaluate the text, dont just summarize it. While a succinct restatement of the texts points is important, part of writing a book review is making a judgment. Is the book a contribution to the field? Does it add to our knowledge? Should this book be read and by whom? One neednt be negative to evaluate; for instance, explaining how a text relates to current debates in the field is a form of evaluation.
2. Do not cover everything in the book. In other words, dont use the table of contents as a structuring principle for your review. Try to organize your review around the books argument or your argument about the book.
3. Judge the book by its intentions not yours. Dont criticize the author for failing to write the book you think that he or she should have written. As John Updike puts it, Do not imagine yourself the caretaker of any tradition, an enforcer of any party standards, a warrior in any ideological battle, a corrections officer of any kind.
4. Likewise, dont spend too much time focusing on gaps. Since a book is only 200 to 500 pages, it cannot possibly address the richness of any topic. For this reason, the most common criticism in any review is that the book doesnt address some part of the topic. If the book purports to be about ethnicity and film and yet lacks a chapter on Latinos, by all means, mention it. Just dont belabor the point. Another tic of reviewers is to focus too much on books the author did not cite. If you are using their bibliography just to display your own knowledge it will be obvious to the reader. Keep such criticisms brief.
5. Dont use too many quotes from the book. It is best to paraphrase or use short telling quotes within sentences.